scorchy
Footballguy
When on vacation, we usually leave my dog (Buck, a german shorthaired pointer) at a boarding place that doubles as a dog day care -- that way, he gets to be out during the day before being boarded at night. My wife and I really like the place, and the dog seems to as well (at least, he appeared to be having fun on the few occasions that my son has asked us to check in on him via the camera app offered by the place). On the second day away for spring break, we got a call from the owner that Buck had been bitten on the ear by another dog and they had taken him to our vet. Buck was OK, didn't need stitches, and the other dog had been booted because it was his second offense. Obviously, we were happy our dog was OK and also relieved that Buck wasn't the aggressor (especially since we were 6000 miles away and not sure what we would have done had he been kicked out). When we went to him up, the owner was super-apologetic, but still handed us a $120 vet bill on top of the $500 for boarding. I paid without saying anything because (a) I wasn't sure if this was typical practice, (b) we really like the place, and (c) it was only $120. Now, after talking to a few friends, they seem to think maybe I should have questioned this. For the record, this is more a question for my own curiosity than anything else -- I'm not annoyed at the place and still plan on taking my dog when we go away this summer. I do wonder whether I would feel the same way if Buck had needed stitches and the bill was closer to $300 - $400 instead.
Also, I'm looking for more of an "ethical" answer than legal one. My wife did take a look at the boarding agreement and two of the three options seem applicable. Thoughts?
Also, I'm looking for more of an "ethical" answer than legal one. My wife did take a look at the boarding agreement and two of the three options seem applicable. Thoughts?