Jump to content


Photo

Do the Rams need to trade up to 4 to get Blackmon?


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
41 replies to this topic

#1 Black

Black

    Footballguy

  • FBG Apps Beta Tester
  • Pip
  • 2,684 posts
  • Joined 26-August 07

Posted 12 March 2012 - 09:04 PM

Do the Rams need to trade up to 4 to get Blackmon? I wonder if they have to pay more now, since they likely slighted the Browns with their Redskins trade?



#2 duaneok66

duaneok66

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 8,778 posts
  • Joined 23-July 06

Posted 12 March 2012 - 09:09 PM

Minnesota needs an OL more than they need a WR, and besides Blackmon isn't worth the #4. Would make no sense to trade up.

#3 Gawain

Gawain

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 3,450 posts
  • Joined 17-July 11

Posted 12 March 2012 - 09:09 PM

They shouldn't. If Blackmon's gone, I see no problem taking Reiff. I'd probably prefer the OT over a WR who reminds me more of Crabtree than of Bryant.
2011 FBG Ultimate Survivor Champion

#4 jurb26

jurb26

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 29,982 posts
  • Joined 31-May 03

Posted 12 March 2012 - 09:13 PM

Trading up to the top 4 to take a player who isn't top 5 in the draft is a mistake. I don't know if they have too, but they shouldn't.

#5 Black

Black

    Footballguy

  • FBG Apps Beta Tester
  • Pip
  • 2,684 posts
  • Joined 26-August 07

Posted 12 March 2012 - 09:15 PM

Minnesota needs an OL more than they need a WR, and besides Blackmon isn't worth the #4. Would make no sense to trade up.

MIN picks at 3 and likely will take Kalil. Browns sit (spurned) at #4...and could use a WR. Or, they could pull a Chargers/Eli thing and make the Rams beg.

#6 jurb26

jurb26

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 29,982 posts
  • Joined 31-May 03

Posted 12 March 2012 - 09:18 PM

Minnesota needs an OL more than they need a WR, and besides Blackmon isn't worth the #4. Would make no sense to trade up.

MIN picks at 3 and likely will take Kalil. Browns sit (spurned) at #4...and could use a WR. Or, they could pull a Chargers/Eli thing and make the Rams beg.

Clev would be wise to take Claiborne. TB will then be the biggest looser.

#7 bicycle_seat_sniffer

bicycle_seat_sniffer

    Smells like chicken

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 28,050 posts
  • Joined 17-December 03

Posted 12 March 2012 - 09:22 PM

I think the Rams could take Micahel Floyd and not miss a thing at WR. Or snag Trent Richardson. No reason to move up for Blackmon, he isnt worth it

 

The world needs long snappers too.

 

 


#8 Tony Soprano

Tony Soprano

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 128 posts
  • Joined 01-May 11

Posted 12 March 2012 - 09:23 PM

I think STL will add a WR early in the draft, but I don't think it's the end of the world if they miss out on Blackmon.

#9 Blackjacks

Blackjacks

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 4,197 posts
  • Joined 31-March 04

Posted 12 March 2012 - 09:24 PM

I think if thd Rams trade up its to get Claiborne not Blackmon. However, I dont see the Rams trading up. I think they use all their picks on rookies they like. Heck, they might even move down again and again at the 33. The facts are we have tons of holes and we need to get young talented guys to fill those spots. We need skill at the offensive positions and skill in the backfield on defense. I wouldnt be mad if we got Blackmon @ 6 (didnt want him @ 2) but I would love if Claiborne fell to us. I hope Richardson goes to Bleveland or Tampa Bay.

BSFFL Dynasty League
2004 and 2009 Champions

QB Tom Brady and Ben Rothlisberger
RB  A. Morris, L. Miller, Todd Gurley, Bernard Pierce and Ray Rice

WR  Jordy Nelson, Mike Wallace, Andre Johnson and Torrey Smith
TE  C Fleener and Charles Clay
K Greg Zurlein and M Crosby
Def/ST Detroit and Houston


#10 duaneok66

duaneok66

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 8,778 posts
  • Joined 23-July 06

Posted 12 March 2012 - 09:30 PM

Minnesota needs an OL more than they need a WR, and besides Blackmon isn't worth the #4. Would make no sense to trade up.

MIN picks at 3 and likely will take Kalil. Browns sit (spurned) at #4...and could use a WR. Or, they could pull a Chargers/Eli thing and make the Rams beg.

I stand corrected - that's what i get for posting too quickly. Still, I don't think Blackmon is worth a top 5 pick.

#11 Multiple Scores

Multiple Scores

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 3,213 posts
  • Joined 15-March 09

Posted 12 March 2012 - 09:36 PM

Take whatever blue chip is left, Claiborne or Richardson.

#12 ExaltedOne

ExaltedOne

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 1,583 posts
  • Joined 11-May 05

Posted 12 March 2012 - 09:36 PM

I don't see it. I think the Rams are a candidate to trade down again, especially if Richardson is sitting there. I'd be calling the Bengals...

#13 duaneok66

duaneok66

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 8,778 posts
  • Joined 23-July 06

Posted 12 March 2012 - 09:37 PM

I don't see it. I think the Rams are a candidate to trade down again, especially if Richardson is sitting there. I'd be calling the Bengals...

excellent post.

#14 cstu

cstu

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 59,042 posts
  • Joined 20-August 04

Posted 13 March 2012 - 12:05 AM

The Rams would should sit back and take the best of whoever lands in their lap - Blackmon, Claiborne, Richardson or Reiff. Trading up is just silly when they have so many needs, not to mention a rather deep draft at WR.

All of us are African, some more recently than others.


"The saddest part about this, this is not a big issue in the scheme of things. But now, because the denials, it's becoming even bigger and bigger."


#15 Terpman22

Terpman22

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 1,170 posts
  • Joined 21-June 11

Posted 13 March 2012 - 01:36 AM

I'm on board with the idea of them trading down again also. Look for them to add another future 1st somehow....

#16 The Comedian

The Comedian

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 1,767 posts
  • Joined 05-September 09

Posted 13 March 2012 - 01:45 AM

So the Browns are going to feel so slighted that the Rams took the best deal to move down from #2 that they're going to take a player at #4 that they otherwise would not to get back at them? Oooookay.

#17 dgreen

dgreen

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 23,717 posts
  • Joined 14-April 03

Posted 13 March 2012 - 05:54 AM

Minnesota needs an OL more than they need a WR, and besides Blackmon isn't worth the #4. Would make no sense to trade up.

MIN picks at 3 and likely will take Kalil. Browns sit (spurned) at #4...and could use a WR. Or, they could pull a Chargers/Eli thing and make the Rams beg.

You're over-playing this Browns thing. The Browns will make the best move they can with no thought at all to the Rams.

#18 MAC_32

MAC_32

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 17,774 posts
  • Joined 29-January 08

Posted 13 March 2012 - 06:51 AM

If Tampa goes after V Jax in free agency they may end up being the goat, not the Rams. The Browns are looking at Blackmon, Claiborne, and a trade down. If the hand is played right they could make Tampa pay a similar price to what Butch foolishly paid for Winslow (a #2) to get Claiborne so the Browns can slide back and take Blackmon while also adding another top 50 pick. Then St Louis decides between Richardson, Reiff, and trading down.

#19 Sigmund Bloom

Sigmund Bloom

    Footballguy

  • Moderator
  • Pip
  • 16,183 posts
  • Joined 11-April 03

Posted 13 March 2012 - 06:52 AM

Rams if anything will look to trade down if the market for Tannehill gets hot. If they stay at 6, they're happy with whomever of Blackmon, Richardson, and Claiborne is still there.

#20 wadegarrett

wadegarrett

    FFA Legendô

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 17,923 posts
  • Joined 15-April 03

Posted 13 March 2012 - 07:00 AM

Minnesota needs an OL more than they need a WR, and besides Blackmon isn't worth the #4. Would make no sense to trade up.

MIN picks at 3 and likely will take Kalil. Browns sit (spurned) at #4...and could use a WR. Or, they could pull a Chargers/Eli thing and make the Rams beg.

You're over-playing this Browns thing. The Browns will make the best move they can with no thought at all to the Rams.

:goodposting: As of today, I think the Browns are looking to trade down. If they can't find anyone to move up they'll take Claiborne.

#21 Zimm

Zimm

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 2,223 posts
  • Joined 05-May 09

Posted 13 March 2012 - 07:34 AM

I don't think Blackmon will or should go in the top 5 picks....I don't think the Browns will even consider Blackmon at 4, and trading down is the best bet. But on the other hand the Rams also have been rumored to want to trade down as well and that makes sense because i really don't see Blackmon as a top 10 talent in this draft and i've said before in other topics that Blackmon is not the consensus top WR in this years draft and Floyd could easily be taken ahead of Blackmon.

Edited by Zimm, 13 March 2012 - 07:35 AM.


#22 B-Deep

B-Deep

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 32,437 posts
  • Joined 15-September 04

Posted 13 March 2012 - 07:52 AM

I cannot believe anyone thinks the rams would trade down with washington and then up with the browns ridiculous
FFA Ring of Fame
Member No.: 1506 - shining path

#23 Stephen Holloway

Stephen Holloway

    Footballguy

  • Staff
  • Pip
  • 1,352 posts
  • Joined 11-April 03

Posted 13 March 2012 - 07:59 AM

Rams if anything will look to trade down if the market for Tannehill gets hot. If they stay at 6, they're happy with whomever of Blackmon, Richardson, and Claiborne is still there.

Sig - Is the thought process here that with QBs likely going both #1 and #2 that Tannehill, by process of elimination is the next besdt QB in line so he is moving way up the draft board? Is this similar to 2011 when so many QBs were taken high and again owners are valuing the position that much more than others or is Tannehill really that good of a prospect? I guess that I am just not convinced of his skills.

WHY YOU should subscribe to be a Footballguys Insider Pro.

"This is the day the LORD made; I will rejoice and be glad in it.


#24 Zimm

Zimm

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 2,223 posts
  • Joined 05-May 09

Posted 13 March 2012 - 08:40 AM

I cannot believe anyone thinks the rams would trade down with washington and then up with the browns ridiculous

:goodposting:

#25 Casting Couch

Casting Couch

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 2,016 posts
  • Joined 05-August 09

Posted 13 March 2012 - 08:40 AM

I don't see it. I think the Rams are a candidate to trade down again, especially if Richardson is sitting there. I'd be calling the Bengals...

excellent post.

I agree with this. It would be very Belichick-esq.

#26 JohnnyU

JohnnyU

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 17,338 posts
  • Joined 14-April 03

Posted 13 March 2012 - 08:51 AM

I'd rather have Michael Floyd later in the draft.

Hopes that were high in the heat of September ... can wilt and die in the chill of November. November can be cold and grey, November can be surly with bitter rain upon the world and winter coming early.
- John Facenda



 


#27 Sigmund Bloom

Sigmund Bloom

    Footballguy

  • Moderator
  • Pip
  • 16,183 posts
  • Joined 11-April 03

Posted 15 March 2012 - 02:51 PM

Rams if anything will look to trade down if the market for Tannehill gets hot. If they stay at 6, they're happy with whomever of Blackmon, Richardson, and Claiborne is still there.

Sig - Is the thought process here that with QBs likely going both #1 and #2 that Tannehill, by process of elimination is the next besdt QB in line so he is moving way up the draft board? Is this similar to 2011 when so many QBs were taken high and again owners are valuing the position that much more than others or is Tannehill really that good of a prospect? I guess that I am just not convinced of his skills.

i think it is Stephen. race to get the #3 QB especially if Manning really is going to TEN/DEN, not one of the teams in the QB market in the draft. Tannehill has been called a top 10-15 pick for months now by many people in the know.

#28 Black

Black

    Footballguy

  • FBG Apps Beta Tester
  • Pip
  • 2,684 posts
  • Joined 26-August 07

Posted 14 April 2012 - 08:46 PM

I think the Browns will stick it to the Rams. Going to cost alot to get to 4 now.

#29 TheFanatic

TheFanatic

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 22,333 posts
  • Joined 15-April 03

Posted 14 April 2012 - 09:19 PM

I think the Browns will stick it to the Rams. Going to cost alot to get to 4 now.

That is if the Rams trade up for the 4. They aren't. Nothing ti see here.
No matter what time of year it is, I am a grillin fool...

Check out my grillin blog.

GrillinFools.com Face Book page

#30 fatness

fatness

    against the grain

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 24,907 posts
  • Joined 06-September 03

Posted 14 April 2012 - 10:39 PM

You're over-playing this Browns thing. The Browns will make the best move they can with no thought at all to the Rams.

After the Vikings pick at #3, Mike Holmgren will probably complain that the Browns offered more.

#31 Sudoku_in_the_Bathtub

Sudoku_in_the_Bathtub

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 2,371 posts
  • Joined 03-April 08

Posted 14 April 2012 - 11:10 PM

Browns have a lot more to be worried about than "sticking it to anyone". Rams aren't going after Browns pick. Useless fodder by Browns to get someone to trade up since they missed on RG3.

#32 hutchins929

hutchins929

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 3,221 posts
  • Joined 11-September 05

Posted 14 April 2012 - 11:33 PM

Honestly, I think it would be better to pick a different player in the first round and pick Kirk Cousins later. I like him better than Tannehill (LONG TERM)
But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.

#33 BigSteelThrill

BigSteelThrill

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 16,635 posts
  • Joined 29-June 06

Posted 15 April 2012 - 01:43 AM

Too many tremendous WR prospects to trade up for one, when you currently have a top 10 pick.

The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

 

~John Galbraith~

 

 

Danes (Denmark citizens) enjoy a high standard of living and the country ranks highly in numerous comparisons of national performance, including education, health care, protection of civil liberties, democratic governance, prosperity and human development. Denmark is frequently ranked as one of the happiest countries in the world in cross-national studies of happiness. The country ranks as having the world's highest social mobility, a high level of income equality, has one of the world's highest per capita incomes, and has one of the world's highest personal income tax rates.


#34 The Comedian

The Comedian

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 1,767 posts
  • Joined 05-September 09

Posted 15 April 2012 - 02:56 AM

Not sure why this thread is still around.

#35 TheWick

TheWick

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 3,408 posts
  • Joined 07-August 06

Posted 15 April 2012 - 06:03 AM

Take whatever blue chip is left, Claiborne or Richardson.

:goodposting:

#36 Sabertooth

Sabertooth

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 25,860 posts
  • Joined 06-May 03

Posted 15 April 2012 - 06:29 AM

Taking Blackmon at 4 would be foolish. He's more of a top 15 talent than a top 5.

Kiss the Rings.  All 13 of them.  


#37 Lott's Fingertip

Lott's Fingertip

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 2,025 posts
  • Joined 05-June 04

Posted 15 April 2012 - 08:00 PM

The Rams might be in a good spot for a trade down at #6. Minn goes Kalil, Cleveland goes Richardson, Tampa goes Claiborne... I think it is too early to go WR, but now would be a good spot to trade down with a team looking at Tannenhill. If Cleveland trades down with a team that takes Tannenhill, then the Rams get Richardson or Claiborne. :thumbup:
ALL running backs get injured. Those who have not gotten injured, just have not gotten injured YET. - Pro football reference
You cannot predict injuries, even though you think you can. - "Injury prone" and recency bias.

[quote]I suppose it's fine with me if you want to disagree with an entire branch of mathematics... that's your prerogative.[/quote] - SSOG

#38 Sinrman

Sinrman

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 8,705 posts
  • Joined 14-April 03

Posted 15 April 2012 - 08:15 PM

Unless someone moves up to #3, #4, or #5, I don't see anyone taking Blackmon before the Rams.... assuming they take him.

WSL1 2015

 

QB: D Carr, J Winston ®

RB: Forsett, A Abdullah ®, D Herron, K Davis, T Coleman ®

WR: J Nelson, R Cobb, R White, D Bowe, A Hurns, D Smith ®, R Greene ®

TE: J Witten, S Chandler

K: M Crosby, C Santos

DST: 49ers, Redskins


#39 Donsmith753

Donsmith753

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 3,627 posts
  • Joined 21-October 09

Posted 16 April 2012 - 04:01 AM

This won't happen either but Floyd at 6 is better than Blackmon at 4.

HA3 Champion


#40 Sabertooth

Sabertooth

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 25,860 posts
  • Joined 06-May 03

Posted 16 April 2012 - 05:34 AM

This won't happen either but Floyd at 6 is better than Blackmon at 4.

I don't think Floyd is better than Blackmon.

Kiss the Rings.  All 13 of them.  


#41 pantherclub

pantherclub

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 11,024 posts
  • Joined 01-June 04

Posted 16 April 2012 - 05:56 AM

It sounds like Floyd pushed himself into the top 10 from some stuff I saw over the weekend. Path to the draft and a few articles about him. Apparently the Panthers brought him in and loved what he did. This may be a smoke screen to get someone to trade up but who knows. I didnt watch enough ND games to get an opinion on Floyd but his pro day stuff looked pretty good. Top 10 though I just dont know.

#42 Donsmith753

Donsmith753

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 3,627 posts
  • Joined 21-October 09

Posted 16 April 2012 - 06:08 AM

This won't happen either but Floyd at 6 is better than Blackmon at 4.

I don't think Floyd is better than Blackmon.

That's not what I said though. Suppose I should have been more clear Floyd at 6 is better than (Blackmon + the cost of getting to 4)

Edited by Donsmith753, 16 April 2012 - 06:09 AM.

HA3 Champion