What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

72 Dolphins: Grumpy Old Men (1 Viewer)

timschochet

Footballguy
Here is the blog from Phil Taylor of Sports Illustrated, who says it so well:

Here they come again, the NFL's grumpy old men, tarnishing their legend a little more each time they grumble about another team's attempt to fashion a similar piece of history. The 1972 Miami Dolphins will forever be remembered as the first NFL team to achieve an undefeated season, but for some Dolphins it has always seemed that being the first is not enough. They desperately want to remain the "only."

Every few years, when a team survives the first half of the year unbeaten and the possibility of a perfect season becomes more real, those old Dolphins do everything but stick pins in voodoo dolls, hoping that the undefeated team falls. The New England Patriots, 9-0 and looking invulnerable, are the latest challenger to the Dolphins' status as the only perfect team in league history, and here, like clockwork, comes former Dolphin coach Don Shula, sending bad karma New England's way.

Even if the Patriots do finish undefeated, according to Shula, their achievement should be marked with an asterisk in the record books because of the Week 1 spying incident against the Jets, for which the team and Pats coach Bill Belichick paid heavy penalties. "The Spygate thing has diminished what they've accomplished," Shula told the New York Daily News earlier this week. "Belichick was fined $500,000, the team was fined $250,00 and they lost a first-round draft choice. That tells you the seriousness or significance of what they found. I guess you got the same thing as putting an asterisk by Barry Bonds' home run record."

At least this is a new approach for the members of '72 team. Usually they simply hope and pray that their challenger loses, then engage in graceless celebration when it inevitably happens. When San Diego beat the 11-0 Colts in 2005, **** Anderson, a safety from the '72 Dolphins, sent the Chargers a case of Dom Perignon as a thank you. Anderson and his neighbor Nick Buoniconti, a former Miami linebacker, get together and open a bottle of champagne each year when the last undefeated team loses. When it comes to protecting their legacy, the old Fish are not a classy bunch.

For tips on how a record-holder is supposed to act, they would be wise to take a look at how Henry Aaron congratulated Bonds for breaking his home run record, or the good cheer with which another ex-Dolphin, Dan Marino, watched Brett Favre break his record for career touchdown passes earlier this season.

What the '72 team fails to realize is that a second undefeated season wouldn't diminish the first. When a record is challenged, it usually reinforces the magnitude of the original accomplishment. But it's getting harder to appreciate how beautiful the Dolphins were to watch in 1972 without thinking about how ugly some of them are to listen to in 2007.

In the case of the Patriots, Shula's contention is a stretch. New England was found to have broken the rules in the first half of the first game against the Jets, a team the Patriots could have crushed without any illegal help. Even the Jets themselves would probably admit that the filming of their signs didn't change the outcome of the game.

Since then, there has been no indication that the Pats have done anything shady. There would be a better argument for putting an asterisk next to their accomplishments from past seasons, when they might well have been illegally filiming, than for questioning the other eight wins of this season.

But even if Shula had a point about Belichick's rule-breaking, he would have been wiser, and classier, to let some other less biased observer make that point. By speaking out himself, he comes off as desperate to keep the Pats from stepping up onto the same pedestal as his team.

Some of the Dolphins insist that they aren't as protective of their perfect team status as it sounds. They are not, according to former tight end Jim Mandich, "pathetic losers down here clinking champagne glasses and desperately clinging to a record set 35 years ago."

Funny, that's exactly what they seem to be doing. The old Dolphins seem to be quite fond of the bubbly, but for their own sake, they should stick a cork in it.

****

 
For tips on how a record-holder is supposed to act, they would be wise to take a look at how Henry Aaron congratulated Bonds for breaking his home run record, or the good cheer with which another ex-Dolphin, Dan Marino, watched Brett Favre break his record for career touchdown passes earlier this season.
;) :lmao: :lmao:
 
Any article about the '72 Dolphins being classless cannot be complete without the mention of Bob Keuchenberg.

The guy is the King of all tools.

 
I thought I read somewhere that the 72 Dolphins had a historically easy schedule. Is that truly the case?
Yeah they did....and while everyone calls the Pats classless for running up the score anyone want to guess what these "classy" guys beat the Patriots by in '72.52-0 :confused: So why don't you old farts just shut the "F" up and just be happy when they serve pudding at the old folks' home....Will the Pats go undefeated? They may but it will be a much tougher road than the 72 Dolphins...
 
I thought I read somewhere that the 72 Dolphins had a historically easy schedule. Is that truly the case?
Yeah they did....and while everyone calls the Pats classless for running up the score anyone want to guess what these "classy" guys beat the Patriots by in '72.52-0 :goodposting: So why don't you old farts just shut the "F" up and just be happy when they serve pudding at the old folks' home....Will the Pats go undefeated? They may but it will be a much tougher road than the 72 Dolphins...
TOXIC WASTE
 
I don't agree with the way the Dolphins celebrate when people lose because their record remains intact, but I can kinda understand it. Records were made to be broken though. However, if you were on the 72 Dolphins team, I am sure you wouldn't want that record to be broken and you would secretly rejoice in the fact that your record still stands. How you act in regards to that record being challenged is an example of the kind of character you have as an athlete, but this article is crap and lousy reporting. You cannot get any more classy than H.Aaron, L.T., Favre, W.Payton, etc. There are many 72 Dolphins that are very classy and to group them all together and say they all are grumpy and classless is just wrong, IMO.

 
The 72 Dolphins were a good story and a good, if not great team. They were in the right place at the right time and they took advantage of it. Their record was perfect, but they were not a perfect team.

The current Patriots are a very good team, a Great team even. I think they and their fans would benefit by being gracious and letting history judge their accomplishments rather than trying to force the eventual judgment of history down our throats before it has even come to pass. Their coach, and some of their fans, are so offensive I am having a difficult time enjoying them. That's a shame.

I will say they are far from the first team to have overzealous fans.

 
It's only two guys who even do the champagne thing.

Im so tired of EVERYTHING in todays world getting blown out of proportion. So Don Shula has an opinion on something. I give him credit for being honest. Just because he is honest doesn't make him bitter.

I can't wait for the Pats to lose just so all this nonsense will stop.

 
Ditkaless Wonders said:
The 72 Dolphins were a good story and a good, if not great team. They were in the right place at the right time and they took advantage of it. Their record was perfect, but they were not a perfect team.The current Patriots are a very good team, a Great team even. I think they and their fans would benefit by being gracious and letting history judge their accomplishments rather than trying to force the eventual judgment of history down our throats before it has even come to pass. Their coach, and some of their fans, are so offensive I am having a difficult time enjoying them. That's a shame. I will say they are far from the first team to have overzealous fans.
:mellow: I too am having a hard time with their coach. Just an unlikeable kinda human being. I do like Brady though and think he deserves it if he gets the record.
 
Ditkaless Wonders said:
The 72 Dolphins were a good story and a good, if not great team. They were in the right place at the right time and they took advantage of it. Their record was perfect, but they were not a perfect team.The current Patriots are a very good team, a Great team even. I think they and their fans would benefit by being gracious and letting history judge their accomplishments rather than trying to force the eventual judgment of history down our throats before it has even come to pass. Their coach, and some of their fans, are so offensive I am having a difficult time enjoying them. That's a shame. I will say they are far from the first team to have overzealous fans.
:thumbup: I too am having a hard time with their coach. Just an unlikeable kinda human being. I do like Brady though and think he deserves it if he gets the record.
Brady has handled his success fairly well. He seems personable and likeable. He has even stayed realatively humble and self effacing which has to be difficult given his status.
 
timschochet said:
Here is the blog from Phil Taylor of Sports Illustrated, who says it so well:Here they come again, the NFL's grumpy old men, tarnishing their legend a little more each time they grumble about another team's attempt to fashion a similar piece of history. The 1972 Miami Dolphins will forever be remembered as the first NFL team to achieve an undefeated season, but for some Dolphins it has always seemed that being the first is not enough. They desperately want to remain the "only."Every few years, when a team survives the first half of the year unbeaten and the possibility of a perfect season becomes more real, those old Dolphins do everything but stick pins in voodoo dolls, hoping that the undefeated team falls. The New England Patriots, 9-0 and looking invulnerable, are the latest challenger to the Dolphins' status as the only perfect team in league history, and here, like clockwork, comes former Dolphin coach Don Shula, sending bad karma New England's way.Even if the Patriots do finish undefeated, according to Shula, their achievement should be marked with an asterisk in the record books because of the Week 1 spying incident against the Jets, for which the team and Pats coach Bill Belichick paid heavy penalties. "The Spygate thing has diminished what they've accomplished," Shula told the New York Daily News earlier this week. "Belichick was fined $500,000, the team was fined $250,00 and they lost a first-round draft choice. That tells you the seriousness or significance of what they found. I guess you got the same thing as putting an asterisk by Barry Bonds' home run record."At least this is a new approach for the members of '72 team. Usually they simply hope and pray that their challenger loses, then engage in graceless celebration when it inevitably happens. When San Diego beat the 11-0 Colts in 2005, **** Anderson, a safety from the '72 Dolphins, sent the Chargers a case of Dom Perignon as a thank you. Anderson and his neighbor Nick Buoniconti, a former Miami linebacker, get together and open a bottle of champagne each year when the last undefeated team loses. When it comes to protecting their legacy, the old Fish are not a classy bunch.For tips on how a record-holder is supposed to act, they would be wise to take a look at how Henry Aaron congratulated Bonds for breaking his home run record, or the good cheer with which another ex-Dolphin, Dan Marino, watched Brett Favre break his record for career touchdown passes earlier this season. What the '72 team fails to realize is that a second undefeated season wouldn't diminish the first. When a record is challenged, it usually reinforces the magnitude of the original accomplishment. But it's getting harder to appreciate how beautiful the Dolphins were to watch in 1972 without thinking about how ugly some of them are to listen to in 2007.In the case of the Patriots, Shula's contention is a stretch. New England was found to have broken the rules in the first half of the first game against the Jets, a team the Patriots could have crushed without any illegal help. Even the Jets themselves would probably admit that the filming of their signs didn't change the outcome of the game. Since then, there has been no indication that the Pats have done anything shady. There would be a better argument for putting an asterisk next to their accomplishments from past seasons, when they might well have been illegally filiming, than for questioning the other eight wins of this season. But even if Shula had a point about Belichick's rule-breaking, he would have been wiser, and classier, to let some other less biased observer make that point. By speaking out himself, he comes off as desperate to keep the Pats from stepping up onto the same pedestal as his team.Some of the Dolphins insist that they aren't as protective of their perfect team status as it sounds. They are not, according to former tight end Jim Mandich, "pathetic losers down here clinking champagne glasses and desperately clinging to a record set 35 years ago." Funny, that's exactly what they seem to be doing. The old Dolphins seem to be quite fond of the bubbly, but for their own sake, they should stick a cork in it.****
effing :bs: :bag: for Phil Taylor
 
Whizzinator said:
I thought I read somewhere that the 72 Dolphins had a historically easy schedule. Is that truly the case?
FACT: 1972 Dolphins' opponents had a 51-86-3 regular season recordFACT: The Dolphins beat a very good Pittsburgh team, on the road, in the AFC Championship gameFACT: Bob Griese went down with a broken leg in game #5 of the season and did not return to the playoffsSay what you will about the Dolphins' strength of schedule. They played in a horrid division (NE 3-11, BUF 4-9-1, BAL 5-9, and NYJ 7-7), but so do the 2007 Patriots. But you can't discount the fact that the team went undefeated with a backup QB starting almost 65% of the season, and had to beat a great team (the Steelers were 11-3) on the road to make the Super Bowl.Bottom line: it was a great achievement, and one to be proud of. If the 2007 Patriots go undefeated, you can't tell me they won't be celebrating each year when the last undefeated goes down. Will we labor them as bitter old-timers then?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It's only two guys who even do the champagne thing. Im so tired of EVERYTHING in todays world getting blown out of proportion. So Don Shula has an opinion on something. I give him credit for being honest. Just because he is honest doesn't make him bitter.I can't wait for the Pats to lose just so all this nonsense will stop.
Why, so this can happen again next year? I would rather the Pats go undefeated, so then all this nonsense stops.
 
Why, so this can happen again next year? I would rather the Pats go undefeated, so then all this nonsense stops.
I think they will keep doing it anyway. It's not exactly a common feat you know. Besides, there will always be a question regarding the Patriots cheating.
 
It's only two guys who even do the champagne thing. Im so tired of EVERYTHING in todays world getting blown out of proportion. So Don Shula has an opinion on something. I give him credit for being honest. Just because he is honest doesn't make him bitter.I can't wait for the Pats to lose just so all this nonsense will stop.
Being honest does not mean he is not a bitter old man either. So because he is honest we should agree with what he said?
 
Whizzinator said:
I thought I read somewhere that the 72 Dolphins had a historically easy schedule. Is that truly the case?
FACT: 1972 Dolphins' opponents had a 51-86-3 regular season recordFACT: The Dolphins beat a very good Pittsburgh team, on the road, in the AFC Championship game

FACT: Bob Griese went down with a broken leg in game #5 of the season and did not return to the playoffs

Say what you will about the Dolphins' strength of schedule. They played in a horrid division (NE 3-11, BUF 4-9-1, BAL 5-9, and NYJ 7-7), but so do the 2007 Patriots.

But you can't discount the fact that the team went undefeated with a backup QB starting almost 65% of the season, and had to beat a great team (the Steelers were 11-3) on the road to make the Super Bowl.

Bottom line: it was a great achievement, and one to be proud of. If the 2007 Patriots go undefeated, you can't tell me they won't be celebrating each year when the last undefeated goes down. Will we labor them as bitter old-timers then?
How was home-field advantage determined at that time? It's odd that an undefeated team would play a playoff game on the road

Ni

 
phthalatemagic said:
PatsFan23 said:
Whizzinator said:
I thought I read somewhere that the 72 Dolphins had a historically easy schedule. Is that truly the case?
Yeah they did....and while everyone calls the Pats classless for running up the score anyone want to guess what these "classy" guys beat the Patriots by in '72.52-0 :rolleyes: So why don't you old farts just shut the "F" up and just be happy when they serve pudding at the old folks' home....Will the Pats go undefeated? They may but it will be a much tougher road than the 72 Dolphins...
TOXIC WASTE
Yeah I guess your opinion is always right and anyone else that doesn't agree with you spews TOXIC WASTE....my mistake you're a genius.
 
raven1911 said:
Whizzinator said:
I thought I read somewhere that the 72 Dolphins had a historically easy schedule. Is that truly the case?
And the Pats have had a hard schedule?? Please...give me a break. Miami, Phi, NYJ, Buf, Cin, Was?
Although the Dolphins did win their playoff games to complete the perfect season - their regular season was a joke. They played the Bills, Jets, Pats and Colts twice.they played only 2 teams with winning records and played ZERO teams that qualified for the playoffs. You'd think Don Shula had this schedule special ordered.They managed to crush the Bills in Miami by 1 point.Giants 8-6Chiefs 8-6Vikings 7-7Jets 7-7Colts 5-9Chargers 4-9-1Bills 4-9-1Cards 4-9-1Pats 3-11Oilers 1-13
 
You'd think Don Shula had this schedule special ordered.They managed to crush the Bills in Miami by 1 point.Giants 8-6Chiefs 8-6Vikings 7-7Jets 7-7Colts 5-9Chargers 4-9-1Bills 4-9-1Cards 4-9-1Pats 3-11Oilers 1-13
They beat everyone on the schedule. What's the problem?
 
phthalatemagic said:
PatsFan23 said:
Whizzinator said:
I thought I read somewhere that the 72 Dolphins had a historically easy schedule. Is that truly the case?
Yeah they did....and while everyone calls the Pats classless for running up the score anyone want to guess what these "classy" guys beat the Patriots by in '72.52-0 :popcorn: So why don't you old farts just shut the "F" up and just be happy when they serve pudding at the old folks' home....Will the Pats go undefeated? They may but it will be a much tougher road than the 72 Dolphins...
TOXIC WASTE
Yeah I guess your opinion is always right and anyone else that doesn't agree with you spews TOXIC WASTE....my mistake you're a genius.
That's not it at all.
 
This "hate the '72 Dolphins" schtick is old. If they're so irrelevant, why does anyone care what they say or think? Just ignore them.
I have no problem with their attitude. What bothers me is that I have to see it on Sportscenter when the last undefeated team loses. Why the f&^% do they even show these ###-clowns on TV every year? Are they that hard up for news?
 
How was home-field advantage determined at that time? It's odd that an undefeated team would play a playoff game on the roadNi
<thread hijack>From an email I recently received regarding this subject:
...the playoff rotation in each conference had to do more with which pre-designated division champion would host the wild card team in the 1st round divisional playoff games. Since the wild card would not be allowed to host ANY post-season games, the winner of the Divisional Playoff Game that pitted two (2) division champions would have the pre-designated right to host the conference championship game. This would make it easier to assure that the wild card team would be excluded from hosting the championship game, as well as for TV networks to anticipate production travel and teams to sell prospective championship game tickets. The concept of the team with the best regular season record hosting the wild card (coming from a division other than its own) and having conference home field advantage was not implemented until 1975.From 1970 through 1974, the designated divisional playoff hosts to the wild card teams were as follows, deviating only in the event that the wild card came from the same division as the pre-designated wild-card host.AFC: 1970-west,1971-central, 1972-east,1973-west, 1974-centralNFC: 1970-central(a), 1971-west, 1972-east(b), 1973-central, 1974-west(a) The NFC Central's Detroit Lions were the 1970 NFC wild card, so they were pitted against the NFC East Champion Dallas Cowboys, instead of the pre-designated Division champion from their own division.(b) The NFC East's Dallas Cowboys were the 1972 NFC wild card, so they were pitted against the NFC West Champion S.F. 49ers, instead of the pre-designated Division champion from their own division.Again, the other divisional playoff games matched division winners for the right to host the conference championship game.The AFC playoffs held form from 1970 through 1974, while the NFC plan required adjustment in 1970 and 1972, as the NFC wild card in those seasons came from the pre-designated wild card host division.I don't know for certain how the alternative wild card host was determined in the 1970 and 1972 NFC playoffs, but it appears as though the host was the division winner that was scheduled to be the wild card host 2 years later, but that seems awfully complicated to have been planned that way at the time. For all I know, it could also have easily been determined by coin flip. I just don't know.
HTH</thread hijack>
 
This "hate the '72 Dolphins" schtick is old. If they're so irrelevant, why does anyone care what they say or think? Just ignore them.
I have no problem with their attitude. What bothers me is that I have to see it on Sportscenter when the last undefeated team loses. Why the f&^% do they even show these ###-clowns on TV every year? Are they that hard up for news?
It is an accomplishment that has stood alone for 35 years. You think sports journalists should ignore it? The fact that these "###-clowns " have been the cause of so much discussion on these boards alone sort of justifies their relevance to NFL history. Unless Sportscenter is going to ignore the fact that another year has gone by without an undefeated team, then these guys will be a part of NFL news each and every year until someone else does it. And they should.I know that I am in the minority, and that as a Fins fan my opinion is extraordinarily biased - but I still enjoy the scene when the last team gets beaten every year, and I watch SC so that I can see the "###-clowns " do their toast that another year has gone by without their amazing feat having been equalled.I admit, that as a Fins fan there is not much else to look forward to lately by week 12, but I still relish the fact that my team is the only one to have ever accomplished the undefeated season. I am not surprized that the players relish it as well.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I know that I am in the minority, and that as a Fins fan my opinion is extraordinarily biased - but I still enjoy the scene when the last team gets beaten every year, and I watch SC so that I can see the "###-clowns " do their toast that another year has gone by without their amazing feat having been equalled.
Exactly. You are the minority. Why does the whole country have to be subjected to it? You can acknowledge the feat without showing these guys drinking their little champagne toast. One doesn't require the other.
 
As a Bolts fan, I have no love for the Pats.

That being said, I hope they go undefeated just so I don't have to hear about that bunch of old dude popping champagne again. They need to get over themselves.

 
Whizzinator said:
I thought I read somewhere that the 72 Dolphins had a historically easy schedule. Is that truly the case?
FACT: 1972 Dolphins' opponents had a 51-86-3 regular season recordFACT: The Dolphins beat a very good Pittsburgh team, on the road, in the AFC Championship game

FACT: Bob Griese went down with a broken leg in game #5 of the season and did not return to the playoffs

Say what you will about the Dolphins' strength of schedule. They played in a horrid division (NE 3-11, BUF 4-9-1, BAL 5-9, and NYJ 7-7), but so do the 2007 Patriots.

But you can't discount the fact that the team went undefeated with a backup QB starting almost 65% of the season, and had to beat a great team (the Steelers were 11-3) on the road to make the Super Bowl.

Bottom line: it was a great achievement, and one to be proud of. If the 2007 Patriots go undefeated, you can't tell me they won't be celebrating each year when the last undefeated goes down. Will we labor them as bitter old-timers then?
Both of you are correct. My favorite trivia points concerning the 1972 Dolphins is that they are the only Super Bowl winner that did not play a playoff team during the regular season, and they are also the only Super Bowl champion that did not play a team with a record more than two games over .500 during the regular season. In the Dolphins case, their regular season opponents were all 8-6 or worse.As people have said anytime this issue surfaces, it's not the Dolphins fault that their schedule ended up being easy. They simply beat everyone that they played. I agree with this entirely; however, I also believe that there is a certain logic that when comparing all-time great teams, it's not as simple as looking only at the record. What irritates me about the 1972 Dolphins is the manner in which Shula, Csonka and others proclaim themselves as the best team in NFL history because they did not lose a game. It's too simplistic for me. Most of us would agree that not all 10-6 (or 9-7, etc.) teams are not alike. We routinely acknowledge that some teams are harmed and others benefit from their schedule. The same standard should apply here.

For a decent discussion on the 1972 Dolphins and their place among Super Bowl teams, check out this thread. Specifically, page 2 points out more details on the state of the NFL in that era and more statistics concerning schedule difficulty and Super Bowl champions.

ESPN.com ranking of every Super Bowl team, Both winners AND losers, from 1 to 80

First post made on January 30, 2007

 
I know that I am in the minority, and that as a Fins fan my opinion is extraordinarily biased - but I still enjoy the scene when the last team gets beaten every year, and I watch SC so that I can see the "###-clowns " do their toast that another year has gone by without their amazing feat having been equalled.
Exactly. You are the minority. Why does the whole country have to be subjected to it? You can acknowledge the feat without showing these guys drinking their little champagne toast. One doesn't require the other.
Nobody is showing the Dolphins do a champagne toast because there isn't one. It's two guys who have perform that ritual in a parking lot and while that would no doubt make for riveting television, I don't know that it's ever been televised. In recent years, when the last undefeated team loses ESPN's Chris Berman has the schtick of having the sound of a cork popping while he references the 1972 Dolphins. That's hardly the Dolphins' fault.
 
I know that I am in the minority, and that as a Fins fan my opinion is extraordinarily biased - but I still enjoy the scene when the last team gets beaten every year, and I watch SC so that I can see the "###-clowns " do their toast that another year has gone by without their amazing feat having been equalled.
Exactly. You are the minority. Why does the whole country have to be subjected to it? You can acknowledge the feat without showing these guys drinking their little champagne toast. One doesn't require the other.
I understand your point, but I also assume you have a remote control for your TV. The fact that there are some people out there that enjoy it - even if we are in the minority - makes it worth putting on TV. I dont like Mark Schlereth, so I dont pay attention to what he says. I dont care for ER, so I dont tune in when it is on. I do however understand that others enjoy both of those things, and that is why they are on TV. While I understand your point, I really do not understand why it bothers so many people so much. It is a toast. It is not a beheading. It is really not a big enough deal that it should upset people like it seems to. Who is it hurting?

 
I understand your point, but I also assume you have a remote control for your TV. The fact that there are some people out there that enjoy it - even if we are in the minority - makes it worth putting on TV.
So ESPN should show curling on a regular basis because a few people up North like it? And what does the fact that you can turn the channel have to do with the point of whether something is newsworthy or not?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Why, so this can happen again next year? I would rather the Pats go undefeated, so then all this nonsense stops.
I think they will keep doing it anyway. It's not exactly a common feat you know. Besides, there will always be a question regarding the Patriots cheating.
only amongst the haters.
No. Amongst pretty much all serious football fans. The degree of question could vary, but there will always be a question.
 
Why, so this can happen again next year? I would rather the Pats go undefeated, so then all this nonsense stops.
I think they will keep doing it anyway. It's not exactly a common feat you know. Besides, there will always be a question regarding the Patriots cheating.
only amongst the haters.
No. Amongst pretty much all serious football fans. The degree of question could vary, but there will always be a question.
just like there will always be a questions about the refs during the steelers super bowl.
 
I understand your point, but I also assume you have a remote control for your TV. The fact that there are some people out there that enjoy it - even if we are in the minority - makes it worth putting on TV.
So ESPN should show curling on a regular basis because a few people up North like it? And what does the fact that you can turn the channel have to do with the point of whether something is newsworthy or not?
Like it or not, a feat that has not been matched for 35 years in a major sport is newsworthy, whether you enjoy it or you hate it. If it upsets you to this degree when they discuss it on TV, watch something else. I still have no concept of why this is so offensive to some people. There are a lot of other things going on in the world worthy of your personal fury. A few old dudes celebrating an unmatched accomplishment should not be one of them in my opinion.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top