nirad3
Footballguy
Currently vying for a playoff spot so every win is crucial.
I am fairly deep at WR, and can afford to lose one. The other owner is after either DK Metcalf (taxi squad) or Courtland Sutton (6 years).
I have Kelce and Rudolph at TE and both are on bye Week 12. I can start 2 TEs if need be, and usually can since I'm pretty thin at RB.
Other owner is offering Mark Andrews (3 years) or Evan Engram (4). I prefer Engram long-term but he's iffy for Week 12, so I've turned my focus to Andrews.
How balanced would Andrews - considering the 3-year deal - be for one of those WRs? I'm thinking I'd need a little sweetener since, by my accounts, all 4 players are fairly equal.
It's 0.75-ppr for WRs and 1-ppr for TE, if that makes a difference. I'm not sure it makes a huge difference.
Right now, Engram is the #114th-ranked player in per-game average. Andrews is #89. Suttton is #87. Metcalf is #190.
Thoughts?
I am fairly deep at WR, and can afford to lose one. The other owner is after either DK Metcalf (taxi squad) or Courtland Sutton (6 years).
I have Kelce and Rudolph at TE and both are on bye Week 12. I can start 2 TEs if need be, and usually can since I'm pretty thin at RB.
Other owner is offering Mark Andrews (3 years) or Evan Engram (4). I prefer Engram long-term but he's iffy for Week 12, so I've turned my focus to Andrews.
How balanced would Andrews - considering the 3-year deal - be for one of those WRs? I'm thinking I'd need a little sweetener since, by my accounts, all 4 players are fairly equal.
It's 0.75-ppr for WRs and 1-ppr for TE, if that makes a difference. I'm not sure it makes a huge difference.
Right now, Engram is the #114th-ranked player in per-game average. Andrews is #89. Suttton is #87. Metcalf is #190.
Thoughts?