Jump to content
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

scothawk

Members
  • Content Count

    779
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

121 Excellent

About scothawk

  • Rank
    Footballguy

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://
  • ICQ
    0

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Previous Fields

  • Favorite NFL Team
    Seattle Seahawks

Recent Profile Visitors

8,262 profile views
  1. Equally it could free up space for Gesicki to eat
  2. From a fantasy point I'm getting more and more worried he gets WR designation from year 2 onwards. Obviously his NFL team dont want to change it for $$ reasons, but that could be the mother of all hold outs. He is going to score anyway but in start 2 WR 1TE standard scoring leagues I would probably avoid.
  3. Man. 3 firsts and 3 starters and take on Arnold for cheap would have looked great. Ah well....
  4. Probably just as well......
  5. is there a chance he gets designated as a WR?
  6. Isn't this what the Raiders do every off season ?
  7. Parsons should go before 1.07. If the eagles take him I could justify top 5 depending on how league values qb. Also that assumes starting 4 lb like my leagues do.
  8. Exactly. These things can linger and cause problems. I hope its nothing like that but somethign doesnt feel right here.
  9. Dak is unsigned. Its going to be interesting.
  10. We don't know Dak is back and we dont know that Seahwks will throw less. We don't know if Dallas goes WR or Pitts just for the fun. In my mind Metcalf is on a different level from Lamb.
  11. Dallas could sign him and use their first rounder on Pitts. Winner winner.
  12. I think they had to go for it there just like you said. A TD would have put pressure on CLE. Instead he put pressure back on PITT.
×
×
  • Create New...