Recent content by slevin

I will make a sig bet with you right now that TJDuckett does not have more than 240 carries on the year.Double the sig for Staley, too - Staley won't crest 250 carries.

Nope - I will not.Counter all you want. If you call your response a "counter" then, fine, but I won't comment on your team anymore becaus it obviously upsets you.Just an FYI - I highlighted McGahee b/c it is obvious you don't believe in Henry, so McG would seem to be the clear choice. I still...

Dude - if you re-read, I would have had Boldin, Boston and Bruce and MAYBE would taken one of those other guys as my RB3 over Duckett instead of Boston.Sorry for the detailed responses, but you don't have to worry about it anymore - I am not going to comment on your team anymore. Done.

As I thought - it was fun in the Shark Pool survivor league to hear other league mate's criticisms, but the more interesting discussions were prompted by others in the Pool.

I just caught this - funnee!True that the spot where Moss becomes the best value - wherever that is in your draft - will be a tough spot to be in since you are deciding between a WR1 who plays like a RB1 and lower echelon RB1 players - and a guarantee that if you take Moss, your RB2 situation...

I mentioned it was your team and that you were happy with it - I see it as what could have been. As for the "worthless" critique, I though an objective observation was invited - especially since the results are being posted in the SHARK'S POOL - not just on your Xpert league site.And, if you go...

Right choice - here it had to be Gardner or (shhhh!) Wayne is a huge questionmark with Stokely, Pollard, Clark, James and the other backs all vying for Harrison's scraps.I like this team, though I think you will be forced at some point to trade a RB for WR help - especially if Eddie ends up as...

Dude - excellent value with that pick - almost the 7th round of a 14 team draft and you landed a viable 70 catch/~1G/6 - 8 TD receiver.And yeah the hedge versus Rogers was smart - you got the guy I would have picked all the way back in the 5th - ahead of Rogers - nearly two rounds later -...

Nope - you can avoid B-S, I simply stink all the time.

Agreed - I also made my feelings known about Henry versus Staley. I look at this team and I see what could have been:If I were picking, it would have gone:RB: Taylor, HenryWR: Boldin (or Mason), Boston, Bruce TE: GonzoInstead of Boston, I might have added one of the RBs selected between that...

I like this team a lot. I am in the camp of folks that believes, at least early in the year, Hearst will see a lot of time on the field. I am also convionced that Rudi will be tremendous. So, if Marshal doesn't miss more than 3 games and if he is on the field for the last 8-10 weeks of the...

Now that they are selected Booker, and secondarily Bruce, were two MORE receivers (in addition to JSmith, RSmith and Price) I'd have preferred over CRogers - only Bruce did not fit the criteria mentioned of being the #1 WR.Sorry to keep harping on it Brit, but I fail to see the interest in...

WRs have tremendous trade value once the cream rises to the top.That said, I agree that JAA's choice of grabbing three WR early was confusing given his situation, but there really weren't any RB options he was in love with, and he ended with what he would have had at the earlier spots - a RBBC...

Actually, I didn't look too hard at anyone's rosters, I was just making the argument for JAA about the points advantage per game based on his roster. You get that advantage too, but are lagging behind him at RB. Since you put it out there though: Consider, that Moulds way underperformed last...

Exactly - my only problem with it was while Jackson was RB15 on YOUR board, he probably would have slipped past most of these guys. In reality, though, who would you have taken instead (ie - RB16?) Henry? I am guessing not based on our bet.You may or may not be correct that Jackson ends up the...