Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
Weebs claims that saying the Russians interfered with the election is advancing a narrative, which I assume he believes is a narrative of the left. He still denies that they interfered. So Paul Ryan must be part of a deep state conspiracy.I believe he is happy they caught the Russian hackers.I know I am.
That’s not what I’m doing at all, but ok. I’m simply asking of the 36 (36!!!) indictments, how many are for crimes related to the 2016 election by admin officials. The answer to that is none. Maybe there’s evidence that we don’t know about. Maybe there are indictments coming down the pike. We don’t know what we don’t know. What we do know is that the 36 (36!!!!!!!!) indictments don’t Actually point to wrongdoing by Trump or his administration. You want them to, I think some of you need them to. But unfortunately they do not.
Or he was just riffing like he has 5,342,675 times prior to and since. Your theory makes more sense though.
Just cause you have a crew of 20 in here that echo the same thing doesn’t make it true.....step outside in the real world every once in awhile.
People are entitled to think earth is flat even after seeing pictures of it from space and live video of astronauts circling the earth. The rest of us think they're morons.
That’s pretty effective riffing. Ask the country who is hacking to help you to do something and suddenly it starts happening. Weird that his riffing about Hillary going to jail and the Mueller probe ending haven’t had the same results. Wonder why that is.
What's funny is they'll refuse to release the transcript because it's part of an ongoing investigation, while crying about Strzok being instructed not to testify about an ongoing investigation.
She was right about so many things.
Since you are parsing down to admin officials, I give you Michael Flynn. He was the NSA, which is an administration position, and not just part of the campaign. He was indicted, and plead guilty.
The Republicans don't want to be seen treating a woman the way that they treated Strzok.
please stop this. she was abhorrent. I voted for her because of the alternative, but she would have been completely ineffective with a republican house and senate and would have energized republican voters to keep it that way.
Even then, people are entitled to their own opinions. But they aren't entitled to present them as facts replacing actual facts. If they want to ignore the actual facts and continue with an uninformed opinion that's on them....certainly their right.
The article from a while back about the different layers of the investigation would be worth revisiting. An series of layers of Fara and perjury indictments, money laundering, foreign influence, hacking, obstruction, espionage and campaign finance with accompanying reports would emerge, or at least that was what was predicted. I see nothing contrary to that so far. Getting Trump’s testimony on the obstruction piece is proving to be a hitch, but that’s only hurting Trump in the long run.David KrisVerified account @DavidKris
FollowFollow @DavidKris
More
I suspect that POTUS and his closest advisors are and should be worried that, depending on the evidence, Mueller’s next steps will make it feel like the walls are closing in. 6/6
3:28 PM - 13 Jul 2018
>>What comes next? Standard practice in this kind of investigation is to begin at the outer ring – low hanging fruit, most readily-provable crimes – and work in towards the bulls-eye as the evidence warrants.<<
The only thing tougher than your imagined scenario would be the actual scenario when Trump asked him in person, a couple of times, and was told "no." Then he shrugged and said "see? Putin said they didn't do it. And I believe him."
This is a little misleading - I am reasonably certain Clinton had the Steele Dossier, or the information it contained, and she (and I think Harry Reid) were trying to get the FBI to acknowledge the investigation by that point in the election.
Oh they’ll meet and Putin will get just what he wanted from it. Though I do wonder about the 1:1 meetup on lover’s lane now.
Putin "getting what he wanted" will be the storyline regardless of what the actual outcomes are. Even Trump railing against the Nordstream2 pipeline and telling Germany to get off RU natural gas dependence was painted as a "win" for Putin. Bombing a Russian client state was depicted even by you as a token gesture. There's no version of reality that can't be contorted to fit the conspiracy theory.
Hm, well let’s see. I think Putin wants uninterrupted coordination of policy and a policy statement of some kind from Trump (either pro-Russia or anti-West or both) that premiers from Lenin to Andropov could have never dreamed. If that happens and that’s the headline then that headline will be well deserved.
Nixon went down for multiple things he said on tape, privately, in the White House.
I might regret asking this question but how is cancelling the summit going to certainly lead to the bold? You think our "president" is really going to go to war with Russia? What actions of his give us a single inkling that this would be the case?
I am completely selfaware and already knew someone would go there.
Natasha Bertrand.
