Is this Vetoable? (1 Viewer)

[Vision6]

Redraft PPR

Team A sends

Andre Johnson (#1 WR in the league)

Eli Manning

Jerrich Cotchery

MoJo

to Team B for

ADP

Fitzgerald

All four players Team B receives become starters in his lineup. Team B has a mediocre record and trying to make a playoff run

 

[abishagenaden]

No collusion = no veto.

I see nothing wrong with the trade anyway.

 

[travdogg]

I can't see a single thing wrong with that deal. I can't even tell which team is winning that deal, although it looks like a good deal for both teams if all 4 of those guys are top guys on the new team.

 

[thayman]

If I had to guess you are a team that is also trying to run for the playoffs and are now scared Team B will push you out.

 

[Keepers]

My bet is he is one of these teams. Check out how the question is phrased ... AJ (#1 WR in the league) and team B is starting all 4 players and is trying to make a playoff run. Anyway, agree that the trade is fine.

 

[slayer666]

Nothing to see here.

 

[Chaka]

Who the heck is MoJo?

 

[doogiej]

No problem with the trade

 

[OPS]

You could make the case that Fitzgerald and Johnson cancel each other out as it is impossible to tell who will have more value down the stretch.

So that would make the trade ADP for Eli, Cotchery, and Jones-Drew. A typical trade of quality for depth. It could very well help both teams, escpecially if team A wasn't going to start all of these players.

 

[JPeso]

Who the heck is MoJo?

Maurice Jones-Drew.Deal is not vetoable.

 

[chitlins3]

what team is allegedly getting the better end of this deal?

 

[Anthony Borbely]

Veto it?

YES [ 1 ] ** [3.12%]

NO [ 31 ] ** [96.88%]

Case closed based on lack of evidence.

I wonder who the "1" is.

 

[Phurfur]

If you give your league veto power any trade is vetoable!

 

[sartre]

My bet is he is one of these teams. Check out how the question is phrased ... AJ (#1 WR in the league) and team B is starting all 4 players and is trying to make a playoff run. Anyway, agree that the trade is fine.

I agree, the way this is worded, the OP is Team A, and is posting this because others in his league are crying foul about his deal.[/sleuth]Oh and I agree with the others that say this is not vetoable.

 

[Chaka]

Who the heck is MoJo?

Maurice Jones-Drew.Deal is not vetoable.

What happened to MJD? Agree about the deal. Vetoing it is even more stupid than the MoJo nickname.

 

[stevegamer]

If you are the commish, and you are posting because you really need to ask, that's a sign you're not able to handle the job.

If you're posting here because of wackjobs in you rleague who disagree with you that it's NOT vetoable, then you're doing a good job.

For anyone who voted yes, please restrict your commish duties to 1-man leagues.

 

[dagwood]

My bet is he is one of these teams. Check out how the question is phrased ... AJ (#1 WR in the league) and team B is starting all 4 players and is trying to make a playoff run. Anyway, agree that the trade is fine.

I am guessing we are talking to the owner of Team A....

 

[icecoldbrewski]

Any trade is vetoable. For any reason or no reason at all. Espeacially if you think it's going to fug up your season. :(

 

[Billy Ball Thorton]

My bet is he is one of these teams. Check out how the question is phrased ... AJ (#1 WR in the league) and team B is starting all 4 players and is trying to make a playoff run. Anyway, agree that the trade is fine.

I am guessing we are talking to the owner of Team A....

I thought the same thing

 

[Nate]

I voted yes. This clearly shatters the competitive integrity of your entire league. What fun is fantasy football if trades like this are allowed to go through!? This trade looks like me on a seesaw with Warren Sapp.

 

[george]

Who the heck is MoJo?

MJD not good enough for you?

 

[fred_1_15301]

I voted yes. This clearly shatters the competitive integrity of your entire league. What fun is fantasy football if trades like this are allowed to go through!? This trade looks like me on a seesaw with Warren Sapp.

Agreed....not a fair trade. Furthermore, it's such an awful trade that I would kick the owner of team A and all relatives out of the league and find replacements for the remainder of the year.

 

[teamroc]

I voted yes. This clearly shatters the competitive integrity of your entire league. What fun is fantasy football if trades like this are allowed to go through!? This trade looks like me on a seesaw with Warren Sapp.

Agreed....not a fair trade. Furthermore, it's such an awful trade that I would kick the owner of team A and all relatives out of the league and find replacements for the remainder of the year.

It's good neither one of you are a commish of a league.It's 74-3. That means there's 74 people with a clue, and 3 people + the OP who are horribly confused. I would consider this a sign.

 

[fred_1_15301]

I voted yes. This clearly shatters the competitive integrity of your entire league. What fun is fantasy football if trades like this are allowed to go through!? This trade looks like me on a seesaw with Warren Sapp.

Agreed....not a fair trade. Furthermore, it's such an awful trade that I would kick the owner of team A and all relatives out of the league and find replacements for the remainder of the year.

It's good neither one of you are a commish of a league.It's 74-3. That means there's 74 people with a clue, and 3 people + the OP who are horribly confused. I would consider this a sign.

Yes it is a sign. It's a sign that your sarcasm detector is down today.........

 

[Nate]

I voted yes. This clearly shatters the competitive integrity of your entire league. What fun is fantasy football if trades like this are allowed to go through!? This trade looks like me on a seesaw with Warren Sapp.

Agreed....not a fair trade. Furthermore, it's such an awful trade that I would kick the owner of team A and all relatives out of the league and find replacements for the remainder of the year.

It's good neither one of you are a commish of a league.It's 74-3. That means there's 74 people with a clue, and 3 people + the OP who are horribly confused. I would consider this a sign.

Yes it is a sign. It's a sign that your sarcasm detector is down today.........

 

[puckalicious]

Any trade is vetoable. For any reason or no reason at all. Espeacially if you think it's going to fug up your season.

Exactly why you shouldn't play in a league that allows owners to vote. Children.

 

[MCguidance]

Veto it?

YES [ 3 ] ** [3.41%]

NO [ 85 ] ** [96.59%]

/thread

 

[Vision6]

Yes I am the owner of team A (I know kinda obvious by the phrasing lol, gotta love the IQ of this board) and a few owners in my league were freaking out. Just making sure I was seeing things str8.

Thx for the input and comments.