What about Edelman? I still think he and Gronk share the top two target spots, with RB spot next, and then it could change week to week after that. Not saying Chandler can't be relevant but as long as everyone is playing and healthy, it's going to be very hit or miss. In mho of course.I think Scott Chandler (TE) will be a big part of the NE game plan. When Brady scans the field and sees Gronk double covered, I think he'll throw it to Chandler early & often.
Do you think he can make hay on his own without someone to draw coverage? Seems daunting.Eddie Royal vs. Green Bay.
If Mason is ruled out--I don't see him as being a "very" desperate play at all. Yeah--he's going against a strong defense--but I don't see the Rams trying to air it out that game-which means he should see a healthy amount of touches. If Mason is out--i'd call Benny a solid flex consideration at worst.If your really desperate B Cunningham. Really really desperate that is.
Coates could be sneaky! Offenses are known to start slow.. NE could start slow due to missing some players, allowing Pitt to get more plays.No. A starting WR on one of the best passing teams in the league is not sneaky. If you said Coates, I would have agreed. They cut everyone who was in front of him but DHB...Is Marcus Wheaton a "sneaky" play? I've got him in one league and totally forgot about him until this morning. I'd love to get him in for the Thursday night circus against the Pats, but I'd have to bench Jarvis Landry...
I think I'm gonna do it.
Benny should catch his fair share of short passes, shouldn't he? I doubt the Rams will pound him into the Seattle D-line all day. Slight PPR value, I'm thinking.If Mason is ruled out--I don't see him as being a "very" desperate play at all. Yeah--he's going against a strong defense--but I don't see the Rams trying to air it out that game-which means he should see a healthy amount of touches. If Mason is out--i'd call Benny a solid flex consideration at worst.If your really desperate B Cunningham. Really really desperate that is.
It doesn't hurt to live n let live.. I mean if you don't wish to help out an opponent or whatever, its fine by a few of us Im sure.As others have mentioned, if you need a sneaky start week 1 then you are doing this wrong. However, this might be useful information if you are playing DFS.
Maybe in amateur yahoo leagues. Those of us in deeper leagues or 16 team leagues are always in need of sneaky plays.As others have mentioned, if you need a sneaky start week 1 then you are doing this wrong. However, this might be useful information if you are playing DFS.
Eh,it seems like every thread in these forums brings out some haters. Just ignore and keep it positive for those of us who are actually interested in unearthing some good under the radar week 1 plays. Whether it's for seaso long leagues or for DFS.Maybe in amateur yahoo leagues. Those of us in deeper leagues or 16 team leagues are always in need of sneaky plays.As others have mentioned, if you need a sneaky start week 1 then you are doing this wrong. However, this might be useful information if you are playing DFS.
Right. Or with injured players or guys who are suspended.Maybe in amateur yahoo leagues. Those of us in deeper leagues or 16 team leagues are always in need of sneaky plays.As others have mentioned, if you need a sneaky start week 1 then you are doing this wrong. However, this might be useful information if you are playing DFS.
I would agree with that. If Tre is out--I could see Benny get touches both rushing the ball as well as in the short passing game. I could easily see 15-20 rushes with maybe 3-4 catches if he's the bell cow for week 1.Benny should catch his fair share of short passes, shouldn't he? I doubt the Rams will pound him into the Seattle D-line all day. Slight PPR value, I'm thinking.If Mason is ruled out--I don't see him as being a "very" desperate play at all. Yeah--he's going against a strong defense--but I don't see the Rams trying to air it out that game-which means he should see a healthy amount of touches. If Mason is out--i'd call Benny a solid flex consideration at worst.If your really desperate B Cunningham. Really really desperate that is.
Exactly, really annoying when you hear comments like these. Doesn't help at all. In one league, I drafted Gates and Foster in one league knowing I would need some fill ins. I drafted guys I plan to start, but you never know. You make choices to draft guys that may be out week 1 to get them later in the year, so I appreciate seeing thoughts on week 1 plays.Eh,it seems like every thread in these forums brings out some haters. Just ignore and keep it positive for those of us who are actually interested in unearthing some good under the radar week 1 plays. Whether it's for seaso long leagues or for DFS.Maybe in amateur yahoo leagues. Those of us in deeper leagues or 16 team leagues are always in need of sneaky plays.As others have mentioned, if you need a sneaky start week 1 then you are doing this wrong. However, this might be useful information if you are playing DFS.
Wheaton is a good bet this week. I wouldn't start him over Landry. Wheaton is my WR6, so I'm not starting him, either. But I am hoping for a huge week so I can sell high on him.You'd be an idiot to bench Jarvis Landry vs. the Redskins secondary, I think. Or really most weeks unless you have 2-3 better options.Is Marcus Wheaton a "sneaky" play? I've got him in one league and totally forgot about him until this morning. I'd love to get him in for the Thursday night circus against the Pats, but I'd have to bench Jarvis Landry...
I think I'm gonna do it.
This. Some of us made the mistake of in the middle of august. And some of those people picked jordy and kelvin. And SOME of them drafted both... I'm having to start steve smith sr, john brown, and kendall wright now in ppr with a deep bench league.Right. Or with injured players or guys who are suspended.Maybe in amateur yahoo leagues. Those of us in deeper leagues or 16 team leagues are always in need of sneaky plays.As others have mentioned, if you need a sneaky start week 1 then you are doing this wrong. However, this might be useful information if you are playing DFS.
I don't think so. I suspect NE may get a huge lead against that terrible Pittsburgh D and Pitt will be playing from behind a lot. Bump Pitt WRs, bench Pitt RBs. Pats are damn near unbeatable at home too.Deangelo Williams. Bell is suspended, Wilfork gone from NE. Should be a lot of scoring
Wheaton, WR PIT. Bryant is suspended, NE has some defensive holes.
Crockett Gillmore, TE Ravens. Only TE on team that's been practicing and Dens OLBs love to blitz, could get burnt.
Richard Rogers, TE GB. Playing the Bears and not many receiving options for Rodgers currently.
Alfred Blue. Foster is hurt.
Eddie Royal. Jeffery banged up and smith out against what might be a shootout.
Reuben Randle WR. Cowboys lost Scandrick and Randle looks to be the benefitiary.
"Hmmm have nothing to do with my life. Oh I got it! Let me choose a thread in the shark pool whose title annoys me and try to derail the thread by letting everyone know how I feel about the word 'sneaky'! Ahh...done! Whew...I don't know about you but I feel better already now that the footballguys forum members know how I feel about that super annoying word 'sneaky'. I'm sure everyone was actually logging into the forums today just for that. Who wouldn't want to know my thoughts on that word? Glad I got that off my chest."sneaky
juicy
tasty
salty
...words that make me cringe when reading or discussing FF.
Am I missing any?
Or you got LeVeon Bell or Martavis Bryant ....or both.As others have mentioned, if you need a sneaky start week 1 then you are doing this wrong. However, this might be useful information if you are playing DFS.
Huh?I like Karlos Williams. Shady has looked bad and is coming off injury. Even if he does come back for week 1 he might be eased back in. Karlos could take the job week 1 and ruin away with it!
Pretty sneaky reply."Hmmm have nothing to do with my life. Oh I got it! Let me choose a thread in the shark pool whose title annoys me and try to derail the thread by letting everyone know how I feel about the word 'sneaky'! Ahh...done! Whew...I don't know about you but I feel better already now that the footballguys forum members know how I feel about that super annoying word 'sneaky'. I'm sure everyone was actually logging into the forums today just for that. Who wouldn't want to know my thoughts on that word? Glad I got that off my chest."sneaky
juicy
tasty
salty
...words that make me cringe when reading or discussing FF.
Am I missing any?
Haha at least you're a good sport badmo! Cheers, man!Pretty sneaky reply.Thank you for changing the title. My goal is to bring attention to the crazy use of those words. Together, we can make it happen."Hmmm have nothing to do with my life. Oh I got it! Let me choose a thread in the shark pool whose title annoys me and try to derail the thread by letting everyone know how I feel about the word 'sneaky'! Ahh...done! Whew...I don't know about you but I feel better already now that the footballguys forum members know how I feel about that super annoying word 'sneaky'. I'm sure everyone was actually logging into the forums today just for that. Who wouldn't want to know my thoughts on that word? Glad I got that off my chest."sneaky
juicy
tasty
salty
...words that make me cringe when reading or discussing FF.
Am I missing any?
rickyg, good topic. I love the title change in response to the trolling.My pick for a good play this week is Woodhead in PPR. I can see at least a few receptions for high end #2 RB numbers this week. I just can't see Gordon being reliable enough in pass pro this early and Woodhead being on the field gives the offense more flexibility. Gates is out and I can see a slight uptick in receptions for Woodhead for that reason also.Pretty sneaky reply.Thank you for changing the title. My goal is to bring attention to the crazy use of those words. Together, we can make it happen."Hmmm have nothing to do with my life. Oh I got it! Let me choose a thread in the shark pool whose title annoys me and try to derail the thread by letting everyone know how I feel about the word 'sneaky'! Ahh...done! Whew...I don't know about you but I feel better already now that the footballguys forum members know how I feel about that super annoying word 'sneaky'. I'm sure everyone was actually logging into the forums today just for that. Who wouldn't want to know my thoughts on that word? Glad I got that off my chest."sneaky
juicy
tasty
salty
...words that make me cringe when reading or discussing FF.
Am I missing any?
Contract does him no good when he's injured.Huh?I like Karlos Williams. Shady has looked bad and is coming off injury. Even if he does come back for week 1 he might be eased back in. Karlos could take the job week 1 and ruin away with it!
Did you see any of the reports on the new contract that the Bills gave McCoy after the trade?
Read the part I bolded. He wasn't just talking about Week 1.Contract does him no good when he's injured.Huh?I like Karlos Williams. Shady has looked bad and is coming off injury. Even if he does come back for week 1 he might be eased back in. Karlos could take the job week 1 and ruin away with it!
Did you see any of the reports on the new contract that the Bills gave McCoy after the trade?
Except we have no reason to believe he'll stay out all season. Odds of him taking shady's job in this season are very slim. Williams would have to carry them into the playoffs before they'd let him start fully over shadyContract does him no good when he's injured.Huh?I like Karlos Williams. Shady has looked bad and is coming off injury. Even if he does come back for week 1 he might be eased back in. Karlos could take the job week 1 and ruin away with it!
Did you see any of the reports on the new contract that the Bills gave McCoy after the trade?
You haven't seen my WR2 and WR3 options in my keeper league with Alshon at best super gimpy. I'm going to be riding the match-up/surprise increase in role/sneaky play a big chunk of this year I'm afraid. The good news is I think WR is going to have lots of quality short-term plays all season long.As others have mentioned, if you need a sneaky start week 1 then you are doing this wrong. However, this might be useful information if you are playing DFS.
Pats historically don't come out of the gate like gangbusters. I think Pitt's OL can be exploited by a good DL, but NE doesn't have that right now. I'm thinking a ton of points on Thursday night with 2 defenses that just aren't remotely close to good.I don't think so. I suspect NE may get a huge lead against that terrible Pittsburgh D and Pitt will be playing from behind a lot. Bump Pitt WRs, bench Pitt RBs. Pats are damn near unbeatable at home too.Deangelo Williams. Bell is suspended, Wilfork gone from NE. Should be a lot of scoring
Wheaton, WR PIT. Bryant is suspended, NE has some defensive holes.
Crockett Gillmore, TE Ravens. Only TE on team that's been practicing and Dens OLBs love to blitz, could get burnt.
Richard Rogers, TE GB. Playing the Bears and not many receiving options for Rodgers currently.
Alfred Blue. Foster is hurt.
Eddie Royal. Jeffery banged up and smith out against what might be a shootout.
Reuben Randle WR. Cowboys lost Scandrick and Randle looks to be the benefitiary.