Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
That's interesting and I don't play Superflex or know your QB situation, but I probably wouldn't have done that. What is your thought process behind it? Do you think Fields is back to the bench once Dalton is healthy? Is OBJ enough to cancel out Lockett in that instance?
Here is one of my tweets from July regarding my thoughts on Lockett. https://twitter.com/Ship_Chaser/status/1419063148267511808?s=20
Your guess is as good as mine on that - this way I will have the option between the two but this guy's price on OBJ was dramatically higher over the last couple months that I have been trying to get him. I am kind of surprised it came down to just Lockett now that OBJ came back and looked good.
Yeah, you know what? Somebody picked up on your Tweet or had Tweeted something similar a while back. I know I've seen that breakdown, framed that exact same way. I don't know if you did the work, but it wouldn't surprise me if somebody just sort of passed off your work as a general Tweet. There's no copyrighting fact.
I have no idea if it got copied or what but the data are there for anyone to look at. Game logs don't lie. All I did was compile it in a packaged nugget. But yeah it's like saying I invented the question mark.
Whew nice deal. I love Marshall and I am a Sermon stan (to some degree). I assume the other guy needed a RB pretty bad because it's hard to imagine moving Marshall and a 2nd for him but who knows.
I do not think this is unique to Zealots leagues. I have had the same experience in my FFPC leagues. There are only 4-5 teams I even bother to send proposals at this point. The remaining teams either respond with a ridiculous counter or never respond.
3 1sts seems close to about right but at least one of them has to be early (preferably 2 of them). We had Cook go for 4 1sts before the season. 3 seems about right. I'd have done this if I was trying to compete.mzkp54 said:
Superflex makes these picks more valuable, as much as I like CMC I'm taking the picks in SF.
I’m sure Gus will recover as well. Moore and Pittman will never be high end players and Lance probably will. Gainwell could be better than Dobbins, especially in ppr
I’m a bit torn.
Feel like you could have gotten more for that package, but I like your getting Deebo.
I offered a similar package to the CMC owner & It was rejected with no counter, so nice job.mzkp54 said:
Do you believe Pittman and Moore will ever be top tier WRs for fantasy? Doesn't it stand to reason Gainwell could be better than Dobbins in ppr? Lance could very well be a top 3 fantasy QB given his arm and legs. I can see why most would agree with you, but I'm not so sure.
I totally believe Pittman will be & I think Moore could be.
LOL, I get the humor, but strong arm QBs that get a lot of yards on the ground are more desirable assets in this era of FF, than your typical drop back passer that can't run.ETA: all QBs have arms and legs, so that’s not really a convincing argument.
Oh I know. I just crack myself up sometimes. I know this is a very serious trade topic, but I figured you’d get a laugh.
As for Pittman, I have him in several leagues and I'm a Colts fan, so I know just about everything there is to know about Pittman. I like his yards after the catch ability, but I don't see Wentz as all that good long term, but I could be wrong. I also have some issues with Pittman's overall game. As for Moore, I like him as a WR, but doubt he's ever a WR1 and I hate his situation.
Their QB situation is definitely my biggest concern with Pittman, but that said, I do believe he has all the tools to be a WR1. He's got the speed, the frame & the ability to get contested balls.
I like your belief in Pittman, but don't be surprised when they draft their WR1 (Say David Bell or Traylon Burks, or even George Pickens when he's recovered).
I had the trade as a coin flip.
Wouldn’t trade Dobbins for that alone, much less add Pittman. And I love Lance’s upside.
For the price, I think it's fine.
Monty/KittleBlick said:
Pittman side for me. I’m not a Sanders believer because I’m not convinced that the Eagles are Sanders believers.
Yep. This is the key. A lot of people have been saying it. They just don't seem to have the confidence in him to feed him. Whatever the reason may be.
