What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

*** 2013 Official Philadelphia Eagles - NFC EAST CHAMPS*** (2 Viewers)

Thank you Cowboys for making sure week 17 is a playoff game no matter what happens week 16!

Unless the Eagles win and Cowboys lose which is fine with me.
So if I understand this correctly...

If the Redskins beat the Cowboys, we are playing to lock up the division on Sunday night.

If the Cowboys beat the Redskins, we have absolutely nothing to play for on Sunday night and will rest all of our starters.

Does that sound about right?

 
Thank you Cowboys for making sure week 17 is a playoff game no matter what happens week 16!

Unless the Eagles win and Cowboys lose which is fine with me.
So if I understand this correctly...

If the Redskins beat the Cowboys, we are playing to lock up the division on Sunday night.

If the Cowboys beat the Redskins, we have absolutely nothing to play for on Sunday night and will rest all of our starters.

Does that sound about right?
If both Eagles and Cowboys win or Eagles lose and Cowboys win, or they both lose, week 17 is for the division.

If Eagles win and Cowboys lose, week 17 is meaningless.

 
Thank you Cowboys for making sure week 17 is a playoff game no matter what happens week 16!

Unless the Eagles win and Cowboys lose which is fine with me.
So if I understand this correctly...

If the Redskins beat the Cowboys, we are playing to lock up the division on Sunday night.

If the Cowboys beat the Redskins, we have absolutely nothing to play for on Sunday night and will rest all of our starters.

Does that sound about right?
Chip doesn't strike me as one to do this. I believe the Eagles are still theoretically alive for the wild card and with Carolina playing New Orleans, will still be alive next week. And the game would still matter seeding wise for the 3 or 4 seed.

 
sporthenry said:
Late225 said:
Dr Oadi said:
Thank you Cowboys for making sure week 17 is a playoff game no matter what happens week 16!

Unless the Eagles win and Cowboys lose which is fine with me.
So if I understand this correctly...

If the Redskins beat the Cowboys, we are playing to lock up the division on Sunday night.

If the Cowboys beat the Redskins, we have absolutely nothing to play for on Sunday night and will rest all of our starters.

Does that sound about right?
Chip doesn't strike me as one to do this. I believe the Eagles are still theoretically alive for the wild card and with Carolina playing New Orleans, will still be alive next week. And the game would still matter seeding wise for the 3 or 4 seed.
I really hope we rest our starters if Dallas beats Washington. Would be great to not go in injured, and to have that extra week of rest.

What is the tiebreaker process/standings between us SF and Carolina? We would know the result of the Panthers game before we play Sunday night...

 
sporthenry said:
Late225 said:
Dr Oadi said:
Thank you Cowboys for making sure week 17 is a playoff game no matter what happens week 16!

Unless the Eagles win and Cowboys lose which is fine with me.
So if I understand this correctly...

If the Redskins beat the Cowboys, we are playing to lock up the division on Sunday night.

If the Cowboys beat the Redskins, we have absolutely nothing to play for on Sunday night and will rest all of our starters.

Does that sound about right?
Chip doesn't strike me as one to do this. I believe the Eagles are still theoretically alive for the wild card and with Carolina playing New Orleans, will still be alive next week. And the game would still matter seeding wise for the 3 or 4 seed.
I really hope we rest our starters if Dallas beats Washington. Would be great to not go in injured, and to have that extra week of rest.

What is the tiebreaker process/standings between us SF and Carolina? We would know the result of the Panthers game before we play Sunday night...
Conference record. So we would get in since all 3 are 7-3 in conference and only way we tie is if those teams lose their remaining 2 games.

 
sporthenry said:
Late225 said:
Dr Oadi said:
Thank you Cowboys for making sure week 17 is a playoff game no matter what happens week 16!

Unless the Eagles win and Cowboys lose which is fine with me.
So if I understand this correctly...

If the Redskins beat the Cowboys, we are playing to lock up the division on Sunday night.

If the Cowboys beat the Redskins, we have absolutely nothing to play for on Sunday night and will rest all of our starters.

Does that sound about right?
Chip doesn't strike me as one to do this. I believe the Eagles are still theoretically alive for the wild card and with Carolina playing New Orleans, will still be alive next week. And the game would still matter seeding wise for the 3 or 4 seed.
I really hope we rest our starters if Dallas beats Washington. Would be great to not go in injured, and to have that extra week of rest.

What is the tiebreaker process/standings between us SF and Carolina? We would know the result of the Panthers game before we play Sunday night...
Conference record. So we would get in since all 3 are 7-3 in conference and only way we tie is if those teams lose their remaining 2 games.
Right but we are also assuming we lose to the cowboys (If we beat the cowboys we are in anyways)... so losing to the cowboys would also hurt our tie breaker

 
Conference record. So we would get in since all 3 are 7-3 in conference and only way we tie is if those teams lose their remaining 2 games.
Right but we are also assuming we lose to the cowboys (If we beat the cowboys we are in anyways)... so losing to the cowboys would also hurt our tie breaker
:doh: Good point. So I guess we are out of the WC. Either way, I doubt he rests them completely, but I could see him pulling them especially if the game gets away.

 
sporthenry said:
Late225 said:
Dr Oadi said:
Thank you Cowboys for making sure week 17 is a playoff game no matter what happens week 16!

Unless the Eagles win and Cowboys lose which is fine with me.
So if I understand this correctly...If the Redskins beat the Cowboys, we are playing to lock up the division on Sunday night.

If the Cowboys beat the Redskins, we have absolutely nothing to play for on Sunday night and will rest all of our starters.

Does that sound about right?
Chip doesn't strike me as one to do this. I believe the Eagles are still theoretically alive for the wild card and with Carolina playing New Orleans, will still be alive next week. And the game would still matter seeding wise for the 3 or 4 seed.
I really hope we rest our starters if Dallas beats Washington. Would be great to not go in injured, and to have that extra week of rest.

What is the tiebreaker process/standings between us SF and Carolina? We would know the result of the Panthers game before we play Sunday night...
No it wouldn't. We have a better conference record than panthers and niners. So we need to play this game. We can make a wild card possibly even with a loss in dallas. Chip is not going to sit players unless the playoffs are secured.

 
loose circuits said:
Chip made some pretty bad calls. Going for it on 4th & 1 from own 20 which then cost a challenge/time out. Time out to get xp team off field when they should have been going for 2.
Chip was horrible today... Not kicking to Patterson and constantly giving the Vikings a field position advantage really hurt... Plus going for it from the 20... Really bad all around.... Just glad CHip did this and Andy didn't.... Could you imagine what would have been said then...LOL

Overall, a throw away game.... And with Romo choking again we actually made out alright..... Sometimes you need some breaks and we got one today...

 
Its amazing that after such an ### whoppin' that I feel like they won today.
The Dallas loss combined with watching a team like the Saints shizz the bed makes me feel not so bad.

It's hard to believe we were down 5 at one point in the 4th quarter.
It shouldn't make you feel any better. In the Philly game thread today after the loss, I mentioned this loss by Philly doesn't make Dallas a better team, let's go watch Dallas struggle vs Green Bay.

It goes both ways, Dallas stinks but because they stink will not help Philly vs the elite teams. I understand what you're saying, it's where the phrase misery loves company evolved but it breeds mediocracy.

Philly really needs to figure out how a team minus the league's MVP and his backup were able to put up 48 points on them. How do you beat a Seattle or a 49er team doing that? Worrying about beating Dallas is just trying to be the best of a very bad division, maybe the worst I have ever seen it. Dallas plays Washington next week, another terrible team and that game could go either way.

 
Its amazing that after such an ### whoppin' that I feel like they won today.
The Dallas loss combined with watching a team like the Saints shizz the bed makes me feel not so bad. It's hard to believe we were down 5 at one point in the 4th quarter.
It shouldn't make you feel any better. In the Philly game thread today after the loss, I mentioned this loss by Philly doesn't make Dallas a better team, let's go watch Dallas struggle vs Green Bay.It goes both ways, Dallas stinks but because they stink will not help Philly vs the elite teams. I understand what you're saying, it's where the phrase misery loves company evolved but it breeds mediocracy.

Philly really needs to figure out how a team minus the league's MVP and his backup were able to put up 48 points on them. How do you beat a Seattle or a 49er team doing that? Worrying about beating Dallas is just trying to be the best of a very bad division, maybe the worst I have ever seen it. Dallas plays Washington next week, another terrible team and that game could go either way.
I agree. They do need to figure it. Sometimes the NFL just doesn't make sense and I think that's what the case was today IMO. How do the Saints lose to the Jets and Rams yet dominate the Panthers? Some of it just can't be explained.

 
Its amazing that after such an ### whoppin' that I feel like they won today.
The Dallas loss combined with watching a team like the Saints shizz the bed makes me feel not so bad.

It's hard to believe we were down 5 at one point in the 4th quarter.
It shouldn't make you feel any better. In the Philly game thread today after the loss, I mentioned this loss by Philly doesn't make Dallas a better team, let's go watch Dallas struggle vs Green Bay.

It goes both ways, Dallas stinks but because they stink will not help Philly vs the elite teams. I understand what you're saying, it's where the phrase misery loves company evolved but it breeds mediocracy.

Philly really needs to figure out how a team minus the league's MVP and his backup were able to put up 48 points on them. How do you beat a Seattle or a 49er team doing that? Worrying about beating Dallas is just trying to be the best of a very bad division, maybe the worst I have ever seen it. Dallas plays Washington next week, another terrible team and that game could go either way.
Watching Romo and the Cowboys choke like ####### dogs always makes me feel better.

 
I still can't get over the stupid kickoff scheme Chip had for this game.
Had a lot to do with losing the game. A lot. There were plenty of issues today, but that was one pretty terrible idea that I can't believe they kept doing throughout the game.
I don't get the payoff of it. Say Henery does hang one or four short, are they automatic TD's or something?

It's bad enough in this day we don't have a kicker who can boom it out of the endzone whenever he wants but come on make them earn their yards.

 
As if it's bad enough we can't trust Henery in clutch FG situations, now we can't trust him to kick the ball through the end zone in a DOME? Another great pick by Andy Reid.

 
Not kicking to Patterson...
This. Don't they always tell the players to be aggressive and not be afraid of mistakes? Completely surrendering in one phase of the game like that was just awful coaching. Did that get the players thinking "Maybe we do suck?"

 
Last edited by a moderator:
As if it's bad enough we can't trust Henery in clutch FG situations, now we can't trust him to kick the ball through the end zone in a DOME? Another great pick by Andy Reid.
:shrug: There is no kicker anywhere worth a fourth round pick. Veteran and young / rookie FA battle in preseason is how K should be decided every year.

 
Foles put up good numbers but he was pretty streaky today, especially early. Last week I kind of wrote off as the weather, but he's missing high a lot the last two or three weeks, no coincidence that's when the picks have come. He led Cooper OB on what should have been a TD and the pick looked like a terrible decision and/or throw.

Gotta be something crept into his footwork or throwing motion. Last year when he missed it was short or occasionally behind not high.

 
So we are officially now out of the wild card race. If we win out, we win the div. If we lose either game, we can't catch SF or Car.

So what exactly would be the point of playing our starters next week? Does being the 3 seed vs the 4 seed matter that much? I know in past years teams who have clinched but are playing for 3rd or 4th have often not cared about which, and rested players. Not a huge advantage either way, although if the home teams win wild card weekend, I'd rather travel to NO then to SEA, so 3rd might be worth playing for.

 
So we are officially now out of the wild card race. If we win out, we win the div. If we lose either game, we can't catch SF or Car.

So what exactly would be the point of playing our starters next week? Does being the 3 seed vs the 4 seed matter that much? I know in past years teams who have clinched but are playing for 3rd or 4th have often not cared about which, and rested players. Not a huge advantage either way, although if the home teams win wild card weekend, I'd rather travel to NO then to SEA, so 3rd might be worth playing for.
This team can't afford to be resting players like they've accomplished something, they need all the work they can get. I don't mind if they limit McCoy's carries a bit, but apart from that they need to go all out.

 
I still can't get over the stupid kickoff scheme Chip had for this game.
Had a lot to do with losing the game. A lot. There were plenty of issues today, but that was one pretty terrible idea that I can't believe they kept doing throughout the game.
I don't get the payoff of it. Say Henery does hang one or four short, are they automatic TD's or something? It's bad enough in this day we don't have a kicker who can boom it out of the endzone whenever he wants but come on make them earn their yards.
I think they got it to 27-22, squib kick and they start at the 50. Mentally crushing for everyone involved, and the game got out of hand after that, just horrible.

 
Just an all round horrible games for the team and coaches. Real head scratching moves by Kelly to keep pooch kicking it. Patterson is good but you can't be afraid of him. Just an all around weak display yesterday.

 
So we are officially now out of the wild card race. If we win out, we win the div. If we lose either game, we can't catch SF or Car.

So what exactly would be the point of playing our starters next week? Does being the 3 seed vs the 4 seed matter that much? I know in past years teams who have clinched but are playing for 3rd or 4th have often not cared about which, and rested players. Not a huge advantage either way, although if the home teams win wild card weekend, I'd rather travel to NO then to SEA, so 3rd might be worth playing for.
Perhaps I'm confused by your post but the purpose of playing your starters is to clinch a playoff spot in case Dallas loses. Your post reads as if the Eagles have already clinched something

 
So we are officially now out of the wild card race. If we win out, we win the div. If we lose either game, we can't catch SF or Car.

So what exactly would be the point of playing our starters next week? Does being the 3 seed vs the 4 seed matter that much? I know in past years teams who have clinched but are playing for 3rd or 4th have often not cared about which, and rested players. Not a huge advantage either way, although if the home teams win wild card weekend, I'd rather travel to NO then to SEA, so 3rd might be worth playing for.
Perhaps I'm confused by your post but the purpose of playing your starters is to clinch a playoff spot in case Dallas loses. Your post reads as if the Eagles have already clinched something
We play the night game. Dallas plays at 1pm. We will know if Dallas loses before our game stars.

 
Just an all round horrible games for the team and coaches. Real head scratching moves by Kelly to keep pooch kicking it. Patterson is good but you can't be afraid of him. Just an all around weak display yesterday.
Yep, exactly. Read in the Inky this morning that thanks to Patterson being all-world on kick returns this year, the Vikes' starting field position on kickoffs has averaged their own 26. Yesterday, without #84 touching it once, their average start was their own 33. :doh:

It's only the second time I've seen Chip coach scared - the first was the second half of the opening game against the Skins. It didn't work then, and it emphatically didn't work yesterday. It baffles me to see it from a guy who was famous for keeping his foot on the gas at all times at Oregon, but I think he'll learn from it. And I sure hope so, because even the Cowboys have enough talent on offense to blow the doors off a team that's playing scared, to say nothing of the Saints or Seahawks.

 
Foles put up good numbers but he was pretty streaky today, especially early. Last week I kind of wrote off as the weather, but he's missing high a lot the last two or three weeks, no coincidence that's when the picks have come. He led Cooper OB on what should have been a TD and the pick looked like a terrible decision and/or throw.

Gotta be something crept into his footwork or throwing motion. Last year when he missed it was short or occasionally behind not high.
I havent had a chance to check but while Foles was a bit off early on I though he came through a lot better then expected. It was a 5 point game in the early part of the 4th--what were his #'s after the Ertz TD?

Then that TD was followed by ANOTHER squib and another start at mid-field for them.

 
Just an all round horrible games for the team and coaches. Real head scratching moves by Kelly to keep pooch kicking it. Patterson is good but you can't be afraid of him. Just an all around weak display yesterday.
IMO this was the worst Kelly coached game of the year by far. He has made GREAT adjustments throughout the year and in this one its almost like he refused to.

 
So we are officially now out of the wild card race. If we win out, we win the div. If we lose either game, we can't catch SF or Car.

So what exactly would be the point of playing our starters next week? Does being the 3 seed vs the 4 seed matter that much? I know in past years teams who have clinched but are playing for 3rd or 4th have often not cared about which, and rested players. Not a huge advantage either way, although if the home teams win wild card weekend, I'd rather travel to NO then to SEA, so 3rd might be worth playing for.
Perhaps I'm confused by your post but the purpose of playing your starters is to clinch a playoff spot in case Dallas loses. Your post reads as if the Eagles have already clinched something
We play the night game. Dallas plays at 1pm. We will know if Dallas loses before our game stars.
As crazy as it may sound I can't see Dallas going to Washington and winning a game they have to win.

 
So we are officially now out of the wild card race. If we win out, we win the div. If we lose either game, we can't catch SF or Car.

So what exactly would be the point of playing our starters next week? Does being the 3 seed vs the 4 seed matter that much? I know in past years teams who have clinched but are playing for 3rd or 4th have often not cared about which, and rested players. Not a huge advantage either way, although if the home teams win wild card weekend, I'd rather travel to NO then to SEA, so 3rd might be worth playing for.
Perhaps I'm confused by your post but the purpose of playing your starters is to clinch a playoff spot in case Dallas loses. Your post reads as if the Eagles have already clinched something
We play the night game. Dallas plays at 1pm. We will know if Dallas loses before our game stars.
Oh ok. Thx

 
So we are officially now out of the wild card race. If we win out, we win the div. If we lose either game, we can't catch SF or Car.

So what exactly would be the point of playing our starters next week? Does being the 3 seed vs the 4 seed matter that much? I know in past years teams who have clinched but are playing for 3rd or 4th have often not cared about which, and rested players. Not a huge advantage either way, although if the home teams win wild card weekend, I'd rather travel to NO then to SEA, so 3rd might be worth playing for.
Perhaps I'm confused by your post but the purpose of playing your starters is to clinch a playoff spot in case Dallas loses. Your post reads as if the Eagles have already clinched something
We play the night game. Dallas plays at 1pm. We will know if Dallas loses before our game stars.
As crazy as it may sound I can't see Dallas going to Washington and winning a game they have to win.
But Washington is just soooooo bad

 
So we are officially now out of the wild card race. If we win out, we win the div. If we lose either game, we can't catch SF or Car.

So what exactly would be the point of playing our starters next week? Does being the 3 seed vs the 4 seed matter that much? I know in past years teams who have clinched but are playing for 3rd or 4th have often not cared about which, and rested players. Not a huge advantage either way, although if the home teams win wild card weekend, I'd rather travel to NO then to SEA, so 3rd might be worth playing for.
Perhaps I'm confused by your post but the purpose of playing your starters is to clinch a playoff spot in case Dallas loses. Your post reads as if the Eagles have already clinched something
We play the night game. Dallas plays at 1pm. We will know if Dallas loses before our game stars.
As crazy as it may sound I can't see Dallas going to Washington and winning a game they have to win.
But Washington is just soooooo bad
The Dallas D cant stop anyone. That alone should make this a close game. Having Cousins under center gives their offense a new look as well and theyre home. Maybe Dallas wins but it will be close IMO

 
So we are officially now out of the wild card race. If we win out, we win the div. If we lose either game, we can't catch SF or Car.

So what exactly would be the point of playing our starters next week? Does being the 3 seed vs the 4 seed matter that much? I know in past years teams who have clinched but are playing for 3rd or 4th have often not cared about which, and rested players. Not a huge advantage either way, although if the home teams win wild card weekend, I'd rather travel to NO then to SEA, so 3rd might be worth playing for.
Perhaps I'm confused by your post but the purpose of playing your starters is to clinch a playoff spot in case Dallas loses. Your post reads as if the Eagles have already clinched something
Birds are 8-6 (7-3 conference). One of Carolina and NO will be a WC out of the south and San Fran will be WC out of the west. They are all currently 10-4 and at worst 7-3 in conference.

We would have to win out and have one of those three lose out in order to make the WC. If we win out we win the division. If we don't win the division then we also don't make the WC.

winning or losing in Chicago has no bearing on anything. The only impact next week will have is if Dallas loses, then we are divisional winners before we ever step on the field Sunday night.

Since OUR game has no impact on our standing, why not rest the players. Not saying I agree, in fact I do not-however, that is the point a lot of people have been making.

 
So we are officially now out of the wild card race. If we win out, we win the div. If we lose either game, we can't catch SF or Car.

So what exactly would be the point of playing our starters next week? Does being the 3 seed vs the 4 seed matter that much? I know in past years teams who have clinched but are playing for 3rd or 4th have often not cared about which, and rested players. Not a huge advantage either way, although if the home teams win wild card weekend, I'd rather travel to NO then to SEA, so 3rd might be worth playing for.
Perhaps I'm confused by your post but the purpose of playing your starters is to clinch a playoff spot in case Dallas loses. Your post reads as if the Eagles have already clinched something
We play the night game. Dallas plays at 1pm. We will know if Dallas loses before our game stars.
As crazy as it may sound I can't see Dallas going to Washington and winning a game they have to win.
:goodposting:

 
So we are officially now out of the wild card race. If we win out, we win the div. If we lose either game, we can't catch SF or Car.

So what exactly would be the point of playing our starters next week? Does being the 3 seed vs the 4 seed matter that much? I know in past years teams who have clinched but are playing for 3rd or 4th have often not cared about which, and rested players. Not a huge advantage either way, although if the home teams win wild card weekend, I'd rather travel to NO then to SEA, so 3rd might be worth playing for.
Perhaps I'm confused by your post but the purpose of playing your starters is to clinch a playoff spot in case Dallas loses. Your post reads as if the Eagles have already clinched something
Birds are 8-6 (7-3 conference). One of Carolina and NO will be a WC out of the south and San Fran will be WC out of the west. They are all currently 10-4 and at worst 7-3 in conference.

We would have to win out and have one of those three lose out in order to make the WC. If we win out we win the division. If we don't win the division then we also don't make the WC.

winning or losing in Chicago has no bearing on anything. The only impact next week will have is if Dallas loses, then we are divisional winners before we ever step on the field Sunday night.

Since OUR game has no impact on our standing, why not rest the players. Not saying I agree, in fact I do not-however, that is the point a lot of people have been making.
That's close. If Dallas loses, then a win against Chicago will clinch the division for the Eagles. If Dallas wins, we are playing for nothing.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
So we are officially now out of the wild card race. If we win out, we win the div. If we lose either game, we can't catch SF or Car.

So what exactly would be the point of playing our starters next week? Does being the 3 seed vs the 4 seed matter that much? I know in past years teams who have clinched but are playing for 3rd or 4th have often not cared about which, and rested players. Not a huge advantage either way, although if the home teams win wild card weekend, I'd rather travel to NO then to SEA, so 3rd might be worth playing for.
Perhaps I'm confused by your post but the purpose of playing your starters is to clinch a playoff spot in case Dallas loses. Your post reads as if the Eagles have already clinched something
Birds are 8-6 (7-3 conference). One of Carolina and NO will be a WC out of the south and San Fran will be WC out of the west. They are all currently 10-4 and at worst 7-3 in conference.

We would have to win out and have one of those three lose out in order to make the WC. If we win out we win the division. If we don't win the division then we also don't make the WC.

winning or losing in Chicago has no bearing on anything. The only impact next week will have is if Dallas loses, then we are divisional winners before we ever step on the field Sunday night.

Since OUR game has no impact on our standing, why not rest the players. Not saying I agree, in fact I do not-however, that is the point a lot of people have been making.
:confused:

If we both lose next week, Dallas can still win the division by beating us in week 17.

 
So we are officially now out of the wild card race. If we win out, we win the div. If we lose either game, we can't catch SF or Car.

So what exactly would be the point of playing our starters next week? Does being the 3 seed vs the 4 seed matter that much? I know in past years teams who have clinched but are playing for 3rd or 4th have often not cared about which, and rested players. Not a huge advantage either way, although if the home teams win wild card weekend, I'd rather travel to NO then to SEA, so 3rd might be worth playing for.
Perhaps I'm confused by your post but the purpose of playing your starters is to clinch a playoff spot in case Dallas loses. Your post reads as if the Eagles have already clinched something
We play the night game. Dallas plays at 1pm. We will know if Dallas loses before our game stars.
As crazy as it may sound I can't see Dallas going to Washington and winning a game they have to win.
But Washington is just soooooo bad
Washington is a train wreck at this point but Wash/Dal games are always a fight. Throw out the records when they play. And right now I think Dallas is choking big time.

 
I completely disagree with resting players. If you want to treat it like the 3rd preseason game, maybe I'd go along with that but you cant have the starters prep all week like they're playing the game and then hours before just say oh btw you're not playing now. Thats not a week of rest and could cause a mental hiccup to do all that prep work in practice and then just not go. I don't like it and think it would screw them up more for the dallas game.

Adding to that, they just got thumped by an inferior team in Minnesota. So under the rest scenario, the starters prepare all week and get pumped to prove they aren't as bad as they looked in that game. Then a little before kickoff their told to hold that emotion one more week. The proverbial blue balling would not be good.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
So we are officially now out of the wild card race. If we win out, we win the div. If we lose either game, we can't catch SF or Car.

So what exactly would be the point of playing our starters next week? Does being the 3 seed vs the 4 seed matter that much? I know in past years teams who have clinched but are playing for 3rd or 4th have often not cared about which, and rested players. Not a huge advantage either way, although if the home teams win wild card weekend, I'd rather travel to NO then to SEA, so 3rd might be worth playing for.
Perhaps I'm confused by your post but the purpose of playing your starters is to clinch a playoff spot in case Dallas loses. Your post reads as if the Eagles have already clinched something
Birds are 8-6 (7-3 conference). One of Carolina and NO will be a WC out of the south and San Fran will be WC out of the west. They are all currently 10-4 and at worst 7-3 in conference.

We would have to win out and have one of those three lose out in order to make the WC. If we win out we win the division. If we don't win the division then we also don't make the WC.

winning or losing in Chicago has no bearing on anything. The only impact next week will have is if Dallas loses, then we are divisional winners before we ever step on the field Sunday night.

Since OUR game has no impact on our standing, why not rest the players. Not saying I agree, in fact I do not-however, that is the point a lot of people have been making.
That's close. If Dallas loses, then a win against Chicago will clinch the division for the Eagles. If Dallas wins, we are playing for nothing.
yeah you're right. was thinking we'd have a two game lead going into week 17

 
So we are officially now out of the wild card race. If we win out, we win the div. If we lose either game, we can't catch SF or Car.

So what exactly would be the point of playing our starters next week? Does being the 3 seed vs the 4 seed matter that much? I know in past years teams who have clinched but are playing for 3rd or 4th have often not cared about which, and rested players. Not a huge advantage either way, although if the home teams win wild card weekend, I'd rather travel to NO then to SEA, so 3rd might be worth playing for.
Perhaps I'm confused by your post but the purpose of playing your starters is to clinch a playoff spot in case Dallas loses. Your post reads as if the Eagles have already clinched something
Birds are 8-6 (7-3 conference). One of Carolina and NO will be a WC out of the south and San Fran will be WC out of the west. They are all currently 10-4 and at worst 7-3 in conference.We would have to win out and have one of those three lose out in order to make the WC. If we win out we win the division. If we don't win the division then we also don't make the WC.

winning or losing in Chicago has no bearing on anything. The only impact next week will have is if Dallas loses, then we are divisional winners before we ever step on the field Sunday night.

Since OUR game has no impact on our standing, why not rest the players. Not saying I agree, in fact I do not-however, that is the point a lot of people have been making.
:confused:

If we both lose next week, Dallas can still win the division by beating us in week 17.
Yes. We need to beat Chicago to win the division.

 
So we are officially now out of the wild card race. If we win out, we win the div. If we lose either game, we can't catch SF or Car.

So what exactly would be the point of playing our starters next week? Does being the 3 seed vs the 4 seed matter that much? I know in past years teams who have clinched but are playing for 3rd or 4th have often not cared about which, and rested players. Not a huge advantage either way, although if the home teams win wild card weekend, I'd rather travel to NO then to SEA, so 3rd might be worth playing for.
Perhaps I'm confused by your post but the purpose of playing your starters is to clinch a playoff spot in case Dallas loses. Your post reads as if the Eagles have already clinched something
Birds are 8-6 (7-3 conference). One of Carolina and NO will be a WC out of the south and San Fran will be WC out of the west. They are all currently 10-4 and at worst 7-3 in conference.We would have to win out and have one of those three lose out in order to make the WC. If we win out we win the division. If we don't win the division then we also don't make the WC.

winning or losing in Chicago has no bearing on anything. The only impact next week will have is if Dallas loses, then we are divisional winners before we ever step on the field Sunday night.

Since OUR game has no impact on our standing, why not rest the players. Not saying I agree, in fact I do not-however, that is the point a lot of people have been making.
That's close. If Dallas loses, then a win against Chicago will clinch the division for the Eagles. If Dallas wins, we are playing for nothing.
yeah you're right. was thinking we'd have a two game lead going into week 17
If we won yesterday.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top