What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

Finland... A model of how to do it right? (1 Viewer)

So you didn't post this in the FFA to create general discussion, you posted it with the specific intent of generating political discussion and are now upset that people aren't talking politics?

Seems like you posted it in the wrong forum then. Maybe delete and try again in the politics forum.
Once I saw the thread title, I expected it to go that way.  The fact that it didn’t at least shows nuance isn’t dead.

 
No, but it can fund programs that make people happy such as not dying from preventable diseases and having maternity/paternity leave and state funded daycare for small children etc. 
Maybe the US has a higher GDP because people work too much, and that working less not only makes people happier it requires fewer programs to make people happy.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Maybe the US has a higher GDP because people work too much, and that working less not only makes people happier it requires fewer programs to make people happy.
I will accept American's working 30.5 hours per week to have parity with Finland, while also having the same social programs that Finland has. 

 
I am confused, are we not in agreement? I don't need the numbers when I am agreeing with you!
The typical work hours per week in Finland is around 40 hours. They work less because they take more vacation/holidays, not because they work less each week. 

From: https://businessculture.org/northern-europe/finland/work-life-balance-2/

Around 10% work a short week (less than 34 hours), and about 50% work a normal working week (35-40 hours). However, about one third of this category works 41 to 49 hours per week; and one sixth works over 50 hours per week.

 
Do you think running General Motors is harder than running the laundry mat in the strip mall down the street?

It’s not that hard.
That is a terrible comparison.   General Motors needed socialism to survive not the laundry mat.

 
Greed drives the American people and benefits the elite.  If you have a boogieman like immigrants to blame then you don't have to blame the greedy 1%.  

That is why the keep resources for the poor heavily regulated and limited.  It causes friction between poor people who now can blame each other for using those resources instead of asking the simple question of why isn't our government providing us the services that other countries are provided theirs.  

With middle class of the US wages not increasing the last 40 years, it pretty easy to figure out where all that money goes in the richest country in the world.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Perhaps I am wrong in my thought process and I am interested to hear from Europeans and people who live in Europe, especially Northern Europe.  It seems like Western and Northern  Europeans demand and get, if only because it is an inbred feature of their culture, fairly efficient government.   The American tradition seems to have lots more inefficiencies and outright graft that makes some of us leery of giving the government more $ to, let's say, use. 

 
Finland is awesome.  That's why more people emigrate to Finland than any other country in the world.  To live the Finnish Dream.
Love the Nordic countries, but, aren't the winters brutal?  I kind of picture it like Game of Thrones north of the wall.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Perhaps I am wrong in my thought process and I am interested to hear from Europeans and people who live in Europe, especially Northern Europe.  It seems like Western and Northern  Europeans demand and get, if only because it is an inbred feature of their culture, fairly efficient government.   The American tradition seems to have lots more inefficiencies and outright graft that makes some of us leery of giving the government more $ to, let's say, use. 
I post at another board with a much higher number of European participants and it is an educating experience to listen to them. They expect the government to work for their well-being and their representatives are elected with that in mind. They're happy to pay high taxes by our standards because they get so much more in return for them.

But we have billion dollar planes and carriers and they don't, so there's that.

@msommer

 
I post at another board with a much higher number of European participants and it is an educating experience to listen to them. They expect the government to work for their well-being and their representatives are elected with that in mind. They're happy to pay high taxes by our standards because they get so much more in return for them.

But we have billion dollar planes and carriers and they don't, so there's that.

@msommer
I don't think our military is the only source of waste and inefficiencies.  There are to many dumb rules, political appointments,  and acceptance of debt across the board. 

 
I post at another board with a much higher number of European participants and it is an educating experience to listen to them. They expect the government to work for their well-being and their representatives are elected with that in mind. They're happy to pay high taxes by our standards because they get so much more in return for them.

But we have billion dollar planes and carriers and they don't, so there's that.

@msommer
I think the best description is that trust in the system enables the rest. Not sure which is cause and effect though.

100 years ago the Nordic countries were agrucultural backwaters. Our democracies were young but there was a sense of common cause, particularly when social democrats started being represented in the legislature and ultimately governing. The post war years brought prosperity and urbanization so betting on education came naturally and with the exception of Norway (oil) all are pretty much service economies now.

Up into the seventies social cohesion was absurdly high, this is when the first immigrants started coming - for work, and we all took in a bunch of refugees.

So for about a hundred years the aim has been to have a healthy population free of poverty and exploitation, which was largely attained (with the possible exception of true equality of the sexes) in the sixties/seventies. 

So the system (mostly) works and thus is trusted. Can it be replicated? IMHO not on a short timescale.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top