Woo hoo Ladarius got a big fat 0.... bum... stinks I told my buddy to bench gates for this clown. Hope it doesn't cost him a win.Like I said, reminds me of Jared Cook; we get caught up in the glow of the measurables and forget everything else that is going on.
He may have his time but people need to remember this is a dynasty discussion, not current events.
he got 4 points in one of my leagues 2 tackles lmao what a terdT with T said:Woo hoo Ladarius got a big fat 0.... bum... stinks I told my buddy to bench gates for this clown. Hope it doesn't cost him a win.Shutout said:Like I said, reminds me of Jared Cook; we get caught up in the glow of the measurables and forget everything else that is going on.
He may have his time but people need to remember this is a dynasty discussion, not current events.
at least you had time to remove bush... I researched all morning, went to breakfast then found out 5min after gametime...Oof, that was rough. I guess I should be happy that Reggie Bush reinjured himself, as I was gonna use Green at flex, but went with Joique Bell instead once Bush pulled up lame. Whew.
Last I checked, the Chargers blew out the Giants yesterday with their existing talent.Still shocked at how coaches out think themselves and under utilize talent.
Yep, and they have a game in four days that they'll need to score alot of points in. Nothing wrong with saving stuff when you are up big.Last I checked, the Chargers blew out the Giants yesterday with their existing talent.Still shocked at how coaches out think themselves and under utilize talent.
Green will have his time, although they do have plenty of other weapons right now.
Not the point I am making, The Giants are pathetic.Last I checked, the Chargers blew out the Giants yesterday with their existing talent.Still shocked at how coaches out think themselves and under utilize talent.
Green will have his time, although they do have plenty of other weapons right now.
I see your point, although they do play different positions despite Green being much more effective than Royal at catching the ball. Maybe Royal is a more capable blocker and that is what is holding Green back - who knows.Not the point I am making, The Giants are pathetic.Last I checked, the Chargers blew out the Giants yesterday with their existing talent.Still shocked at how coaches out think themselves and under utilize talent.
Green will have his time, although they do have plenty of other weapons right now.
My point is, you have a physical freen and you leave him on the bench for Royal who did nothing and has not practiced since October?
How does playing a player who really has not done much over a guy you want to have play a lead role when gates is gone.
that is my point on coaching that I will not understand.
he "played" he just didnt have any stats.Not the point I am making, The Giants are pathetic.Last I checked, the Chargers blew out the Giants yesterday with their existing talent.Still shocked at how coaches out think themselves and under utilize talent.
Green will have his time, although they do have plenty of other weapons right now.
My point is, you have a physical freen and you leave him on the bench for Royal who did nothing and has not practiced since October?
How does playing a player who really has not done much over a guy you want to have play a lead role when gates is gone.
that is my point on coaching that I will not understand.
Ladarius Green ran just five pass routes in Sunday's win over the Giants.
A week after playing on 91 percent of the snaps, Green played on just 42 percent of the snaps. Blame the return of Eddie Royal (40 snaps) and the Chargers' big lead. Green was used as a blocker, catching no passes on just one target -- strange usage for such a talented and athletic player. Green is a good bet to be more involved in the gameplan in Thursday's potential shootout with the Broncos, but fantasy owners can't comfortably use a player with a suddenly inconsistent role.
Source: profootballfocus.com
We also have to remember the human side to this. Mike McCoy and Royal have history from their time in DEN together. When Royal looked like he was going to be a huge red zone threat after his 5 TDs in the first two games, he probably got those opportunities because he had a little bit better of an understanding of McCoy's offense and McCoy probably likes the guy. Now Royal gets hurt, sits out, and the much better talent in Green comes out and shows what he's able to do. It's easy for us to take the position that Green should play over Royal because he's the more talented player, but that's a very cold, statistical way of looking at it...McCoy isn't going to bench one of his players and damage what probably is a very good player/coach relationship just because Green flashed on a few plays the past couple games. It's also probably a similar scenario with why Vincent Brown isn't losing playing time to Seyi Ajirotutu...another situation where the established player is blocking the more talented one from seeing steady time on the field.Not the point I am making, The Giants are pathetic.Last I checked, the Chargers blew out the Giants yesterday with their existing talent.Green will have his time, although they do have plenty of other weapons right now.Still shocked at how coaches out think themselves and under utilize talent.
My point is, you have a physical freen and you leave him on the bench for Royal who did nothing and has not practiced since October?
How does playing a player who really has not done much over a guy you want to have play a lead role when gates is gone.
that is my point on coaching that I will not understand.
Going to start Cameron from here on out -- dumping Green (redraft)Rotoworld:
Ladarius Green ran just five pass routes in Sunday's win over the Giants.
A week after playing on 91 percent of the snaps, Green played on just 42 percent of the snaps. Blame the return of Eddie Royal (40 snaps) and the Chargers' big lead. Green was used as a blocker, catching no passes on just one target -- strange usage for such a talented and athletic player. Green is a good bet to be more involved in the gameplan in Thursday's potential shootout with the Broncos, but fantasy owners can't comfortably use a player with a suddenly inconsistent role.
Source: profootballfocus.com
Yes, I would blame the lopsided score more than I would blame the return of Eddie Royal. Royal only missed one week. He played in weeks 11 and 12 when Green had 5 targets in each of those games.he "played" he just didnt have any stats.
when a team is up 31 to 0 to whatever it was, the passing game will pretty much be on 3rd down only going forward.
Not a bad matchup, but bad in-game results.
Two touchdowns on three targets.I feel fortunate to have gotten keenan allen points when I did.
not true MT, Royal took over half of Greens snaps awayYes, I would blame the lopsided score more than I would blame the return of Eddie Royal. Royal only missed one week. He played in weeks 11 and 12 when Green had 5 targets in each of those games.he "played" he just didnt have any stats.
when a team is up 31 to 0 to whatever it was, the passing game will pretty much be on 3rd down only going forward.
Not a bad matchup, but bad in-game results.
Two touchdowns on three targets.I feel fortunate to have gotten keenan allen points when I did.
NYG were ranked 23rd against TEs coming into week 14. Denver is ranked 31st, so the match-up is better. That game obviously won't be one where SD is playing with a huge lead, so Green should see more time on the field. High-risk/high-reward if you play him...but with him, all it takes is one play.How are the Giants against TE`s statistically? Maybe they went after the corners as they are weaker vs the pass ? How is Denver vs TE`s ? Maybe they use Green more on Thursday night>
Guru's like Bloom were adamant he was the high upside play to go with over guys like Cameron and G. Graham.so ppl are mad that they started a backup TE over starting TE's?
cool
Green got his second-most snaps ever yesterday. He got more snaps against the Giants than he did against Miami or Kansas City. The difference is that they were mostly on running plays yesterday -- but that's because the Chargers mostly ran the ball yesterday. (They ran the ball on 59% of their offensive plays yesterday, compared to 41% over the previous three games.)not true MT, Royal took over half of Greens snaps awayYes, I would blame the lopsided score more than I would blame the return of Eddie Royal. Royal only missed one week. He played in weeks 11 and 12 when Green had 5 targets in each of those games.he "played" he just didnt have any stats.
when a team is up 31 to 0 to whatever it was, the passing game will pretty much be on 3rd down only going forward.
Not a bad matchup, but bad in-game results.
Two touchdowns on three targets.I feel fortunate to have gotten keenan allen points when I did.
If you knew that the Chargers would be able to run at will on the Giants and that the Giants wouldn't be able to score on the crappy SD D you should have told somebody.bonesman said:Guru's like Bloom were adamant he was the high upside play to go with over guys like Cameron and G. Graham.so ppl are mad that they started a backup TE over starting TE's?
cool
yeah, weird game this football.If you knew that the Chargers would be able to run at will on the Giants and that the Giants wouldn't be able to score on the crappy SD D you should have told somebody.bonesman said:Guru's like Bloom were adamant he was the high upside play to go with over guys like Cameron and G. Graham.so ppl are mad that they started a backup TE over starting TE's?
cool
Where did I imply I know anything?If you knew that the Chargers would be able to run at will on the Giants and that the Giants wouldn't be able to score on the crappy SD D you should have told somebody.bonesman said:Guru's like Bloom were adamant he was the high upside play to go with over guys like Cameron and G. Graham.so ppl are mad that they started a backup TE over starting TE's?
cool
What I meant by that was that Green was a high upside play if you expected the game to be high scoring and Rivers to throw the ball 40 times.Where did I imply I know anything?If you knew that the Chargers would be able to run at will on the Giants and that the Giants wouldn't be able to score on the crappy SD D you should have told somebody.bonesman said:Guru's like Bloom were adamant he was the high upside play to go with over guys like Cameron and G. Graham.so ppl are mad that they started a backup TE over starting TE's?
cool
He was the upside (risky) play, gates was the safe play and that's how it worked out.bonesman said:Guru's like Bloom were adamant he was the high upside play to go with over guys like Cameron and G. Graham.so ppl are mad that they started a backup TE over starting TE's?
cool
For the rest of this year, yes. 2014 is his year.Greens value?????? try in the
I missed Gates' retirement announcement.For the rest of this year, yes. 2014 is his year.Greens value?????? try in the
Maybe, maybe not. Depends on Gates, Green's development as a blocker, what SD does with their receivers, etc. Green is a great stash, and he's got plenty of talent, but he's a long term play. He's going to struggle to get the consistent targets necessary to be reliable in FF until Gates is gone or on the bench. And if the foot doesn't flare up again, Gates could easily be on the Gonzo career arc -- dude has more catches and receiving yards than any TE in the league outside of Graham and Cameron this year at age 33.For the rest of this year, yes. 2014 is his year.Greens value?????? try in the
I missed Gates' retirement announcement.For the rest of this year, yes. 2014 is his year.Greens value?????? try in the
Not retirement, but he could be a cap casualty if team brass think that Green is ready to take over. If Gates stays around, then Green probably does have to wait another year. Could be like a Todd Heap/Shannon Sharpe or Jimmy Graham/Jeremy Shockey situation where you don't see his true potential until the proven vet is gone.I missed Gates' retirement announcement.For the rest of this year, yes. 2014 is his year.Greens value?????? try in the
I agree he could be a cap casualty. Gates is scheduled to make $7.4M next season, and it appears that the Chargers could cut him for roughly a $1.5M cap hit.Not retirement, but he could be a cap casualty if team brass think that Green is ready to take over. If Gates stays around, then Green probably does have to wait another year. Could be like a Todd Heap/Shannon Sharpe or Jimmy Graham/Jeremy Shockey situation where you don't see his true potential until the proven vet is gone.I missed Gates' retirement announcement.For the rest of this year, yes. 2014 is his year.Greens value?????? try in the
Actually, "looks like Tarzan, plays like Tarzan - but has to wait until Tarzan Sr stops swinging on the vines ahead of him".Looks like Tarzan, plays like Jane. I don't understand how anyone is starting this guy until he puts up consistent numbers. It's his second year in the league and he barely has over 400 yards combined in both years. Time for a reality check. As for the "gurus" that's what you get for blindly taking crappy advice.
Agreed. You can't blame Green, especially for the Broncos' game. Nobody thought Rivers would be throwing so infrequently. This guy has all the makings of a future stud, or at least Julius Thomas type production. I just wish I could have gotten him in my league.Actually, "looks like Tarzan, plays like Tarzan - but has to wait until Tarzan Sr stops swinging on the vines ahead of him".Looks like Tarzan, plays like Jane. I don't understand how anyone is starting this guy until he puts up consistent numbers. It's his second year in the league and he barely has over 400 yards combined in both years. Time for a reality check. As for the "gurus" that's what you get for blindly taking crappy advice.
And I don't think the "gurus" said he was a lock. They just said in a pinch he might score some points, as he has in the past.
Hes apparently unaware of Danny Woodheads existence, its okay though -- everyone forgets about Woody.Phil Simms just said Green may be the fastest guy on the team .... for what thats worth ....
That TD was impressivePhil Simms just said Green may be the fastest guy on the team .... for what thats worth ....
nice TD catch vs Cincy, he high pointed at one well