What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

Toyota Develops Improved Hydrogen Fuel-Cell Vehicle (1 Viewer)

cstu

Footballguy
Toyota Develops Improved Hydrogen Fuel-Cell VehicleJAPAN: June 9, 2008TOKYO - Toyota Motor Corp said on Friday it has developed an advanced fuel-cell vehicle that can run for 830 km (516 miles) on a single tank of hydrogen and in temperatures as low as 30 degrees Celsius below freezing (-22 F).The zero-emission FCHV-adv will be leased to government agencies, among other possible users, in Japan starting later this year, a spokeswoman said.The new version of the fuel-cell car, which runs on hydrogen and emits only water, increased fuel efficiency by 25 percent with an improved fuel cell unit and other changes to its brake system and elsewhere.Combined with a slightly bigger fuel tank and a doubling of the maximum storage pressure, the FCHV-adv extended the cruising range from the previous FCHV's 330 km (205 miles), Toyota said in a statement. It has a maximum speed of 155 km per hour (97 mph).Fuel-cell vehicles are widely considered the ultimate longer-term alternative to today's conventional cars as they run on an inexhaustible and cheaper source of fuel -- hydrogen -- have no harmful tail-pipe emissions, and do not compromise driving performance. The main hurdles for their proliferation are a lack of fuelling stations and the high cost of development.Toyota and domestic rival Honda Motor Co became the world's first two automakers to put a fuel-cell vehicle on the road in December 2002, and have since been in a tight race to prepare them for mass-commercialisation.Honda's latest FCX Clarity, a sporty-looking fuel-cell sedan, can run 620 km (385 miles) on a single fuelling as measured under Japan's fuel efficiency test method. It can go as fast as 160 km per hour (99 mph), uses a lithium-ion battery and can withstand temperatures from -30 to 95 degrees Celsius (-22F to 203F).Honda plans to begin leasing the car in the United States starting next month and in Japan later this year. It is targeting lease sales of about 200 FCX Clarity cars in the first three years in the two countries combined.Toyota's FCHV-adv, which uses a nickel-metal hydride battery, will be showcased as a test-ride vehicle at the Group of Eight rich nations' summit in Toyako, northern Japan, next month. It will also provide more than 70 hybrid cars and hydrogen-fuelled buses for use by shuttle participants. (Reporting by Chang-Ran Kim; Editing by Michael Watson)
 
Yeah, it runs for 516 miles and then explodes, just like the Hindenburg...

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yeah, it runs for 516 miles and then explodes, just like the Hindenburg...
Hydrogen Fact #2 - The Hindenburg disaster was not caused by hydrogen(Note: This is Hydrogen Fact #2 from “Twelve Hydrogen Facts” which is part of the Hydrogen Manhattan Project.)When the subject of hydrogen cars is brought up, the immediate response from some people is to bring up the Hindenburg disaster.The Hindenburg was a German zeppelin that burst into flames at the Lakehurst Naval Air Station in New Jersey on May 6, 1937. Since the Hindenburg was filled with hydrogen, the concern is that this event shows that hydrogen is not safe.However, Addison Bain is a retired NASA scientist that showed the disaster was due to the coating on the fabric skin of the Hindenburg. The coating used on the airship contained iron oxide and aluminum-impregnated cellulose acetate butyrate which are used in solid rocket fuel. A spark caused by static electricity ignited the outer skin which led to the destruction of the Hindenburg.Joseph Romm, the top hydrogen critic, has even sided with Addison Bain on this issue.Furthermore, here is an excerpt from the Rocky Mountain Institute (which was co-founded by Amory Lovins) website about safety concerns with hydrogen due to the Hindenburg, Challenger Space Shuttle, and the hydrogen bomb:“The Hindenburg MythMost hydrogen concerns stem from the Hindenburg disaster of 1937. The hydrogen gas that once filled the Hindenburg zeppelin did burn, but it did so quickly, upwardly, and away from the people below. When the airship was docking, an unexpected electrical discharge ignited the airship’s canvas (which was unknowingly treated with two major components of rocket fuel!). The clean hydrogen flames swirled above the occupants of the passenger compartment, and all those who rode the airship down to the ground survived. Thirty-five of the thirty-seven casualties perished from jumping to the ground, and most other injuries resulted from diesel burns.The Challenger Space Shuttle and the H-bombMany people incorrectly associate hydrogen fears with the vividly haunting images of the 1986 Challenger Space Shuttle explosion or the detonation of a hydrogen bomb. Experts agree that the Challenger catastrophe was not caused by hydrogen. And an H-bomb employs tritium, a fundamentally different form of hydrogen, to replicate the same process by which the sun generates energy. This occurs at astronomical temperatures and pressures where nuclear rather than chemical reactions take place.”
 
Ford and GM should really just put themselves out of their misery...they have been so behind for so long.

 
Ford and GM should really just put themselves out of their misery...they have been so behind for so long.
Agreed. It's not like they had exclusive rights to alternative type fuel for cars for 10 years and did absolutely nothing with it. :confused:
 
why aren't these cars being mass produced again?
I'm going to take a wild guess and say that there are no hydrogen fueling stations for mass consumers to fill up their cars.Do you want to ask why there are no hydrogen fueling stations?
 
I, for one, welcome our new Japanese overlords, and as a trusted citizen, I can be useful in rounding up other Americans to work in their underground hydrogen mines.

 
Ford and GM should really just put themselves out of their misery...they have been so behind for so long.
Agree completely. Luckily there are only about 6 people employeed by both companies so it won't have any kind of impact on the economy.
 
I, for one, welcome our new Japanese overlords, and as a trusted citizen, I can be useful in rounding up other Americans to work in their underground hydrogen mines.
I recall the Japanese already tried this move once and it didn't work out so well, maybe I'm wrong :(
 
why aren't these cars being mass produced again?
I'm going to take a wild guess and say that there are no hydrogen fueling stations for mass consumers to fill up their cars.Do you want to ask why there are no hydrogen fueling stations?
sounds like that's an easy money maker...leverage the space already available at gas stations...I would be investing in that if I were a Toyota or a Honda executive. I doubt this is the reason...my guess is that the new technology cited in this article was a necessary technology and/or costs were prohibitive, or still are prohibitive...regardless we need to find a way to make this affordable.
 
Yeah, it runs for 516 miles and then explodes, just like the Hindenburg...
That's what I always thought was the problem with hydrogen. Didn't BMW try something with hydrogen fuel cells awhile back and it didn't work out?I wonder if the federal safety and/or consumer reports have done any crash tests yet on this vehicle.

Edit to add:

Sorry....I was referring to the Honda FCX Clarity.

http://green.yahoo.com/news/ap/20080616/ap...apan_honda.html

Honda rolls out new zero-emission car

By TOMOKO A. HOSAKA, Associated Press Writer Posted Mon Jun 16, 2008 8:31am PDT

Canadian actress Laura Harris reacts during an interview by reporters about the new FCX Clarity at a Honda Motor Co. plant in Takanezawa, Tochigi prefecture (state) Monday, June 16, 2008. The Japanese automaker has begun commercial production of its new zero-emission, hydrogen fuel cell car, called the FCX Clarity. (AP Photo/Katsumi Kasahara)

TAKANEZAWA, Japan - Honda's new zero-emission, hydrogen fuel cell car rolled off a Japanese production line Monday and is headed to Southern California, where Hollywood is already abuzz over the latest splash in green motoring.

The FCX Clarity, which runs on hydrogen and electricity, emits only water and none of the noxious fumes believed to induce global warming. It is also two times more energy efficient than a gas-electric hybrid and three times that of a standard gasoline-powered car, the company says.

Japan's third biggest automaker expects to lease out a "few dozen" units this year and about 200 units within three years. In California, a three-year lease will run $600 a month, which includes maintenance and collision coverage.

Among the first customers are actress Jamie Lee Curtis and filmmaker husband Christopher Guest, actress Laura Harris, film producer Ron Yerxa, as well as businessmen Jon Spallino and Jim Salomon.

"It's so smooth," said Harris, who played villainness Marie Warner on the hit TV show "24" and was flown over by Honda for the ceremony. "It's like a future machine, but it's not."

The FCX Clarity is an improvement of its previous-generation fuel cell vehicle, the FCX, introduced in 2005.

A breakthrough in the design of the fuel cell stack, which is the unit that powers the car's motor, allowed engineers to lighten the body, expand the interior and increase efficiency, Honda said.

The fuel cell draws on energy synthesized through a chemical reaction between hydrogen gas and oxygen in the air, and a lithium-ion battery pack provides supplemental power. The FCX Clarity has a range of about 270-miles per tank with hydrogen consumption equivalent to 74 miles per gallon, according to the carmaker.

The 3,600-pound vehicle can reach speeds up to 100 miles per hour.

John Mendel, executive vice president of America Honda Motor Co., said at a morning ceremony it was "an especially significant day for American Honda as we plant firm footsteps toward the mainstreaming of fuel cell cars."

The biggest obstacles standing in the way of wider adoption of fuel cell vehicles are cost and the dearth of hydrogen fuel stations. For the Clarity's release in California, Honda said it received 50,000 applications through its website but could only consider those living near stations in Torrance, Santa Monica and Irvine.

Initially, however, the Clarity will go only to a chosen few starting July and then launch in Japan this fall.

California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has called for a statewide network of hydrogen stations, but progress has been slow.

The state has also recently relaxed a mandate for the number of zero-emission cars it aims to have on roads. By 2014, automakers must now sell 7,500 electric and hydrogen fuel cell vehicles, a reduction of 70 percent.

Spallino, who currently drives Honda's older FCX and was also flown in for the ceremony, said he will use the Clarity to drive to and from work and for destinations within the Los Angeles area. The small number of hydrogen fuel stations is the "single limiting factor" for fuel cell vehicles, he said.

"It's more comfortable, and it handles well," said Spallino of Redondo Beach. "It's got everything. You're not sacrificing anything except range."

The world's major automakers have been making heavy investments in fuel cells and other alternative fuel vehicles amid climbing oil prices and concerns about climate change.

Although Honda Motor Co. was the first Japanese automaker to launch a gas-electric hybrid vehicle in the U.S. in 1999, it has been outpaced by the dominance of Toyota's popular Prius.

Toyota announced in May that it has sold more than 1 million Prius hybrids, while both the Honda Insight and the hybrid Accord have been discontinued due to poor sales.

Honda also plans to launch a gas-electric hybrid-only model, as well as hybrid versions of the Civic, the sporty CR-Z and Fit subcompact.

Toyota has announced that it would launch a plug-in hybrid with next-generation lithium-ion batteries by 2010 and a hydrogen fuel cell vehicle later in Japan later this year.

U.S. carmaker General Motors Corp. plans to introduce a Chevrolet Volt plug-in electric vehicle in 2010. It also introduced a test-fleet of hydrogen fuel cell Equinox SUVs.

Honda has no plans for a plug-in electric vehicle. President Takeo ####ui said he does not believe current battery technology is good enough to develop a feasible car.

The company has not revealed how much each car costs to make, and it is unclear when, or if, the car will be available for mass-market sales. Takeo has set a target for 2018, but meeting that goal will depend on whether Honda can significantly lower development and assembly costs as well as market reaction to fuel cells.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yeah, it runs for 516 miles and then explodes, just like the Hindenburg...
That's what I always thought was the problem with hydrogen. Didn't BMW try something with hydrogen fuel cells awhile back and it didn't work out?I wonder if the federal safety and/or consumer reports have done any crash tests yet on this vehicle.
Hydrogen burns. So does gas. If a hydrogen tank bursts and catches on fire, since hydrogen is lighter than air, it'll shoot a very hot stream of fire straight up into the air. If a gas tank leaks and catches on fire, it'll flow around on the ground. Which is better?
 
How much is hydrogen a gallon?
It's sold by the kg and it's the equivalent in energy to a gallon of gas. Since hydrogen cars are more efficient (the FCX gets 68 miles per kg) they are cheaper to run even with a similar price between hydrogen and gas. The cost is between $4-$5, but the cost should go down quickly once it achieves economies of scale. I've read that $3/kg is possible using nuclear. The problem with it today is that it is produced using natural gas, not really a solution to our long-term energy problem.Also, the cost of hydrogen produced today from wind power (without any subsidies) would be less than the equivalent of gasoline at $3.50 per gallon (using traditional combustion engines).

 
Big article in the NY Post today.

200 are available this year

only available thru a $600/mo. lease

refilling the cars tank w/ hydrogen = $20 compared to $304 using regular gasoline

 
Big article in the NY Post today.200 are available this yearonly available thru a $600/mo. leaserefilling the cars tank w/ hydrogen = $20 compared to $304 using regular gasoline
Interesting...assuming the lease costs are accurate this is actually doable right now...we need to start mass producing these bad boys.If anyone finds the Post article, please provide link here.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Big article in the NY Post today.

200 are available this year

only available thru a $600/mo. lease

refilling the cars tank w/ hydrogen = $20 compared to $304 using regular gasoline
Interesting...assuming the lease costs are accurate this is actually doable right now...we need to start mass producing these bad boys.If anyone finds the Post article, please provide link here.
link
CLEAN, GREEN MACHINE

By CLEMENTE LISI

June 17, 2008 --

The eco-friendly car of the future is finally here.

As gas prices soar past $4 a gallon, Honda became the first carmaker ever yesterday to unveil a zero-emission car that runs solely on hydrogen.

The FCX Clarity, which rolled off the assembly line yesterday in Japan and will hit the streets next month, only emits water vapor from its exhaust pipe, with none of the fumes that cause global warming, company officials said.

Although drivers will not be able to buy the car, the FCX Clarity will be available through a three-year lease program that will cost $600 a month.

"This is an important day in the history of fuel-cell vehicle technology and a monumental step closer to the day when fuel-cell cars will be part of the mainstream," said John Mendel, executive vice president of American Honda.

The 3,600-pound car reaches a top speed of 100 mph, and can go for 270 miles before it needs to be filled with hydrogen.

The vehicle is powered with the help of a fuel-cell stack - which draws on energy synthesized through a chemical reaction between hydrogen gas and oxygen in the air - and also contains a lithium-ion battery pack that provides supplemental power.

Honda said it has received 50,000 applications through its Web site - but will only consider leasing the vehicle to those living near hydrogen stations in the California cities of Santa Monica, Irvine and Torrance under a limited test program, the carmaker said.

Honda said it plans to deliver about 200 FCX Clarity fuel-cell vehicles on lease in the US, Canada and Japan in the first three years of production.

Company officials said they hope to mass-produce the car within the next 10 years - but meeting that goal will depend on whether Honda can significantly lower production costs.

Another obstacle standing in the way of wider adoption of fuel-cell vehicles is the lack of hydrogen-fuel stations.

The Japanese carmaker has not revealed how much the vehicle - which features interior upholstery fabric made of fermented corn - costs to make.

Hollywood celebs are already clamoring for the cutting-edge rides.

Actress Jamie Lee Curtis and her filmmaker husband, Christopher Guest, actress Laura Harris, and movie producer Ron Yerxa are among the first people to order the new car.
 
Wonder why it takes 10 years to mass produce? If you can make 200 now, why couldn't you make 50,000 in in five years?

The American government needs to find a way to expedite this ASAP...it's a matter of national security and economic health.

What's the f'ing holdup here?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Wonder why it takes 10 years to mass produce? The American government needs to find a way to expedite this ASAP...it's a matter of national security and economic health.What's the f'ing holdup here?
The cynic in me says it's obvious. However, it's possible that the manufacturing plants will have to be updated/reconfigured etc. Then even with the cars produced, the stations will have to be upgraded/reconfigured as well.
 
Wonder why it takes 10 years to mass produce? The American government needs to find a way to expedite this ASAP...it's a matter of national security and economic health.What's the f'ing holdup here?
The cynic in me says it's obvious. However, it's possible that the manufacturing plants will have to be updated/reconfigured etc. Then even with the cars produced, the stations will have to be upgraded/reconfigured as well.
Companies won't do it without some governmental incentive and I don't blame them. The fault rests with the leadership of the country who were asleep at the wheel and building bridges to nowhere instead of protecting our national security. The sad thing is that the cost of updating plants and building filling pumps is a drop in the bucket to the $500B a year we are sending overseas. We're talking the cost of 2-3 months in Iraq to free us from oil once and for all.
 
Ford and GM should really just put themselves out of their misery...they have been so behind for so long.
Moron. Ford has had them for years for fleet sales. They are not publicly available because there is no H2 infrastructure (where are you going to fill up? No reason for your average gas station owner to invest in a H-delivery pump that would service 2 customers a week. Not to metion the public safety 'concerns' over refueling a 'bomb' in your car), and they have been cost prohibitive (wouldn't sell at $20k over an identical gas vehicle, though that price is coming down significantly)... Also, as far as Hydrogen saving us from our energy worries, where do you think that H2 comes from? In fact many
 
Wonder why it takes 10 years to mass produce? The American government needs to find a way to expedite this ASAP...it's a matter of national security and economic health.What's the f'ing holdup here?
The cynic in me says it's obvious. However, it's possible that the manufacturing plants will have to be updated/reconfigured etc. Then even with the cars produced, the stations will have to be upgraded/reconfigured as well.
Companies won't do it without some governmental incentive and I don't blame them. The fault rests with the leadership of the country who were asleep at the wheel and building bridges to nowhere instead of protecting our national security. The sad thing is that the cost of updating plants and building filling pumps is a drop in the bucket to the $500B a year we are sending overseas. We're talking the cost of 2-3 months in Iraq to free us from oil once and for all.
If true, wtf is going on here...time to get this ship moving....like yesterday.
 
Just playing devil's advocate:

1. It's been mentioned a little bit, but what are the sources of hydrogen and their environmental impact?

2. How bad for the environment are the batteries? Big batteries = lots of mining = bad sometimes. (most of the time)

3. Durability/longevity of the engines? Just wondering - maybe they are cleaner and thus last longer?

4. Distribution of hydrogen? Since it's new, we should consider new methods of distribution if they are more efficient.

Before we anoint these to be the cars of the future, we should consider the longterm impacts here.

 
It's so weird that Ford and GM aren't all over this. :confused:
GM already has their hydrogen celled test run cars on the road.
sounds like they are behind the 8 ball...again.
GM had the Chevy Equinox hydrogen celled vehicles on the road last year for testing. Speculation is that this can be in full production in about 6 years. As much grief as GM gets, and deserves, they are ahead of the game on this one. With 14 new models coming out in the next 18 months and a commitment to the hydrogen cells, it appears they have a long term plan that might actually work.
 
It's so weird that Ford and GM aren't all over this. :lmao:
GM already has their hydrogen celled test run cars on the road.
sounds like they are behind the 8 ball...again.
GM had the Chevy Equinox hydrogen celled vehicles on the road last year for testing. Speculation is that this can be in full production in about 6 years. As much grief as GM gets, and deserves, they are ahead of the game on this one. With 14 new models coming out in the next 18 months and a commitment to the hydrogen cells, it appears they have a long term plan that might actually work.
Good to hear, I'm obviously rooting for the American manufacturers, but wont feel sorry for them if they drop the ball here...it would probably be a death blow.Six years sounds better than 10...with a little government incentive we might be able to make this happen even quicker than that.Why aren't more people talking about this...this fixes so many problems so quickly it should be the ONLY thing people are talking about.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Just playing devil's advocate:1. It's been mentioned a little bit, but what are the sources of hydrogen and their environmental impact?2. How bad for the environment are the batteries? Big batteries = lots of mining = bad sometimes. (most of the time)3. Durability/longevity of the engines? Just wondering - maybe they are cleaner and thus last longer? 4. Distribution of hydrogen? Since it's new, we should consider new methods of distribution if they are more efficient. Before we anoint these to be the cars of the future, we should consider the longterm impacts here.
1. you need electricity to create the Hydrogen, so we would need more nuclear(ideally)...it would be a complete transformation of our energy processes.2. Why do batteries require mining? Lithium?3. Durability/longevity, :lmao:4. Haven't thought about distribution...a good idea to re-think the gas station model though...land costs money which jacks up prices.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It's so weird that Ford and GM aren't all over this. :lmao:
GM already has their hydrogen celled test run cars on the road.
sounds like they are behind the 8 ball...again.
GM had the Chevy Equinox hydrogen celled vehicles on the road last year for testing. Speculation is that this can be in full production in about 6 years. As much grief as GM gets, and deserves, they are ahead of the game on this one. With 14 new models coming out in the next 18 months and a commitment to the hydrogen cells, it appears they have a long term plan that might actually work.
Good to hear, I'm obviously rooting for the American manufacturers, but wont feel sorry for them if they drop the ball here...it would probably be a death blow.Six years sounds better than 10...with a little government incentive we might be able to make this happen even quicker than that.
The main obstacle will be setting up the infrastructure for the new fueling stations and getting the majority of people onboard. GM is opening a fueling station in L.A. (I believe) that should be functioning by late summer/early fall.
 
It's so weird that Ford and GM aren't all over this. :sarcasm:
GM already has their hydrogen celled test run cars on the road.
sounds like they are behind the 8 ball...again.
GM had the Chevy Equinox hydrogen celled vehicles on the road last year for testing. Speculation is that this can be in full production in about 6 years. As much grief as GM gets, and deserves, they are ahead of the game on this one. With 14 new models coming out in the next 18 months and a commitment to the hydrogen cells, it appears they have a long term plan that might actually work.
Good to hear, I'm obviously rooting for the American manufacturers, but wont feel sorry for them if they drop the ball here...it would probably be a death blow.Six years sounds better than 10...with a little government incentive we might be able to make this happen even quicker than that.
The main obstacle will be setting up the infrastructure for the new fueling stations and getting the majority of people onboard. GM is opening a fueling station in L.A. (I believe) that should be functioning by late summer/early fall.
Why can't we leverage existing gas stations? Is it a competition thing? Hydrogen less profitable than gasoline?
 
It's so weird that Ford and GM aren't all over this. :sarcasm:
GM already has their hydrogen celled test run cars on the road.
sounds like they are behind the 8 ball...again.
GM had the Chevy Equinox hydrogen celled vehicles on the road last year for testing. Speculation is that this can be in full production in about 6 years. As much grief as GM gets, and deserves, they are ahead of the game on this one. With 14 new models coming out in the next 18 months and a commitment to the hydrogen cells, it appears they have a long term plan that might actually work.
Good to hear, I'm obviously rooting for the American manufacturers, but wont feel sorry for them if they drop the ball here...it would probably be a death blow.Six years sounds better than 10...with a little government incentive we might be able to make this happen even quicker than that.
The main obstacle will be setting up the infrastructure for the new fueling stations and getting the majority of people onboard. GM is opening a fueling station in L.A. (I believe) that should be functioning by late summer/early fall.
would the fueling station be compatible with other manufacturers such as Honda etc. ?? Just curious.
 
It's so weird that Ford and GM aren't all over this. :sarcasm:
GM already has their hydrogen celled test run cars on the road.
sounds like they are behind the 8 ball...again.
GM had the Chevy Equinox hydrogen celled vehicles on the road last year for testing. Speculation is that this can be in full production in about 6 years. As much grief as GM gets, and deserves, they are ahead of the game on this one. With 14 new models coming out in the next 18 months and a commitment to the hydrogen cells, it appears they have a long term plan that might actually work.
Good to hear, I'm obviously rooting for the American manufacturers, but wont feel sorry for them if they drop the ball here...it would probably be a death blow.Six years sounds better than 10...with a little government incentive we might be able to make this happen even quicker than that.
The main obstacle will be setting up the infrastructure for the new fueling stations and getting the majority of people onboard. GM is opening a fueling station in L.A. (I believe) that should be functioning by late summer/early fall.
would the fueling station be compatible with other manufacturers such as Honda etc. ?? Just curious.
Yes, there's a standard design.http://www.hydrogencarsnow.com/hydrogen-fi...n-irvine-ca.htm

 
It's so weird that Ford and GM aren't all over this. :sarcasm:
GM already has their hydrogen celled test run cars on the road.
sounds like they are behind the 8 ball...again.
GM had the Chevy Equinox hydrogen celled vehicles on the road last year for testing. Speculation is that this can be in full production in about 6 years. As much grief as GM gets, and deserves, they are ahead of the game on this one. With 14 new models coming out in the next 18 months and a commitment to the hydrogen cells, it appears they have a long term plan that might actually work.
Good to hear, I'm obviously rooting for the American manufacturers, but wont feel sorry for them if they drop the ball here...it would probably be a death blow.Six years sounds better than 10...with a little government incentive we might be able to make this happen even quicker than that.
The main obstacle will be setting up the infrastructure for the new fueling stations and getting the majority of people onboard. GM is opening a fueling station in L.A. (I believe) that should be functioning by late summer/early fall.
Why can't we leverage existing gas stations? Is it a competition thing? Hydrogen less profitable than gasoline?
Who will want to give up a business that can soak the population as much as the gas companies do to take a chance on a new product that the public hasn't even really accepted yet? The gas companies won't cooperate knowing that the population will stick to something they know and is convenient, even if it's expensive.Here's an article from last week about GM's efforts.Link.

 
Many of the questions on why it takes so long or why something fails can be seen in the film: "Who Killed the Electric Car?" Look it up. It's pretty telling!

Sometimes things that make sense don't succeed for reasons beyond our control.

 
It's so weird that Ford and GM aren't all over this. :yes:
GM already has their hydrogen celled test run cars on the road.
sounds like they are behind the 8 ball...again.
GM had the Chevy Equinox hydrogen celled vehicles on the road last year for testing. Speculation is that this can be in full production in about 6 years. As much grief as GM gets, and deserves, they are ahead of the game on this one. With 14 new models coming out in the next 18 months and a commitment to the hydrogen cells, it appears they have a long term plan that might actually work.
Good to hear, I'm obviously rooting for the American manufacturers, but wont feel sorry for them if they drop the ball here...it would probably be a death blow.Six years sounds better than 10...with a little government incentive we might be able to make this happen even quicker than that.
The main obstacle will be setting up the infrastructure for the new fueling stations and getting the majority of people onboard. GM is opening a fueling station in L.A. (I believe) that should be functioning by late summer/early fall.
Why can't we leverage existing gas stations? Is it a competition thing? Hydrogen less profitable than gasoline?
Who will want to give up a business that can soak the population as much as the gas companies do to take a chance on a new product that the public hasn't even really accepted yet? The gas companies won't cooperate knowing that the population will stick to something they know and is convenient, even if it's expensive.Here's an article from last week about GM's efforts.Link.
Most gas stations are not owned by "big oil" and they don't make much on a gallon of gas. For them, it's mass distribution and mini-mart sales.
 
Just playing devil's advocate:1. It's been mentioned a little bit, but what are the sources of hydrogen and their environmental impact?2. How bad for the environment are the batteries? Big batteries = lots of mining = bad sometimes. (most of the time)3. Durability/longevity of the engines? Just wondering - maybe they are cleaner and thus last longer? 4. Distribution of hydrogen? Since it's new, we should consider new methods of distribution if they are more efficient. Before we anoint these to be the cars of the future, we should consider the longterm impacts here.
One other question. Isn't water vapor a greenhouse gas?
 
Just playing devil's advocate:

1. It's been mentioned a little bit, but what are the sources of hydrogen and their environmental impact?

2. How bad for the environment are the batteries? Big batteries = lots of mining = bad sometimes. (most of the time)

3. Durability/longevity of the engines? Just wondering - maybe they are cleaner and thus last longer?

4. Distribution of hydrogen? Since it's new, we should consider new methods of distribution if they are more efficient.

Before we anoint these to be the cars of the future, we should consider the longterm impacts here.
One other question. Isn't water vapor a greenhouse gas?
Yep, but it's over-whelmingly NOT man-made.http://www.geocraft.com/WVFossils/greenhouse_data.html

 
Many of the questions on why it takes so long or why something fails can be seen in the film: "Who Killed the Electric Car?" Look it up. It's pretty telling!Sometimes things that make sense don't succeed for reasons beyond our control.
This is what I was referring to by "my cynicism. I have heard rumblings for years that oil companies have bought up patent after patent and "put them on the shelf". I can't prove it in any fashion, but it wouldn't surprise me in the least.
 
http://www.livemint.com/Companies/VZUQEzpuR3ITX6Fgoal9EN/Hyundai-to-sell-hydrogenpowered-SUV-in-2014.html

Detroit: For years, the joke in the auto industry was that a mass-produced car that runs on hydrogen was always a decade away.
That will change next year when Hyundai starts selling a Tucson SUV powered by a hydrogen fuel cell. It will be the first mass-market vehicle of its type to be sold or leased in the US.
“These things are now ready for prime time,” John Krafcik, Hyundai’s North American CEO, said last week. His company plans to announce details of the new Tucson on Wednesday at the Los Angeles Auto Show.
Even as the industry focused on battery-powered and hybrid cars, automakers such as Hyundai, Honda and Toyota kept up research on fuel cells. Now they appear to have conquered obstacles such as high costs, safety concerns and a lack of filling stations. These vehicles could help the companies meet stricter future fuel-economy standards.
Automakers have been dabbling in hydrogen-powered cars since the 1960s. General Motors announced a test fleet of hydrogen-powered Chevy Equinoxes in the mid-2000s, and Honda leased about two-dozen FCX Clarity models for $600 per month starting in 2005.
President George W. Bush allocated $1.2 billion for hydrogen research and said in his 2003 State of the Union address: “The first car driven by a child born today could be powered by hydrogen and pollution free.” But the program was largely scrapped by the Obama administration, which focused more on battery-powered vehicles.
Hyundai now is making Bush’s forecast come true, beating other auto companies to the mass market with Tucsons that have electric motors powered by a stack of hydrogen fuel cells. Hyundai plans to start selling the vehicles in Southern California and eventually spread to other areas as filling stations are built.
Hyundai says it has overcome safety and storage issues with a rear-mounted tank that has passed numerous crash tests without incident. As for filling stations, the California Air Resources Board says there currently are nine open to the public in the state. Legislators recently allocated about $200 million per year for 100 more, to be built by 2023.
Also at the Los Angeles show, Honda Motor Co. is scheduled to show off a fuel-cell concept vehicle, which it says hints at the aerodynamic design of the next generation fuel-cell vehicle to be launched in 2015. Further details weren’t available.
Toyota Motor Corp. is scheduled to unveil its own concept fuel-cell vehicle at this week’s Tokyo Motor Show. That one also is likely for distribution in the mass market in 2015.
General Motors continues work on its fuel-cell vehicles.
The largest US automaker, which has spent a lot of time and resources on battery-powered cars such as the Chevrolet Volt, has no fuel-cell vehicles currently in its new product pipeline, spokesman Dan Flores said Monday. He said more work needs to be done on cost and infrastructure to make the cars viable.
Hyundai is expected to introduce prices and details of how its cars will be sold or leased at the Los Angeles show. Automakers usually offer leases when they put new technology on the market.
Hydrogen cars likely will help automakers meet new goals from eight key states to put more zero-emissions cars on the road. The states, including California and New York, pledged late last month to work together to put 3.3 million battery-powered cars, plug-in hybrids and other clean-burning vehicles on the roads in those states by 2025. That’s more than 15 times as many zero-emission vehicles projected to be in use in the entire US by 2015.
The other states in the pact are Massachusetts, Maryland, Oregon, Connecticut, Rhode Island and Vermont. The eight states together represent about 23% of the US auto market.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Top