Sherman just said on SVP that he was miked up yesterday and he truly went up to Crabtree and told him good game when Crabtree pushed him so maybe Crabtree was the punk? Hopefully that sound bit comes out cause I'd like to see if Sherman is telling the truth. I'd love to hear that final exchange.
So a person that acts the way Sherman does was really going up to Crabtree to tell him good game before the game was even over and Crabtree pushes his Facemask after being "mocked" and he is the punk? Shermans arrogance is unlike like any other I have come to learn. It seems
everything he does is for him, I do not believe anything he says when his actions show something to the contrary. So while on the audio he could of been saying good game, if there is bad blood between him and Crabtree, it was not a genuine good game. Look at how he treated Skip Bayless unprovoked. I am not judging him based off hearsay or rumors, I am judging him based on visual evidence that shows this guy is a bad person and a thug.
I also can only go by what I have seen. I have seen him posture in the past and given the end of game antics yesterday and what I have seen referenced in this thread today, I am still convinced. I will hesitate to call him a thug, but I will call him tasteless and punk. His self promotional side (Stanford Grad smart guy) should know that given their apparent history, Crabtree is not going to shake at that point. He did that with the full intent of provocation, knowing he could claim otherwise when it did not work. It was a full blown setup.
I do not know what Crabtree and his history is all about. I suspect he is 'suspect' also. I believe he was suspect coming out of college?
What strikes me is Sherman is HUGELY self serving, hypocritical and evasive. He criticizes Crabtree for the shove after his attempt at a handshake, but also justifies his rant as heat of the moment action. Both I say would qualify.
The Bayless exchange threw me over the edge. Deny the past and focus only on provocation. Do not answer direct questions and belittle your 'foe'. He claimed that he wanted to talk about some charity work, but only when Bayless was talking or asking a question. When Sherman's mouth opened and only he had the mic it was 100%, I am the best. Nothing else. What also surprises me is that Stephen A sat quietly by. Was there more?
Also this explaination attempt at justifcation shows similar avoidance. "ask Crabtree". He tries to place himself above the fray, when he stands squarely in it and is hugely responsible for it.
I vote TOOL.