I'm watching him but he's only got one catch so far.Logan Paulsen?
RG3 missed him by a yard on a bomb along on the sidelines.'CataclysmicThunder said:Logan Paulsen?
Wouldn't expect much, wasn't he a former O-lineman? Fred Davis is much more talented and he didn't do much.'CataclysmicThunder said:Logan Paulsen?
Worst. Name. For an OLer. Ever.Guy Whimper.**O-Line leagues only. Actually, I just wanted to type his name because it's funny.
Guy Whimper.**O-Line leagues only. Actually, I just wanted to type his name because it's funny.
He had a solid Week 1 and was silent until today. Not sure what to make of it.Mccluster. One week fluke?
Is he going to get a legit shot?Starks
Yep it has complete suckBasically nothing for the 8th week in a row.
If they don't pick up someone else, can't imagine they'll stick with Alex Green plodding at 2.4 ypc (his avg as starter) for 20+ carries/game.Probably looking atupside of 10-15 touches/game for Starks. However, there's always a shot that he handles most/all 1st/2nd down work.Is he going to get a legit shot?Starks
If you think Gabbert's turned the corner, you may be right.I simply don't want to risk consistently playing a WR whose QB has thrown for 186 or less in 5 of 7 starts this year. For a bye week fill-in, sure I'd look to Shorts.Considering Shorts has played five quarters as a starter with Gabbert at QB and has 16 targets for 10-177-1 in that time I'm surprised he's not at the top of this list.
He's going to have some uneven games, but I think when all is said and done he'll be 2012's WW pickup of the year.
Why?I think Isaiah Pead's role is about to jump significantly in St Louis.
If SJax is traded, it is the Pead and Richardson show. Richardson is not going to carry the load himself.Why?I think Isaiah Pead's role is about to jump significantly in St Louis.
Definitely looks like he's worth handcuffing to McGahee now. Reminds me of Gore/Hunter situation in SF...Hillman, assuming he doesn't lose one of these fumbles. Balls been very loose on several of his carries and he completely lost track of it on that big run.
Snagged him before kickoff today. Then that ******* Young decided to show up.Broyles
Wishful thinking. Green has looked this way for 3 weeks now and Starks has 5, 0 and 1 carries in those 3 weeks. Green ain't much but they like Starks even less.If they don't pick up someone else, can't imagine they'll stick with Alex Green plodding at 2.4 ypc (his avg as starter) for 20+ carries/game.Probably looking atupside of 10-15 touches/game for Starks. However, there's always a shot that he handles most/all 1st/2nd down work.Is he going to get a legit shot?Starks
They'd be better off with Ryan Grant running the ball than Alex Green. The guy is atrocious running the ball.
Plus Blackmon just flatout sucks. Saw a sequence at the end of the game where Jags are driving to win and Gabbert threw to Blackmon 4 straight plays to end it. 3 incompletes and 1 catch for 4 yards... 5 shy of the first down on 4th down. He looks so confused right now. Shorts seems to be in rhythm with Gabbert at least.Considering Shorts has played five quarters as a starter with Gabbert at QB and has 16 targets for 10-177-1 in that time I'm surprised he's not at the top of this list. He's going to have some uneven games, but I think when all is said and done he'll be 2012's WW pickup of the year.
Now that's digging deep. If DWill gets traded, and if JStew gets injured.Tolbert if Williams is traded? Just a JStew injury away (not a rare occurrence) to the backfield by himself.
Turner/Quizz would be a good comparison as well. But I agree, if Hillman doesn't hold onto the ball better, he won't see many, if ANY carries.Definitely looks like he's worth handcuffing to McGahee now. Reminds me of Gore/Hunter situation in SF...Hillman, assuming he doesn't lose one of these fumbles. Balls been very loose on several of his carries and he completely lost track of it on that big run.
But has Starks been fully healthy? I don't know the answer, maybe GB homers can chime in. Green has been pretty abysmal on the ground, but if Starks is fully healthy and they still show zero interest in giving him a chance, then that's pretty telling. If Starks has been held back because of his turf toe or whatever and is now getting healthy, he might get a chance.(??)Wishful thinking. Green has looked this way for 3 weeks now and Starks has 5, 0 and 1 carries in those 3 weeks. Green ain't much but they like Starks even less.If they don't pick up someone else, can't imagine they'll stick with Alex Green plodding at 2.4 ypc (his avg as starter) for 20+ carries/game.Probably looking atupside of 10-15 touches/game for Starks. However, there's always a shot that he handles most/all 1st/2nd down work.Is he going to get a legit shot?Starks
They'd be better off with Ryan Grant running the ball than Alex Green. The guy is atrocious running the ball.
Starks is not on any injury report and he didn't see the field week 7.But has Starks been fully healthy? I don't know the answer, maybe GB homers can chime in. Green has been pretty abysmal on the ground, but if Starks is fully healthy and they still show zero interest in giving him a chance, then that's pretty telling. If Starks has been held back because of his turf toe or whatever and is now getting healthy, he might get a chance.(??)Wishful thinking. Green has looked this way for 3 weeks now and Starks has 5, 0 and 1 carries in those 3 weeks. Green ain't much but they like Starks even less.If they don't pick up someone else, can't imagine they'll stick with Alex Green plodding at 2.4 ypc (his avg as starter) for 20+ carries/game.Probably looking atupside of 10-15 touches/game for Starks. However, there's always a shot that he handles most/all 1st/2nd down work.Is he going to get a legit shot?Starks
They'd be better off with Ryan Grant running the ball than Alex Green. The guy is atrocious running the ball.
That does not mean Starks has been healthy. I still believe that Starks may get a shot here. I just don't see Green gaining any tough yards and I think Green Bay would like to find a more physical option.'Insein said:Starks is not on any injury report and he didn't see the field week 7.'finito said:But has Starks been fully healthy? I don't know the answer, maybe GB homers can chime in. Green has been pretty abysmal on the ground, but if Starks is fully healthy and they still show zero interest in giving him a chance, then that's pretty telling. If Starks has been held back because of his turf toe or whatever and is now getting healthy, he might get a chance.(??)'Insein said:Wishful thinking. Green has looked this way for 3 weeks now and Starks has 5, 0 and 1 carries in those 3 weeks. Green ain't much but they like Starks even less.'Craig_MiamiFL said:If they don't pick up someone else, can't imagine they'll stick with Alex Green plodding at 2.4 ypc (his avg as starter) for 20+ carries/game.Probably looking atupside of 10-15 touches/game for Starks. However, there's always a shot that he handles most/all 1st/2nd down work.'finito said:Is he going to get a legit shot?'Craig_MiamiFL said:Starks
They'd be better off with Ryan Grant running the ball than Alex Green. The guy is atrocious running the ball.