massraider
Footballguy
Historical data is interesting, but anyone think the Browns should be thinking: ''Awww geez, 2nd QB, we better pass.....''
Article with embedded list, QBs taken in top 2 since '70, sorted by win percentageCloser than it appears between #1 QB and QB's taken 2nd in the top 5 (since the Peyton/Leaf debacle):
#1: Winston, Luck, Stafford, Eli, Carr, Couch
Second QB taken in top 5: Mariota, Griffin, Sanchez, Rivers, Harrington, McNabb
Going in the way back machine here, but Dan Pastorini went #3 overall to the Oilers in 71', and he had a very Trent Dilfer like career, where he wasn't awful, but he certainly wasn't very good. Pastorini was the 3rd QB taken that year, after Jim Plunkett and Archie Manning.Article with embedded list, QBs taken in top 2 since '70, sorted by win percentage
http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/eye-on-football/25557163/rams-and-browns-beware-history-says-drafting-qbs-early-is-a-crapshoot
* Two other first round non-FBS QBs besides McNair (3) and Flacco (18)
Ken O'Brien UC Davis (24) hallowed class of '83
Phil Simms Morehead State (7) '79
BTW, to the historians out there, have there been any non-FBS QBs since Simms (or before, since the merger) taken in the first round that failed?
People write articles with good intentions but often don't go the extra mile to show the "big picture."Article with embedded list, QBs taken in top 2 since '70, sorted by win percentage
http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/eye-on-football/25557163/rams-and-browns-beware-history-says-drafting-qbs-early-is-a-crapshoot
* Two other first round non-FBS QBs besides McNair (3) and Flacco (18)
Ken O'Brien UC Davis (24) hallowed class of '83
Phil Simms Morehead State (7) '79
BTW, to the historians out there, have there been any non-FBS QBs since Simms (or before, since the merger) taken in the first round that failed?
Peyton Manning 1 QB 177 IND 1998
Bruce Smith 1 DE 148 BUF 1985
John Elway 1 QB 138 IND 1983
Lawrence Taylor 2 LB 137 NYG 1981
Marshall Faulk 2 RB 133 IND 1994
Julius Peppers 2 DE 126 CAR 2002
Randy White 2 DT 116 DAL 1975
Tony Dorsett 2 RB 108 DAL 1977
Donovan McNabb 2 QB 107 PHI 1999
Terry Bradshaw 1 QB 106 PIT 1970
Orlando Pace 1 T 106 LAR 1997
Eli Manning 1 QB 104 SDC 2004
Drew Bledsoe 1 QB 103 NEP 1993
Carson Palmer 1 QB 100 CIN 2003
Troy Aikman 1 QB 97 DAL 1989
V Testaverde 1 QB 97 TBB 1987
Neil Smith 2 DE 95 KCC 1988
Too Tall Jones 1 DE 94 DAL 1974
Michael Vick 1 QB 93 ATL 2001
Eric Dickerson 2 RB 91 LAR 1993
C Bennett 2 LB 90 IND 1987
Jim Plunkett 1 QB 85 NEP 1971
Bert Jones 2 QB 81 IND 1973
Irving Fryar 1 WR 79 NEP 1984
Calvin Johnson 2 WR 78 DET 2007
K Johnson 1 WR 78 NYJ 1996
Cam Newton 1 QB 76 CAR 2011
Mario Williams 1 DE 75 HOU 2006
Archie Manning 2 QB 75 NOS 1971
Art Still 2 DE 73 KCC 1978
Lee Roy Selmon 1 LB 73 TBB 1976
Alex Smith 1 QB 72 SFO 2005
S Bartkowski 1 QB 70 ATL 1975
Earl Campbell 1 RB 68 TEN 1978
Leonard Davis 2 T 67 ARI 2001
Ndamukong Suh 2 DT 65 DET 2010
Jeff George 1 QB 65 IND 1990
Matt Stafford 1 QB 64 DET 2009
Kevin Hardy 2 LB 64 JAX 1996
Tony Boselli 2 T 63 JAX 1995
Dan Wilkinson 1 DT 60 CIN 1994
R Maryland 1 DT 60 DAL 1991
Reggie Bush 2 RB 60 NOS 2006
Bill Fralic 2 G 58 ATL 1985
Von Miller 2 LB 58 DEN 2011
Billy Sims 1 RB 58 DET 1980
Tony Casillas 2 DT 57 ATL 1986
Sherman White 2 DE 55 CIN 1972
Jake Long 1 T 53 MIA 2008
Eric Turner 2 DB 52 CLE 1991
Mike McCoy 2 DT 46 GBP 1970
George Rogers 1 RB 46 NOS 1981
Darrell Russell 2 DT 46 OAK 1997
LaVar Arrington 2 LB 46 WAS 2000
Andrew Luck 1 QB 45 IND 2012
Mike Bell 2 DE 45 KCC 1979
David Carr 1 QB 44 HOU 2002
John Matuszak 1 DE 43 TEN 1973
Chris Long 2 DE 42 LAR 2008
Ronnie Brown 2 RB 41 MIA 2005
Johnie Cooks 2 LB 40 IND 1982
Robert Gallery 2 T 38 OAK 2004
Tom Cousineau 1 LB 36 BUF 1979
Dean Steinkuler 2 T 35 TEN 1984
Sam Bradford 1 QB 33 LAR 2010
Kenneth Sims 1 DE 32 NEP 1982
Rick Mirer 2 QB 32 SEA 1993
Robert Griffin 2 QB 32 WAS 2012
Tim Couch 1 QB 30 CLE 1999
Quentin Coryatt 2 LB 30 IND 1992
Courtney Brown 1 DE 28 CLE 2000
Tony Mandarich 2 T 28 GBP 1989
Aundray Bruce 1 LB 25 ATL 1988
Ricky Bell 1 RB 24 TBB 1977
Bo Jackson 1 RB 22 TBB 1986
Walt Patulski 1 DE 21 BUF 1972
Eric Fisher 1 T 21 KCC 2013
Lam Jones 2 WR 21 NYJ 1980
Blair Thomas 2 RB 20 NYJ 1990
Luke Joeckel 2 T 15 JAX 2013
Steve Emtman 1 DE 13 IND 1992
Bo Matthews 2 RB 13 SDC 1974
Jameis Winston 1 QB 13 TBB 2015
Ki-Jana Carter 1 RB 12 CIN 1995
Greg Robinson 2 T 12 LAR 2014
Jason Smith 2 T 10 LAR 2009
Steve Niehaus 2 DT 9 SEA 1976
Marcus Mariota 2 QB 9 TEN 2015
J Clowney 1 DE 6 HOU 2014
J Russell 1 QB 6 OAK 2007
Charles Rogers 2 WR 4 DET 2003
Ryan Leaf 2 QB 1 SDC 1998
I think it's way too early to say Winston and Mariota are successful NFL QBs. Both looked real good and seem to be on their way, but sometimes guys don't progress like we expect.If Goff and Wentz are both exceptional, then that'd be two years in a row. Once is surprising, two is very interesting.
yeah absolutely, just one year in looks goodI think it's way too early to say Winston and Mariota are successful NFL QBs. Both looked real good and seem to be on their way, but sometimes guys don't progress like we expect.
In principle I agree with this, but I sort of put this type of thing into two categories - the GM trader and the GM drafter.Wow, Rams. If I were a Rams fan I would not be happy.
If I were a Titans fan, you could not knock the smile off of my face. They still have to make good decisions with the picks, many of the beneficiaries of these type of deals have not done that, but they can make a mistake or two and still come out great.
Exactly. If some guy in your fantasy league trades a 2018 1st of the best team in the league straight up for Julio Jones, it is a GREAT trade.In principle I agree with this, but I sort of put this type of thing into two categories - the GM trader and the GM drafter.
So, no matter what the GM drafter does, it was a slam-dunk victory for the GM trader. Yes, I know it's the same guy but I don't agree with those who state, "Yeah, big haul but let's see what they do with those picks."
That's sick.Goffun fact
Career TD/INT ratio in the red zone (37 starts)?
56/1
Goff really has been amazing in those situations, and in end-of-half drives. If he had more opportunities at end-of-game drives there'd likely be no question about who's the #1 QB. His only real clean game-winning drive opportunity came at the end of the Arizona State game this year, which was the best game of Goff's career (coming back from 21 points down, including three scores in the last 9:13, and, two in the last 6:05, game-winning drive ending in FG with no time on the clock).That's sick.
Sure. Titans could miss on every pick. But they could have missed on the #1 too for that matter. Or not maximized it. I would still be them every day if I had the chance, even though the Rams may be still be okay after all is said and done.In principle I agree with this, but I sort of put this type of thing into two categories - the GM trader and the GM drafter.
So, no matter what the GM drafter does, it was a slam-dunk victory for the GM trader. Yes, I know it's the same guy but I don't agree with those who state, "Yeah, big haul but let's see what they do with those picks."
We agree they needed a QB (just not how they did it).It's a minor quibble of mine, because they are an NFL team, moving to LA. Ummm, the buzz is already there.
Wins will make them money, not a fresh new QB.
We heard this with the Texans and Vince Young. They needed to bring the local guy in, local buzz!! All any NFL team needs to do is win.
I'm not saying it isn't creating buzz. People are talking about the Rams. Not an easy task since Martz left town. No offense.You seem to be conflating the idea that the Rams legitimately need a QB, with the idea that increased buzz generated could translate to increased ticket sales for a new/old team that skipped over a generation of fans. They aren't necessarily mutually exclusive propositions.
He was so accurate in Kelly's system. Why isn't he trying to just get him and 'call it a day?'FUBAR said:crazy to think I once thought Nick Foles could be a franchise QB.
A year or so ago when Rivers was unhappy about all this moving stuff and stadium ideas and even mentioned retirement, this same issue was discussed. It wasn't that they needed a rookie QB but now some say it with the Rams.massraider said:It's a minor quibble of mine, because they are an NFL team, moving to LA. Ummm, the buzz is already there.
Wins will make them money, not a fresh new QB.
We heard this with the Texans and Vince Young. They needed to bring the local guy in, local buzz!! All any NFL team needs to do is win.
He'd have to be cheap enough. But then, Chip did trade him for Sam so I'm guessing Chip isn't interested.He was so accurate in Kelly's system. Why isn't he trying to just get him and 'call it a day?'
Only here?I'm predicting it here - Wentz will be a failure in the NFL...
Who will want to move up, though?If the Cowboys draft Tunsil they have (probably) the greatest OL ever on paper since the entire OL would be first rounders.
If they draft Ramsey, they'll have three of four DBs as first rounders.
They ought to be able to block well enough and defend ODB(and others) well enough without adding either.
They don't need to draft where they are.
If a QB goes one and two, then I think they're the next most likely to trade down. They have needs (WR is glaring to me) but those can all be filled later.
I think the Chargers (or maybe it's their prideful fan base?) are wayyy worse than people say. It shouldn't just be the Browns and Titans can benefit from many picks and a trade down. They should be in that conversation too.
There's nothing wrong with them adding Tunsil or them replacing Weddle with Ramsey or playing him at CB or whatever. It's all nice quality picks, but I'm afraid they're going to be back at the top next year. I don't like the similarity of underperforming rookie RB Sankey/Gordon and adding a tackle Lewan/Tunsil but it's a fine philosophy despite Whisenhunt- The runner and the blocker.
There have been so many Sundays that it seemed Rivers to Gates was their offense. That well is drying up.
I still have hope for Gordon and Keenan looks special at times but unless those two step up, they'll be right back at the top of the draft next year. The Raiders have got good (on paper) real quick. The Broncos just won the Supe. The Chiefs have a stable of RBs the Chargers can't stop. It's not an easy division for them to improve within