2QBBC (1 Viewer)

[Macdaddy_2004]

So I read the article - my league is a start 2QB and I don't know how helpful this type of strategy would be.

I guess what I am looking for are other opinions on the article - has anyone implemented the strategy this year - if so, how do you like your team?

I am having my draft soon and am contemplating going with this strategy but not sure.

Anyone have any opinions?

 

[Macdaddy_2004]

According to Stuart his QB committees will score 40-50 more fantasy points than an average tandem at QB for the year.

How helpful is this?

Is this the equivalent of having a top 10 and a top 15QB in the league?

 

[Chase Stuart]

According to Stuart his QB committees will score 40-50 more fantasy points than an average tandem at QB for the year.How helpful is this?Is this the equivalent of having a top 10 and a top 15QB in the league?

I want to be clear here -- and my apologies if I wasn't clear in the article.My committee(s) will score 40-50 more points this year....than if my committee had a league average schedule. Obviously they're not going to outscore Peyton Manning and Carson Palmer, and they might not outscore Tony Romo and Jon Kitna, either. But the point is ADP largely ignores strength of schedule. I think the draft market is pretty efficient, and one of the only ways to beat ADP consistently is to study what the market doesn't. There's not a bigger factor ignored by the market than SOS. So I think you can get my committee at a discount because they're being undervalued, to the tune of 40-50 FPs combined. This way you can lay off QBs early in your draft and then grab those guys late.P.S. I appreciate you keeping the names and the other important subscriber content private. Thanks.