I stopped watching after 3 episodes also and just read the recap of finale. Did they ever explain any of the supernatural nonsense going on like the orange getting thrown back or the lone survivor saying demonic things in the hospital before dying?
Not really. They just hit that the town is weird and people are connected to other planes of existence in that godforsaken place.I stopped watching after 3 episodes also and just read the recap of finale. Did they ever explain any of the supernatural nonsense going on like the orange getting thrown back or the lone survivor saying demonic things in the hospital before dying?
I stopped watching after 3 episodes also and just read the recap of finale. Did they ever explain any of the supernatural nonsense going on like the orange getting thrown back or the lone survivor saying demonic things in the hospital before dying?
After telling us the entire season to ask the right question, Danvers tells us in the finale that "some questions just don't have answers"
Lucky *******Got 4 episodes down and now I can't log into MAX so.....screw it. I don't care how it ends.
Yep. I mean he's basically the RGIII of television writing.Yeah, finished up about as terrible as expected.
Hilarious that they snuck in "Time is a Flat circle" as some sort of pathetic final attempt to connect this trash to S1.
Bad writing, tons of time wasted on unnecessary sub-plots. Dumb ending. Just bad TV.
That being said....Pizzloatto should probably just take the high road and stop publicly trashing it. I get that technically its "your show" but nothing they do will change anyone's thoughts on S1 (which was obviously a masterpiece). Dude is a total one hit wonder who should probably focus on his own failures instead of the failures of others
I disagree. They gave it the True Detective label. Accordingly, it's natural to compare it to this benchmark. I frankly wish this was a standalone series and I may have enjoyed it more.I'm in the minority; but I thought it was pretty good. It's pretty unfair to compare it to S1; as that was one of the greatest single TV seasons maybe of all time; but as it was...it kept my interest.
I feel like the supernatural aspects don't really need to be explained as there weren't any "group" moments. Each person deals with grief, the remote location and the long night in their own way. That's fine by me.
I stopped watching after 3 episodes also and just read the recap of finale. Did they ever explain any of the supernatural nonsense going on like the orange getting thrown back or the lone survivor saying demonic things in the hospital before dying?
Isn’t the tongue what linked the cases together?The Dude - But what about the tongue?!
Walter - FORGET ABOUT THE ******* TONGUE!!
My beef is when these types of stories try to make you think it's monsters all season just to end up explaining it away with some other BS.I stopped watching after 3 episodes also and just read the recap of finale. Did they ever explain any of the supernatural nonsense going on like the orange getting thrown back or the lone survivor saying demonic things in the hospital before dying?
Basically visions that Navarro had. Probably just in her mind. She hinted that this was a curse she and her sister inherited from her mother.
It was. How’d it get there?Isn’t the tongue what linked the cases together?The Dude - But what about the tongue?!
Walter - FORGET ABOUT THE ******* TONGUE!!
Isn’t the tongue what linked the cases together?The Dude - But what about the tongue?!
Walter - FORGET ABOUT THE ******* TONGUE!!
My beef is when these types of stories try to make you think it's monsters all season just to end up explaining it away with some other BS.I stopped watching after 3 episodes also and just read the recap of finale. Did they ever explain any of the supernatural nonsense going on like the orange getting thrown back or the lone survivor saying demonic things in the hospital before dying?
Basically visions that Navarro had. Probably just in her mind. She hinted that this was a curse she and her sister inherited from her mother.
Either go with monsters or don't.
If I want to watch Scooby Doo, I'll watch the original.
Cleaning lady denied knowing anything about it.Isn’t the tongue what linked the cases together?The Dude - But what about the tongue?!
Walter - FORGET ABOUT THE ******* TONGUE!!
ASK THE RIGHT QUESTION!!!...... It's "Who left the tongue?"
1. It was the cleaning ladies; knowing that this would put into motion the reopening of the Annie case?
2. It was a distraught Clark......giving himself up?
3. Was it Sedna,,,,the spirit making things right?
Navarro mentioned to Danvers how her mom used to peel oranges. I think the oranges were a symbol of her mother and a connection with her spirit.I stopped watching after 3 episodes also and just read the recap of finale. Did they ever explain any of the supernatural nonsense going on like the orange getting thrown back or the lone survivor saying demonic things in the hospital before dying?
Basically visions that Navarro had. Probably just in her mind. She hinted that this was a curse she and her sister inherited from her mother.
Well, there is at least some suggestion that some supernatural creature did this (the weird video, the tongue, the sheer terror on the dead men's faces, etc.). I assume that's what he's referring to.My beef is when these types of stories try to make you think it's monsters all season just to end up explaining it away with some other BS.I stopped watching after 3 episodes also and just read the recap of finale. Did they ever explain any of the supernatural nonsense going on like the orange getting thrown back or the lone survivor saying demonic things in the hospital before dying?
Basically visions that Navarro had. Probably just in her mind. She hinted that this was a curse she and her sister inherited from her mother.
Either go with monsters or don't.
If I want to watch Scooby Doo, I'll watch the original.
Monsters? What show were you watching?
Yes, they played it up for 5 episodes that it was some supernatural force. Turns out it was Broomhilda.Well, there is at least some suggestion that some supernatural creature did this (the weird video, the tongue, the sheer terror on the dead men's faces, etc.). I assume that's what he's referring to.My beef is when these types of stories try to make you think it's monsters all season just to end up explaining it away with some other BS.I stopped watching after 3 episodes also and just read the recap of finale. Did they ever explain any of the supernatural nonsense going on like the orange getting thrown back or the lone survivor saying demonic things in the hospital before dying?
Basically visions that Navarro had. Probably just in her mind. She hinted that this was a curse she and her sister inherited from her mother.
Either go with monsters or don't.
If I want to watch Scooby Doo, I'll watch the original.
Monsters? What show were you watching?
Cleaning lady denied knowing anything about it.Isn’t the tongue what linked the cases together?The Dude - But what about the tongue?!
Walter - FORGET ABOUT THE ******* TONGUE!!
ASK THE RIGHT QUESTION!!!...... It's "Who left the tongue?"
1. It was the cleaning ladies; knowing that this would put into motion the reopening of the Annie case?
2. It was a distraught Clark......giving himself up?
3. Was it Sedna,,,,the spirit making things right?
Thing was bagged and tagged. Forensics confirmed it was Annie’s. Someone cut it out of her. Preserved it. Then left it at Tsalal while the Muderous Moppers rounded up the scientists.
Danvers looked at the spot again where it had been left and there was a shiny residue there.
What does it mean?!
you gotta admit it would be pretty cool if there were monsters in it like maybe a demon or a steve mcqueen type vampire those guys are always cool take that to the bank shukemigoMy beef is when these types of stories try to make you think it's monsters all season just to end up explaining it away with some other BS.I stopped watching after 3 episodes also and just read the recap of finale. Did they ever explain any of the supernatural nonsense going on like the orange getting thrown back or the lone survivor saying demonic things in the hospital before dying?
Basically visions that Navarro had. Probably just in her mind. She hinted that this was a curse she and her sister inherited from her mother.
Either go with monsters or don't.
If I want to watch Scooby Doo, I'll watch the original.
Monsters? What show were you watching?
i fail to see how this show should impact your footwear but hey everyone has their own things take that to the bank bromigoMy apologies if this comes across as a drive-by, but this show is a good example of why I almost never start new shoes anymore. Why make the investment if the ending is just going to suck?
Like everybody else, I do make the occasional exception to the "no new shows" rule. I watched the first season of House of the Dragon after it good reviews, so I'm invested in that series now. I'm sure my wife and I will watch S3 of White Lotus when that comes out. But Game of Thrones and The Walking Dead made me swear off watching anything that gets released weekly until it's over and I know it's not going to go sideways.
i assume it has to be clark.
1. It was the cleaning ladies; knowing that this would put into motion the reopening of the Annie case?
2. It was a distraught Clark......giving himself up?
3. Was it Sedna,,,,the spirit making things right?
The Dude - But what about the tongue?!
Walter - FORGET ABOUT THE ******* TONGUE!!
Renewed for another season with same creator as this season:Sounds like True Detective is probably dead now. As great as S1 was, I think this pretty much kills any cache the name had with audiences.
If I want to watch Scooby Doo, I'll watch the original.
The show was well liked among enough people to carry on the name. I was fine with the season myself. The ending was a bit of a letdown but I’ve resigned myself to the fact that it’s difficult for most series’ to stick the landing in a way that is satisfactory to everyone.Renewed for another season with same creator as this season:Sounds like True Detective is probably dead now. As great as S1 was, I think this pretty much kills any cache the name had with audiences.
I’ll still hate watch itRenewed for another season with same creator as this season:Sounds like True Detective is probably dead now. As great as S1 was, I think this pretty much kills any cache the name had with audiences.
So time is a flat circleRenewed for another season with same creator as this season:Sounds like True Detective is probably dead now. As great as S1 was, I think this pretty much kills any cache the name had with audiences.
The show was well liked among enough people to carry on the name. I was fine with the season myself. The ending was a bit of a letdown but I’ve resigned myself to the fact that it’s difficult for most series’ to stick the landing in a way that is satisfactory to everyone.Renewed for another season with same creator as this season:Sounds like True Detective is probably dead now. As great as S1 was, I think this pretty much kills any cache the name had with audiences.
I could nitpick about things, sure, but I don’t understand the thought process amongst some viewers that the only shows worth anyones time have to be considered masterpieces. How many of those are there in the entire history of television? It’s either the most amazing thing you’ve ever seen or garbage. It’s 6 episodes of your time. Nothing groundbreaking. Was worth the watch. My unprofessional review.
So another one for the garbage heap. Point proven or do you have reviews of season 3 on here? I don’t want to go back and look. Just seems like the majority of people who loved season 1 have become more and more volatile with every passing season.The show was well liked among enough people to carry on the name. I was fine with the season myself. The ending was a bit of a letdown but I’ve resigned myself to the fact that it’s difficult for most series’ to stick the landing in a way that is satisfactory to everyone.Renewed for another season with same creator as this season:Sounds like True Detective is probably dead now. As great as S1 was, I think this pretty much kills any cache the name had with audiences.
I could nitpick about things, sure, but I don’t understand the thought process amongst some viewers that the only shows worth anyones time have to be considered masterpieces. How many of those are there in the entire history of television? It’s either the most amazing thing you’ve ever seen or garbage. It’s 6 episodes of your time. Nothing groundbreaking. Was worth the watch. My unprofessional review.
It doesn't have to always be a masterpiece. True Detective 3 was FAR from a masterpiece, but it was light years ahead of this steaming pile of giraffe manure. I lost access to HBO so I won't ever watch episodes 5 or 6 to TD 4 but if you thought the ending was the only letdown, buddy.....we weren't watching the same show.
I can't believe this director is getting another shot. She should be directing used car commercials.
So another one for the garbage heap. Point proven or do you have reviews of season 3 on here? I don’t want to go back and look. Just seems like the majority of people who loved season 1 have become more and more volatile with every passing season.The show was well liked among enough people to carry on the name. I was fine with the season myself. The ending was a bit of a letdown but I’ve resigned myself to the fact that it’s difficult for most series’ to stick the landing in a way that is satisfactory to everyone.Renewed for another season with same creator as this season:Sounds like True Detective is probably dead now. As great as S1 was, I think this pretty much kills any cache the name had with audiences.
I could nitpick about things, sure, but I don’t understand the thought process amongst some viewers that the only shows worth anyones time have to be considered masterpieces. How many of those are there in the entire history of television? It’s either the most amazing thing you’ve ever seen or garbage. It’s 6 episodes of your time. Nothing groundbreaking. Was worth the watch. My unprofessional review.
It doesn't have to always be a masterpiece. True Detective 3 was FAR from a masterpiece, but it was light years ahead of this steaming pile of giraffe manure. I lost access to HBO so I won't ever watch episodes 5 or 6 to TD 4 but if you thought the ending was the only letdown, buddy.....we weren't watching the same show.
I can't believe this director is getting another shot. She should be directing used car commercials.
The hype and expectations flattened that movie, but not a bad flick if you are flipping through channels and come across it.They didn't let the director of Ishtar make another movie. Elaine May should have directed True Detective 4....she'd still have a job.
The hype and expectations flattened that movie, but not a bad flick if you are flipping through channels and come across it.They didn't let the director of Ishtar make another movie. Elaine May should have directed True Detective 4....she'd still have a job.
That time period was a tough reckoning for actors of that generation. Beatty/Hoffman/Nicholson/Redford/Voight were all pushing 50. Teen movies and Stallone/Schwarzenegger action movies were the rage. Cruise and Hanks were the new leading men.
Beatty and Hoffman took a chance on Ishtar for the same reason Nicholson took a chance on the Joker--to reinvigorate their careers. Nicholson hit a homerun, Beatty and Hoffman struck out.
so in the end is Navarro alive?.....hiding out on a lakehouse with Foster?....help
so in the end is Navarro alive?