Shutout said:
The one thing that was always apparently different with Fitz from day 1 was his hands. It wouldn't have mattered if he was shorter, slower, or anything else; if you ever watched him in college you could see he had that "it" factor when it came to getting that ball.
This is hyperbole. Lots of players have great hands, and hands alone do very little. Larry was the best in college and is one of the best in the NFL, not simply because of his hands. We all know why Larry is great, so I won't go into it. I'll simply say that A.J. Green has great hands too.
Shutout said:
I don't see AJ or Julio as similar. In the last 12 years or so, I have seen 4 player who I thought "holy crap...that's different"Moss, Fitz, calvin, and Crabtree. All for different reasons but they had something you can't measure or buy.
What is it that they had that you can't "measure or buy?" That is nothing more than saying you had a gut feeling. No disrespect, but who are you that we should trust your gut? The thing that people are missing: the experts, the people paid to be in the know, say that Green is an elite prospect. The people with the resources of an ESPN, the people with film and not Youtube highlights or game recordings that follow the ball, say Green is an elite prospect.
Shutout said:
I think AJ or Julio can be Maclin, Steve Smith, or that type of player but a lot more depends on the situation they end up in and how they develop more so than these great WRs that came before them.
I don't know what to say here. You throw out comparisons to the "greats that came before", then use names that don't make any sense: Maclin? Smith? Neither Maclin or Smith had the physical tools that Jones and Green posses - their games are nothing alike. If you are trying to put a cap on Green's potential, especially by using a guy like Smith, who simply doesn't have the physical tools, you are missing something.