*** 2013 Official Philadelphia Eagles - NFC EAST CHAMPS*** (1 Viewer)

[Deamon]

So I had a huge post written up with notes on plays from the Vikings game through the end of the 3rd, but somehow managed to lose it going back and forth between the film and the board in the browser. Serves me right for not typing it in Word and pasting it in I guess. Here's what I remember.

The Vikings played man coverage (either tight or off depending on distance/situation) with a single high safety almost the whole game. They kept the 2nd S in the box as the 7th man. This seems to be the number that will drive them away from the run. At times in the 3rd quarter they split the TE a few yards outside to take another guy out of the box.

Both Peters and Johnson had trouble with the DEs, Peters got beat cleanly at least 3 times, Johnson struggled consistently to get into his vertical set fast enough to stop Robison collapsing if not turning the corner. The interior 3 were pretty good, apart from a couple of misses on Heremanns.

The run blocking was inconsistent as well, Heremanns and Ertz had a few misses that I noticed and overall they seemed to have less success this game with the 2 double teams at the point with guys then slipping off to attack the LBs on the Inside Zone runs. For whatever reason they weren't getting off those initial blocks and to the 2nd level and the LBs were making plays. 28 of Shady's yards came on two plays, one a nicely executed outside zone, the other what looked like a broken play where either Foles or Shady went the wrong way. Outside that there wasn't a lot of space.

They key to this offense beating this kind of defensive game plan is to take the plays that are there in the passing game, and we consistently didn't see them or didn't execute. Some examples:

• They play where Polk dropped the ball in the right flat, Cooper had 2 steps on his man down the left sideline with the S stuck between the hashes. Potential TD there.
• There was a play in the 3rd where Foles hit Ertz for 5 yds or so, but missed Shady breaking open on a wheel route covered by a S, another potential TD.
• There was a play where Foles scrambled for about 5 in the 2nd Q, don't think he had his eyes downfield on that because a few yards before he crossed the LoS, Cooper broke his route towards the sideline, with his man trailing and no other defender around, another potential TD.
• Foles badly overthrew a wide open Avant on 3rd and 16 near the right sideline, would have been a 1st.
• Foles led Cooper out of bounds on what should have been a TD pass. A better player might make the circus catch and keep his feet in bounds, but the throw was off target.

Looking at the INT live, I thought he'd thrown up a 50/50 ball and got stung for the gamble, in reality it was much worse. Jackson crossed the formation in motion, nobody came with him, which should have told Foles this was zone coverage. He was under center for this play, and turned his back for the PA fake, which may have something to do with the results. Jackson was uncovered completely off the line, Prater was actually covering Cooper until he passed him to the middle S. He kind of half trailed in no mans land (probably had deep third responsibility) and Foles just launched the ball right to him, like he didn't see him. Jackson may not have seen him either, because he was so open he'd been running with his head turned back to the ball for about 20 yards. Just a complete head scratcher.

If you look at Foles on the balls which are not thrown well, a lot of the time it seems due to sloppy footwork. When he has his feet set and gets hip rotation and back foot to front weight transfer the ball comes out with decent velocity, a nice spiral and good accuracy. At times he'll plant his front foot wide to the left or not do much with his feet at all (sometimes due to the pocket collapsing), that's when the ball seems to be off target much more often. Some of these throws do work, but at least in that game there's a clear difference in how the ball comes out based on the footwork. We already knew he's not a guy like Favre or Jeff George who can throw just with his arm, if this difference is consistent he's going to need to be conscious of being consistent with throwing off a proper platform. I'm going to watch this much more closely in the last two games to see if it's just a once off or if there's something to it.

love your breakdowns, keep them comin!

 

[Deamon]

Looking at the week 17 flex situation, I would say that there are 3 candidates for based on the do-or-die playoff scenario:

Ravens-Bengals

Packers-Bears

Eagles-Cowboys

If both are do-or-die, I think that Eagles would definitely be in over Ravens-Bengals. Packers-Bears would be close. I'd say if both Eagles and Cowboys win this week, then it would be Eagles-Cowboys (since that would mean that Bears lose, so record-wise Eagles-Cowboys is better).

If Eagles lose this week, I could see Packers-Bears getting it, especially if Rodgers is back.

I think the Eagles/Cowboys will get primetime. Everybody in America wants to see if Romo can win a clutch game

Do you think the fact we are playing on SNF this week will hurt our chances of getting it next week though?

 

[JetMaxx]

So I had a huge post written up with notes on plays from the Vikings game through the end of the 3rd, but somehow managed to lose it going back and forth between the film and the board in the browser. Serves me right for not typing it in Word and pasting it in I guess. Here's what I remember.

The Vikings played man coverage (either tight or off depending on distance/situation) with a single high safety almost the whole game. They kept the 2nd S in the box as the 7th man. This seems to be the number that will drive them away from the run. At times in the 3rd quarter they split the TE a few yards outside to take another guy out of the box.

Both Peters and Johnson had trouble with the DEs, Peters got beat cleanly at least 3 times, Johnson struggled consistently to get into his vertical set fast enough to stop Robison collapsing if not turning the corner. The interior 3 were pretty good, apart from a couple of misses on Heremanns.

The run blocking was inconsistent as well, Heremanns and Ertz had a few misses that I noticed and overall they seemed to have less success this game with the 2 double teams at the point with guys then slipping off to attack the LBs on the Inside Zone runs. For whatever reason they weren't getting off those initial blocks and to the 2nd level and the LBs were making plays. 28 of Shady's yards came on two plays, one a nicely executed outside zone, the other what looked like a broken play where either Foles or Shady went the wrong way. Outside that there wasn't a lot of space.

They key to this offense beating this kind of defensive game plan is to take the plays that are there in the passing game, and we consistently didn't see them or didn't execute. Some examples:

• They play where Polk dropped the ball in the right flat, Cooper had 2 steps on his man down the left sideline with the S stuck between the hashes. Potential TD there.
• There was a play in the 3rd where Foles hit Ertz for 5 yds or so, but missed Shady breaking open on a wheel route covered by a S, another potential TD.
• There was a play where Foles scrambled for about 5 in the 2nd Q, don't think he had his eyes downfield on that because a few yards before he crossed the LoS, Cooper broke his route towards the sideline, with his man trailing and no other defender around, another potential TD.
• Foles badly overthrew a wide open Avant on 3rd and 16 near the right sideline, would have been a 1st.
• Foles led Cooper out of bounds on what should have been a TD pass. A better player might make the circus catch and keep his feet in bounds, but the throw was off target.

Looking at the INT live, I thought he'd thrown up a 50/50 ball and got stung for the gamble, in reality it was much worse. Jackson crossed the formation in motion, nobody came with him, which should have told Foles this was zone coverage. He was under center for this play, and turned his back for the PA fake, which may have something to do with the results. Jackson was uncovered completely off the line, Prater was actually covering Cooper until he passed him to the middle S. He kind of half trailed in no mans land (probably had deep third responsibility) and Foles just launched the ball right to him, like he didn't see him. Jackson may not have seen him either, because he was so open he'd been running with his head turned back to the ball for about 20 yards. Just a complete head scratcher.If you look at Foles on the balls which are not thrown well, a lot of the time it seems due to sloppy footwork. When he has his feet set and gets hip rotation and back foot to front weight transfer the ball comes out with decent velocity, a nice spiral and good accuracy. At times he'll plant his front foot wide to the left or not do much with his feet at all (sometimes due to the pocket collapsing), that's when the ball seems to be off target much more often. Some of these throws do work, but at least in that game there's a clear difference in how the ball comes out based on the footwork. We already knew he's not a guy like Favre or Jeff George who can throw just with his arm, if this difference is consistent he's going to need to be conscious of being consistent with throwing off a proper platform. I'm going to watch this much more closely in the last two games to see if it's just a once off or if there's something to it.

love your breakdowns, keep them comin!

X2

 

[jon007]

^^^^^ Excellent post. Foles does have heavy feet. When comparing Brees, Brady and P. Manning, Brees has some of the best footwork I have ever seen. Foles doesn't even come close to any of these guys.

 

[unckeyherb]

Ppg. Yards are a meaningless stat

Cutler>>Foles

Marshall/Jeffrey>>>Jackson/Cooper

Black Unicorn>>>>Philly TEs

Bears OL>Eagles OL

Shady and Forte are both elite backs but I'd give the nod to Shady by a little.

Trestman> >>Chip

That cover it?

Can you give me the number of your dealer? I want what you're smoking.

Where am I wrong?

Here: Cutler>>FolesHere by a lot: Bears OL>Eagles OL

You're not "wrong" here, just selling Shady short. He's way better than Forte. Shady and Forte are both elite backs but I'd give the nod to Shady by a little.

Don't know if you are wrong or not. Pretty major lack of data points to judge. FWIW, Trestman looks like a sexual predator, so you're wrong here too. Trestman> >>Chip

What makes Shady "way better" than Forte? I love Shady and think he may be the best rb in football but it's not a large gap between them. Their stats are pretty similar and Forte has had a wretched line for years. What makes them so different? nearly a 1/2 yard per carry difference and 4.4 yard per reception for starters. The birds' Oline was missing 4/5ths of their starters last year. Both OLs are playing well this year. That's not what you said. You said Chicago has a better o-line. This is incorrect, as has been pointed out a bunch.

Trestman does look a little creepy, but I'd still rather have him on the sidelines. Decades of NFL experience. Those decades of experience have translated to the same record as Chip, who has zero NFL level experience. Based on your point above, once Chip has a couple years under his belt he'll be much better than Trestman. As it stands, they're even on HC experience and win/loss totals.

 

[fred_1_15301]

Looking at the week 17 flex situation, I would say that there are 3 candidates for based on the do-or-die playoff scenario:

Ravens-Bengals

Packers-Bears

Eagles-Cowboys

If both are do-or-die, I think that Eagles would definitely be in over Ravens-Bengals. Packers-Bears would be close. I'd say if both Eagles and Cowboys win this week, then it would be Eagles-Cowboys (since that would mean that Bears lose, so record-wise Eagles-Cowboys is better).

If Eagles lose this week, I could see Packers-Bears getting it, especially if Rodgers is back.

I think the Eagles/Cowboys will get primetime. Everybody in America wants to see if Romo can win a clutch game

Do you think the fact we are playing on SNF this week will hurt our chances of getting it next week though?

Doubt it because ratings are all that matters.

 

[Terpman22]

Man. Bears need to lose this game. Lost my semi game last week to a guy I hate, who is a Bear's fan. Now he is in the championship game (has Jeffery, Cutler and Forte) and the Eagles will have a direct effect on what level of $$ he gets (as well as what level of happiness I get). With that said, I just found out the #####'s girl had been cheating on him for a while, so that made me happy. I hate dbags.

 

[Late225]

Here are the stats between Foles and Cutler.

Touchdowns- Foles 23 Cutler 16

Interceptions- Foles 2 Cutler 10

Yards per attempt Foles 9.0 Cutler 7.3

QB Rating Foles 117.0 Cutler 89.8

LOL. Anyone saying that Cutler is better this year is smoking much better stuff than I am. It's a landslide. Cutler would be holding Foles' clipboard.

I know the stats. Foles has had a great year and appears to be the answer to the Eagles problems at QB. That's great! Still not going to find a lot of people who would rather have Foles as their franchise QB over Cutler, much less "holding Foles' clipboard." Landslide? Wake up!

Many commentators analysts, etc don't even know if the Bears should keep him. A journeyman backup came in when Cutler was injured and performed way better than Cutler did. He's a glorified Jeff George. Can throw a piece of popcorn through a wind tunnel, but has terrible judgment. He's already been on one team that didn't want him as their franchise quarterback and now his second team is undecided. Not sure what you're seeing in Cutler that no one else is. At any rate, he sure as hell isn't better than Foles. The stat difference is staggering. It's not even a contest.

To his credit, the guys that didn't want him drafted Tebow in the first round.

 

[⚡DEADHEAD⚡]

So I had a huge post written up with notes on plays from the Vikings game through the end of the 3rd, but somehow managed to lose it going back and forth between the film and the board in the browser. Serves me right for not typing it in Word and pasting it in I guess. Here's what I remember.

The Vikings played man coverage (either tight or off depending on distance/situation) with a single high safety almost the whole game. They kept the 2nd S in the box as the 7th man. This seems to be the number that will drive them away from the run. At times in the 3rd quarter they split the TE a few yards outside to take another guy out of the box.

Both Peters and Johnson had trouble with the DEs, Peters got beat cleanly at least 3 times, Johnson struggled consistently to get into his vertical set fast enough to stop Robison collapsing if not turning the corner. The interior 3 were pretty good, apart from a couple of misses on Heremanns.

The run blocking was inconsistent as well, Heremanns and Ertz had a few misses that I noticed and overall they seemed to have less success this game with the 2 double teams at the point with guys then slipping off to attack the LBs on the Inside Zone runs. For whatever reason they weren't getting off those initial blocks and to the 2nd level and the LBs were making plays. 28 of Shady's yards came on two plays, one a nicely executed outside zone, the other what looked like a broken play where either Foles or Shady went the wrong way. Outside that there wasn't a lot of space.

They key to this offense beating this kind of defensive game plan is to take the plays that are there in the passing game, and we consistently didn't see them or didn't execute. Some examples:

• They play where Polk dropped the ball in the right flat, Cooper had 2 steps on his man down the left sideline with the S stuck between the hashes. Potential TD there.
• There was a play in the 3rd where Foles hit Ertz for 5 yds or so, but missed Shady breaking open on a wheel route covered by a S, another potential TD.
• There was a play where Foles scrambled for about 5 in the 2nd Q, don't think he had his eyes downfield on that because a few yards before he crossed the LoS, Cooper broke his route towards the sideline, with his man trailing and no other defender around, another potential TD.
• Foles badly overthrew a wide open Avant on 3rd and 16 near the right sideline, would have been a 1st.
• Foles led Cooper out of bounds on what should have been a TD pass. A better player might make the circus catch and keep his feet in bounds, but the throw was off target.

Looking at the INT live, I thought he'd thrown up a 50/50 ball and got stung for the gamble, in reality it was much worse. Jackson crossed the formation in motion, nobody came with him, which should have told Foles this was zone coverage. He was under center for this play, and turned his back for the PA fake, which may have something to do with the results. Jackson was uncovered completely off the line, Prater was actually covering Cooper until he passed him to the middle S. He kind of half trailed in no mans land (probably had deep third responsibility) and Foles just launched the ball right to him, like he didn't see him. Jackson may not have seen him either, because he was so open he'd been running with his head turned back to the ball for about 20 yards. Just a complete head scratcher.If you look at Foles on the balls which are not thrown well, a lot of the time it seems due to sloppy footwork. When he has his feet set and gets hip rotation and back foot to front weight transfer the ball comes out with decent velocity, a nice spiral and good accuracy. At times he'll plant his front foot wide to the left or not do much with his feet at all (sometimes due to the pocket collapsing), that's when the ball seems to be off target much more often. Some of these throws do work, but at least in that game there's a clear difference in how the ball comes out based on the footwork. We already knew he's not a guy like Favre or Jeff George who can throw just with his arm, if this difference is consistent he's going to need to be conscious of being consistent with throwing off a proper platform. I'm going to watch this much more closely in the last two games to see if it's just a once off or if there's something to it.

love your breakdowns, keep them comin!

X2

I'd pay for this kind of analysis.

 

[dhockster]

Man. Bears need to lose this game. Lost my semi game last week to a guy I hate, who is a Bear's fan. Now he is in the championship game (has Jeffery, Cutler and Forte) and the Eagles will have a direct effect on what level of $$ he gets (as well as what level of happiness I get). With that said, I just found out the #####'s girl had been cheating on him for a while, so that made me happy. I hate dbags.

Does he know this? If not, and he wins the championship, you can always tell him this to ruin his victory. That would be the shark move.

 

[Terpman22]

Man. Bears need to lose this game. Lost my semi game last week to a guy I hate, who is a Bear's fan. Now he is in the championship game (has Jeffery, Cutler and Forte) and the Eagles will have a direct effect on what level of $$ he gets (as well as what level of happiness I get). With that said, I just found out the #####'s girl had been cheating on him for a while, so that made me happy. I hate dbags.

Does he know this? If not, and he wins the championship, you can always tell him this to ruin his victory. That would be the shark move.

Ha. Well, the good news is I found out the day after he beat me. That made me smile. And that fact that he knows and is still with the slut.

 

[Don't Noonan]

Who is the number 2 RB for the Eagles behind McCoy?

 

[Awful Waffle]

Who is the number 2 RB for the Eagles behind McCoy?

Chris Polk. Looks like he jumped ahead of Bryce Brown.

 

[Justloveit]

Hi guys,

I live overseas so dont have access to a lot of info.

Is there a scenario where Desean Jackson might get rested? Or is he a lock to play?

 

[Deamon]

Hi guys,

I live overseas so dont have access to a lot of info.

Is there a scenario where Desean Jackson might get rested? Or is he a lock to play?

There's a chance, but it's doubtful. If Dallas beats Washington in the morning, then our game is irrelevant but all indications are that we will play the starters regardless of this. I would start him with confidence, with a very small downgrade if dallas beats washington as there's a chance we could sit him maybe for the 4th quarter depending on the score.

 

[Justloveit]

thanks for your reply

 

[Mighty Mice]

Special teams has to be better today than it has been the last 2 games. Both TDs allowed v Detroit on returns and the ridiculous field position disadvantage kickoffs put the team in last week v Minnesota killed us. This game could be high scoring, close, and key plays on special teams might make or break the Eagles today.

 

[Mighty Mice]

Big day today. Go Redskins, and GO EAGLES!!!!

Bears run defense last 7 games:

Week 9 Lacy 22/150/1

Week 10 Bush 14/105; Bell 10/41

Week 11 Rice 25/131/1

Week 12 Cunningham 13/109/1; Austin 1/65/1; Stacy 12/87/1

Week 13 Peterson 35/211

Week 14 Murray 18/146; Randle 9/53/1

Week 15 Baker 8/38/1 (Team totals 17/93 well over 5 ypc)

Eagles #1 run offense... who will stop McCoy today? If Reid were still here I would be worried that Shady might get 12 carries and Foles throws 42 passes in the rain against the worst run d in the league. Let's see what Chip does tonight.

Who else sees Washington giving Dallas all sorts of problems in the spoiler role this week? Dangerous game for the 'Boys.

 

[Iwannabeacowboybaby!]

Big day today. Go Redskins, and GO EAGLES!!!!

Who else sees Washington giving Dallas all sorts of problems in the spoiler role this week? Dangerous game for the 'Boys.

If Green Bay can beat Dallas at home, then any team in the league can give Dallas problems. I would rather see Rg3 in there as Cousins brings in a breath of fresh air feeling. It doesn't get much easier defensively than playing against Atlanta and then the Cowboys to give the Skins false hopes or at least inflated hopes as if the rest of the NFL plays as bad as defense.

Anyway, that game will be close and Dallas is 2nd to none in finding new and interesting ways to lose games so it will be entertaining to say the least.

 

[Kwai Chang Caine]

For Christ sakes guys. They ain't sitting players. If if it means playing for three seed. You think anyone wants to be in the Seattle bracket?

 

[Snotbubbles]

For Christ sakes guys. They ain't sitting players. If if it means playing for three seed. You think anyone wants to be in the Seattle bracket?

Playing at NO or SEA, it doesn't matter. Philly can't beat either of those teams at their place. At this point, just making the playoffs should be the goal. If that means resting guys so they are ready for next week, so be it.

 

[Deamon]

For Christ sakes guys. They ain't sitting players. If if it means playing for three seed. You think anyone wants to be in the Seattle bracket?

Playing at NO or SEA, it doesn't matter. Philly can't beat either of those teams at their place. At this point, just making the playoffs should be the goal. If that means resting guys so they are ready for next week, so be it.

I agree with both of these statements. Personally I would MUCH rather play @ New O (similar time zone, fast turf indoors, new o hit or miss at times) then @ Seattle (haven't lost at home in 2 years, tough loud outdoor stadium, lots of travel).

However, unfortunately teams historically don't care about the 3 vs 4 seed. Chip said we need to get back on track and he won't rest starters though, so I see them playing to win in the first half at least.

 

[eoMMan]

So do we want Dallas to win or lose? Lose, right?

 

[Deamon]

So do we want Dallas to win or lose? Lose, right?

Yes, lose. If they lose, we can clinch the division tonight with a win.

If Dallas wins, tonights game becomes irrelevant and week 17 vs Dallas is for the playoff berth.

 

[Mighty Mice]

Yes, Dallas to lose. Eagles could clinch NFC East with win and Dallas loss.

 

[Deamon]

Yes, Dallas to lose. Eagles could clinch NFC East with win and Dallas loss.

Couldn't even look at one post above yours?

 

[Deamon]

WOOO! Go Skins!

 

[babydemon90]

It's not irrelevant if Dallas wins. Pls stop saying that.

 

[Deamon]

It's not irrelevant if Dallas wins. Pls stop saying that.

Please stop saying teams care about if they get the 3 or 4 seed. They don't. The ONLY thing it matters for is the 3 or 4 seed, but has zero effect on if we win the division. ANyways, hoping Washington holds on here and we have a shot at winning the div tonight. If we win the div tonight, you won't likely see starters in vs Dallas week 17 even though it could be the difference between the 3 and the 4.

 

[Mighty Mice]

Yes, Dallas to lose. Eagles could clinch NFC East with win and Dallas loss.

Couldn't even look at one post above yours?

Was in process of typing at same time I guess.

Anyways, pretty great to be looking at playoff positioning right now. Might be able to win division tonight and that's a great thing!

 

[Deamon]

Yes, Dallas to lose. Eagles could clinch NFC East with win and Dallas loss.

Couldn't even look at one post above yours?

Was in process of typing at same time I guess.

Anyways, pretty great to be looking at playoff positioning right now. Might be able to win division tonight and that's a great thing!

Yep, hoping wash doesn't pull a dallas here!

 

[babydemon90]

It's not irrelevant if Dallas wins. Pls stop saying that.

Please stop saying teams care about if they get the 3 or 4 seed. They don't. The ONLY thing it matters for is the 3 or 4 seed, but has zero effect on if we win the division. ANyways, hoping Washington holds on here and we have a shot at winning the div tonight. If we win the div tonight, you won't likely see starters in vs Dallas week 17 even though it could be the difference between the 3 and the 4.

There is a non-zero chance of a week 17 tie, no ? So this week matters, regardless. HTH.

 

[Deamon]

It's not irrelevant if Dallas wins. Pls stop saying that.

Please stop saying teams care about if they get the 3 or 4 seed. They don't. The ONLY thing it matters for is the 3 or 4 seed, but has zero effect on if we win the division. ANyways, hoping Washington holds on here and we have a shot at winning the div tonight. If we win the div tonight, you won't likely see starters in vs Dallas week 17 even though it could be the difference between the 3 and the 4.

There is a non-zero chance of a week 17 tie, no ? So this week matters, regardless. HTH.

Pretty close to non-zero. About 1 in 1000 games end in a tie.

 

[Deamon]

Ugh how do you blow a coverage like that

 

[Awful Waffle]

Washington is so useless.

 

[Snotbubbles]

Even if Dallas wins this game, I have absolute confidence that Philly will go into Dallas and lay a good ol' ### whooping on Dallas.

 

[Deamon]

Even if Dallas wins this game, I have absolute confidence that Philly will go into Dallas and lay a good ol' ### whooping on Dallas.

I like our chances in Dallas too... but that week of rest would have been nice. And you never know what could happen in a winner take all game in Dallas.

 

[ShaHBucks]

Do we not have wildcard scenerios with a loss next week?

 

[Deamon]

Even if Dallas wins this game, I have absolute confidence that Philly will go into Dallas and lay a good ol' ### whooping on Dallas.

I like our chances in Dallas too... but that week of rest would have been nice. And you never know what could happen in a winner take all game in Dallas.

I hate the way they won this game too.... gonna give them lots of confidence and momentum

 

[Deamon]

Do we not have wildcard scenerios with a loss next week?

Nope... We can't catch sf OR car/no with a loss next week.

 

[Billy Bats]

Was setting up for a big night then the Redskins and Romo ####### ruined it. Bleh.

 

[Manster]

Even if Dallas wins this game, I have absolute confidence that Philly will go into Dallas and lay a good ol' ### whooping on Dallas.

Absolute? It could definately happen, but I wouldnt be absolutely confident in the eagles.

Look, I'm used to the Cowboys folding to end the season, but Im not absolutely confident they will.

Hopefully we beat down dirty chip and co.! see u next week iggles

 

[Snotbubbles]

Even if Dallas wins this game, I have absolute confidence that Philly will go into Dallas and lay a good ol' ### whooping on Dallas.

Absolute? It could definately happen, but I wouldnt be absolutely confident in the eagles.

Look, I'm used to the Cowboys folding to end the season, but Im not absolutely confident they will.

Hopefully we beat down dirty chip and co.! see u next week iggles

Yes, absolute. Dallas will be going for the NFC East last week choke trifecta next week.

 

[fred_1_15301]

Even if Dallas wins this game, I have absolute confidence that Philly will go into Dallas and lay a good ol' ### whooping on Dallas.

Absolute? It could definately happen, but I wouldnt be absolutely confident in the eagles. Look, I'm used to the Cowboys folding to end the season, but Im not absolutely confident they will.

Hopefully we beat down dirty chip and co.! see u next week iggles

Yes, absolute. Dallas will be going for the NFC East last week choke trifecta next week.

Just a hunch but I doubt you'll be this confident at around 8:00 next week. Regardless of what you think about the Cowboys, they still have a QB who has the potential to carry a team. He certainly didn't choke today when the opportunity was there. They also have a pretty explosive offense. Also, in a one game do or die situation anything can happen. Given that the game is in Dallas, I actually expect the Cowboys to be favored. A little surprised at how confident you are........

 

[Snotbubbles]

Even if Dallas wins this game, I have absolute confidence that Philly will go into Dallas and lay a good ol' ### whooping on Dallas.

Absolute? It could definately happen, but I wouldnt be absolutely confident in the eagles. Look, I'm used to the Cowboys folding to end the season, but Im not absolutely confident they will.

Hopefully we beat down dirty chip and co.! see u next week iggles

Yes, absolute. Dallas will be going for the NFC East last week choke trifecta next week.

Just a hunch but I doubt you'll be this confident at around 8:00 next week. Regardless of what you think about the Cowboys, they still have a QB who has the potential to carry a team. He certainly didn't choke today when the opportunity was there. They also have a pretty explosive offense. Also, in a one game do or die situation anything can happen. Given that the game is in Dallas, I actually expect the Cowboys to be favored. A little surprised at how confident you are........

I have a good read on the Eagles. That's why.

 

[Billy Bats]

Romo finally makes a play and we get infested by the roaches. Somebody turn on the lights in here.

 

[Buddy Ball 2K3]

Even if Dallas wins this game, I have absolute confidence that Philly will go into Dallas and lay a good ol' ### whooping on Dallas.

Absolute? It could definately happen, but I wouldnt be absolutely confident in the eagles. Look, I'm used to the Cowboys folding to end the season, but Im not absolutely confident they will.

Hopefully we beat down dirty chip and co.! see u next week iggles

Good to see you guys, where ya been?

 

[Snotbubbles]

Romo finally makes a play and we get infested by the roaches. Somebody turn on the lights in here.

Next week.

The beautiful thing about Dallas is this is as good as it will get for the next couple seasons. Their cap is so mismanaged.

 

[Manster]

i dont come into this crapshack often. Just curious. Thanks for solidifying why typically avoid anything iggle.

Im not the guy who thinks the Cowboys are going to the SB every year. Quite the opposite. I know the story all too well. So your insults mean nothing to me.

I just hope we send dirty chip back to ####hole philly with his tail between his legs.......cuz i know he has a tail

 

[Deamon]

i dont come into this crapshack often. Just curious. Thanks for solidifying why typically avoid anything iggle.

Im not the guy who thinks the Cowboys are going to the SB every year. Quite the opposite. I know the story all too well. So your insults mean nothing to me.

I just hope we send dirty chip back to ####hole philly with his tail between his legs.......cuz i know he has a tail

What has he done dirty? He left his arrogance in Oregon for the most part and has been pretty respectable in the nfl, do you see anything different?

As for next week, I think it'll be a pickem game for the spread. Could be anyones game, I'm confident we will win the game but I wouldn't say absolute confidence or that it's anywhere close to a sure thing.