3-1 Trade for Rhamondre (1 Viewer)

[qdaddyo]

14-team PPR

QB - Carr, Fields
RB - Gibbs, Montgomery, Warren, Steele, Corum, Ray Davis, Benson
WR - London, Nabers, Jamo, Quentin Johnson, Puka
TE - Pitts
PK - Prater
DF - Houston

I get Rhamondre Stevenson.
I give Fields, Steele, Quentin.

This helps with my week 5 bye-pocalyose when my Lions players are off.

I’d be giving up all bench players.

 

[BLOCKED_PUNT]

I'd say no

 

[Jaruby]

If you have decent options on waivers to replace your bench why not do it? You get the best player and give up 2 guys that just came off waivers and a QB the head coach still says isn’t the #1.

 

[qdaddyo]

I'd say no

Why wouldn’t you do it?

 

[Gally]

I'd say no

Why wouldn’t you do it?

My guess is that this is in relation to the Rhamondre owner

 

[Gally]

I would give up Corum instead of Steele since you have two copies of Corum on your roster. You don't need both of them.


Jokes aside, I would make the offer but I doubt it is accepted.

 

[BassNBrew]

Gotta know your QB scoring.

 

[qdaddyo]

Gotta know your QB scoring.

• 0.04 points / yard
• 4 points / TD
• -2 points / INT
• No other bonuses

 

[BassNBrew]

Based on that scoring I'm not parting with Fields

1) If Fields keeps the job, he'll outscore Carr by 2 ppg.
2) I owner Carr last year in this scoring format. sCarred for life with 4 single digit games.
3) IMO Stevenson/Monty are a push. I'd rather have Monty and smooth out the Lions output. I one upped you with a starting lineup of Goff, Gibbs, LaPorta, Jamo. Trying to acquire Monty.

 

[acartina37]

14-team PPR

QB - Carr, Fields
RB - Gibbs, Montgomery, Warren, Steele, Corum, Ray Davis, Benson
WR - London, Nabers, Jamo, Quentin Johnson, Puka
TE - Pitts
PK - Prater
DF - Houston

I get Rhamondre Stevenson.
I give Fields, Steele, Quentin.

This helps with my week 5 bye-pocalyose when my Lions players are off.

I’d be giving up all bench players.

As a heavy Rhomadre Drafter this year, I'm not even taking the time of day to look at that trade. Unless this other team is really hurting, or stacked at RB, that trade does not move the needle for me to move on from a guy getting as many touches as rhomadre is.

 

[BLOCKED_PUNT]

I'd say no

Why wouldn’t you do it?

My guess is that this is in relation to the Rhamondre owner

thanks for lying to try to make me look better.

I actually said no since I was an ignorant meathead that blurted out his uninformed opinion. I thought he was giving up a little too much for what I felt like was 1 week rental.

I had assumed that he'll be starting Gibbs and Monty each week unless one of the other is injured. I'm also of the opinion that Steele is a fine spot starter/flex and will be given the lions share of the carries in a pretty good Chiefs O. At WR he's likely starting London/Jamo/Nabers until Puka comes back in week 7 and when he does he can put one of those WRs or Steele in flex (if he has 1) and be fine.

I was also worried that Gibson might start to cut into his share.

Given the game tonight and folks in the shark pool talking about how bad the NE 0line is----so if he listened to me (and why would he?!) I might have helped him dodge a bullet. Maybe they'll be fine now that Maye is (probably) taking over and there's still value in getting a starter.

I think trading Fields and Quentin is fine.

 

[Gally]

Given the game tonight and folks in the shark pool talking about how bad the NE 0line is

The Jets are also a really good defense which I think factors in quite a bit to the crap game last night. RS will still get the bulk of touches and be a volume play. I am not worried..........yet.

 

[qdaddyo]

The Rhamondre owner accepted the deal but it couldn’t be completed bc of our league’s 24-hour veto period and TNF. We’ll revisit after the weekend.

However, I have another set of offers that I’d love some feedback on which I’ll post in a new thread.