I am the one who brought that example up several months ago, and I was on an island at the time. That said, all that "proves" is that they are willing to take the long view with a player, not that they're planning on it. It certainly seems like an outlier situation, in fact that was one of the several counter-points to my posts- the Lions were "rebuilding" when they took Jameson, so it made sense to play the long game, but now they're contenders so it doesn't. Also, we've heard of plenty of "project" WRs, QBs, TEs, etc.- how many times have we heard of a "project" RB, especially taken with such a high draft pick? That simply isn't the NFL, RBs are expected to come in and contribute right away, and their much shorter career expectancy points to using them up and spitting them out, not playing the long game and signing them to a 2nd contract. They have several rookies playing key roles right now as well, it just doesn't make sense that they would use their highest pick on the least valuable and easiest to get acclimated position with the long game in mind while using lower picks on more difficult positions and relying on them heavily right away.Because the Lions FO clearly takes the long view.If he's not needed, then why spend the #12 pick on him? After they signed Montgomery, no less.LOL he's not needed. You're being reactionary and not analytical.… he’s just a JAG.
He may be JAG but we don't have near enough information to know if he is or isn't. Fantasy players completely fell in love with his #12 draft position and completely ignored the contract they gave Monty.
People also dismissed Monty's talent. He's a much better RB than petulant fantasy managers ever gave him credit for.
This is what happens when you try to wish your dreams into existence.
They did draft a guy with a busted wheel at #9 last year after all.
Again, occam's razor certainly seems to apply here- he simply hasn't performed up to expectations, therefore he isn't getting used as much as expected. Unfortunately it looks like it on the field as well.