What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

***2016 MLB Playoff thread: Cubs win for first time since sliced bread hit market (1 Viewer)

Just remembered I'll be in Chicago Wed - Fri this week.  I love to watch championship games with local fans.  Any recommendations where to watch or will all the bars be the same basically?  I'll be staying on the MM.  Going to grab myself a cubs shirt or jersey when I get into town.
If you hop on a red line train, you can be in Wrigleyville in 20 minutes. If you want to be in the middle of the madness, it'll be worth the trip.

 
Hypothetical question: 

Obviously public sentiment is with the Cubs. But I think if the Cavs had not won the title in June, public sentiment would be split and maybe even with the Indians. 50+ years without a championship for a city, across all the major sports, is IMO a bigger deal and engenders more sympathy than 100+ years without a championship for a single team.  After all, the vast majority of Cubs fans also root for the Blackhawks and Bulls. My friend disagreed, he thinks people would still be rooting for the Cubs because people give extra weight to the 100+ year drought and the Cubs as lovable losers narrative.  What say you?

 
I used the think that too when he started showing up during the Royals post-season games, but there is more to the guy. I agree he is an attention loving whore, but he does donate a fair sum of money in the communities where he goes to the games. At least he did here in KC.

Right about the time the Royals were winning, there were two firefighters killed on duty here. He donated $10,000 to each of the families, so $20,000.  I think he has also donated a ton of game tickets to people and things like that in all the cities he is in, plus he is known to pay for food and drinks for those around him.
Sounds like a great guy. 

 
Hypothetical question: 

Obviously public sentiment is with the Cubs. But I think if the Cavs had not won the title in June, public sentiment would be split and maybe even with the Indians. 50+ years without a championship for a city, across all the major sports, is IMO a bigger deal and engenders more sympathy than 100+ years without a championship for a single team.  After all, the vast majority of Cubs fans also root for the Blackhawks and Bulls. My friend disagreed, he thinks people would still be rooting for the Cubs because people give extra weight to the 100+ year drought and the Cubs as lovable losers narrative.  What say you?
I think the Cubs drought transcends every other drought in sports. Kids around the country grow up knowing about it. It's legend.

 
Hypothetical question: 

Obviously public sentiment is with the Cubs. But I think if the Cavs had not won the title in June, public sentiment would be split and maybe even with the Indians. 50+ years without a championship for a city, across all the major sports, is IMO a bigger deal and engenders more sympathy than 100+ years without a championship for a single team.  After all, the vast majority of Cubs fans also root for the Blackhawks and Bulls. My friend disagreed, he thinks people would still be rooting for the Cubs because people give extra weight to the 100+ year drought and the Cubs as lovable losers narrative.  What say you?
Even if the Cavs had not won, no one outside of NE OH would be rooting for the Tribe...and I say that as a Tribe fan myself. We even come in second best at being a sucky team, that's how much we've sucked.

 
Even if the Cavs had not won, no one outside of NE OH would be rooting for the Tribe...and I say that as a Tribe fan myself. We even come in second best at being a sucky team, that's how much we've sucked.
Yeah, I think this is mostly true.  But I would have been rooting for you! I bet most of my hometown of DC would have been as well.  Maybe places like Buffalo, Minneapolis and Atlanta too. From our perspective (or mine, anyway), not winning at all sucks way worse than not winning in a particular sport. Honestly if the Twins were in this World Series I might be rooting for them ... although Minnesota is winning the 2019 NBA title anyway.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Schwarber DH'ing today, joining Cubs in Cleveland tomorrow. Doesn't mean he's making the roster, but this entire development has been super exciting.

 
Yeah, I think this is mostly true.  But I would have been rooting for you! I bet most of my hometown of DC would have been as well.  Maybe places like Buffalo, Minneapolis and Atlanta too. From our perspective (or mine, anyway), not winning at all sucks way worse than not winning in a particular sport. Honestly if the Twins were in this World Series I might be rooting for them ... although Minnesota is winning the 2019 NBA title anyway.
You forgot about St. Louis. 

I think your hypothetical is closer to the middle.  Maybe even now too.

 
Cubs should bury the hatchet and let Bartman throw out the first pitch.
No way do you set this guy up for having to saddle any kind of blame for Cubs post season failure. Cubs lose the game that he throws out the first pitch of, end up losing the series? I don't even what to think about the mouth-breathing droolers reforming their lynch mob. Especially in this day and age of social media.

They win it, then you ask him to throw out the first pitch opening day 2017.

 
Yeah, I think this is mostly true.  But I would have been rooting for you! I bet most of my hometown of DC would have been as well.  Maybe places like Buffalo, Minneapolis and Atlanta too. From our perspective (or mine, anyway), not winning at all sucks way worse than not winning in a particular sport. Honestly if the Twins were in this World Series I might be rooting for them ... although Minnesota is winning the 2019 NBA title anyway.
I was thinking, "But the Twins just won in '91". Then I remembered that's 25 years ago and I'm old.

Anyone remember Joe Niekro throwing the emery board out of his pocket in '87?

 
Totally. You guys got this.

:thumbup:

did the 2003 cubs let it happen I wonder?

or does it happen whether you want it to or not?
Maddon and the players don't focus on these things.  They could care less.  If #### goes wrong, it is not the curse's fault.  They stopped hitting for two games.  What happened after that?  It happened when they didn't want, but guess what?  This team did not let it affect their performance.  That is the difference.  

 
Schwarber DH'ing today, joining Cubs in Cleveland tomorrow. Doesn't mean he's making the roster, but this entire development has been super exciting.
Exciting, but I don't see how they make this move.  Play with the team that got you there.  I am probably 100% wrong in my opinion.  He was 0-3 with a walk Saturday.  

 
Exciting, but I don't see how they make this move.  Play with the team that got you there.  I am probably 100% wrong in my opinion.  He was 0-3 with a walk Saturday.  
I agree. Mostly I want it for Schwarber, not the team. Cubs already have offensive depth. The marginal improvement of putting in a guy who's been rehabbing all season is questionable, especially since you'd probably be removing a relief pitcher from the roster.

 
You forgot about St. Louis. 

I think your hypothetical is closer to the middle.  Maybe even now too.
I've been a Cardinals fan for almost 40 years.  I'll be rooting for the Indians, even after seeing how emotional Bill Murray got over getting to see the Cubs play in the Series in his lifetime. 

Also, Cubs payroll is $186MM versus Cleveland's $114MM.  I'll roll with the underdog.    

 
Exciting, but I don't see how they make this move.  Play with the team that got you there.  I am probably 100% wrong in my opinion.  He was 0-3 with a walk Saturday.  
I agree with you, so we're probably both 100% wrong. But the way I see it if they use him at DH they effectively lose a roster spot for the middle three games of the series, which are played consecutively and thus the ones most likely to require use of the whole team.  Is that worth it for what is, at best, a very small upgrade to the starting lineup for Games 1,2, 6 and 7?  And it's not even clear to me that it's an upgrade- Contreras' 2016 numbers are basically identical to Schwarber's 2015 numbers and he'd be the DH for the first two games with the starters going with their preferred catchers.

 
I agree. Mostly I want it for Schwarber, not the team. Cubs already have offensive depth. The marginal improvement of putting in a guy who's been rehabbing all season is questionable, especially since you'd probably be removing a relief pitcher from the roster.
He can be in the dugout like he has been all year.  The Cubs have done a great job making sure he is part of the team.  No need to risk re-injury or take away a spot from someone who has been there all year. 

 
I was thinking, "But the Twins just won in '91". Then I remembered that's 25 years ago and I'm old.

Anyone remember Joe Niekro throwing the emery board out of his pocket in '87?
Three WNBA titles in the last five years, too.  

And yes, I do remember the Niekro emery board incident!  Love the look on one of the umps as he spotted the board and tracked its flight.  Didn't turn into a sideshow or anything, but it was clear his head and eye were locked in on it, with a look of, "that seems suspicious".  

 
Hypothetical question: 

Obviously public sentiment is with the Cubs. But I think if the Cavs had not won the title in June, public sentiment would be split and maybe even with the Indians. 50+ years without a championship for a city, across all the major sports, is IMO a bigger deal and engenders more sympathy than 100+ years without a championship for a single team.  After all, the vast majority of Cubs fans also root for the Blackhawks and Bulls. My friend disagreed, he thinks people would still be rooting for the Cubs because people give extra weight to the 100+ year drought and the Cubs as lovable losers narrative.  What say you?


I think the Cubs drought transcends every other drought in sports. Kids around the country grow up knowing about it. It's legend.


Even if the Cavs had not won, no one outside of NE OH would be rooting for the Tribe...and I say that as a Tribe fan myself. We even come in second best at being a sucky team, that's how much we've sucked.


Yeah, I think this is mostly true.  But I would have been rooting for you! I bet most of my hometown of DC would have been as well.  Maybe places like Buffalo, Minneapolis and Atlanta too. From our perspective (or mine, anyway), not winning at all sucks way worse than not winning in a particular sport. Honestly if the Twins were in this World Series I might be rooting for them ... although Minnesota is winning the 2019 NBA title anyway.
Yeah the cubs outshine everything else in regards to drought, however today's age of social media has enough pull that people are cheering against all the cubs fans.

 
Just realized that the by far best team in baseball has to travel for game 1 and maybe game 7 because of a pretend baseball game 3 months ago. Cool. 
And the old system was alternating years for home field which isn't any better.

If you go by record how do you judge schedules if the won loss records are close?

Use head to head?

 
I don't have any issue with Marlins guy and kind of like him. He's very wealthy and spends his time/money going to loads of baseball games and getting others to go to baseball games, giving money to people in need, and doing weird baseball shtick. Sounds like a great life. 

 
And what I explained poorly was if the records were close but the team with more wins had a far easier regular season schedule that would seem like a bad method also.

The best way would be head to head record.

I also looked at SB% against pitchers and the ranking for Cubs starters worst to best is Arrieta 84%, Lackey 81%, Lester 75%,  Hendricks 71%.

Indians are Bauer 67%, Kluber 57%, Tomlin 50%, Salazar 50%.

 
And the old system was alternating years for home field which isn't any better.

If you go by record how do you judge schedules if the won loss records are close?

Use head to head?
Other sports leagues use schedule and disregard the fact that schedules aren't balanced.  For example in the NBA a 62 win Eastern Conference team would have home court over a 61 win Western Conference team even though the West team was likely the better regular season team after adjusting for SOS.  And baseball does it in the AL and NL playoffs, too.  Indians certainly didn't deserve home field in the ALDS over the Red Sox based on regular season record + SOS, but they got it.

This is one of those "don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good" situations. Even if the wrong team gets home field 10% or even 20% of the time based on record because it doesn't adjust for SOS, that's still way better than alternating or using the ASG, which give the wrong team home field 50% of the time.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Congrats to the Cubs, they woke up and took it to LA.  I am happy for both them and the Indians and am looking for a good series.  Someone gets to rid themselves of a ghost or 3.

Despite not being a great solution, alternating home field every year is by far the better way to go then the All Star Game winner getting it.  But W-L record should still be the decider.  And no a wild card team should not have home field unless its over another wild card team.  Win your division.  :boxing:

 
Congrats to the Cubs, they woke up and took it to LA.  I am happy for both them and the Indians and am looking for a good series.  Someone gets to rid themselves of a ghost or 3.

Despite not being a great solution, alternating home field every year is by far the better way to go then the All Star Game winner getting it.  But W-L record should still be the decider.  And no a wild card team should not have home field unless its over another wild card team.  Win your division.  :boxing:
Personally, I think the team with the best regular season record should have home field advantage but if not, here's an idea:  give home field advantage to the league with the superior inter-league record.  All star game could be a tie breaker.  

 
Personally, I think the team with the best regular season record should have home field advantage but if not, here's an idea:  give home field advantage to the league with the superior inter-league record.  All star game could be a tie breaker.  
Not a bad option. I could get behind that.  

ASG should have no bearing on anything, its an exhibition game and should remain that way.  I still dont understand the outrage at one ending in a tie. 

 
I just had a friend on my facebook feed express shock that Dexter Fowler will be the first black player to play in the World Series for the Cubs.

:mellow:

 
I just had a friend on my facebook feed express shock that Dexter Fowler will be the first black player to play in the World Series for the Cubs.

:mellow:
At first glance that is pretty shocking.  Then you remember...... 108 years

(have then been in the series since?)

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top