There's really nothing even to debate. Nobody has provided a jumping off point, a premise, anything...
It's just been RAEGAN AND CENTRAL AMERICA AND PRIVATE PRISONS!!! SEEEE!!!
There's been no premise declared, nothing that is arguable. It's just a lot of grief and anger. There's no way to debate grief and anger.
For instance, if one had said, "There have been private prisons in America since America was founded, but they were expanded exponentially by Reagan in response to the drug war and its aims," then nobody would likely argue that.
Instead we got the grievance of the OP mixed with certitude about something, not to mention castigations and anger.
It's like one of the other posters said. The Drug War and its attendant goals and aims are subject to heavily moderated, lengthy debate.
Not this set-up.