What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

Former staffer accuses Joe Biden of sexual assault (1 Viewer)

If I am responsible for her witnesses not talking to a reporter and thereby bringing doubt on Tara’s story, I feel terrible about it.
On this, the author has more:

Feminist writer Katha Pollitt also said it was “not a good sign” that the brother and friend “aren’t responding to reporters’ queries.” But the truth is they didn’t respond to Marcotte’s queries. They have spoken to multiple other reporters. Back before the story came out, I actually warned Tara myself during our conversation that it didn’t sound from Marcotte’s inquiries that she was interested in being fair and recommended being cautious about her. I think that concern was vindicated. Marcotte used the fact that she couldn’t get a comment from Tara’s brother and friend as one of the “red flags” that justified the media’s silence on Tara’s accusation.
I think it's a perfectly fair point that just because someone does not speak to a reporter that doesn't mean they are dissembling or anything like that. However it's a little strange for a reporter who knows the subject, apparently influences the subject and the people they know, tells these people that dealing with another given reporter with be self-damaging, and then comes back and writes a post-mortum about how golly look at the unfair collateral damage stemming from not talking to the reporter.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The NYT has addressed it. - Posting it here for anyone who doesn't have access.

Reade spoke with the NYT. Apparently they started investigating including interviews with her since March 25th, when the podcast came out.

Her brother did not to speak to the Times. IIRC he hasn't spoken to anyone but Grim. However a friend of Reade's did, saying she told them of the claim in 1993. Another friend says Reade told her in 2008 of "inappropriate touching" which sounds more like her prior claim and the claims of the other women.

Reade also told the NYT that she never told Biden's top aides about the alleged assault.

It also adds to the contradiction because besides Time, besides the NC Union (twice), apparently Reade was also in communication with Lucy Flores and Reade also did not share this aspect of the story with her.

Examining Tara Reade’s Sexual Assault Allegation Against Joe Biden

Ms. Reade, a former Senate aide, has accused Mr. Biden of assaulting her in 1993 and says she told others about it. A Biden spokeswoman said the allegation is false, and former Senate office staff members do not recall such an incident.

WASHINGTON — A former Senate aide who last year accused Joseph R. Biden Jr. of inappropriate touching has made an allegation of sexual assault against the former vice president, the Democratic Party’s presumptive presidential nominee this fall.

The former aide, Tara Reade, who briefly worked as a staff assistant in Mr. Biden’s Senate office, told The New York Times that in 1993, Mr. Biden pinned her to a wall in a Senate building, reached under her clothing and penetrated her with his fingers. A friend said that Ms. Reade told her the details of the allegation at the time. Another friend and a brother of Ms. Reade’s said she told them over the years about a traumatic sexual incident involving Mr. Biden.

A spokeswoman for Mr. Biden said the allegation was false. In interviews, several people who worked in the Senate office with Ms. Reade said they did not recall any talk of such an incident or similar behavior by Mr. Biden toward her or any women. Two office interns who worked directly with Ms. Reade said they were unaware of the allegation or any treatment that troubled her.

Last year, Ms. Reade and seven other women came forward to accuse Mr. Biden of kissing, hugging or touching them in ways that made them feel uncomfortable. Ms. Reade told The Times then that Mr. Biden had publicly stroked her neck, wrapped his fingers in her hair and touched her in ways that made her uncomfortable.

Soon after Ms. Reade made the new allegation, in a podcast interview released on March 25, The Times began reporting on her account and seeking corroboration through interviews, documents and other sources. The Times interviewed Ms. Reade on multiple days over hours, as well as those she told about Mr. Biden’s behavior and other friends. The Times has also interviewed lawyers who spoke to Ms. Reade about her allegation; nearly two dozen people who worked with Mr. Biden during the early 1990s, including many who worked with Ms. Reade; and the other seven women who criticized Mr. Biden last year, to discuss their experiences with him.

No other allegation about sexual assault surfaced in the course of reporting, nor did any former Biden staff members corroborate any details of Ms. Reade’s allegation. The Times found no pattern of sexual misconduct by Mr. Biden.

On Thursday, Ms. Reade filed a report with the Washington, D.C., police, saying she was the victim of a sexual assault in 1993; the public incident report, provided to The Times by Ms. Reade, does not mention Mr. Biden by name, but she said the complaint was about him. Ms. Reade said she filed the report to give herself an additional degree of safety from potential threats. Filing a false police report may be punishable by a fine and imprisonment.

Ms. Reade, who worked as a staff assistant helping manage the office interns, said she also filed a complaint with the Senate in 1993 about Mr. Biden; she said she did not have a copy of it, and such paperwork has not been located. The Biden campaign said it did not have a complaint. The Times reviewed an official copy of her employment history from the Senate that she provided showing she was hired in December 1992 and paid by Mr. Biden’s office until August 1993.

The seven other women who had complained about Mr. Biden told the Times this month that they did not have any new information about their experiences to add, but several said they believed Ms. Reade’s account.

Last year, Mr. Biden, 77, acknowledged the women’s complaints about his conduct, saying his intentions were benign and promising to be “more mindful and respectful of people’s personal space.”

In response to Ms. Reade’s allegation, Kate Bedingfield, a deputy Biden campaign manager, said in a statement: “Vice President Biden has dedicated his public life to changing the culture and the laws around violence against women. He authored and fought for the passage and reauthorization of the landmark Violence Against Women Act. He firmly believes that women have a right to be heard — and heard respectfully. Such claims should also be diligently reviewed by an independent press. What is clear about this claim: It is untrue. This absolutely did not happen.”

Ms. Reade made her new allegation public as Mr. Biden was closing in on the Democratic presidential nomination after winning a string of primaries against his chief rival, Senator Bernie Sanders. Ms. Reade, who describes herself as a “third-generation Democrat,” said she originally favored Marianne Williamson and Senator Elizabeth Warren in the race but voted for Mr. Sanders in the California primary last month. She said her decision to come forward had nothing to do with politics or helping Mr. Sanders, and said neither his campaign nor the Trump campaign had encouraged her to make her allegation.

President Trump has been accused of sexual assault and misconduct by more than a dozen women, who have described a pattern of behavior that went far beyond the accusations against Mr. Biden. The president also directed illegal payments, including $130,000 to a pornographic film actress, Stormy Daniels, before the 2016 election to silence women about alleged affairs with Mr. Trump, according to federal prosecutors.

Mr. Trump has even boasted about his mistreatment of women; in a 2005 recording, he described pushing himself on women and said he would “grab them by the #####,” bragging that he could get away with “anything” because of his celebrity.

Even so, Mr. Trump has at times attacked opponents over their treatment of women. The president has not mentioned Ms. Reade’s allegation, which has circulated on social media and in liberal and conservative news outlets.

Ms. Reade’s account

Ms. Reade, 56, told The Times that the assault happened in the spring of 1993. She said she had tracked down Mr. Biden to deliver an athletic bag when he pushed her against a cold wall, started kissing her neck and hair and propositioned her. He slid his hand up her cream-colored blouse, she said, and used his knee to part her bare legs before reaching under her skirt.

“It happened at once. He’s talking to me and his hands are everywhere and everything is happening very quickly,” she recalled. “He was kissing me and he said, very low, ‘Do you want to go somewhere else?’”

Ms. Reade said she pulled away and Mr. Biden stopped.

“He looked at me kind of almost puzzled or shocked,” she said. “He said, ‘Come on, man, I heard you liked me.’”

At the time, Ms. Reade said she worried whether she had done something wrong to encourage his advances.

“He pointed his finger at me and he just goes: ‘You’re nothing to me. Nothing,’” she said. “Then, he took my shoulders and said, ‘You’re OK, you’re fine.’”

Mr. Biden walked down the hallway, Ms. Reade said, and she cleaned up in a restroom, made her way home and, sobbing, called her mother, who encouraged her to immediately file a police report.

Instead, Ms. Reade said, she complained to Marianne Baker, Mr. Biden’s executive assistant, as well as to two top aides, Dennis Toner and Ted Kaufman, about harassment by Mr. Biden — not mentioning the alleged assault.

The staff declined to take action, Ms. Reade said, after which she filed a written complaint with a Senate personnel office. She said office staff took away most of her duties, including supervising the interns; assigned her a windowless office; and made the work environment uncomfortable for her.

She said Mr. Kaufman later told her she was not a good fit in the office, giving her a month to look for a job. Ms. Reade never secured another position in Washington.

In an interview, Mr. Kaufman, a longtime friend of Mr. Biden’s who was his chief of staff at the time, said: “I did not know her. She did not come to me. If she had, I would have remembered her.”

Mr. Toner, who worked for Mr. Biden for over three decades, said the allegation was out of character for Mr. Biden. Other senators and office staffs had reputations for harassing women at work and partying after hours, according to those who worked in the office at the time. Mr. Biden was known for racing to catch the train to get home to Wilmington, Del., every night.

“It’s just so preposterous that Senator Biden would be faced with these allegations,” said Mr. Toner, who was deputy chief of staff when Ms. Reade worked in the office. “I don’t remember her. I don’t remember this conversation. And I would remember this conversation.”

The Biden campaign issued a statement from Ms. Baker, Mr. Biden’s executive assistant from 1982 to 2000.

“I never once witnessed, or heard of, or received, any reports of inappropriate conduct, period — not from Ms. Reade, not from anyone,” she said. “I have absolutely no knowledge or memory of Ms. Reade’s accounting of events, which would have left a searing impression on me as a woman professional, and as a manager.”

Melissa Lefko, a former staff assistant for Mr. Biden from 1992 to 1993, said she did not remember Ms. Reade. But she recalled that Mr. Biden’s office was a “very supportive environment for women” and said she had never experienced any kind of harassment there.

“When you work on the Hill, everyone knows who the good guys are and who the bad guys are, and Biden was a good guy,” she said.

Ms. Reade said that she could not remember the exact time, date or location of the assault but that it occurred in a “semiprivate” place in the Senate office complex.

A friend said that Ms. Reade told her about the alleged assault at the time, in 1993. A second friend recalled Ms. Reade telling her in 2008 that Mr. Biden had touched her inappropriately and that she’d had a traumatic experience while working in his office. Both friends agreed to speak to The Times on the condition of anonymity to protect the privacy of their families and their self-owned businesses.

Ms. Reade said she also told her brother, who has confirmed parts of her account publicly but who did not speak to The Times, and her mother, who has since died.

Differing recollections

At the time of the alleged assault, Ms. Reade said she was responsible for coordinating the interns in the office. Two former interns who worked with her said they never heard her describe any inappropriate conduct by Mr. Biden or saw her directly interact with him in any capacity but recalled that she abruptly stopped supervising them in April, before the end of their internship. Others who worked in the office at the time said they remembered Ms. Reade but not any inappropriate behavior.

Friends and former co-workers describe Ms. Reade as friendly, caring, compassionate and trustworthy, though perhaps a bit naïve. A single mother, she changed her name for protection after leaving an abusive marriage in the late 1990s and put herself through law school in Seattle. After leaving Mr. Biden’s office, she eventually returned to the West Coast, where she worked for a state senator; as an advocate for domestic violence survivors, testifying as an expert witness in court; and for animal rescue organizations.

During her time in Mr. Biden’s office, he was working to pass the Violence Against Women Act, which Mr. Biden has described as his “proudest legislative accomplishment.” In 2017, Ms. Reade retweeted praise for Mr. Biden and his work combating sexual assault. In more recent months, her feed has featured support for Mr. Sanders and criticism of Mr. Biden.

Ms. Reade said she did not disclose the sexual assault allegation last year when she spoke out because she was scared. After her initial complaints were reported last year by a local California newspaper, Ms. Reade said she faced a wave of criticism and death threats, as well as accusations that she was a Russian agent because of Medium posts and tweets, several of which are now deleted, she had written praising President Vladimir Putin.

Ms. Reade said that she was not working for Russia and did not support Mr. Putin, and that her comments were pulled out of context from a novel she was writing at the time.

“It was trying to smear me and distract from what happened, but it won’t change the facts of what happened in 1993,” she said.

She called her praise for Mr. Putin “misguided.”

Ms. Reade tried to get legal and public relations support from the Time’s Up Legal Defense Fund, an initiative established by prominent women in Hollywood to fight sexual harassment. Her outreach to the group was first reported by The Intercept.

As it has for thousands of people who have contacted the group, the Time’s Up Legal Defense Fund, which does not represent clients, gave her a list of lawyers with expertise in such cases. She said she contacted every single one but none took her case. Two lawyers confirmed speaking to Ms. Reade but declined to comment on the record about her or the allegation.

SKDKnickerbocker, the political consulting firm where Mr. Biden’s chief strategist, Anita Dunn, works as a managing director, has a contract with the Time’s Up legal defense fund. Ms. Dunn has never worked with the fund and her firm was not told of Ms. Reade’s request, according to officials at the fund.

Ms. Reade also contacted at least one of the women who spoke out along with her last year about Mr. Biden’s penchant for physical contact.

Lucy Flores, a former Nevada state assemblywoman who accused Mr. Biden of making her uncomfortable by kissing and touching her during a 2014 campaign event, exchanged a few emails last year with Ms. Reade but said Ms. Reade did not share her full story.

“Biden is not just a hugger,” Ms. Flores said. “Biden very clearly was invading women’s spaces without their consent in a way that made them feel uncomfortable. Does he potentially have the capacity to go beyond that? That’s the answer everyone is trying to get at.”


 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
From NYT article:

"No other allegation about sexual assault surfaced in the course of our reporting, nor did any former Biden staff corroborate Reade’s allegation. We found no pattern of sexual misconduct by Biden, beyond hugs, kisses and touching that women previously said made them uncomfortable."

Who wants to tell em?
Well that's so much better. We should all be okay with our wives and daughters being kissed and touched by their boss in a way that makes them uncomfortable. 🙄

 
From NYT article:

"No other allegation about sexual assault surfaced in the course of our reporting, nor did any former Biden staff corroborate Reade’s allegation. We found no pattern of sexual misconduct by Biden, beyond hugs, kisses and touching that women previously said made them uncomfortable."

Who wants to tell em?
There were no allegations against Kavanaugh either unless you include a handful who were clearly lying.  The standard for Biden is:

- Don't let women tell their story

- Do attack their character

- Certainly don't believe them. 

- Women are motivated to lie. 

 
From NYT article:

"No other allegation about sexual assault surfaced in the course of our reporting, nor did any former Biden staff corroborate Reade’s allegation. We found no pattern of sexual misconduct by Biden, beyond hugs, kisses and touching that women previously said made them uncomfortable."

Who wants to tell em?
The same posters reading/believing/defending this are currently over in the Sean Hannity thread declaring HANNITY the #1 source of misinformation.

You can't make this stuff up.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
From NYT article:

"No other allegation about sexual assault surfaced in the course of our reporting, nor did any former Biden staff corroborate Reade’s allegation. We found no pattern of sexual misconduct by Biden, beyond hugs, kisses and touching that women previously said made them uncomfortable."

Who wants to tell em?
It’s cool he just sniffs every kids hair and kisses them and gropes all of his peers wives.

 
The same posters reading/believing/defending this are currently over in the Sean Hannity thread declaring HANNITY the #1 source of misinformation.

You can't make this stuff up.
That may not even be the worst part.  The sentence before ("nor did any former Biden staff corroborate Reade’s allegation") is very misleading since she has several friends and family that do corroborate she told them long ago.  Now the Times has even edited the story to remove any reference to other women he has inappropriately touched.  The New York Times is completely whitewashing the story.  What joke journalism.  Nothing but a mouth piece for the Democrat candidate. 

 
The sentence before ("nor did any former Biden staff corroborate Reade’s allegation") is very misleading since she has several friends and family that do corroborate she told them long ago. 
It’s one friend and a brother specifically about the assault claim, and the brother has only spoken to Intercept. He wouldn’t speak to NYT or Salon.

 
Now the Times has even edited the story to remove any reference to other women he has inappropriately touched.  The New York Times is completely whitewashing the story.
So they started investigating right after the Halper interview. They interview Reade, two friends and try to reach her brother. They interview three former executive aides of Biden, all of whom Reade specifically references. They survey the other women making claims about Biden and even quote Flores. They also sought to corroborate her claim of a report to the Senate ethics office. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
So they started investigating right after the Halper interview. They interview Reade, two friends and try to reach her brother. They interview three former executive aides of Biden, all of whom Reade specifically references. They survey the other women making claims about Biden and even quote Flores. They also sought to corroborate her claim of a report to the Senate ethics office. 
You are far more impressed with their impartiality than I am.  I see things in the article like this gem, ("Filing a false police report may be punishable by a fine and imprisonment.") and just roll my eyes.  Did they ever mention perjury is a crime when talking about Blassey Ford's story?  The Times bent over backwards trying to turn Ford into a sympathetic hero providing her story with zero skepticism.  Here they are showing extreme skepticism.  

IMHO, both stories deserve a lot of skepticism, but the Times is showing they are not in honest broker in how they do present stories.  

 
You are far more impressed with their impartiality than I am.  I see things in the article like this gem, ("Filing a false police report may be punishable by a fine and imprisonment.") and just roll my eyes.  Did they ever mention perjury is a crime when talking about Blassey Ford's story?  The Times bent over backwards trying to turn Ford into a sympathetic hero providing her story with zero skepticism.  Here they are showing extreme skepticism.  

IMHO, both stories deserve a lot of skepticism, but the Times is showing they are not in honest broker in how they do present stories.  
Well I guess there has been this constant insistence the NYT was hushing this up, but then as it turns out they started working on it right away, and now the run a story and appear to have interviewed at least a dozen people? And yet it’s not good enough.

Also about that snip:

>>On Thursday, Ms. Reade filed a report with the Washington, D.C., police, saying she was the victim of a sexual assault in 1993; the public incident report, provided to The Times by Ms. Reade, does not mention Mr. Biden by name, but she said the complaint was about him. Ms. Reade said she filed the report to give herself an additional degree of safety from potential threats. Filing a false police report may be punishable by a fine and imprisonment.<<

- She has done it to protect her from threats?

(eta - note, I'm editing this because it occurs to me now that the report was probably anonymized for public release. It also seems this is a standard statement any time a publication reports on a police report, in fact Business Insider did it in their report on Reade's police report as well).

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I mean ‘false police reports are punishable’ makes a lot more sense in the context that apparently she failed to name Biden.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I mean ‘false police reports are punishable’ makes a lot more sense in the context that apparently she failed to name Biden.
It makes no sense to mention that except to point out the writer's skepticism.  Also this story about Biden's alleged sexual assault spends three paragraphs dealing with accusations against Trump but did not have space to discuss Lucy Flores allegations against Biden.

Furthermore several interns corroborated details of the story that she was relieved of some of her duties during that time frame, supporting the idea of possible retribution.  Not consistent with the no corroboration as they reported. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
It makes no sense to mention that except to point out the writer's skepticism.  Also this story about Biden's alleged sexual assault spends three paragraphs dealing with accusations against Trump but did not have space to discuss Lucy Flores allegations against Biden.
I guess I just disagree on the first point. 

I guess I need to look at the piece again for the other stuff.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I guess I just disagree on the first point. It makes sense to raise it because otherwise what’s the reason for not mentioning Biden in the police report?

I guess I need to look at the piece again for the other stuff.
Again, I believe these stories deserve skepticism.  But the New York Times beat us over the head that we must believe women.  Not just when it's supports their partisan liberal slant.  It speaks to two polar opposite approaches to very similar stories.  One was rushed and unquestioned.  The other was put under a microscope looking for holes. 

 
Again, I believe these stories deserve skepticism.  But the New York Times beat us over the head that we must believe women.  Not just when it's supports their partisan liberal slant.  It speaks to two polar opposite approaches to very similar stories.  One was rushed and unquestioned.  The other was put under a microscope looking for holes. 
I'm not sure I'd say skepticism. I think decent journalism and equal standards should be expected or demanded.

Also looking at it again, I think the point about the foray into the Trump allegations is about the fact it could or will be a political issue because it's already a major problem for Trump and clearly he would love to have a counterpoint. I don't think it's controversial to say this could likely have political impact once Trump starts using it.  Though I agree the 3 paras certainly makes it seem like an unnecessary But Trump interposition. 

I guess I don't feel the need to defend the NYT on its Ford coverage, but I do think this article is pretty fair. Maybe the most important point is they started investigating the claim right after the Halper interview, so they have not been avoiding it at all.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm not sure I'd say skepticism. I think decent journalism and equal standards should be expected or demanded.

Also looking at it again, I think the point about the foray into the Trump allegations is about the fact it could or will be a political issue because it's already a major problem for Trump and clearly he would love to have a counterpoint. I don't think it's controversial to say this could likely have political impact once Trump starts using it.  Though I agree the 3 paras certainly makes it seem like an unnecessary But Trump interposition. 

I guess I don't feel the need to defend the NYT on its Ford coverage, but I do think this article is pretty fair. Maybe the most important point is they started investigating the claim right after the Halper interview, so they have not been avoiding it at all.
I am spreading!

In all seriousness though(and I posted this earlier in the thread) the NYT poted a story about Kavanaugh and in that story they failed to mention key stuff initially and updated it after it was exposed. 

An earlier version of this article, which was adapted from a forthcoming book, did not include one element of the book's account regarding an assertion by a Yale classmate that friends of Brett Kavanaugh pushed his penis into the hand of a female student at a drunken dorm party. The book reports that the female student declined to be interviewed and friends say that she does not recall the incident. That information has been added to the article.
I think it is difficult to argue the coverage of the two events is the same. 

 
Another good point they raised in the article is that the NYT pointed out she was a Bernie supporter suggesting some motivating a motivation for Reade to lie.  As someone who was called some really nasty names for even suggesting Fird could be motivated because she is a pro-abortio Democrat (later confirmed by her lawyer) that piece of hypocrocy really pisses me off.   In Ford's case every bit of discrepency or oddity about her story was excused by some expert opinion explaining how that is typical of victims.  The more I think about this the more pathetic are the extreme differences in approaches which can only be explained by partisan politics from the NYT.  

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Another good point they raised in the article is that the NYT pointed out she was a Bernie supporter suggesting some motivating a motivation for Reade to lie. 
That is a terrible insinuation by whomever states it.

Its another of the over whelming conspiracy theories that we are just don't need and yet are overrun with these days.  Q anyone?

 
Another good point they raised in the article is that the NYT pointed out she was a Bernie supporter suggesting some motivating a motivation for Reade to lie.  As someone who was called some really nasty names for even suggesting Fird could be motivated because she is a pro-abortio Democrat (later confirmed by her lawyer) that piece of hypocrocy really pisses me off.   In Ford's case every bit of discrepency or oddity about her story was excused by some expert opinion explaining how that is typical of victims.  The more I think about this the more pathetic are the extreme differences in approaches which can only be explained by partisan politics from the NYT.  
Yep. Trauma and different memory storage, ptsd, etc.

They even questioned the fact that her friend has had some substance abuse issues. 

I do feel the need to clarify once again that my issue here is with the NYT and other media outlets as well as how politicians handled the ford case.

I will likely be voting Biden barring any major changes. 

 
It has taken awhile but more and more media outlets are now reporting on the sexual assault charges on Biden. 

I guess it really does not matter at this point as Joe will be the nominee regardless. Hopefully Joe will just issue an apology to Reade and maybe cut her a check and this will go away and we can move on.

 
It has taken awhile but more and more media outlets are now reporting on the sexual assault charges on Biden. 

I guess it really does not matter at this point as Joe will be the nominee regardless. Hopefully Joe will just issue an apology to Reade and maybe cut her a check and this will go away and we can move on.
Unless there is some smoking gun where his staffers are caught covering up and lying for Biden then there will be no payoff.  Just denials.  

 
Had 8 years of one...nice, smart, could speak without sounding like (well, something that would get me suspended for saying it).  A large percentage of the country disliked him anyway.
Yeah, he was pretty nice.  Never understood the hatred.  Well...I guess I understand the hatred from some people, but that's dumb.   

 
It's not exactly on point (and it really isn't a statement for or against either side), but just taking the opportunity to point out that one of our Founding Father Presidents was a rapist. 

 
Do other people find the NYT unreadable?  That's not just me right.  I literally can't stand reading their political coverage.  This was the key takeaway for me:

The seven other women who had complained about Mr. Biden told the Times this month that they did not have any new information about their experiences to add, but several said they believed Ms. Reade’s account.

Other thing I noticed was how they went out of their way to bring up Trump.  I don't know how else we're supposed to read that than a defense of Biden's sexual assault by comparing it to Trump's.  Just badfaith, extremely delayed reporting.  And inconsistent with their treatment of Kavanaugh accusers.

 
Dickies said:
The allegations against Biden wouldn’t surprise me if they are true. I’m still in disbelief that out of all the solid candidates we had to choose from this cycle that we ended up with this. 
He’s reliable and appeals to many of the same people who switched from Obama to Trump. They’re playing the matchup. Bernie and Liz were too easily of targets. Pete couldn’t gain any traction with minorities and Amy just couldn’t get enough traction period. I’d take any of them over Biden, but at the same time I’m happy to get fully behind him.

 
This made it to my local news last night.  "Presidential candidate accused of sexual assault" was the lead in.

I really don`t think it will hurt Joe but it seems to be picking up steam.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top