That's definitely not trueThat was NOT after mitigation. I never made any projection that INCLUDED mitigation as mitigation is a HUGE unknown variable.
No commentNot getting political but did Trump suggest injection of cleaning supplies and or lamps on people?
330 million people x 50% infected x 1% death rate = 1.65M dead.DrJ said:Nah, even if everyone in the country got it it would still be hard pressed to hit 2 million because it's simply not that dangerous.
Longer than @gianmarco ? Yeah, well, about that ...DrJ said:Yes, a radiologist. A guy that went to medical school far longer than you, I'm sure.
Yes, the Subway.Politician Spock said:Yes, the bigger the "dose" you initially catch, the harder it is for your immune system to beat. If an area has an issue with a lot of people sneezing directly into other people's mouths from 2 inches away, then they would see a higher death per case ratio than other areas. I've only been to NYC a few times, and never witnessed such behavior. Have I missed something?
A radiologist. Is the radiologist an infectious disease expert?DrJ said:Yes, a radiologist. A guy that went to medical school far longer than you, I'm sure. And there are plenty of others...the guy that shared the article with me was also a radiologist for example.
And one only needs a small measure of common sense to see through the crap you guys are spewing.
No!!Not getting political but did Trump suggest injection of cleaning supplies and or lamps on people?
You're telling me this post came before mitigation?Yesterday 100 people per hour died from COVID-19 around the world.
In about two weeks it could be 1000 people per hour... with the NYC area leading the way.
While I was there I would buy one of those weekly passes (maybe it was a monthly pass, but I was only there for a week at a time). Rode the subway a lot. Especially as I went sight seeing.Yes, the Subway.
That opinion piece isn’t wrong. It may not be perfect either, but it’s probably a decent premise to start from when considering slowly opening some things back up.DrJ said:There's plenty of doctors that say this was a ridiculous overreaction. This one was written by a radiologist. https://thehill.com/opinion/healthcare/494034-the-data-are-in-stop-the-panic-and-end-the-total-isolation?fbclid=IwAR0v3YF87K-upxDjJUNqte9KKrebXsHh3Mas7MxW_4o1Gazkj2AK-XWILKc
Stop acting like there's universal agreement. A bunch of smart, educated people think most of you are lunatics. I'm one of them.
someone could have sneezed or coughed into their hands prior to boarding, then touched any number of surfaces (bannisters, handrails, straps, seats) to spread it - one doesn't need to literally blow into your mug.While I was there I would buy one of those weekly passes (maybe it was a monthly pass, but I was only there for a week at a time). Rode the subway a lot. Especially as I went sight seeing.
Never had anyone sneeze two inches from my mouth.
Yes. The first government mitigation efforts in the US began around March 13th when, for example, Ohio Governor DeWine announced schools would be closed starting March 16th. Then over the next 10 days or so the country started shutting down. It takes weeks to see the results of mitigation, and at the time areas, such as New York City, were sucking hard at the mitigation efforts. There was absolutely no way on March 26 to factor in mitigation to any projection when mitigation efforts are a HUGE variable.You're telling me this post came before mitigation?
I know. That's not what we're talking about.someone could have sneezed or coughed into their hands prior to boarding, then touched any number of surfaces (bannisters, handrails, straps, seats) to spread it - one doesn't need to literally blow into your mug.
Ok nice spin jobYes. The first government mitigation efforts in the US began around March 13th when, for example, Ohio Governor DeWine announced schools would be closed starting March 16th. Then over the next 10 days or so the country started shutting down. It takes weeks to see the results of mitigation, and at the time areas, such as New York City, were sucking hard at the mitigation efforts. There was absolutely no way on March 26 to factor in mitigation to any projection when mitigation efforts are a HUGE variable.
If you read the posts that responded to me on March 26th, I said the same thing then.Ok nice spin job
I think he suggested lamps in peopleNot getting political but did Trump suggest injection of cleaning supplies and or lamps on people?
I was being somewhat facetious. However, I'm convinced the subway system in NYC and surrounding areas is among the greatest reasons the spread has been so great there.While I was there I would buy one of those weekly passes (maybe it was a monthly pass, but I was only there for a week at a time). Rode the subway a lot. Especially as I went sight seeing.
Never had anyone sneeze two inches from my mouth.
Sneezing is also not one of the typical symptoms of COVID-19.
Matches up pretty well with the data out of italy.That opinion piece isn’t wrong. It may not be perfect either, but it’s probably a decent premise to start from when considering slowly opening some things back up.
The NY Times piece on comorbidities is also really eye opening.
The data and statistics will help guide good decisions. Keep the testing going, ramp it up like crazy. Keep the science on the forefront.
I completely agree. The dynamics of NYC produced a rate of virus spread that no other area of the country could possibly reproduce.I was being somewhat facetious. However, I'm convinced the subway system in NYC and surrounding areas is among the greatest reasons the spread has been so great there.
I haven't been on most mass-transit systems throughout the country but I've been on many, and NONE of them come close to the experience of the subways in NYC. Just packed, butts to nuts, much of the time. I can't think of a single other time in my life I was forced to be that 'intimate' with complete strangers, except for perhaps during Mardi Gras during my college days. It HAS to be a huge factor.
Agree with all that. But, I would ask you or anyone else who might have an idea: is the fact that you are a subway rider for perhaps 20-30 minutes, breathing the same circulated air as dozens or hundreds of others, often with mouths 6-12 inches apart, sufficient to infect you with a 'high does' of viral load? I mean, nobody has to actually sneeze in your mouth for you to still be treated to a great amount of their viral shedding via their breath. Correct? And if so, the WAY in which New Yorkers are catching the virus could potentially make them sicker and thereby raise fatality rates.I completely agree. The dynamics of NYC produced a rate of virus spread that no other area of the country could possibly reproduce.
But once you are infected by it, the rate of spread it took to finally reach you has absolutely nothing to do with how your body experiences the infection.
Some people here are arguing that the deaths NYC is experiencing isn't applicable to other area because the virus won't spread there as fast. I disagree. IMHO yhey will experience the same amount of deaths. The slower spread the experience will just make it take longer to get there. If people were dying in NYC because people at risk of dying were being denied hospital care, then I would agree that areas with slower spread won't have that issue and would have less deaths. But that's not happening in NYC. Residents in NYC have just as much access to hospitalization as the rest of the US with slower rates of spread.
And then some are arguing that people in NYC will die more from this because there is more pollution there, or they get bigger doses of the virus there, or other reasons. Basically they're just coming up with any reason possible to say what is happening in NYC is an outlier and should be ignored.
I'm not sure. I don't need to be an infectious disease expert to know if someone sneezes 2 inches from your mouth to know you'll get a high dosage of whatever their sneeze has.Agree with all that. But, I would ask you or anyone else who might have an idea: is the fact that you are a subway rider for perhaps 20-30 minutes, breathing the same circulated air as dozens or hundreds of others, often with mouths 6-12 inches apart, sufficient to infect you with a 'high does' of viral load? I mean, nobody has to actually sneeze in your mouth for you to still be treated to a great amount of their viral shedding via their breath. Correct? And if so, the WAY in which New Yorkers are catching the virus could potentially make them sicker and thereby raise fatality rates.
It's not just one thing. It's everything combined.But the majority of people don't work in tech, and not everyone that does stopped working that early. I feel like the 10x discrepancy between NYC deaths and SF deaths per capita is not fully covered by that change, but maybe I am wrong. It just seems like there is still some missing puzzle piece, or the early exposure numbers need more analysis.
Leaving Wrigley on the L after a game/show can be a treat as well. Nothing compared to those Indian trains thoRush hour tube in London, or subway in Tokyo is an experience of packedness tho don’t oft experience in NYC. I’ve been sardined in all of them, but more rare to literally have no space left in NYC, while common on the others.
IIRC, you said it will just take longer for less dense areas to spread, but the mortality rates of those infected will be similar, assuming equal care? For example, 1000 people in NYC and 1000 people in Alaska get infected. With access to the same health care, are you saying the death rates should be similar?I'm not sure. I don't need to be an infectious disease expert to know if someone sneezes 2 inches from your mouth to know you'll get a high dosage of whatever their sneeze has.
My understand is the virus rides in the air on droplets, and the droplets that come from ones mouth are contingent on what the person did to expel the droplet. For example, yelling will produce large droplets, whereas simply breathing produces small droplets. Small droplets would result in small dosages of infection. I would think an office where a lot of people shout at each other would be worse than a subway where people don't talk to each other, at least in regards to how bad the air is. The surface areas of a subway would be far worse than the office, but again, surfaces result in small dosages. But again, I'm not an infectious disease expert. It's just my opinion.
There are Florida memes for a reasonFWIW...it's been all the rage here in Florida from the beginning. People seem to believe if we get to summer it's going to magically disappear. This is all anecdotal and specific to Florida of course. Don't know what local yokels are saying elsewhere.
Contemporary flu testing is better than 50% accurate - it's PCR based, just like that used for COVID-19. The old antigen test was less accurate.Or January.
The flu test is only about 50% accurate. So what people had, was most likely the flu
Charming.Good reminder of why I don't typically interact with the homeless.
Influenza-like illness (ILI) = fever + cough OR sore throat.Justaflu bros won't ever be right. This is far more contagious than the flu. The problem is the "justaflu" label gets applied far too broadly. Justaflu bros are the extreme and low populated group of people who are congregating in the tens and hundreds demanding we open everything today and that this was all a hoax. A segment here and in other places wants to toss anyone who disagrees with them into that same bin. What's really funny and goes to your point is the fact that scientists and doctors have used the flu to compare and contrast from the start. Yet when anyone cited them, they drew the "justaflu" label from people here like everyone knows who. Now there are literally people from the CDC and the medical community admitting there is a likelihood many Covid-19 cases were mistaken as the flu. Just another example why painting others with broad strokes and "when in doubt - name call" is such a pathetic form of discussion.
You have any data to support this?And part of that is because they've shut off access to medical care for people that need it.
Yep. And a hospital doesn't need to be 100%+ capacity to be overwhelmed. C-19 patients use a lot more resources than average patients, including the time of healthcare providers.That completely ignores hospital capacity. It's indisputable that a person living in a place where the hospital isn't overrun stands a better chance to survive this than if that same person walked into a hospital bursting at the seams. They simply won't receive the same level of treatment. Even Cuomo is saying as much.
YesIIRC, you said it will just take longer for less dense areas to spread, but the mortality rates of those infected will be similar, assuming equal care? For example, 1000 people in NYC and 1000 people in Alaska get infected. With access to the same health care, are you saying the death rates should be similar?
Problem is that if they are used incorrectly, gloves can be as bad or worse than no gloves with cross contamination.They should mandate gloves where I'm located. Too many people at the supermarket don't seem to be taking this seriously at all.
Gotta disagree here.FWIW...it's been all the rage here in Florida from the beginning. People seem to believe if we get to summer it's going to magically disappear. This is all anecdotal and specific to Florida of course. Don't know what local yokels are saying elsewhere.
Florida Man is real...trust me.There are Florida memes for a reason
It's been all over the place here in Central FloridaGotta disagree here.
As a FL resident, I don't think I've heard a single person indicate they think this will go away once summer arrives. Sure, some have said that the heat could help slow it down some....but not eliminate it completely.
Florida gets enough of a bad rap. Let's not add to it please.
You serious Clark?No!!
(He suggested injection of disinfectant.)
While NY/NYC are declining, there are 20-25 states that aren’t.According to worldometers we have crossed over 50k deaths and there seems to be no downward trend of cases and deaths which seem just stuck at just under 30k and just over 2k, respectively. Sometimes for each are on other side of that line such as cases yesterday but generally those are our daily numbers.
Really depressing to see these numbers, I had hoped the plateau would have start seen decreasing numbers by now given the social distancing we have all done but not apparent yet.
Be more cool if you come backWell, it's probably higher in heavily polluted trash dumps.
As a Florida resident, I haven’t seen another Florida resident in 6 weeks. Hope you are right.Gotta disagree here.
As a FL resident, I don't think I've heard a single person indicate they think this will go away once summer arrives. Sure, some have said that the heat could help slow it down some....but not eliminate it completely.
Florida gets enough of a bad rap. Let's not add to it please.
I agree in general, but I also didn't expect it to plateau and then 2-4 days later start a steep decline as some models seem to have inferred. I think cases are increasing at a slower rate than expected with increased testing and deaths have plateaued and hopefully will start to decline soon. A steeper decline will be reliant on an anti-viral or some other therapeutic treatment which takes the most effected out of ICU's quicker. I'm cautiously optimistic here, and not depressed. I think good news will be on the way sooner rather than later.According to worldometers we have crossed over 50k deaths and there seems to be no downward trend of cases and deaths which seem just stuck at just under 30k and just over 2k, respectively. Sometimes for each are on other side of that line such as cases yesterday but generally those are our daily numbers.
Really depressing to see these numbers, I had hoped the plateau would have start seen decreasing numbers by now given the social distancing we have all done but not apparent yet.