HellToupee
Footballguy
Hunter02
the Apple doesn’t fall far from the tree
the Apple doesn’t fall far from the tree
After a 7 point swing I would agree with you.Nobody is expecting Biden to win Iowa.
I've been monitoring a betting site (because I'm sick) and Iowa has been firmly in Trump's territory for quite some time.After a 7 point swing I would agree with you.
Posts like this are a huge part of the problem here. Not a good look at all..come on man be better or this board is probably not for you.Snorkelson said:I’m certain there are other fantasy football message boards you can post on that cater to free speech, regardless of bigotry or false content, and where you can pretty much call anyone any names you want. You can even start a thread to piss and moan about how unfair it is here and how overrun with liberals it has become.
Sounds a lot like Twitter's excuse when they're caught in hypocrisy.Joe Bryant said:I already apologized. As I said in the post, I should have locked the other thread long ago.
The magnitude of Trump’s advantage and quality of the pollster is what makes that poll notable. States aren’t independent of each other. If Trump were to win Iowa by 7, it would make me question Biden’s polling leads in other battleground states.I've been monitoring a betting site (because I'm sick) and Iowa has been firmly in Trump's territory for quite some time.
It seems like an obvious article to write because it’s true. Trump could win. Anyone who states otherwise doesn’t understand polling and statistics.Interested to see how many outlets/polls come out with CYA articles about how Trump COULD win this thing.
I agree. I just find it interesting that outlets are NOW willing to address the polling factors and Biden campaign errors that some of the right leaning outlets have been pointing out for weeks.It seems like an obvious article to write because it’s true. Trump could win. Anyone who states otherwise doesn’t understand polling and statistics.
I haven’t seen this too much personally but I’ve been more interested in the data/stats guys than the partisan talking heads. The stats guys have talked about it a lot. Nate Silver quipped about how he spends 90% of his time thinking about something that will happen 10% of the time.I agree. I just find it interesting that outlets are NOW willing to address the polling factors and Biden campaign errors that some of the right leaning outlets have been pointing out for weeks.
Issues that plenty on these boards have dismissed as "talking points".
So what is your opinion on statistics? It feels like no matter the side the statistics can be skewed to show favorable to either candidate.I haven’t seen this too much personally but I’ve been more interested in the data/stats guys than the partisan talking heads. The stats guys have talked about it a lot. Nate Silver quipped about how he spends 90% of his time thinking about something that will happen 10% of the time.
Factors like that can play a role in why Trump can win despite the polls usually giving Biden such big leads. If Trump wins, it will be interesting to read the post-mortems from the pollsters. The pollsters do make adjustments to their numbers to reflect what they believe are proper samples of voters. That includes the "shy" Trump voter concept.So what is your opinion on statistics? It feels like no matter the side the statistics can be skewed to show favorable to either candidate.
There have been a couple studies now that show trump voters are less likely to answer polls accurately due to fears of being judged or outed. Some here think that is ridiculous, but now we're seeing reporting that polls could be wrong and this is likely a reason why.
Nope. Me being honest.Sounds a lot like Twitter's excuse when they're caught in hypocrisy.
How about stopping censorship altogether then no need to apologize?
I think for the most part polls have been fairly accurate. They get it wrong sometimes and then try to use historicals to figure out how they got it wrong and adjust for next time. But for the most part they are correct.So what is your opinion on statistics? It feels like no matter the side the statistics can be skewed to show favorable to either candidate.
There have been a couple studies now that show trump voters are less likely to answer polls accurately due to fears of being judged or outed. Some here think that is ridiculous, but now we're seeing reporting that polls could be wrong and this is likely a reason why.
I'm with you. The record number of voters coming out are not split 50-50. Logic would point to a blue landslide. Trump will have succeeded in uniting this country (against him). Too many folks are tired of the hate and division he's caused.I think for the most part polls have been fairly accurate. They get it wrong sometimes and then try to use historicals to figure out how they got it wrong and adjust for next time. But for the most part they are correct.
I believe that the pollsters are so worried about what happened in 2016 that they are over adjusting. I'm one of the few on these boards that think Biden will beat his polls numbers and that this election will not be close. I just see everything pointing to Trump getting smoked. Polls, early voting, massive voting numbers, 2018 midterms. All of these things are favoring the Democrats. To me this is a case of Occam's razor.
I have a couple $100 bets with some friends who are positive Trump is going to win. One of my friend even offered me 3-1 odds (I did not take the odds), but he gets all his news from Conservative channels.
I know anything can happen, but I am generally driven by logic.
I think that Trump incorrectly believes that great rally's won him the 2016 election. The rally's may have helped a little, but the big factor in 2016 were the undecided voters breaking towards Trump, and the Dems staying home (a large part because of peoples feelings about Hillary). He captured a huge percentage of these voters and most of them did not go to Trump rally's.I'm with you. The record number of voters coming out are not split 50-50. Logic would point to a blue landslide. Trump will have succeeded in uniting this country (against him). Too many folks are tired of the hate and division he's caused.
Widbil83 said:Joe, as somebody who has a lifetime FBG subscription and promotes the hell out of you guys at every turn this is ridiculous.
I just don't trust the pollsters right now. I think the social bias against Trump support can not be accurately measured. Everyone is giving themselves an out in case they are wrong and I think it speaks to that.Factors like that can play a role in why Trump can win despite the polls usually giving Biden such big leads. If Trump wins, it will be interesting to read the post-mortems from the pollsters. The pollsters do make adjustments to their numbers to reflect what they believe are proper samples of voters. That includes the "shy" Trump voter concept.
And the Biden thread was only up for 2 weeks? That's remarkable. What is the point of political discussion without dissenting opinion?In their defense the Trump bashing thread was only 2850 pages, 142,456 posts and over 2.5 million views.
It's crazy to me how naive people are about the Covid danger.Some of the attendees at MAGA rallies are repeats, such as this guy and his family who were the first in line at OpaLocka airport in north Miami-Dade (of Amelia Earhart fame). It's his 7th MAGA rally this summer and he's super-excited to see the president yet again. He showed up 14 hours early. The rally is supposed to start at 11:30pm tonight, which means it would likely be in violation of the county midnight curfew. And as usual, attendees are waiving all their legal rights to sue over COVID-19 exposure.
It's a pattern here. This isn't the first time. Won't be the last.And the Biden thread was only up for 2 weeks? That's remarkable. What is the point of political discussion without dissenting opinion?
That’s all valid, 2016 exposed some flaws in the system. One question though, may pollsters have claimed to have made adjustments based on what the learned in ‘16. If the polls in general are correct this year will you trust them again?I just don't trust the pollsters right now. I think the social bias against Trump support can not be accurately measured. Everyone is giving themselves an out in case they are wrong and I think it speaks to that.
Yeah, I get it. One other point to make. I strongly believe that the reputable pollsters are trying to get it as right as they can. They might be making big mistakes but I don't think it's due to bias.I just don't trust the pollsters right now. I think the social bias against Trump support can not be accurately measured. Everyone is giving themselves an out in case they are wrong and I think it speaks to that.
It's never a bad thing to be honest, that's to be applauded. As to your second sentence, moderation is not a synonym of censorship. No one is calling for you to stop moderating your forums. Consistency is all anyone asks for. Hopefully it's better going forward.Nope. Me being honest.
And we'll definitely continue to moderate if we have a forum.
So you guys are advocating for all these websites to 100% let anything go and let anybody say what they want? Seems like a weird stance if so.Sounds a lot like Twitter's excuse when they're caught in hypocrisy.
How about stopping censorship altogether then no need to apologize?
I'll give them more credit. But consider 2018 if you think they fixed all their polling issues then. DeSantis was what a 4-5 pt underdog in the polls and pulled it off? When you dive into those polls, they made the exact same mistakes.That’s all valid, 2016 exposed some flaws in the system. One question though, may pollsters have claimed to have made adjustments based on what the learned in ‘16. If the polls in general are correct this year will you trust them again?
*I ask you and others this because it’s the question I’m asking myself.
Not sure if you missed my last sentence or not but I’m not giving them any credit right now. Don’t trust the polls at the moment, hence why I’m asking myself (and others like you) if I can again.I'll give them more credit. But consider 2018 if you think they fixed all their polling issues then. DeSantis was what a 4-5 pt underdog in the polls and pulled it off? When you dive into those polls, they made the exact same mistakes.
If the polls are wrong again, are you still going to give them credit they know what they are doing?
Trying to be consistent is the thing we work hardest on. And the single biggest truth of this forum is that everyone thinks THEIR side is unfairly treated while the OTHER side gets away with everything. That's life. Same as Day 1.It's never a bad thing to be honest, that's to be applauded. As to your second sentence, moderation is not a synonym of censorship. No one is calling for you to stop moderating your forums. Consistency is all anyone asks for. Hopefully it's better going forward.
Just asking a question. What is your suggestion for more consistency?So odd that asking for equal treatment and consistency gets immediately bastardized into a call for a free for all by the side benefitting from the unequal moderation. Actually it's not odd at all, it's par for the course.
I do believe this as well.Yeah, I get it. One other point to make. I strongly believe that the reputable pollsters are trying to get it as right as they can. They might be making big mistakes but I don't think it's due to bias.
Gotcha. I think traditional polling is dead. The methods used historically don't seem to be the best models in today's society.Not sure if you missed my last sentence or not but I’m not giving them any credit right now. Don’t trust the polls at the moment, hence why I’m asking myself (and others like you) if I can again.
Agreed no doubt.Gotcha. I think traditional polling is dead. The methods used historically don't seem to be the best models in today's society.
I think they have to work on how they phrase questions and who they talk to vs random yes or nos over the phone.
Evolve or die right?
I would be interested to see how correct the polls were in 2018. Plus/Minus 3% of the time with a 95% confidence. This would mean that in 20 races, the polls would be correct if the final results were within 3% in 19 of the 20 races.I'll give them more credit. But consider 2018 if you think they fixed all their polling issues then. DeSantis was what a 4-5 pt underdog in the polls and pulled it off? When you dive into those polls, they made the exact same mistakes.
If the polls are wrong again, are you still going to give them credit they know what they are doing?
Do you think Biden is going to win Florida? The numbers I've heard don't look good for that.I would be interested to see how correct the polls were in 2018. Plus/Minus 3% of the time with a 95% confidence. This would mean that in 20 races, the polls would be correct if the final results were within 3% in 19 of the 20 races.
That one falls within the 3% and has actually gone back and forth. I would say Biden is a very small favorite in Florida. I wouldn't bet money on that one, but if someone forced me to make a decision I would just go with the odds.Do you think Biden is going to win Florida? The numbers I've heard don't look good for that.
From what I’ve seen early turnout, while strong and favoring Biden, isn’t favoring him as much as he’d need to carry the state. The odds “feel” very low for Biden imo. If (big IF) he does carry it though that’s bad news for Trump.That one falls within the 3% and has actually gone back and forth. I would say Biden is a very small favorite in Florida. I wouldn't bet money on that one, but if someone forced me to make a decision I would just go with the odds.Do you think Biden is going to win Florida? The numbers I've heard don't look good for that.
Is it true people get suspended for months for using certain emoji and disagreeing with each other and for saying Biden stutters? Ive seen way worse just the past couple days, in this thread alone against Trump. The posts that are over the top trolling seem to vanish, but the posters keep posting. I've never seen a forum quite like this one before.Trying to be consistent is the thing we work hardest on. And the single biggest truth of this forum is that everyone thinks THEIR side is unfairly treated while the OTHER side gets away with everything. That's life. Same as Day 1.
I don't expect the consistency to change from where it's been. But we'll keep trying. As we have forever.
And the single biggest truth of this forum is that everyone thinks THEIR side is unfairly treated while the OTHER side gets away with everything. That's life. Same as Day 1.Is it true people get suspended for months for using certain emoji and disagreeing with each other and for saying Biden stutters? Ive seen way worse just the past couple days, in this thread alone against Trump. The posts that are over the top trolling seem to vanish, but the posters keep posting. I've never seen a forum quite like this one before.
As a conservative, Twitter can do whatever it wants. Private company. You do you.So you guys are advocating for all these websites to 100% let anything go and let anybody say what they want? Seems like a weird stance if so.
If not, and you are saying there should be some sort of line, what do you think it should be? As an owner, Joe shouldn't be able to decide what that line is?
Totally understand. No worries.But nenermind. This forum and FF service doesnt seem to be for me.
How many voters have been influenced by these polls? Why would the pollsters change?I'll give them more credit. But consider 2018 if you think they fixed all their polling issues then. DeSantis was what a 4-5 pt underdog in the polls and pulled it off? When you dive into those polls, they made the exact same mistakes.
If the polls are wrong again, are you still going to give them credit they know what they are doing?
I found this place because of FF and the Shark Pool. Pretty sure that is how everyone found it. That was the draw, not people arguing and trolling about Biden, Trump abortions and basically hatin on each other. Maybe it is time to get back to your roots and the simple life again.Totally understand. No worries.
To be fair, they’re playing Prince.I don't know where to post this anymore.
https://twitter.com/RealJamesWoods/status/1322985448575131648?s=20
It's in the 80s pretty much all over the state here. That and the fact that there are bare trees in the background should give it away that it's not Tampa.Wait a minute. Is it that cold in Tampa?