Or 1.3 points. Or 1.8 points.I could have swore Ingram caught a pass for 13 yards earlier but they aren't showing it on his stat line. So Ingram might have a stat correction coming that would add 2.3 points to his total.
Or 1.3 points. Or 1.8 points.I could have swore Ingram caught a pass for 13 yards earlier but they aren't showing it on his stat line. So Ingram might have a stat correction coming that would add 2.3 points to his total.
YawnOr 1.3 points. Or 1.8 points.I could have swore Ingram caught a pass for 13 yards earlier but they aren't showing it on his stat line. So Ingram might have a stat correction coming that would add 2.3 points to his total.
It was #82, Benjamin Watson.Milkman said:I could have swore Ingram caught a pass for 13 yards earlier but they aren't showing it on his stat line. So Ingram might have a stat correction coming that would add 2.3 points to his total.
ok thank you.It was #82, Benjamin Watson.Milkman said:I could have swore Ingram caught a pass for 13 yards earlier but they aren't showing it on his stat line. So Ingram might have a stat correction coming that would add 2.3 points to his total.
hahaPretty disappointing game so far
IN redraft maybe. Free agency looms large for Ingram and he's still young. Definate hold in dynasty.Terrific job today. What will happen when Khiry and PT return? That's the question. May still be prudent to explore selling high.
Good point. I should've clarified.IN redraft maybe. Free agency looms large for Ingram and he's still young. Definate hold in dynasty.Terrific job today. What will happen when Khiry and PT return? That's the question. May still be prudent to explore selling high.
I know PT is smart and crafty, but he has no business being on the field when Ingram is available to play...no matter the situation. PT is now slower than most TEs; he just doesnt have the physical tools any more. Khiry and Cadet will get touches and affect production, and rightfully so. The Saints need to hedge for 2015.Terrific job today. What will happen when Khiry and PT return? That's the question. May still be prudent to explore selling high.
He's pricing himself out of NO. They'll roll with PT, Khiry, Cadet and an UDFA rookie.I drafted him in one league and picked him up on waivers in another (a couple weeks before he came back) and have started him the last 3 weeks in both and he has been solid. I knew his first game back against Detroit would be tough regardless, so that didn't phase me at all. I wish I got him in my last league where my RBs are killing me, but he went early.
To folks thinking that Payton won't ride him, I disagree wholeheartedly. He is extremely effective and helped them get back in the game as much as Brees did. I've had Brees the past few years and have watched a bunch of Saints games (usually beating the Panthers) and I don't recall them having anyone run this effective. I never really watched McAllister, but Ingram is very impressive.
I know he is a FA, but I would be shocked if the Saints let him go with no effort.
This is sarcasm right? 27 carries and 5 targets is not enough?Another great game out of Ingam. Payton is still way too pass happy. SMH.
What is the FA market for RBs? Seems like that has dried up recently. Bush got $4M per year after 2600 total yards in 2 years in Miami. Stephen Jackson got the same. Ben Tate's deal is up to $3.5M per year. Tate was only 25 when he signed the deal and Bush was 28. Not perfect apples to apples, but I am not sure I see Ingram breaking the bank elsewhere. I am sure there may be other examples, but I can't think of too many big FA deals for RBs recently. Even Chris Johnson's deal is around $4M per year for two years or even just one year.He's pricing himself out of NO. They'll roll with PT, Khiry, Cadet and an UDFA rookie.I drafted him in one league and picked him up on waivers in another (a couple weeks before he came back) and have started him the last 3 weeks in both and he has been solid. I knew his first game back against Detroit would be tough regardless, so that didn't phase me at all. I wish I got him in my last league where my RBs are killing me, but he went early.
To folks thinking that Payton won't ride him, I disagree wholeheartedly. He is extremely effective and helped them get back in the game as much as Brees did. I've had Brees the past few years and have watched a bunch of Saints games (usually beating the Panthers) and I don't recall them having anyone run this effective. I never really watched McAllister, but Ingram is very impressive.
I know he is a FA, but I would be shocked if the Saints let him go with no effort.
We HATES the angry dirty nasty Ingram, don't we my Precious.Mark AngryamSoulfly3 said:Ingram mad
Trying to think of teams with a strong need for a lead back, who would spend for one? Baltimore? Indy? NE? Plus Murray will be out there, maybe Lynch, Gurley will probably be a lead back somewhere.What is the FA market for RBs? Seems like that has dried up recently. Bush got $4M per year after 2600 total yards in 2 years in Miami. Stephen Jackson got the same. Ben Tate's deal is up to $3.5M per year. Tate was only 25 when he signed the deal and Bush was 28. Not perfect apples to apples, but I am not sure I see Ingram breaking the bank elsewhere. I am sure there may be other examples, but I can't think of too many big FA deals for RBs recently. Even Chris Johnson's deal is around $4M per year for two years or even just one year.He's pricing himself out of NO. They'll roll with PT, Khiry, Cadet and an UDFA rookie.I drafted him in one league and picked him up on waivers in another (a couple weeks before he came back) and have started him the last 3 weeks in both and he has been solid. I knew his first game back against Detroit would be tough regardless, so that didn't phase me at all. I wish I got him in my last league where my RBs are killing me, but he went early.
To folks thinking that Payton won't ride him, I disagree wholeheartedly. He is extremely effective and helped them get back in the game as much as Brees did. I've had Brees the past few years and have watched a bunch of Saints games (usually beating the Panthers) and I don't recall them having anyone run this effective. I never really watched McAllister, but Ingram is very impressive.
I know he is a FA, but I would be shocked if the Saints let him go with no effort.
I don't think Robinson has shown anything close to what Ingram has this year in terms of a running game that helps control the game. I think they will make a lot more of an effort to keep Ingram that most people think.
Obviously not, they lost. Almost 50 attempts and 3 turnovers out of Brees.This is sarcasm right? 27 carries and 5 targets is not enough?Another great game out of Ingam. Payton is still way too pass happy. SMH.
I traded Gerhart and a 1st rounder for Ingram and two first rounders. The other owner emailed me the other day saying that was the second worst trade he's ever made. In our first year of this dynasty league, right after the start up draft in 2000, he traded Terrell Owens for Germaine Crowell.Got laughed at when I took him in the 6th round
The Raiders cap is at $85M next year.Trying to think of teams with a strong need for a lead back, who would spend for one? Baltimore? Indy? NE? Plus Murray will be out there, maybe Lynch, Gurley will probably be a lead back somewhere.What is the FA market for RBs? Seems like that has dried up recently. Bush got $4M per year after 2600 total yards in 2 years in Miami. Stephen Jackson got the same. Ben Tate's deal is up to $3.5M per year. Tate was only 25 when he signed the deal and Bush was 28. Not perfect apples to apples, but I am not sure I see Ingram breaking the bank elsewhere. I am sure there may be other examples, but I can't think of too many big FA deals for RBs recently. Even Chris Johnson's deal is around $4M per year for two years or even just one year.He's pricing himself out of NO. They'll roll with PT, Khiry, Cadet and an UDFA rookie.I drafted him in one league and picked him up on waivers in another (a couple weeks before he came back) and have started him the last 3 weeks in both and he has been solid. I knew his first game back against Detroit would be tough regardless, so that didn't phase me at all. I wish I got him in my last league where my RBs are killing me, but he went early.
To folks thinking that Payton won't ride him, I disagree wholeheartedly. He is extremely effective and helped them get back in the game as much as Brees did. I've had Brees the past few years and have watched a bunch of Saints games (usually beating the Panthers) and I don't recall them having anyone run this effective. I never really watched McAllister, but Ingram is very impressive.
I know he is a FA, but I would be shocked if the Saints let him go with no effort.
I don't think Robinson has shown anything close to what Ingram has this year in terms of a running game that helps control the game. I think they will make a lot more of an effort to keep Ingram that most people think.
The Saints were relatively run-happy today given they were in comeback-mode all game.Obviously not, they lost. Almost 50 attempts and 3 turnovers out of Brees.This is sarcasm right? 27 carries and 5 targets is not enough?Another great game out of Ingam. Payton is still way too pass happy. SMH.
Probably can't afford to. No team is further over the 2015 cap right now than New Orleans.He's not going anywhere, they will tag him.
Moreover, the Saints decline a $5 million 5th year just a handful of months ago and then tag him for $11 million? The chance of that happening is extremely low.Probably can't afford to. No team is further over the 2015 cap right now than New Orleans.He's not going anywhere, they will tag him.
How many receptions is he averaging when PT plays? The situation is still the same but he showed tonight if given the opportunity he can be a 3 down back. Very excited to see where he lands since I couldn't trade him.Ingram's per-game receiving numbers are now up to 2.83 targets, 1.83 receptions, and 11.2 yards. Over 16 games that would pro-rate to 45 targets, 29 catches, and 179 yards. I set his over/under at 30 catches before the season, and while his missed time means he's almost certainly going to fall short, it's looking like it was around the right ballpark.
It may not sound like much, but it's an extra 47 points in PPR leagues over the course of a season. It adds up.
uh...yeah, now he's producing when he gets more than 6 touchesThey traded up to get him and now he's producing, I just don't see them letting him walk away. I could be very, very wrong but this is something that must be considered. As an owner I really hope they don't. There are a few teams I'd love to see him with.
yeah, I'd second this ---- possible top 5 back next year.How many receptions is he averaging when PT plays? The situation is still the same but he showed tonight if given the opportunity he can be a 3 down back. Very excited to see where he lands since I couldn't trade him.Ingram's per-game receiving numbers are now up to 2.83 targets, 1.83 receptions, and 11.2 yards. Over 16 games that would pro-rate to 45 targets, 29 catches, and 179 yards. I set his over/under at 30 catches before the season, and while his missed time means he's almost certainly going to fall short, it's looking like it was around the right ballpark.
It may not sound like much, but it's an extra 47 points in PPR leagues over the course of a season. It adds up.
Indy, Baltimore, Atl, maybe Philly would all be great spots.
To be fair, he did suck his first few years.uh...yeah, now he's producing when he gets more than 6 touchesThey traded up to get him and now he's producing, I just don't see them letting him walk away. I could be very, very wrong but this is something that must be considered. As an owner I really hope they don't. There are a few teams I'd love to see him with.
personally, I don't think he sucked -- I think that's just a reaction based off his stats.To be fair, he did suck his first few years.uh...yeah, now he's producing when he gets more than 6 touchesThey traded up to get him and now he's producing, I just don't see them letting him walk away. I could be very, very wrong but this is something that must be considered. As an owner I really hope they don't. There are a few teams I'd love to see him with.
that would be extremely interestingI mean if he finds his way to NE, his preordained home, I wouldn't be upset.
With Vereen there i personally wouldn't want to see that. He'd be a two down back again. Indy would be my preference.
Edit he potentially could get pulled on third downs there too so maybe not.
who said vereen will be there next year?With Vereen there i personally wouldn't want to see that. He'd be a two down back again. Indy would be my preference.
Edit he potentially could get pulled on third downs there too so maybe not.