I'm taking him at #4 overall in a non ppr leagueHe shouldn't still be there at 7, but if he is: Hes a special talent, who is only 27 yrs old.Hes one of the few RBs in the league that will stay on the field for 3 downs and isnt in a RBBC.Hes likely to flirt with 350-375 touches.Hes the 49ers GL back.The 49ers look poised to win 9-10 games, and this will likely be the best squad that Gore has played on in his career. The 49ers offense will be heavily run focused, as they are ditching the spread they used last year.They have a young, athletic OL that features alot of run-blocking talent.Hes been durable (at least 14 games played in every year of his career).Should post something around 1700-1800 total yards and 12+ TDs.
That's a good point.Anthony Dixon, an unspectacular rookie rb out of Miss St., is leading the league in rushing during the preseason. Gore, who is light years better than Dixon, will be running behind the same line in the regular season. Draw your own conclusions.
I think it's closer than people think and I don't own either of these players on any team at this point. If MacGahee gets traded then Rice seems like the wise choice. I think the TD vulture factor could sway some people to Gore, though.I'm stuck picking between Rice and Gore at #4 in a ten team PPR--I'm starting to think Gore may have a better season than Rice...
This is all good. Only disagree with his touches. I think 320 is within reach if he plays 16 games. Realistically, I expect around 280-300.He shouldn't still be there at 7, but if he is: Hes a special talent, who is only 27 yrs old.Hes one of the few RBs in the league that will stay on the field for 3 downs and isnt in a RBBC.Hes likely to flirt with 350-375 touches.Hes the 49ers GL back.The 49ers look poised to win 9-10 games, and this will likely be the best squad that Gore has played on in his career. The 49ers offense will be heavily run focused, as they are ditching the spread they used last year.They have a young, athletic OL that features alot of run-blocking talent.Hes been durable (at least 14 games played in every year of his career).Should post something around 1700-1800 total yards and 12+ TDs.
If a non-RB is taken in the first 6 picks, you are pretty much guaranteed to see either Gore or Turner in a non-PPR league.I should add that Turner has better odds of being there at #7 than Gore does.Gore is a true workhorse who can hit homeruns in both the running game and passing game. Non PPR? For sure I go with him if he fell there....but if Turner is there I would be leaning that way. I doubt Turner will be there though in non PPR. However if Michael Turner and Frank Gore are there your playing with some weak owners IMO.
Bottom line where did he finish ranked all those years you just posted in PPR and non PPR.Everyone needs to remember that over his 5 years he has averaged only 233 carries per season. The decline has been very obvious over the past 4 years....almost 100 carries less than in 2006. I like Frank, but probably not taking him in the first round in ANY league. Play it safe.
Here is the link:
http://www.nfl.com/players/frankgore/profile?id=GOR411171
In 2006 he carried the ball 312 times
In 2007 he carried the ball 260 times
In 2008 he carried the ball 240 times
In 2009 he carried the ball 229 times
The 49ers are a much better team now than they were in any of those years. They won't be playing from behind quite as often and they will be running the ball more just b/c they are improved and will likely have the lead in more games. That seems like a safe assumption to me barring some injury that has not yet happened on their offense. My guess is that he gets a number of carried somewhere b/w his 2006 & 2007 totals and he should be good for at least 40 receptions.Everyone needs to remember that over his 5 years he has averaged only 233 carries per season. The decline has been very obvious over the past 4 years....almost 100 carries less than in 2006. I like Frank, but probably not taking him in the first round in ANY league. Play it safe.
Here is the link:
http://www.nfl.com/players/frankgore/profile?id=GOR411171
In 2006 he carried the ball 312 times
In 2007 he carried the ball 260 times
In 2008 he carried the ball 240 times
In 2009 he carried the ball 229 times
You're comparing 16 games to 14 games. His touches per games have fallen from 23 to 20 but only from 21 to 20 since 2007. He seems as certain as anyone to get 20+ touches per game which is really all you can ask for...Everyone needs to remember that over his 5 years he has averaged only 233 carries per season. The decline has been very obvious over the past 4 years....almost 100 carries less than in 2006. I like Frank, but probably not taking him in the first round in ANY league. Play it safe.
Here is the link:
http://www.nfl.com/players/frankgore/profile?id=GOR411171
In 2006 he carried the ball 312 times
In 2007 he carried the ball 260 times
In 2008 he carried the ball 240 times
In 2009 he carried the ball 229 times
Good luck with that. Talk about injury prone. Off season back surgery....no thanks not in the first 2 rounds in my book.I would also add that the reason he has only played or at least started in 14 of 16 games is that he is injury prone albeit to a smaller extent.....I think the numbers really do show that he has been hurt a little more each year. Personally I would probably rather have Steven Jackson and he is slipping in drafts this year.
I'm just saying if you draft Gore be ready for some disappointment. I think his body and the numbers are showing this. If you want my honest opinion I would take RAY RICE over anyone this year at the RB position.Good luck with that. Talk about injury prone. Off season back surgery....no thanks not in the first 2 rounds in my book.I would also add that the reason he has only played or at least started in 14 of 16 games is that he is injury prone albeit to a smaller extent.....I think the numbers really do show that he has been hurt a little more each year. Personally I would probably rather have Steven Jackson and he is slipping in drafts this year.
Right but at 7 i dont' have luxury of drafting RiceI'm just saying if you draft Gore be ready for some disappointment. I think his body and the numbers are showing this. If you want my honest opinion I would take RAY RICE over anyone this year at the RB position.Good luck with that. Talk about injury prone. Off season back surgery....no thanks not in the first 2 rounds in my book.I would also add that the reason he has only played or at least started in 14 of 16 games is that he is injury prone albeit to a smaller extent.....I think the numbers really do show that he has been hurt a little more each year. Personally I would probably rather have Steven Jackson and he is slipping in drafts this year.
It's because you're overthinking it. If you don't want him don't take him but he could finish as a top 2-3 back this year. He's on a team with a running philosophy, improved line, improved weapons, strong defense, cake schedule and he's the 3 down workhorse back.I'm gonna be staring right at him at #7 and need to be convinced. Its gonna be either him, Moss or AJ and we're non ppr. Why is my gut saying pass but the entire free world saying grab him and don't look back?
Gore is going to have a monster year. If you get him at 7Honestly now. If you need to be "sold" on Frank Gore...it's time for a new hobby.
and this year the stars seem to be aligning with the schedule, line, defense and talent on offense.According to FFI over the last four seasons no RB has more yards from scrimmage than Gore. Not bad considering his injury history.Imagine if he manages to play 16.
I wouldn't make up my mind now. I'd watch what happens in the draft and react accordingly.ppierce said:So i take Gore at 7 and then in 2nd take best avail wr unless Manning is still there.
It's like selling you on water. Or cleavage.Andy Dufresne said:Honestly now. If you need to be "sold" on Frank Gore...it's time for a new hobby.
Or more likely it's a league with an uncommon scoring system, either heavy TD, 6 pt pass TD, or some other variant.I think being in the 7 spot is a great place to be. You can have your choice of a top (likely THE top) WR, can benefit if a RB slips, or even go QB in leagues that favor them. Specifically for Gore, there's nothing I or anyone else can say to make you sold on him. You either like him or you don't. I lean toward Turner in a heavy TD league, or Gore in a standard/performance non-PPR league, or Rice in a PPR league as the #3 RB. Depending on your scoring system, you can pick your favorite or go with a different position.Todem said:However if Michael Turner and Frank Gore are there your playing with some weak owners IMO.
The one bit of advice that works for every draft, but seriously, it's good advice. Don't make your mind up too far in advance. However, you might sketch out contingency draft plans based on the different starting options. For me at least, this helps me understand the deeper impact of my early round choices.Each different strategy requires appropriate responses in the mid-to-later rounds. Knowing in advance which strategies are preferred can/will influence your early round choices. And if it turns out that all of the various approaches can work, sketching them out in advance let you know HOW to make them work as the draft unfolds, rather than flying totally by the seat of your pants.I wouldn't make up my mind now. I'd watch what happens in the draft and react accordingly.ppierce said:So i take Gore at 7 and then in 2nd take best avail wr unless Manning is still there.
I'd like to draft Gore @ 1.07 while pouring water on cleavage.I think we can all agree with that.It's like selling you on water. Or cleavage.Andy Dufresne said:Honestly now. If you need to be "sold" on Frank Gore...it's time for a new hobby.
I took Rice at 3 in non-ppr whose schedule is not as good (although not bad either), but I think you might be right. Gore might have been the better choice. Less vultures, higher chance of TD's, easier schedule, lesser chance of him being rested down the stretch. Wish I had seen this thread prior to my draft, actually.I agree with Gore supporters on talent & age. Also which top RB (including CJ, MJD, Rice & AP) has this cake of a schedule?Week 1 @ SeattleWeek 2 New OrleansWeek 3 @ Kansas CityWeek 4 @ AtlantaWeek 5 PhiladelphiaWeek 6 OaklandWeek 7 @ CarolinaWeek 8 DenverWeek 9 BYEWeek 10 St. LouisWeek 11 Tampa BayWeek 12 @ ArizonaWeek 13 @ Green BayWeek 14 SeattleWeek 15 @ San DiegoWeek 16 @ St. LouisWeek 17 Arizona
I took Rice at 3 in non-ppr whose schedule is not as good (although not bad either), but I think you might be right. Gore might have been the better choice. Less vultures, higher chance of TD's, easier schedule, lesser chance of him being rested down the stretch. Wish I had seen this thread prior to my draft, actually.I agree with Gore supporters on talent & age. Also which top RB (including CJ, MJD, Rice & AP) has this cake of a schedule?
Week 1 @ Seattle
Week 2 New Orleans
Week 3 @ Kansas City
Week 4 @ Atlanta
Week 5 Philadelphia
Week 6 Oakland
Week 7 @ Carolina
Week 8 Denver
Week 9 BYE
Week 10 St. Louis
Week 11 Tampa Bay
Week 12 @ Arizona
Week 13 @ Green Bay
Week 14 Seattle
Week 15 @ San Diego
Week 16 @ St. Louis
Week 17 Arizona