This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
I know it's been beaten to death in here, but the gambling advice on his show is uniformly terrible and should not be followed by anyone. This is no different than "the Daily Wager," "Fox Bet Live," Cowherd, etc.
Couple things I like comin' up:
Florian Marku over Charlton -125 (playable up to -175 imo)
Jamel Herring over Frampton +120/+110 (playable to -150, I think? I'm just way off the market on this one. Feel like it'll correct back towards me as we get closer tho)
Had some intel about a fight...
Dave Mason, the head guy at BetOnline, said it was their biggest decision ever. By quite a bit.
Some people were betting without realizing the rules had changed. other people followed them off the cliff. There was a loud argument on gambling twitter about who predicted election outcomes...
Actually in a situation like this, it wouldn't surprise me. The liability books were carrying on Trump was massive. It's not true for random Thursday MAC games, but for something like this, I can def see it.
Took him KO/UD -175. I like that more than KO, UD, or straight up, just because I think most Teofimo win-outcomes end up with him getting a KO, I don't see many Teo decisions/draws/close Lomachenko decisions. And if they're fighting close rounds the whole way through, again, I don't see...
I've been seriously handicapping boxing this year, and I run into the same thing, although boxing is by no means as tough to beat as the NFL so there are some pretty bad prices (Bet365 getting a new trader has tightened the opening price considerably, unfortunately). There are...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.