What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

2016 Anarchy League 6 Thread (1 Viewer)

I wonder if that is the ideal use of the flex spot?
I'd probably have gone that way myself if Ladarius hadn't fallen to me at TE32. My priority for the flex in a 0/1/2 progressive format was always gonna be TE, but if you want to shoot the moon and win this thing, I would speculate you're more likely to hit the jackpot late at RB (who may have to climb over only 1 other guy to get bellcow work) than at WR (who may have to surmount 2-3 guys to get starter's targets).

But instead, I'm going to war at the position with Ivory, Coleman, Chris Thompson, and D-Mac. So, yeah, about that blocking factor ...

 
You have a starter. I think.  :)

I might have a starter, but he has a borderline HOF RB trying to take his job.

I wonder how much Chris Thompson can do if Washington has no other options? 

There are some players in camp right now that I didn't even realize were still in the league.

 
Biabreakable said:
You have a starter. I think.  :)

I might have a starter, but he has a borderline HOF RB trying to take his job.

I wonder how much Chris Thompson can do if Washington has no other options? 
I was going to respond that it's more a bet against Jones than in favor of Thompson, and then realized my entire RB corps is basically bets against other RBs.

I've never liked Yeldon, am lukewarm on Jones, and don't think Freeman's 2015 is anywhere near repeatable. And even for all the hype, EzE is, lest we forget, a rookie, and the bust rates on rookies are not insignificant.

I suppose I have the best odds to trail the league in RB scoring, but at least instead of plodders I have four guys who could make some noise if they stay healthy and a couple supposed #1s spit the bit.

 
Feels good to finally finish.  Overall I'm pretty happy with my team.  I was very happy to get AB with the second pick.

 
The 5 RBs was a partial miscalculation in my predraft. I didn't want both Sporles and Hillman at the previous turn. I predrafted because I was on nights. I thought I was safe to get Aiken, Smith or Sharpe. 

I took Alf right after because if Zeke has a gets injured, it's a league winning type of pick up. 

Also, my general strategy this year is to go RB heavy. Everyone is going crazy with WR (rightfully) but you win leagues by going against the grain, right??? Anarchy leagues are their own beast however.

 
Morris is a guy I would have picked over Johnathan WIlliams. I have barely even watched Williams, I have just heard several people say good things about him. I don't think I have heard anyone say they like Alex Collins more than Williams, and I think Collins is a pretty decent RB.

Happy to add Jocob Tamme the most hated player in the NFL and apparently fantasy circles as well for my flex.  :)

 
Also, my general strategy this year is to go RB heavy. Everyone is going crazy with WR (rightfully) but you win leagues by going against the grain, right??? Anarchy leagues are their own beast however.
I like to zig when other zag as well. However being contrarian is not how you win leagues. You win leagues by scoring more points than your competition. If you can do something different and that leads to a competitive advantage then it makes sense. Doing something different just to be different does not, although it is still fun.

 
I like to zig when other zag as well. However being contrarian is not how you win leagues. You win leagues by scoring more points than your competition. If you can do something different and that leads to a competitive advantage then it makes sense. Doing something different just to be different does not, although it is still fun.
Yeah. I had a bunch more written out about that but erased it because A) I can rambling on with the best of them and B) this thread is about this league not draft strategy. But since you asked...

Right now everyone is going so heavy with WRs (especially at the top of drafts) that there's RBs who should've got way before that are still on the board. Last, in my home league (14 teams) I went RB in all four of the first rounds. I lost in the finals because of stupid Blair Walsh killing my kicker. I don't even remember who mine was.

Anyways, going RB early is risky because they get hurt but when you have 4 solid starters (start 2 RB league), you could lose 50% of your picks to injury and still in a decent spot. Outside of someone picking up, DJ or Freeman, you're liking to be winning big at the RB spot. Everyone claims you can get these guys off the WW and there is players like them every year but there's no guarantee that you'll be the one who gets them. Plus, there's also a ton of guys who will flash then do nothing. At WR, there's also break outs but usually you can at least get guys will put up some points. Plus, look at the WRs in the 10-15th rounds. They aren't studs but they will at least put up something. VJax and Garçon. Rishard Mathews is a #1 WR on his team. Am I excited about them? No. But they will do. Plus, if my backs are all doing good I should be able to move one of them to a team that has nothing at RB for a decent WR. 

I can probably go on but that's enough for now. Rambling man. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I appreciate a good ramble.

The draft is done now so a good time to talk about strategy, what worked? What didn't?

I consider FF especially in a total points format to be a lot about risk management and playing the odds.

Last season only 8 RB made the top 100 scorers in this format. Only 39 RB scored over 100 points. In 2014 11 RB finished in the top 100 and 35 scored over 100 points.

Last season 37 WR finished in the top 100. 74 of them scored over 100 points. In 2014 33 WR finished in the top 100 and 77 of them scored over 100 points.

Value Based Drafting does not matter as much in total points format as it does in head to head leagues.

The odds are against you drafting RB in the top 100 picks in this format.

We must draft 64 RB. RB 64 the last two seasons has scored about 57 points. So these are the kind of points you may be looking at drafting a RB as your flex player.

There are TE who were not drafted who should score 80 or more points. If everyone drafted a 3rd TE that would be 48 drafted. TE 48 scored 56 points last season and 63 points in 2014 which is about the same or better than RB 64.

WR 81 to 93 scored more points than RB 64 last season. WR 81 to 96 scored more than RB 64 in 2014.

In 2016 there were 36 TE drafted. TE 36 scored an average of 92 points over the last 2 seasons.

Jacob Tamme scored 189 points in this format last season.

So for the flex spot you have a combination of more upside and a higher floor filling that spot with a WR or TE compared to a RB.

It still comes down to the particular player, and Morris may outperform RB 64 points significantly. I am just saying that you have better odds of landing a higher scoring WR or TE late in the draft compared to a RB.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I drafted three RB in the Top 100 picks in League 2 and won. IMO, you need to get players to outperform and have players stay healthy to win. 

 
I appreciate a good ramble.

The draft is done now so a good time to talk about strategy, what worked? What didn't?

I consider FF especially in a total points format to be a lot about risk management and playing the odds.

Last season only 8 RB made the top 100 scorers in this format. Only 39 RB scored over 100 points. In 2014 11 RB finished in the top 100 and 35 scored over 100 points.

Last season 37 WR finished in the top 100. 74 of them scored over 100 points. In 2014 33 WR finished in the top 100 and 77 of them scored over 100 points.

Value Based Drafting does not matter as much in total points format as it does in head to head leagues.

The odds are against you drafting RB in the top 100 picks in this format.

We must draft 64 RB. RB 64 the last two seasons has scored about 57 points. So these are the kind of points you may be looking at drafting a RB as your flex player.

There are TE who were not drafted who should score 80 or more points. If everyone drafted a 3rd TE that would be 48 drafted. TE 48 scored 56 points last season and 63 points in 2014 which is about the same or better than RB 64.

WR 81 to 93 scored more points than RB 64 last season. WR 81 to 96 scored more than RB 64 in 2014.

In 2016 there were 36 TE drafted. TE 36 scored an average of 92 points over the last 2 seasons.

Jacob Tamme scored 189 points in this format last season.

So for the flex spot you have a combination of more upside and a higher floor filling that spot with a WR or TE compared to a RB.

It still comes down to the particular player, and Morris may outperform RB 64 points significantly. I am just saying that you have better odds of landing a higher scoring WR or TE late in the draft compared to a RB.
Drafting RBs in the early rounds is fine, because what matters there is how much of an edge they give you over the RBs who are going later (compared with the same question at other positions). That is the idea behind value based drafting, and it applies to this draft as much as anywhere.

But you never want to draft a RB as your flex in this league, outside of very rare cases (e.g., if you're on the clock late in the draft and it's suddenly announced that Mark Ingram is out for the year and Tim Hightower is going to be the workhorse). When you're choosing between RB, WR, and TE for your flex spot, you just want the guy who is going to score the most points, and that is never going to be a 0 ppr RB (outside of very rare cases).

 
Yeah VBD principles do still apply. I just don't think that is as relevant in total points format as it is in head to head formats.

Some folks rely on points per game as the basis of their player evaluation, which is also more applicable to head to head formats, but not as much in total points.

 
My first-ever Anarchy draft is in the books. Critiques welcomed:

1.04 - Julio Jones, ATL (WR3). Would have taken him even at 1.02. A huge talent, in his prime, who's the Vegas favorite to lead the league in receiving yards. If the Falcons back-door their way to an NFC South title he could feasibly be the #1 non-QB.

2.13 - Delanie Walker, TEN (TE6). A "grit my teeth" pick as I expect some target regression for him ... doubly so as a Titan in a playoff league ... triply so as Mike Evans was still on the board, and I love Evans this year. But this format seems similar to this year's SSL3 (2PPR for TEs with 1 TE + a flex), so my default strategy was the same (TEs early and often). Last year's 338 points probably a pipe dream, but should be a safe bet for 250+.

3.04 / 4.13 - Brandin Cooks, NO (WR16) / Julian Edelman, NE (WR26). Target monsters, check. #1 options on pass-first offenses, check. Future HOF QBs, check. Cooks gets a bump from the Saints' plane-crash defense, Edelman from the prospect of multiple playoff games. Barring injury, should generate 450 points between them.

5.04 - Antonio Gates, SD (TE13). There's a big enough drop between Gates and the next tier of TEs that I don't mind sewing up my starters at the quarter-pole. Should again be in the mix for 80 catches and 10 TDs opposite Keenan, especially after Stevie's injury. There's a real chance my first five picks could net 800 targets between them, which I'll take every day of the week in this type of format.

Interlude: At this point in the draft my roster likely has the highest floor of any in the league. Which would be great news in the survivor format, where the goal is "don't finish last", but probably not good enough for a league where the goal is "put up more points than 15 other teams". So around this point I switched tacks by leaning towards boom-or-bust options ahead of safe, steady types.

6.13 - Allen Hurns, JAX (WR40). Passed on a handful of borderline QB1/2s like Dalton and Stafford in order to shoot for upside with someone like Cousins or Taylor. Instead I went with a pure value play with Hurns - at #93 overall, about a round lower than in other Anarchy leagues. I'm expecting some TD regression but he should still be a good bet for 1,000 yards, as I expect the JAX pass game regression to come out of AR15's numbers before Hurns'.

7.04 - Washington, TMQB (Cousins - QB15). Shooting for the moon here with Cousins - to be honest, a half-season of lights-out performances against bad defenses carries echoes of Nick Foles to me, but in this format even a small chance at top-5 stats probably justifies a QB15 price tag.

8.13 - Chris Ivory, JAX (RB36). Now that I've finally gotten around to considering RBs, the pickins are as slim as I expected them to be. In this format, the true 'boom or bust' RBs are actually two-down GL backs, and Ivory fits the mold. I wouldn't want to count on him in a survivor, but here if he can get into the end zone 8-10 times I don't much care when they happen.

9.04 - Seahawks, DST (DST3). I had a couple guys in mind I wouldn't hate to reach for here, but I gambled I'd be able to catch at least one of them on the way back in the 10th. Instead I went with the D/ST with the greatest track record of elite performance in the NFL. A good bet for 100+ VBD, as much or more than I can get anywhere else at this point.

10.13 - Tevin Coleman, ATL (RB45). Dan Quinn is talking up a timeshare, which seems bizarre when the other guy was last year's fantasy RB1. But Coleman's got enough talent that I think he carves out a significant role regardless. Thought about Blount here, but chose to roll with the lower floor and higher ceiling.

11.04 - Ladarius Green, PIT (TE32). Welp, I said I was going boom-or-bust, right? Top-10 potential if he plays, and last season TE10 scored 243 points - so I'll take a 50/50 shot at that (or maybe that pace for a half-season) over any RB/WR left on the board here. Could be the difference between finishing 1st and 4th ... or between 12th and last.

12.13 - Chris Boswell, PIT (PK10). Solid kicker on a good offense with playoff potential - don't want to get caught out here as can happen once we get into the 20s.

13.04 - Titans, TMQB (Mariota - QB23). IMO, this spot is ridiculous value for Mariota as a rising second-year passer with lots of new offensive weapons on a bad team that will have to throw a bunch. A couple of new backs with pass-catching chops should offer additional point potential via dump-off and swing-pass TDs. Didn't really consider anyone else at this spot - and knowing this kind of value is available at QB late just reinforces my "wait forever on QB" mindset for 2016, even in leagues like this one where every QB is rostered.

14.13 - Chris Thompson, WAS (RB61). Catches a lot of balls, which doesn't matter overly much in 0PPR. Second on the depth chart behind an unproven 23-year-old with ball-control issues, which might. Don't think he has the size or stamina to be an every-down back, but it's at least a little telling that the Skins haven't been big fishermen in the FA RB pool. At least some potential for playoff points here as well.

15.04 - Chris Hogan, NE (WR74). Cornering the market on dudes named Chris - so there's that. Anyway, if there are two things we've learned about Belichick, it's that he'll make the playoffs, and that his RB and WR depth charts exist in name only. Plenty of upside on his own merits, but might also offer some handcuff value to my 4th-round pick should he again miss time.

16.13 - Roberto Aguayo, TB (PK26). Y'all are funny. I got this kid at PK26 in PDSL, then watched him go 8th off the board in my SSL, and then fall all the way back to PK26 again here. What's changed, really? Barring an Ankiel-like meltdown he isn't getting cut this year, and he should be on a solid but not spectacular offense. Middle-of-the-pack performance with top-10 upside.

17.04 - Darren MacFadden, DAL (RB66). Just because I apparently felt like cornering the market on talented backs with recurring injury issues. And because someone has to win the NFC East.

18.13 - Browns, DST (DST31). Because past the top 5, defenses are kinda random year-to-year. 

Overall my mix of floor and ceiling should keep me in the fat part of the bell curve at worst. Obvious weak spots are my RBs and the relative sparsity of names with deep playoff potential. In exchange I've got a really high floor at WR and TE, a QB combo with risk but a ton of upside, and a flex who can carry this team to a title on his back if he actually comes out of that tunnel and plays a full 16 or close to it. Not sure I have the horses at QB or RB to ultimately take this puppy home, but not a squad I'm embarrassed about either.

Thanks to @Anarchy99 for cutting me in on the fun this year and best of luck to all. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I feel like I stole from everyone when I got Stills with my very last pick.  Couldn't believe he was still there in this deep of a draft.

 
Stills could wind up being one of the biggest bargains that late in the draft. Which gives me an idea. Why not post some of the best value for their draft position picks at the end of the season? 

That could be fun to look back on.

I like Mr Ir's draft a lot. I think it could have been good by going with Evans instead of Walker, but you made a rational decision there due to the scarcity of high volume reception TE. I think he got some nice value with his picks.

Thats funny about the Bucs kicker. Drafters can be a fickle bunch. What may have been considered a reality for months gets swept away in the blink of an eye on one play in a game that doesn't matter. Getting caught up in the excitement of actual plays being made instead of pondering what maybe could happen.

I try to keep perspective. My dynasty focus fits season long formats like this better than head to head leagues where being hot on the wire allows drafters some more risks.

How could a redraft format be closer to dynasty than this?

 
I think it's safe to say that unless we redefine the postseason to include the rest of 2017, no one's gonna catch @Genester. Here's the complete list of squads within 400 points of him:  :shock:


Franchise


PF


Avg PF


Genester


3207.54


188.7


Go DC Yourself


3032.66


178.4


Mr. Irrelevant


2971.78


174.8


Grigs Allmoon


2859.62


168.2


 Hawkeye21


2831.14


166.5

But hey, everyone knows that the Anarchy leagues run all the way through the Super Bowl, and a lot can change between now and then. Maybe he doesn't have a lot of scoring potential in the playoffs and DC or I can make a late r... hey, wait a min... holy ####, he's still got all these guys left?


[SIZE=9pt]Player[/SIZE]



[SIZE=9pt]YTD Pts[/SIZE]



[SIZE=9pt]Bye[/SIZE]



[SIZE=9pt]Drafted[/SIZE]



[SIZE=9pt]Packers, Green Bay GBP TMQB[/SIZE]



[SIZE=9pt]466.50[/SIZE]



[SIZE=9pt]4[/SIZE]



[SIZE=9pt]1.06[/SIZE]



[SIZE=9pt]Patriots, New England NEP TMQB[/SIZE]



[SIZE=9pt]389.84[/SIZE]



[SIZE=9pt]9[/SIZE]



[SIZE=9pt]2.11[/SIZE]



[SIZE=9pt]Blount, LeGarrette NEP RB[/SIZE]



[SIZE=9pt]227.90[/SIZE]



[SIZE=9pt]9[/SIZE]



[SIZE=9pt]11.06[/SIZE]



[SIZE=9pt]Williams, Terrance DAL WR[/SIZE]



[SIZE=9pt]127.40[/SIZE]



[SIZE=9pt]7[/SIZE]



[SIZE=9pt]14.11[/SIZE]



[SIZE=9pt]Hooper, Austin ATL TE ([/SIZE][SIZE=9pt]Q[/SIZE][SIZE=9pt])[/SIZE]



[SIZE=9pt]83.10[/SIZE]



[SIZE=9pt]11[/SIZE]



[SIZE=9pt]16.11[/SIZE]



[SIZE=9pt]James, Jesse PIT TE[/SIZE]



[SIZE=9pt]129.80[/SIZE]



[SIZE=9pt]8[/SIZE]



[SIZE=9pt]10.11[/SIZE]



[SIZE=9pt]Crosby, Mason GBP PK[/SIZE]



[SIZE=9pt]134.00[/SIZE]



[SIZE=9pt]4[/SIZE]



[SIZE=9pt]12.11[/SIZE]



[SIZE=9pt]Packers, Green Bay GBP Def[/SIZE]



[SIZE=9pt]123.00[/SIZE]



[SIZE=9pt]4[/SIZE]



[SIZE=9pt]13.06[/SIZE]


I don't know the all-time Anarchy League scoring record, but he's gotta have it pretty squarely in his sights. Congrats in advance.​
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks, but no thanks :-) I haven't checked all the teams, but both you and DC have more players in the play-offs than I do. Don't think it is a done deal at all.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Genester isn't that close to being the highest scoring team this season. He's roughly 160 points behind swabs from League 7.

I believe the all time scoring record was Stinkin' Ref (3781.76) in League 4 in 2011 

Genester will need to get roughly 411 points in the playoffs from ATL TMQB, DET TMQB, Bell, Perkins, Cooper, Landry, TWilliams, James, Prater to break the record.

 
You have the wrong team there :)
Yeah, well, I still have the New Year's hangover. 

swabsr will need to get roughly 411 points in the playoffs from ATL TMQB, DET TMQB, Bell, Perkins, Cooper, Landry, TWilliams, James, Prater to break the record.

 
Anarchy99 said:
Genester isn't that close to being the highest scoring team this season. He's roughly 160 points behind swabs from League 7.

I believe the all time scoring record was Stinkin' Ref (3781.76) in League 4 in 2011 
So, in other words, it's not so much Genester putting up an all-time epic performance as the rest of us League 6ers being god-awful.  :mellow:

 
So, in other words, it's not so much Genester putting up an all-time epic performance as the rest of us League 6ers being god-awful.  :mellow:
I was keeping up for most of the year but when Reed went down and Blair Walsh got cut my team started to fade back a lot.

@Anarchy99 which leagues score the most total points overall? That might be a way to measure which leagues captured the most possible points. My guess would be the league of champions, but I could be wrong.

 
I was keeping up for most of the year but when Reed went down and Blair Walsh got cut my team started to fade back a lot.

@Anarchy99 which leagues score the most total points overall? That might be a way to measure which leagues captured the most possible points. My guess would be the league of champions, but I could be wrong.
I'd imagine all the cumulative scores would be within a couple percent of each other, if only because there's going to be 95%+ overlap in league-wide rosters. Every QB, every DST, and essentially every PK is drafted, so from one league to the next the only differences are going to be maybe 10-12 late-round RB/WR/TE fliers.

If it were possible to measure such a thing, the best way to determine the "savviest" leagues would probably be something like "hidden net value gained" - the leagues in which the names that were drafted early relative to other leagues outperformed the most, and those drafted relatively later underperformed the most, if that makes any sense. Note that I am in no way volunteering to figure this out.  :)

 
I will post the league scoring totals after I calculate them, but they won't really show anything. For starters, 98-99% of the league composition in terms of rosters will be the same. Usually only a few late round picks will vary. If those outliers will change based on how late the leagues drafted. Leagues that draft later will have a slight advantage, as some players will get hurt, other folks may have earned a more defined role, more news came out, etc.

IMO, the best way to judge which league drafted better is the narrowness of the scoring bandwidth. So in reality, leagues with lower scoring at the top but more competitive likely equals a better number of top drafters than a few teams scoring leaps and bounds above the majority of the league. All leagues will have some teams that don't do well, but looking at the rosters some owners will have bad luck and end up with a ton of injuries. It happens.

 
could maybe take a look at the players not drafted......here are the top 50 guys league 2 missed on...... 

1-4 put up over 200 points...with Pitta being the biggest miss at just over 250.....Sims at 32 was last player with over 100....

There were 288 players drafted.....1-45 finished in the top 288....

I think that might be a way to look at it....(which league had the lowest number of players in the top 288 "not drafted")....league 2 had 45.....whereas league 1 had 47.....haven't looked at the other leagues....Russell Shepard is the baseline....

Of the top 500 scoring players....Adrian Peterson was the worst player drafted...followed by Doctson and McFadden....Jeremyx13 drafted two of those...#badluck

1.    42.    Pitta, Dennis BAL TE    
2.    66.    Williams, Tyrell SDC WR    
3.    72.    Doyle, Jack IND TE    
4.    78.    Hill, Tyreek KCC WR    
5.    84.    Thielen, Adam MIN WR    
6.    94.    Fiedorowicz, C.J. HOU TE    
7.    97.    LaFell, Brandon CIN WR    
8.    98.    Meredith, Cameron CHI WR    
9.    107.    Lee, Marqise JAC WR    
10.    115.    Enunwa, Quincy NYJ WR    
11.    121.    Inman, Dontrelle SDC WR    
12.    128.    Davis, Vernon WAS TE    
13.    132.    Sturgis, Caleb PHI PK    
14.    138.    Lutz, Wil NOS PK    
15.    145.    Kerley, Jeremy SFO WR    
16.    156.    Montgomery, Ty GBP WR    
17.    159.    Nelson, J.J. ARI WR    
18.    161.    Gabriel, Taylor ATL WR    
19.    171.    Humphries, Adam TBB WR    
20.    174.    James, Jesse PIT TE    
21.    180.    Rogers, Eli PIT WR    
22.    181.    Gresham, Jermaine ARI TE    
23.    190.    Kelley, Rob WAS RB    
24.    197.    Anderson, Robby NYJ WR    
25.    198.    Gillislee, Mike BUF RB    
26.    200.    Quick, Brian RAM WR    
27.    202.    Patterson, Cordarrelle MIN WR    
28.    204.    Burton, Trey PHI TE    
29.    206.    Roberts, Seth OAK WR    
30.    208.    Celek, Garrett SFO TE    
31.    226.    Asiata, Matt MIN RB    
32.    229.    Sims, Dion MIA TE    
33.    251.    Goodwin, Marquise BUF WR    
34.    259.    Richard, Jalen OAK RB    
35.    262.    Hawkins, Andrew CLE WR    
36.    266.    Turbin, Robert IND RB    
37.    269.    Draughn, Shaun SFO RB    
38.    270.    Royal, Eddie CHI WR    
39.    271.    Wilson, Albert KCC WR    
40.    273.    Uzomah, C.J. CIN TE    
41.    275.    Patton, Quinton SFO WR    
42.    276.    Rodgers, Jacquizz TBB RB    
43.    277.    Zenner, Zach DET RB    
44.    282.    Williams, Damien MIA RB    
45.    287.    Shepard, Russell TBB WR    
46.    290.    Forbath, Kai MIN PK    
47.    291.    Swoope, Erik IND TE    
48.    292.    Hardy, Justin ATL WR    
49.    294.    Toilolo, Levine ATL TE    
50.    295.    Robinson, Aldrick ATL WR1
 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
number of players in top 288 not drafted....

league---#

1--47

2--45

3--47

4--46

5--47

6--47

7--48

so yes....league 2 the league of champions were clearly the better drafters......... ;)

but we must also remember that many of the drafters in the later drafts use the previous drafts as basically their cheatsheet.....

 
I'd imagine all the cumulative scores would be within a couple percent of each other, if only because there's going to be 95%+ overlap in league-wide rosters. Every QB, every DST, and essentially every PK is drafted, so from one league to the next the only differences are going to be maybe 10-12 late-round RB/WR/TE fliers.

If it were possible to measure such a thing, the best way to determine the "savviest" leagues would probably be something like "hidden net value gained" - the leagues in which the names that were drafted early relative to other leagues outperformed the most, and those drafted relatively later underperformed the most, if that makes any sense. Note that I am in no way volunteering to figure this out.  :)
Yeah I guess that is what I was trying to get at with the total points for the entire league. I don't know how to measure that either, or how meaningful it would be. Just seemed like a good opportunity to talk smack. 

Of course Stinkin Ref carried that notion forward with style and substance.  :cool:

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top