Juxtatarot
Footballguy
I don’t care if a politician makes a mistake (or if his people do). I just care if they don’t correct it.
Especially if they do so within a few hours.I don’t care if a politician makes a mistake (or if his people do). I just care if they don’t correct it.
Really good article...this stood out
Also this on policy...“This idea that we just sort people into baskets of good and evil ignores the central fact of human existence, which is that each of us is a basket of good and evil,” he says. “The job of politics is to summon the good and beat back the evil.”
“Every good policy that I’ve developed in my administration happened not because I cooked it up on the campaign, kept the promise intact and then delivered it,” he says, “but because I stated a priority in one of my campaigns, interacted with my legislative body and my community, and developed something that really served people well.”
I know that's not exactly what he's saying but undecided voters hear: "Don't worry that I'm not saying what I'm going to do. Just trust me to do good things once I'm elected".“Every good policy that I’ve developed in my administration happened not because I cooked it up on the campaign, kept the promise intact and then delivered it,” he says, “but because I stated a priority in one of my campaigns, interacted with my legislative body and my community, and developed something that really served people well.”
Talk about leaving it right out over the plate.I know that's not exactly what he's saying but undecided voters hear: "Don't worry that I'm not saying what I'm going to do. Just trust me to do good things once I'm in".
If he does this on every issue and fails to give an opinion on where he stands over and over, then I agree with you. But it's refreshing to hear a guy say he doesn't have all the answers and proclaim going in that he will be working with others to figure out what's best for the country. Like I said a week or so ago, Buttigieg is a mayor, not a senator or congressman. He hasn't played any role in many of the issues he's being asked about and rather than have some campaign strategist tell him where he should stand, he's being honest when he still needs time to look further into an issue. I think it's one of the reasons he continues to rise in the polls. People hear him talk and he's trustworthy. Not some calculated politician reading from a script.I know that's not exactly what he's saying but undecided voters hear: "Don't worry that I'm not saying what I'm going to do. Just trust me to do good things once I'm in".
That's a good point. It can be seen as a sign of strength to say "I don't know" or to apologize. But it can't be for everything.If he does this on every issue and fails to give an opinion on where he stands over and over, then I agree with you. But it's refreshing to hear a guy say he doesn't have all the answers and proclaim going in that he will be working with others to figure out what's best for the country. Like I said a week or so ago, Buttigieg is a mayor, not a senator or congressman. He hasn't played any role in many of the issues he's being asked about and rather than have some campaign strategist tell him where he should stand, he's being honest when he still needs time to look further into an issue. I think it's one of the reasons he continues to rise in the polls. People hear him talk and he's trustworthy. Not some calculated politician reading from a script.
To be fair, it worked out as winning the election.
I’d take this over someone claiming to know more than the experts do. How is that working out?
I agree.When do primary debates happen? I get the desire for policy talk, I’d like that too, but it seems the slow play here is the correct move. He’s effectively new on the national stage, use the introduction phase simply to connect and make the public comfortable with you; build your persona with everyone. Once that’s accomplished, then start rolling out the more concrete stances and desired methods of legislatively accomplishing them.
Just inviting everyone in to see if and how we can get along is all you need to know from a candidate?His first act has been to invite the dispossessed - from Trump voters to folks who need trigger warnings - into the tent to see if and how we can get along, and that is a POLICY more revolutionary and necessary than anything since Morning in America. I already know who da Bootyjudge is because of that and dont need to know more to support him in this ridiculous time.
For now, yes. That's a pretty remarkable step, especially when all the other parvenus - most of whom have already established themselves as part of the problem - are huckstering.Just inviting everyone in to see if and how we can get along is all you need to know from a candidate?
Interesting. Thanks.For now, yes. That's a pretty remarkable step, especially when all the other parvenus - most of whom have already established themselves as part of the problem - are huckstering.
I’ve said for years on this board I will vote for any candidate whom I believe is intelligent, honest, open-minded, and genuinely wants to help people.I know that's not exactly what he's saying but undecided voters hear: "Don't worry that I'm not saying what I'm going to do. Just trust me to do good things once I'm elected".
Looks like you killed the thread, Henry.I’ve said for years on this board I will vote for any candidate whom I believe is intelligent, honest, open-minded, and genuinely wants to help people.
I see no reason to change that policy now.
Interesting. Why do you say that’s the other end of the spectrum?On the other end of the spectrum from the Sharpton visit, Buttigieg dropped in on Jimmy Carter's Sunday School class today. https://www.businessinsider.com/pete-buttigieg-husband-chasten-attend-jimmy-carters-sunday-school-2019-5
Sharpton and Carter aren't in the same ball park in my opinion.Interesting. Why do you say that’s the other end of the spectrum?
Its as simple as black and white.Interesting. Why do you say that’s the other end of the spectrum?
I didn't describe Sharpton.Its as simple as black and white.
(I don't want to answer for Joe - but I suspect it is in how he described Sharpton - which was that Sharpton is not a good guy - and Joe views Carter as the epitome of a good guy)
For Carter, I think a lot of him. I've admired how he's carried himself after his presidency.Mr. Sharpton also has a history of anti-Semitic agitation. In August 1991 an Orthodox Jewish driver ran a red light and swerved into Gavin Cato, an 8-year-old black child, in the Brooklyn neighborhood of Crown Heights. The following night a mob set upon 29-year-old Yankel Rosenbaum—an Australian student who had nothing to do with the accident—and stabbed him to death. At Gavin’s funeral, Mr. Sharpton caricatured Jews as “diamond dealers” and, according to a report in Newsday, “seemed to scoff . . . at labeling Gavin’s death an accident.” At a rally around the same time, he was quoted as saying: “If the Jews want to get it on, tell them to pin their yarmulkes back and come over to my house.”
In the summer of 1995 Mr. Sharpton’s National Action Network held daily protests against Freddy’s Fashion Mart, a Jewish-owned Harlem retailer that had a rent dispute with a black-owned subtenant. Protesters screamed about “bloodsucking Jews” and “Jew bastards,” and Mr. Sharpton himself vowed: “We will not stand by and allow them to move this brother so that some white interloper can expand his business on 125th Street.” In December Roland Smith, 51, who’d participated in the protests, returned to Freddy’s, brandished a gun, and burned the place down. Smith killed seven people and himself in the attack.
I don’t like Sharpton, but he’s a Democrat and a Baptist minister and now this is a Democrat at a Sunday School. Just trying to figure out what you meant.Sharpton and Carter aren't in the same ball park in my opinion.
Wow, I don't think you have to look very hard to see the difference between Sharpton and CarterI don’t like Sharpton, but he’s a Democrat and a Baptist minister and now this is a Democrat at a Sunday School. Just trying to figure out what you meant.
I do see the difference. I was confused about what “spectrum” we were talking about.Wow, I don't think you have to look very hard to see the difference between Sharpton and Carter
Late June.How long do we have to wait before seeing him in a debate?
That was Josh Lyman’s strategy with Matt Santos, and it workedWhen do primary debates happen? I get the desire for policy talk, I’d like that too, but it seems the slow play here is the correct move. He’s effectively new on the national stage, use the introduction phase simply to connect and make the public comfortable with you; build your persona with everyone. Once that’s accomplished, then start rolling out the more concrete stances and desired methods of legislatively accomplishing them.
Meanwhile our president can't get anything done because the mean reporter was mean to him.Im impressed how he can be mayor, run for President, and coach the Celtics all at once.
That might be impressive if the Celtics had not folded like a cheap lawn chair.Im impressed how he can be mayor, run for President, and coach the Celtics all at once.
They just got beat down by a better team.That might be impressive if the Celtics had not folded like a cheap lawn chair.
I see a bit in my Twitter feed and he is still my favorite. But, yeah, not making a lot of newsBiden was pretty crafty to wait until everyone else of any note had jumped in. He got the last, best word and no one else is drawing attention away with their own announcement. This is the first thing that I've seen on Pete B in a couple weeks.
The Jacob Wohl stuff was pretty funny, but Buttigieg himself didn’t have much to do with it.I see a bit in my Twitter feed and he is still my favorite. But, yeah, not making a lot of news
He actually called that this was about to happen when he was on the Daily Show recently. I think the question is whether he can pick it back up in June. Which is when or just before he should start policy rollout IMOI see a bit in my Twitter feed and he is still my favorite. But, yeah, not making a lot of news
It was a good line. He’s really good at the personality fluff, can’t take that away from him.Not really a fan but I have to give him points for his response to Trump calling him Aldred E Nuemann. "I had to goggle it".
As i said in one of my initial post on da Bootyjudge, i'm sure he wouldn't enter the fray without an entire flow chart on countering Trumpshtick. Gay nerds know how to deal w bullies. Don't oppose, make them appear insubstantial. "Why would that even bother me?" is a beaut. He's saving "What, me worry?!" for later.It was a good line. He’s really good at the personality fluff, can’t take that away from him.
But it’s weird that he would make it a generational thing. I’m younger than Pete and I know MAD magazine. Most of us probably remember the late night show on Fox. I did the little foldout puzzles on the back.
To me it’s like saying he had to google what was cool about the 90’s.
I know people Pete’s age who do know MAD and I know those who don’t.It was a good line. He’s really good at the personality fluff, can’t take that away from him.
But it’s weird that he would make it a generational thing. I’m younger than Pete and I know MAD magazine. Most of us probably remember the late night show on Fox. I did the little foldout puzzles on the back.
To me it’s like saying he had to google what was cool about the 90’s.
Henry Ford said:
Also, MAD magazine was cool in the 90s?
I don’t even think then. My half sister is that generation, and I’m pretty sure she would have no idea at all who Alfred E. Newman is. And she was the ultra-popular “it” girl in middle/high school.If you were 13, maybe.
Well I guess it’s been around for a long time. Apparently they’re bringing it back. I didn’t know it had been discontinued.I know people Pete’s age who do know MAD and I know those who don’t.
I didn’t even realize it was still being published.
Yeah - I would have put its "cool" factor in the late 70's maybe early 80'sAlso, MAD magazine was cool in the 90s?