Jump to content
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Jamesinaz

Members
  • Posts

    311
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Jamesinaz

  1. Took about perfect timing. I am also in a quandary about TY. If I start him it's over either: Gallup or Ridley in a WR spot M Sanders, D Waller, M Andrews, D Samuel, B Scarbrough, J Samuels in Flex Not sure why I care. 4-7 and not going anywhere but I can't help trying to win every week. LOL.
  2. Looking up his 2015-2016 QB ratings I see 43.4 and 49.5. I don't think that is a good QB. So his last 2 years at age 28-29 were really bad, and now he is 3 years removed from playing and tossing a ball to some receivers without a pass rush or concern about getting hit shows he is ready for the NFL again? On a purely football level I wouldn't take a chance on he being for real. His last minute change of venue was also a calculated power play and if I were an owner I would find that concerning. Add in the potential circus and hard pass for me. I don't see how his presence would HELP a teams chemistry even if one assumes it won't hurt.
  3. I played D Watson. Hey, who wouldn't? And next week I might STILL start Watson over Murray. But now matchup matters too.
  4. Living in AZ I get to watch the Cardinals a lot. When they drafted a 5'10" QB with the first pick I thought they were nuts. Now I'm not so sure. The next Mahomes? Likely not. But a franchise QB that can win big games if surrounded by some talent? Yeah I think they got that. And that is valuable. It sure does make watching AZ interesting again.
  5. I'm not sure if I have a mathematical chance. I am pretty darned sure I'm out of it though. Feels wrong to trade and I passed on his offer. And I told him why.
  6. OK, I'm in a standard non-PPR 12 team league redraft. At this point I feel weird doing any deals as I am 3-6 and pretty much out of this year so not sure it is appropriate to deal with a contender. In any case I was offered Coleman for Niners D straight up. Honestly not sure it helps me. My I can only start 2 RBs and one Flex and have Chubb, C Carson, J Samuels, R Freeman already. Yeah, I suppose it is a slight upgrade over my flex choices but again, I am not a contender. Guess I'm asking if this makes sense at all, And if there are some form of ethics I should consider here. BTW it's a family no money league so it's all about bragging rights. And I should add there is very little trading done so I'm tempted just to get more activity and help next years movement.
  7. OK, I'm in a standard non-PPR 12 team league redraft. At this point I feel weird doing any deals as I am 3-6 and pretty much out of this year so not sure it is appropriate to deal with a contender. In any case I was offered Coleman for Niners D straight up. Honestly not sure it helps me. My I can only start 2 RBs and one Flex and have Chubb, C Carson, J Samuels, R Freeman already. Yeah, I suppose it is a slight upgrade over my flex choices but again, I am not a contender. Guess I'm asking if this makes sense at all, And if there are some form of ethics I should consider here. BTW it's a family no money league so it's all about bragging rights. And I should add there is very little trading done so I'm tempted just to get more activity and help next years movement.
  8. Well, I don't even know why I try being 3-6. Weird. I have the most scored against team in my league and it isn't by a small margin. Oh well. I can't help trying so I added TY from the FA pool replacing Chase Edmunds who I think slid to #3 in AZ when he is actually healthy again. If my some miracle I make the playoffs and Hilton is healthy he makes a nice pair with Tyreek.
  9. Should have mentioned I am in redraft. I wonder how quickly Chase heals from this, and once back will they load him up or RBBC with all 3 guys making them all useless to me. At least Watkins is a starter across from Hill. Or maybe I take Breida who was weirdly waived. Can't now. Chase is locked until waiver day Tuesday.
  10. Curious what people think about Edmunds now? How long he is out? What role when he returns? I have him and am about to waive him for Sammy Watkins. Anyone think that is silly?
  11. I'm in a redraft league. So trading Hill is not a real option. Thankfully I don't share the doom and gloom of some here. Yes, losing Mahomes is a downer and could reduce Hill's performance going forward. But he is still an elite receiver in a team format and coaching system that will get him the ball. He won't become Juju IMO.
  12. As a Cards fan I can pretty much assure you it isn't gonna happen. They are excellent defensively and pitching but they lack punch. This series ended with that last inning. Oh well. They got closer than 26 other teams.
  13. Trying to add Jets this week. Between them and LAC I think I have the year covered. PIT and BUF are rostered already.
  14. I agree. having another threat helps. I picked up Chase Edmonds last week and not just as a handcuff. I think going forward we will see a lot of them on the field together. And both are dynamic backs and threats running or receiving.
  15. Wondering if any of the other KC WRs are still worth keeping or playing with Hill back. I got Robinson and don't expect much from him going forward. Anyone else feel the same?
  16. Thanks. I chickened out and played Watson. Looks like I'll win this week even if Murray was the choice. Thanks again.
  17. I played it safe and chose Watson. Will not be surprised if Murray surpasses even this good day for Watson. Doesn't matter. Team is good today with Chubb and return of T Hill.
  18. Standard league. Chase E, Ridley, Gallup, R Freeman, M Sanders
  19. Yeah mnormally. But Murray against ATL. Juicy.
  20. In some ways I don't think it matters. His main WR is still there and I think with DJ ailing he will run more. I am seriously thinking of starting him AND Chase Edmonds as my flex.
  21. Thanks. It is a quandary. I am heavily favored this week and may start Murray for the first time "just because".
  22. K Murray or D Watson? I know. First world problems.
  23. Sort of a 1st world problem here. I haven't played Kyler Murray yet this year. And he has steadily improved in real football terms. This week he faces a lame ATL defense in what should be a shootout in AZ. I really like his chances to be a top 3 QB in week 6. On the negative side he is lacking one of his better received in Kirk. Watson looks to be in a shootout of his own vs KC in KC. But KC has a better D and it could be a hard day on Watson if they don't slow the pass rush. Seriously considering Murray. Thoughts?
  24. To be honest you seem to have a very good team. Except at QB. Why do the deal if it doesn't improve you there?
×
×
  • Create New...