I'm Starting T. Rawls over _____________________ (1 Viewer)

[Truebluey]

So I might have out thought myself on this one.

Picked up Rawls because my opponent had Lynch.

Down 12 going into tomorrow night.

He's done. I can start Rawls or Abdullah at my flex.

PPR.

I'm still leaning Rawls but I think I need a TD? Does he catch any passes?

 

[Steel Curtainrod]

Already in, started him over Foster, Spiller and Blue in PPR. Rolled in a few GPPS as well. Good luck all.

 

[Thunderlips]

Down by 20 and I can go with either Rawls or Abdullah......

To me, Rawls seems much more able to get 100 and 2TD than Abdullah....so I have to roll with him.

 

[Deamon]

So I might have out thought myself on this one.

Picked up Rawls because my opponent had Lynch.

Down 12 going into tomorrow night.

He's done. I can start Rawls or Abdullah at my flex.

PPR.

I'm still leaning Rawls but I think I need a TD? Does he catch any passes?

Bell out. I'd be tempted to go AA.

 

[Short Corner]

Have the same optionof Rawls or AA. Tiedand opponent is done.

 

[cr8f]

So I might have out thought myself on this one.

Picked up Rawls because my opponent had Lynch.

Down 12 going into tomorrow night.

He's done. I can start Rawls or Abdullah at my flex.

PPR.

I'm still leaning Rawls but I think I need a TD? Does he catch any passes?

Probably Fred Jackson's role and Rawls isn't a great pass protector so probably not.

 

[Markus P Dub]

So I might have out thought myself on this one.

Picked up Rawls because my opponent had Lynch.

Down 12 going into tomorrow night.

He's done. I can start Rawls or Abdullah at my flex.

PPR.

I'm still leaning Rawls but I think I need a TD? Does he catch any passes?

I'm in the same boat. I sat Ingram for Rawls last night knowing I was down 3 with my opponent only having KJ Wright left. Ingram has been consistent but I couldnt take a mediocre game from him. He got 12 and would have put me up 9.5 but I'm confident Rawls can do that as well. I like fighting for the win instead of hoping for a guy to not get tackles and watch my lead go kaput.

I also have AA on the bench but even with Bell out I cant trust not him but the stupid coaching staff on their utilization of him. He should get the touches but i can see Theo in there a lot in 3rd down situations for the pass pro. SEA is going to be rocking tonight and also with Zenner up he might get carries too on the early downs; so a 3 headed dog tonight.

FJax could steal some love from Rawls but Coach Carroll is pretty straight fwd (so no mind games) and Rawls should get a lot of carries.

At least thats my hope lol

 

[SonataArctica]

I have ameer and Rawls. Down 1 point in ppr and he has nothing else. What is the safer choice?

 

[Futz]

Rawls without a doubt. Ameer could stuffed and Riddick has been the garbage time receiver lately.

 

[jimmykick]

going with rawls over abdullah

 

[shady inc]

Might have overthought this. SSehawks line stinks. Rawls doing nothing

 

[shadyridr]

Shouldve started fjax

 

[Ketamine Dreams]

Looks terrible. He might break a long one in the second half though; Detroit D is bound to give up at some point.

 

[shadyridr]

The oline looks terrible

 

[Houston turmOiler]

I thought I benched CJ Anderson

 

[Shutout]

Is the Seattle line missing some players?

 

[ponchsox]

Jeremy hill

How's that working out for ya?

 

[ILUVBEER99]

ouch, had a lot of hope for him after last week. Hopefully he can get a TD, looks like Freddy went to locker room with injury.

 

[jimmykick]

going with rawls over abdullah

#### #### #### i lost by .08 points and abdullah outscored rawls by about a point.

didn't help that jimmy graham and seattle d got me jack squat either. i needed next to nothing out of those 3 guys!

 

[Truebluey]

Man, I squeaked out the win but I'm not starting any Seattle Rb, including Lynch, until I see that O-line improve.