I didn't realize they'd added an NIT for college football.I will put my absolute homer prediction in now - USC makes the playoffs this season.
I didn't realize they'd added an NIT for college football.I will put my absolute homer prediction in now - USC makes the playoffs this season.
I would be very surprised if USC made the playoffs this year. Vegas seems to agree with me on this. I think 8-4 is what I would guess so above the 7.5 over/underI will put my absolute homer prediction in now - USC makes the playoffs this season.
I didn't realize they'd added an NIT for college football.I will put my absolute homer prediction in now - USC makes the playoffs this season.
For what it’s worth I made a prediction last year that Oregon would go undefeated on the regular season!
I think Fanduel has USC predicted at 7.5 wins. Since I don’t bet at online sports books, I will take the over on that line for any bets that folks here want to make up to an aggregate cap of $500.
I would be very surprised if USC made the playoffs this year. Vegas seems to agree with me on this. I think 8-4 is what I would guess so above the 7.5 over/underI will put my absolute homer prediction in now - USC makes the playoffs this season.
Time for Oregon to go get Ryder Lyons!
Not a lawyer. Is that saying the schools are capped at $20M in payments for NIL to their athletes or the conferences or is it saying any of that at all? Only thing I walked away with from the article is there is still a ton more legal fighting ahead. Sorry if dumb question. I don't follow that stuff very closely.Here’s a short but good summary of the House antitrust settlement approved yesterday. https://www.sportico.com/law/analysis/2025/ncaa-house-settlement-approved-1234849259/
Not a lawyer. Is that saying the schools are capped at $20M in payments for NIL to their athletes or the conferences or is it saying any of that at all? Only thing I walked away with from the article is there is still a ton more legal fighting ahead. Sorry if dumb question. I don't follow that stuff very closely.Here’s a short but good summary of the House antitrust settlement approved yesterday. https://www.sportico.com/law/analysis/2025/ncaa-house-settlement-approved-1234849259/
Ok. So they are saying the MOST a school can pay the totality of their student athletes is $20M but they don't have to participate and if they participate, they don't have to go the full $20M and that $20M doesn't have anything to do with NIL or scholarship. Trying to understand the benefit/point of this.Not a lawyer. Is that saying the schools are capped at $20M in payments for NIL to their athletes or the conferences or is it saying any of that at all? Only thing I walked away with from the article is there is still a ton more legal fighting ahead. Sorry if dumb question. I don't follow that stuff very closely.Here’s a short but good summary of the House antitrust settlement approved yesterday. https://www.sportico.com/law/analysis/2025/ncaa-house-settlement-approved-1234849259/
I haven’t read the opinion. But the linked article states the following:
Participating colleges will directly pay athletes a share of up to 22% of the average power conference athletic media, ticket and sponsorship revenue, with $20.5 million pegged as the initial annual cap. Those payments will be in addition to both athletic scholarships, which cover tuition, housing, health resources and other benefits, and NIL deals athletes sign with third parties.
To be clear, colleges are not obligated to participate in revenue-sharing, and those that participate are not obligated to pay the full $20.5 million
So with respect to your questions, I take that to mean the cap is per college, and it is not inclusive of NIL packages or scholarships.
As for NIL deals, they will now have to go through an independent fair market value review to ensure they aren’t blatant pay for play deals.
I believe it is the first time the schools can legally pay the athletes directly. I would guess most of the P4 schools will pay the full $20.5 million. Not sure if the information will be made public, but it would be interesting to know how schools distribute these funds. This has been coming for a while, so most schools should already have a plan in place.Trying to understand the benefit/point of this.
Wouldn't title IX drive that?I believe it is the first time the schools can legally pay the athletes directly. I would guess most of the P4 schools will pay the full $20.5 million. Not sure if the information will be made public, but it would be interesting to know how schools distribute these funds. This has been coming for a while, so most schools should already have a plan in place.Trying to understand the benefit/point of this.
Football and men's basketball are usually the only sports that make money, but I can see some legal battles coming up if they receive the majority of the $20.5 pie. I didn't read the article. Was Title IX addressed?
Regarding the bolded, I am going to guess this will be a toothless body that rubber stamps every deal. How are they going to prove one endorsement deal is a pay for play when every NIL deal is essentially a pay for play?Participating colleges will directly pay athletes a share of up to 22% of the average power conference athletic media, ticket and sponsorship revenue, with $20.5 million pegged as the initial annual cap. Those payments will be in addition to both athletic scholarships, which cover tuition, housing, health resources and other benefits, and NIL deals athletes sign with third parties.
To be clear, colleges are not obligated to participate in revenue-sharing, and those that participate are not obligated to pay the full $20.5 million
So with respect to your questions, I take that to mean the cap is per college, and it is not inclusive of NIL packages or scholarships.
As for NIL deals, they will now have to go through an independent fair market value review to ensure they aren’t blatant pay for play deals.
Regarding the bolded, I am going to guess this will be a toothless body that rubber stamps every deal. How are they going to prove one endorsement deal is a pay for play when every NIL deal is essentially a pay for play?Participating colleges will directly pay athletes a share of up to 22% of the average power conference athletic media, ticket and sponsorship revenue, with $20.5 million pegged as the initial annual cap. Those payments will be in addition to both athletic scholarships, which cover tuition, housing, health resources and other benefits, and NIL deals athletes sign with third parties.
To be clear, colleges are not obligated to participate in revenue-sharing, and those that participate are not obligated to pay the full $20.5 million
So with respect to your questions, I take that to mean the cap is per college, and it is not inclusive of NIL packages or scholarships.
As for NIL deals, they will now have to go through an independent fair market value review to ensure they aren’t blatant pay for play deals.
The NIL collective for Texas will stop paying Arch Manning if he transfers to Texas tech. That seems like what the NCAA would consider pay for play.
And also, why does any athlete need to submit their endorsement contract to some ''independent fair market value review'? There is no CBA They agreed to, and if a collection of independent businesses (schools/NCAA) conspire to restrict an American's earnings, they are in violation of our anti-trust laws----as I understand them.
Regarding the bolded, I am going to guess this will be a toothless body that rubber stamps every deal. How are they going to prove one endorsement deal is a pay for play when every NIL deal is essentially a pay for play?Participating colleges will directly pay athletes a share of up to 22% of the average power conference athletic media, ticket and sponsorship revenue, with $20.5 million pegged as the initial annual cap. Those payments will be in addition to both athletic scholarships, which cover tuition, housing, health resources and other benefits, and NIL deals athletes sign with third parties.
To be clear, colleges are not obligated to participate in revenue-sharing, and those that participate are not obligated to pay the full $20.5 million
So with respect to your questions, I take that to mean the cap is per college, and it is not inclusive of NIL packages or scholarships.
As for NIL deals, they will now have to go through an independent fair market value review to ensure they aren’t blatant pay for play deals.
The NIL collective for Texas will stop paying Arch Manning if he transfers to Texas tech. That seems like what the NCAA would consider pay for play.
And also, why does any athlete need to submit their endorsement contract to some ''independent fair market value review'? There is no CBA They agreed to, and if a collection of independent businesses (schools/NCAA) conspire to restrict an American's earnings, they are in violation of our anti-trust laws----as I understand them.
Yea, didn’t BYU just land the top basketball player in the nation? What are the chances that happens 10 years ago?Regarding the bolded, I am going to guess this will be a toothless body that rubber stamps every deal. How are they going to prove one endorsement deal is a pay for play when every NIL deal is essentially a pay for play?Participating colleges will directly pay athletes a share of up to 22% of the average power conference athletic media, ticket and sponsorship revenue, with $20.5 million pegged as the initial annual cap. Those payments will be in addition to both athletic scholarships, which cover tuition, housing, health resources and other benefits, and NIL deals athletes sign with third parties.
To be clear, colleges are not obligated to participate in revenue-sharing, and those that participate are not obligated to pay the full $20.5 million
So with respect to your questions, I take that to mean the cap is per college, and it is not inclusive of NIL packages or scholarships.
As for NIL deals, they will now have to go through an independent fair market value review to ensure they aren’t blatant pay for play deals.
The NIL collective for Texas will stop paying Arch Manning if he transfers to Texas tech. That seems like what the NCAA would consider pay for play.
And also, why does any athlete need to submit their endorsement contract to some ''independent fair market value review'? There is no CBA They agreed to, and if a collection of independent businesses (schools/NCAA) conspire to restrict an American's earnings, they are in violation of our anti-trust laws----as I understand them.
The approval of this settlement will almost certainly be appealed, as it was approved over multiple objections from class members. Even if it survives an appeal, you're surely correct that the new paradigm is on thin ice legally. They've already hired a commissioner (Brian Seely from MLB) as called for under the settlement. The commissioner has oversight for the school payments and private NIL deals - to review them for a "valid business purpose" among other things. It seems like one big gaslight to me. Pay to Play has been a massive part of this, and the NCAA remains stubbornly steadfast despite the obvious unsupportable fraud in its position. But I think this could add some protections and structure to these contracts, which have been like the wild west the past couple years. I've previously read about Universities drafting NIL contracts that would pull money if the player were injured and couldn't play. Even the most blatant rubber stamping exercise can't overlook something that obviously offensive. The valuation analysis might be interesting. Obviously having Arch Manning or Cooper Flagg endorse your car dealership has substantial value. The difficultly might come when an unknown tackle transferring from an FCS school gets an $800k NIL deal before he's stepped foot on campus. That's got to be hard to defend.
As for Title IX, there is still some gray area there. The settlement is silent on that, but the Office for Civil Rights has stated they believe any revenue sharing payments are subject to the law and such revenue must be disbursed equally based on gender. Sources quoted in the Athletic suggested a top football program budget will likely have to be in the range of $40m-$50m to be a competitive team that expects to make the playoff. If the school can pay its football team roughly $10m (meaning nothing for men's basketball, baseball, hockey, etc.), they'll need another $30m-$40m in private booster funding. I believe that's quite a bit more than the biggest schools were raising last season.
One other interesting angle is this oversight commission depends on the rule that athletes self-report any value received over $600, including all of their private NIL deals. How likely is that to work? An anonymous quote from an article I read this morning - "“If you tell a booster or business owner they can’t give a star player $2 million, there will be lawsuits,” said the personnel director. “There’s no enforcing this. Fair market value? F— Deloitte. This is going to get even crazier. ... “There are a lot of rich people that can’t buy a professional sports franchise, but they can give a ton of money to their alma mater,” said a power conference administrator. “And if you’re telling millionaires and billionaires what they can and can’t do with their money, you’re probably going to lose that battle.”
The issues faced by smaller schools is also very interesting. The Ivies have maintained they will not opt into this settlement and will maintain their commitment to sports amateurism. Of course, they can offer extremely valuable benefits other smaller schools can't. Maybe they'll separate completely? I can see a B-league of true amateur athletes emerging that might appeal to old-school sports fans.
From the Iowa St. AD - “Iowa State does not have that (additional) $20 million, but if we don’t pay it for this coming year, we have big problems, right? So we’re going to pay it,” said Pollard. “Would you pay a bigger fee (as a student) … to go to school here so that a member of our men’s basketball team could get paid $1.5 million in addition to their scholarship, their room and board, and all the services they get for being a student on campus? That’s the fundamental question we’re going to have to ask ourselves. Because if we don’t do that, then what we’re saying is that we’re not going to have the athletics program that we’re having.”
Meanwhile, some of the traditionally middle of the pack schools like BYU who have access to booster goldmines suddenly find themselves moving up in the hierarchy.
There will surely be a ton of unintended or unexpected consequences from this. I still maintain we are heading toward a future where sports and schools are completely divorced and separated from each other, but as before I don't see that happening in my lifetime despite how inevitable it seems.
JIIIMMMMMMMEEERRRRRRRRRRRYea, didn’t BYU just land the top basketball player in the nation? What are the chances that happens 10 years ago?Regarding the bolded, I am going to guess this will be a toothless body that rubber stamps every deal. How are they going to prove one endorsement deal is a pay for play when every NIL deal is essentially a pay for play?Participating colleges will directly pay athletes a share of up to 22% of the average power conference athletic media, ticket and sponsorship revenue, with $20.5 million pegged as the initial annual cap. Those payments will be in addition to both athletic scholarships, which cover tuition, housing, health resources and other benefits, and NIL deals athletes sign with third parties.
To be clear, colleges are not obligated to participate in revenue-sharing, and those that participate are not obligated to pay the full $20.5 million
So with respect to your questions, I take that to mean the cap is per college, and it is not inclusive of NIL packages or scholarships.
As for NIL deals, they will now have to go through an independent fair market value review to ensure they aren’t blatant pay for play deals.
The NIL collective for Texas will stop paying Arch Manning if he transfers to Texas tech. That seems like what the NCAA would consider pay for play.
And also, why does any athlete need to submit their endorsement contract to some ''independent fair market value review'? There is no CBA They agreed to, and if a collection of independent businesses (schools/NCAA) conspire to restrict an American's earnings, they are in violation of our anti-trust laws----as I understand them.
The approval of this settlement will almost certainly be appealed, as it was approved over multiple objections from class members. Even if it survives an appeal, you're surely correct that the new paradigm is on thin ice legally. They've already hired a commissioner (Brian Seely from MLB) as called for under the settlement. The commissioner has oversight for the school payments and private NIL deals - to review them for a "valid business purpose" among other things. It seems like one big gaslight to me. Pay to Play has been a massive part of this, and the NCAA remains stubbornly steadfast despite the obvious unsupportable fraud in its position. But I think this could add some protections and structure to these contracts, which have been like the wild west the past couple years. I've previously read about Universities drafting NIL contracts that would pull money if the player were injured and couldn't play. Even the most blatant rubber stamping exercise can't overlook something that obviously offensive. The valuation analysis might be interesting. Obviously having Arch Manning or Cooper Flagg endorse your car dealership has substantial value. The difficultly might come when an unknown tackle transferring from an FCS school gets an $800k NIL deal before he's stepped foot on campus. That's got to be hard to defend.
As for Title IX, there is still some gray area there. The settlement is silent on that, but the Office for Civil Rights has stated they believe any revenue sharing payments are subject to the law and such revenue must be disbursed equally based on gender. Sources quoted in the Athletic suggested a top football program budget will likely have to be in the range of $40m-$50m to be a competitive team that expects to make the playoff. If the school can pay its football team roughly $10m (meaning nothing for men's basketball, baseball, hockey, etc.), they'll need another $30m-$40m in private booster funding. I believe that's quite a bit more than the biggest schools were raising last season.
One other interesting angle is this oversight commission depends on the rule that athletes self-report any value received over $600, including all of their private NIL deals. How likely is that to work? An anonymous quote from an article I read this morning - "“If you tell a booster or business owner they can’t give a star player $2 million, there will be lawsuits,” said the personnel director. “There’s no enforcing this. Fair market value? F— Deloitte. This is going to get even crazier. ... “There are a lot of rich people that can’t buy a professional sports franchise, but they can give a ton of money to their alma mater,” said a power conference administrator. “And if you’re telling millionaires and billionaires what they can and can’t do with their money, you’re probably going to lose that battle.”
The issues faced by smaller schools is also very interesting. The Ivies have maintained they will not opt into this settlement and will maintain their commitment to sports amateurism. Of course, they can offer extremely valuable benefits other smaller schools can't. Maybe they'll separate completely? I can see a B-league of true amateur athletes emerging that might appeal to old-school sports fans.
From the Iowa St. AD - “Iowa State does not have that (additional) $20 million, but if we don’t pay it for this coming year, we have big problems, right? So we’re going to pay it,” said Pollard. “Would you pay a bigger fee (as a student) … to go to school here so that a member of our men’s basketball team could get paid $1.5 million in addition to their scholarship, their room and board, and all the services they get for being a student on campus? That’s the fundamental question we’re going to have to ask ourselves. Because if we don’t do that, then what we’re saying is that we’re not going to have the athletics program that we’re having.”
Meanwhile, some of the traditionally middle of the pack schools like BYU who have access to booster goldmines suddenly find themselves moving up in the hierarchy.
There will surely be a ton of unintended or unexpected consequences from this. I still maintain we are heading toward a future where sports and schools are completely divorced and separated from each other, but as before I don't see that happening in my lifetime despite how inevitable it seems.
Yea, didn’t BYU just land the top basketball player in the nation? What are the chances that happens 10 years ago?Regarding the bolded, I am going to guess this will be a toothless body that rubber stamps every deal. How are they going to prove one endorsement deal is a pay for play when every NIL deal is essentially a pay for play?Participating colleges will directly pay athletes a share of up to 22% of the average power conference athletic media, ticket and sponsorship revenue, with $20.5 million pegged as the initial annual cap. Those payments will be in addition to both athletic scholarships, which cover tuition, housing, health resources and other benefits, and NIL deals athletes sign with third parties.
To be clear, colleges are not obligated to participate in revenue-sharing, and those that participate are not obligated to pay the full $20.5 million
So with respect to your questions, I take that to mean the cap is per college, and it is not inclusive of NIL packages or scholarships.
As for NIL deals, they will now have to go through an independent fair market value review to ensure they aren’t blatant pay for play deals.
The NIL collective for Texas will stop paying Arch Manning if he transfers to Texas tech. That seems like what the NCAA would consider pay for play.
And also, why does any athlete need to submit their endorsement contract to some ''independent fair market value review'? There is no CBA They agreed to, and if a collection of independent businesses (schools/NCAA) conspire to restrict an American's earnings, they are in violation of our anti-trust laws----as I understand them.
The approval of this settlement will almost certainly be appealed, as it was approved over multiple objections from class members. Even if it survives an appeal, you're surely correct that the new paradigm is on thin ice legally. They've already hired a commissioner (Brian Seely from MLB) as called for under the settlement. The commissioner has oversight for the school payments and private NIL deals - to review them for a "valid business purpose" among other things. It seems like one big gaslight to me. Pay to Play has been a massive part of this, and the NCAA remains stubbornly steadfast despite the obvious unsupportable fraud in its position. But I think this could add some protections and structure to these contracts, which have been like the wild west the past couple years. I've previously read about Universities drafting NIL contracts that would pull money if the player were injured and couldn't play. Even the most blatant rubber stamping exercise can't overlook something that obviously offensive. The valuation analysis might be interesting. Obviously having Arch Manning or Cooper Flagg endorse your car dealership has substantial value. The difficultly might come when an unknown tackle transferring from an FCS school gets an $800k NIL deal before he's stepped foot on campus. That's got to be hard to defend.
As for Title IX, there is still some gray area there. The settlement is silent on that, but the Office for Civil Rights has stated they believe any revenue sharing payments are subject to the law and such revenue must be disbursed equally based on gender. Sources quoted in the Athletic suggested a top football program budget will likely have to be in the range of $40m-$50m to be a competitive team that expects to make the playoff. If the school can pay its football team roughly $10m (meaning nothing for men's basketball, baseball, hockey, etc.), they'll need another $30m-$40m in private booster funding. I believe that's quite a bit more than the biggest schools were raising last season.
One other interesting angle is this oversight commission depends on the rule that athletes self-report any value received over $600, including all of their private NIL deals. How likely is that to work? An anonymous quote from an article I read this morning - "“If you tell a booster or business owner they can’t give a star player $2 million, there will be lawsuits,” said the personnel director. “There’s no enforcing this. Fair market value? F— Deloitte. This is going to get even crazier. ... “There are a lot of rich people that can’t buy a professional sports franchise, but they can give a ton of money to their alma mater,” said a power conference administrator. “And if you’re telling millionaires and billionaires what they can and can’t do with their money, you’re probably going to lose that battle.”
The issues faced by smaller schools is also very interesting. The Ivies have maintained they will not opt into this settlement and will maintain their commitment to sports amateurism. Of course, they can offer extremely valuable benefits other smaller schools can't. Maybe they'll separate completely? I can see a B-league of true amateur athletes emerging that might appeal to old-school sports fans.
From the Iowa St. AD - “Iowa State does not have that (additional) $20 million, but if we don’t pay it for this coming year, we have big problems, right? So we’re going to pay it,” said Pollard. “Would you pay a bigger fee (as a student) … to go to school here so that a member of our men’s basketball team could get paid $1.5 million in addition to their scholarship, their room and board, and all the services they get for being a student on campus? That’s the fundamental question we’re going to have to ask ourselves. Because if we don’t do that, then what we’re saying is that we’re not going to have the athletics program that we’re having.”
Meanwhile, some of the traditionally middle of the pack schools like BYU who have access to booster goldmines suddenly find themselves moving up in the hierarchy.
There will surely be a ton of unintended or unexpected consequences from this. I still maintain we are heading toward a future where sports and schools are completely divorced and separated from each other, but as before I don't see that happening in my lifetime despite how inevitable it seems.
Why Khary Adams committing to Notre Dame is a recruiting upset
Notre Dame offered Towson (Md.) Loyola Blakefield class of 2026 cornerback Khary Adams last summer, and the Irish have consistently been mentioned as a leading school in his recruitment.
At different points over the last several months, a few different schools had a lot of buzz in the elite prospect’s recruitment. LSU and USC had some momentum early in the spring. There was plenty of talk about Michigan and South Carolina for him as well.
Oregon made a big move for him in April and was poised to get his last official visit before a late June commitment date.
And of course, Penn State — a program that dominates in the mid-Atlantic — was a mainstay in his recruitment. He visited the Nittany Lions six times.
However, Adams spoke to On3’s Chad Simmons before making his Fighting Irish commitment public and revealed that ND was the school that set the pace in his recruitment.
“This whole process, Notre Dame has been that one school everyone was up against,” Adams said. “It was Notre Dame vs. Penn State, then Notre Dame vs. Oregon, so Notre Dame was up there for me from the beginning.
But still, when taking a step back and examining Adams’ recruitment, this is a battle that Penn State usually wins.
“I think it is an upset,” Blue & Gold analyst Tim Hyde said. “This is Penn State territory. Notre Dame hasn’t gotten a national kid like Adams out of that area in a long time. Cam Hart was a three-star wide receiver when the Irish got him six years ago.
“Some Notre Dame fans have said, ‘Is it really an upset?’ Yes, it is. A top five kid at his position out of Maryland? It’s an upset. This is a great win for Notre Dame.”
Calling this an upset recruiting win is no slight toward Notre Dame. It’s actually the opposite. The Irish are parlaying their success from the 2024—25 season onto the recruiting trail, and it’s paying dividends.
“He comes from Penn State territory,” continued Hyde. “It just is [an upset]. Penn State does an amazing job in that region. This is a huge win for Notre Dame.”
Adams ranks as the No. 30 overall player and No. 3 cornerback in America according to On3’s own rankings.
“For as great as Notre Dame cornerback recruiting has been lately, they haven’t landed any top-50 ranked national guys,” Hyde noted. “Adams is ranked in the top five at cornerback by 247 and On3. Notre Dame has done a tremendous job bringing guys in and coaching them up.
“Coach [Marcus] Freeman has shown that he can get Notre Dame there, and Coach [Mike] Mickens is going to get even more defensive backs drafted.”
Adams committed to the Irish on Saturday afternoon, and later in the day, Wyndmoor (Pa.) La Salle College’s Joey O’Brien, the No. 40 overall player and No. 5 safety in America according to the 2026 On3 Industry Ranking, joined him on the Irish commit list.
The Irish now have four defensive back commits, as NND had four-star talents Ayden Pouncey and Chaston Smith already locked in.
Time for Oregon to go get Ryder Lyons!
Notre Dame Lands A Commitment From Tight End Preston Fryzel
The commits keep rolling in... who is next?
![]()
With Preston Fryzel on Board, Notre Dame Eyes More 2026 Commitments
Notre Dame scratched a tight end off its recruiting to-do list for 2026 on Monday, and a fair amount more of possible commitments appear possible in coming dayswww.si.com
Yeah old news. BYU came in with offer nobody could beat. QB not a big concern for Oregon.Time for Oregon to go get Ryder Lyons!
Hmmm. He just committed to BYU. Oregon likely to now focus on Bryson Beaver. Interesting name for an Oregon recruit.
Yeah old news. BYU came in with offer nobody could beat. QB not a big concern for Oregon.Time for Oregon to go get Ryder Lyons!
Hmmm. He just committed to BYU. Oregon likely to now focus on Bryson Beaver. Interesting name for an Oregon recruit.
Early commitments have always been anything but an actual commitment, but in today's NIL environment, they mean almost nothing. Kids are just holding spots until the next offer comes along right before NSD. Underwood was as solid as it gets to LSU until Michigan doubled his offer. They smartly waited until the last minute to flip him.
Wacthed it live... the kid is Mormon.... he had a 95% chance of going to BYU with the field have the 5%Time for Oregon to go get Ryder Lyons!
Hmmm. He just committed to BYU. Oregon likely to now focus on Bryson Beaver. Interesting name for an Oregon recruit.
Wacthed it live... the kid is Mormon.... he had a 95% chance of going to BYU with the field have the 5%Time for Oregon to go get Ryder Lyons!
Hmmm. He just committed to BYU. Oregon likely to now focus on Bryson Beaver. Interesting name for an Oregon recruit.
I follow Oregon recruiting very well and nobody was expecting Lyons to commit to Oregon over BYU the past 2 weeks. BYU came out with a huge offer and his faith definately gave them an advantage.Yeah old news. BYU came in with offer nobody could beat. QB not a big concern for Oregon.Time for Oregon to go get Ryder Lyons!
Hmmm. He just committed to BYU. Oregon likely to now focus on Bryson Beaver. Interesting name for an Oregon recruit.
Old news? He just announced his commitment today. And the fongbomb prediction only landed last night. All the Oregon podcast guys were optimistic on getting him until the last 24 hours. You think it was the money alone that swayed him and not also his faith? Have they reported what the amounts of the competing offers were?
As for Lyons, he wouldn’t be on campus until 2027, which means he wouldn’t even be in line to play until 2028 at the earliest. They may not have a need for the next three years, but this recruit was to lay the foundation for the future. I wouldn’t be surprised if Oregon ends up with him down the road through the transfer portal. He is uber-talented and seems like a real match with your program.
I follow Oregon recruiting very well and nobody was expecting Lyons to commit to Oregon over BYU the past 2 weeks. BYU came out with a huge offer and his faith definately gave them an advantage.Yeah old news. BYU came in with offer nobody could beat. QB not a big concern for Oregon.Time for Oregon to go get Ryder Lyons!
Hmmm. He just committed to BYU. Oregon likely to now focus on Bryson Beaver. Interesting name for an Oregon recruit.
Old news? He just announced his commitment today. And the fongbomb prediction only landed last night. All the Oregon podcast guys were optimistic on getting him until the last 24 hours. You think it was the money alone that swayed him and not also his faith? Have they reported what the amounts of the competing offers were?
As for Lyons, he wouldn’t be on campus until 2027, which means he wouldn’t even be in line to play until 2028 at the earliest. They may not have a need for the next three years, but this recruit was to lay the foundation for the future. I wouldn’t be surprised if Oregon ends up with him down the road through the transfer portal. He is uber-talented and seems like a real match with your program.
Oregon has had a transfer QB the past 2 years as a Heisman finalist. QB will not be an issue for a few years with Moore and then they can always grab a portal guy if needed. That said, I would have liked them to get Curtis or Lyons.