Aaron Rodgers will win EVERY major award this Year (1 Viewer)

[Carolina Hustler]

Okay, so your thoughts are valid because some poster started a thread about Matt Flynn.

Let's see some actual experts break it down that actually have a say in the vote. You'll see that not a single one of them mentions Matt Flynn's performance or anything about a "system" at all (much less as a negative factor) when they pick Rodgers. I doubt that argument even enters into the decision process for most of the voters.

HmmmYou act as if it's only a handfull of FBG's posters are talking about this...

This is a national sports discussion, validating the discussion we are having here..

You degrading every poster who seems to take up the opposing argument is rather immature, and getting kinda old..

Reality is, there is merit to the discussion, whether it's enough to knock Rodgers out of MVP isn't the only discussion point.

1) Is it a valid discussion? Yes..

2) Should Flynn's production weigh into the Rodgers MVP discussion? Yes

3) Does Flynn's production weigh in enough to knock Rodgers out of the MVP spot? Probably not..

You've been consistently wrong about questions 1 and 2.. Shows extreme bias on your behalf, which is ok.. You're a Packers fan.. But to make ignorant, degrading or thick headed remarks about it isn't making you sound very intelligent..

I think Rodger's wins the MVP. I don't think that proves he is, was, has been, will be the better QB. That is still up for discussion. He's a media darling. He has played some very solid/great football, MVP caliber.. But he isn't the only one.

Again, all wrong. Flynn's performance only matters to those who are haters. Hate on, my friend. Hate on.

Guess you missed the link..

Here I'll make it more obvious for you

https://www.google.com/search?q=matt+flynn+nfl+mvp&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-USfficial&client=firefox-a

^LINK^

 

[Sabertooth]

If backups decide it, this award has to go to Peyton Manning.

 

[benson_will_lead_the_way]

Okay, so your thoughts are valid because some poster started a thread about Matt Flynn.

Let's see some actual experts break it down that actually have a say in the vote. You'll see that not a single one of them mentions Matt Flynn's performance or anything about a "system" at all (much less as a negative factor) when they pick Rodgers. I doubt that argument even enters into the decision process for most of the voters.

HmmmYou act as if it's only a handfull of FBG's posters are talking about this...

This is a national sports discussion, validating the discussion we are having here..

You degrading every poster who seems to take up the opposing argument is rather immature, and getting kinda old..

Reality is, there is merit to the discussion, whether it's enough to knock Rodgers out of MVP isn't the only discussion point.

1) Is it a valid discussion? Yes..

2) Should Flynn's production weigh into the Rodgers MVP discussion? Yes

3) Does Flynn's production weigh in enough to knock Rodgers out of the MVP spot? Probably not..

You've been consistently wrong about questions 1 and 2.. Shows extreme bias on your behalf, which is ok.. You're a Packers fan.. But to make ignorant, degrading or thick headed remarks about it isn't making you sound very intelligent..

I think Rodger's wins the MVP. I don't think that proves he is, was, has been, will be the better QB. That is still up for discussion. He's a media darling. He has played some very solid/great football, MVP caliber.. But he isn't the only one.

Again, all wrong. Flynn's performance only matters to those who are haters. Hate on, my friend. Hate on.

Guess you missed the link..

Here I'll make it more obvious for you

https://www.google.com/search?q=matt+flynn+nfl+mvp&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-USfficial&client=firefox-a

^LINK^

Always funny to argue with Packer fans that can't look beyond their own team colors

 

[wiscstlatlmia]

11 games in a dome. Gotta discount Brees' record a bit, particularly in a season when more than one person broke the long-standing record.

Also have to discount the 14 interceptions as well. Rodgers only had 6 - that is SIX - ints compared ot 45 TDs. I think you have to look at the stat padding that was going on in NO last game with Brees.

You should also add in that Matt Flynn threw for 6 TD's in one game...must be easy with all those weapons/the GB passing system.

With all due respect, that's the weakest argument in football - "it's the system, dammit". If it was so easy, everyone would be doing it and doing it as good as Rodgers. From your logic then Brees could easily be replaced in NO and Brady would be easily replaced in NE.BTW, Rodgers was also calling the plays during yesterdays game.

NO respect was given. When someone says with all due respect, an insult follows.The Green Bay system focuses on matchups and mismatches. With Jermichael Finley/Greg Jennings/Jordy Nelson/Cobb/Driver/James Jones versus any defense is a mismatch. I was referencing that Rodgers could be replaced easier than Brees because of what Matt Flynn accomplished on sunday. Therefore, Brees deserves the MVP.

Well, Considering Jennings has been injured for about 5 weeks now and Finley has been a complete bust this year... I would give the edge to Drew Brees for Offensive Weapons. Graham Colston Sproles Meachem Moore Henderson vs. Jennings Finley Cobb Nelson jones Driver is a wash and I personally think its in favor of the Saint's.

 

[Jersey35]

Since none of us are actually qualified to make a determination (and thankfully so, in some cases), I'm willing to let the actual voters decide.

Anyone who knows football would bet on Aaron Rodgers. But let's just wait and see.

 

[sho nuff]

Okay, so your thoughts are valid because some poster started a thread about Matt Flynn.

Let's see some actual experts break it down that actually have a say in the vote. You'll see that not a single one of them mentions Matt Flynn's performance or anything about a "system" at all (much less as a negative factor) when they pick Rodgers. I doubt that argument even enters into the decision process for most of the voters.

HmmmYou act as if it's only a handfull of FBG's posters are talking about this...

This is a national sports discussion, validating the discussion we are having here..

You degrading every poster who seems to take up the opposing argument is rather immature, and getting kinda old..

Reality is, there is merit to the discussion, whether it's enough to knock Rodgers out of MVP isn't the only discussion point.

1) Is it a valid discussion? Yes..

2) Should Flynn's production weigh into the Rodgers MVP discussion? Yes

3) Does Flynn's production weigh in enough to knock Rodgers out of the MVP spot? Probably not..

You've been consistently wrong about questions 1 and 2.. Shows extreme bias on your behalf, which is ok.. You're a Packers fan.. But to make ignorant, degrading or thick headed remarks about it isn't making you sound very intelligent..

I think Rodger's wins the MVP. I don't think that proves he is, was, has been, will be the better QB. That is still up for discussion. He's a media darling. He has played some very solid/great football, MVP caliber.. But he isn't the only one.

Again, all wrong. Flynn's performance only matters to those who are haters. Hate on, my friend. Hate on.

Guess you missed the link..

Here I'll make it more obvious for you

https://www.google.com/search?q=matt+flynn+nfl+mvp&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-USfficial&client=firefox-a

^LINK^

Always funny to argue with Packer fans that can't look beyond their own team colors

As posted in the other thread...you two should really look at the links before considering them proof.Most of them make the case for Rodgers.

One of them even stated what many of us have been saying.

"But please, I hope no one with a brain — voters or anyone else — questions Rodgers' season based on Flynn's performance. Rodgers set an NFL record by finishing with a 122.5 passer rating and is the only quarterback ever to throw for at least 4,000 yards and throw six or less interceptions in a season. MVP or not, let's not manufacture reasons to diminish what will still go down as one of the best seasons for a quarterback in NFL history."

And its always funny when benson calls anyone else a homer.

 

[Carolina Hustler]

Okay, so your thoughts are valid because some poster started a thread about Matt Flynn.

Let's see some actual experts break it down that actually have a say in the vote. You'll see that not a single one of them mentions Matt Flynn's performance or anything about a "system" at all (much less as a negative factor) when they pick Rodgers. I doubt that argument even enters into the decision process for most of the voters.

HmmmYou act as if it's only a handfull of FBG's posters are talking about this...

This is a national sports discussion, validating the discussion we are having here..

You degrading every poster who seems to take up the opposing argument is rather immature, and getting kinda old..

Reality is, there is merit to the discussion, whether it's enough to knock Rodgers out of MVP isn't the only discussion point.

1) Is it a valid discussion? Yes..

2) Should Flynn's production weigh into the Rodgers MVP discussion? Yes

3) Does Flynn's production weigh in enough to knock Rodgers out of the MVP spot? Probably not..

You've been consistently wrong about questions 1 and 2.. Shows extreme bias on your behalf, which is ok.. You're a Packers fan.. But to make ignorant, degrading or thick headed remarks about it isn't making you sound very intelligent..

I think Rodger's wins the MVP. I don't think that proves he is, was, has been, will be the better QB. That is still up for discussion. He's a media darling. He has played some very solid/great football, MVP caliber.. But he isn't the only one.

Again, all wrong. Flynn's performance only matters to those who are haters. Hate on, my friend. Hate on.

Guess you missed the link..

Here I'll make it more obvious for you

https://www.google.com/search?q=matt+flynn+nfl+mvp&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-USfficial&client=firefox-a

^LINK^

Always funny to argue with Packer fans that can't look beyond their own team colors

As posted in the other thread...you two should really look at the links before considering them proof.Most of them make the case for Rodgers.

One of them even stated what many of us have been saying.

"But please, I hope no one with a brain — voters or anyone else — questions Rodgers' season based on Flynn's performance. Rodgers set an NFL record by finishing with a 122.5 passer rating and is the only quarterback ever to throw for at least 4,000 yards and throw six or less interceptions in a season. MVP or not, let's not manufacture reasons to diminish what will still go down as one of the best seasons for a quarterback in NFL history."

And its always funny when benson calls anyone else a homer.

Proof that it's being discussed outside of this forum, and at a nation wide level.. Yea, how does what you've just posted here prove otherwise?.. I think you're confused.. I didn't post the link to prove Rodgers wouldn't get the MVP.. As a matter of fact, I think I've said on a number of occasions that Rodgers will likely be the MVP.. That link was proof that it wasn't "just a handfull of bearsfans, Rodgers haters, and fisherman" that were discussing the topic..A couple Packer Fans here have insinuated that anyone willing to consider this topic was stupid and that we were a limited minority, specific to a couple FBG threads.. That link proves otherwise..

You didn't mention several of the other articles, for obvious reasons.. Right?.. lol

Congratulations finding at least 1 that agrees with you.. What does that prove?

 

[General Tso]

11 games in a dome. Gotta discount Brees' record a bit, particularly in a season when more than one person broke the long-standing record.

Also have to discount the 14 interceptions as well. Rodgers only had 6 - that is SIX - ints compared ot 45 TDs. I think you have to look at the stat padding that was going on in NO last game with Brees.

You should also add in that Matt Flynn threw for 6 TD's in one game...must be easy with all those weapons/the GB passing system.

With all due respect, that's the weakest argument in football - "it's the system, dammit". If it was so easy, everyone would be doing it and doing it as good as Rodgers. From your logic then Brees could easily be replaced in NO and Brady would be easily replaced in NE.BTW, Rodgers was also calling the plays during yesterdays game.

NO respect was given. When someone says with all due respect, an insult follows.The Green Bay system focuses on matchups and mismatches. With Jermichael Finley/Greg Jennings/Jordy Nelson/Cobb/Driver/James Jones versus any defense is a mismatch. I was referencing that Rodgers could be replaced easier than Brees because of what Matt Flynn accomplished on sunday. Therefore, Brees deserves the MVP.

Well, Considering Jennings has been injured for about 5 weeks now and Finley has been a complete bust this year... I would give the edge to Drew Brees for Offensive Weapons. Graham Colston Sproles Meachem Moore Henderson vs. Jennings Finley Cobb Nelson jones Driver is a wash and I personally think its in favor of the Saint's.

Jennings only missed two of Rodgers starts. And Finley was far from a complete bust. He finished with the 4th highest point total among TE's in my league. And you forgot to mention Jordy Nelson, who arguably had the greatest breakout season for a WR in the last 5 years. Green Bay definitely has the most talented receivers in the game. I think Flynn helped prove that.

 

[smackdaddies]

Funny AP voters (all 2.5) might think that...allthe rest have spoken

Rodgers -----> Brees

 

[benson_will_lead_the_way]

Okay, so your thoughts are valid because some poster started a thread about Matt Flynn.

Let's see some actual experts break it down that actually have a say in the vote. You'll see that not a single one of them mentions Matt Flynn's performance or anything about a "system" at all (much less as a negative factor) when they pick Rodgers. I doubt that argument even enters into the decision process for most of the voters.

HmmmYou act as if it's only a handfull of FBG's posters are talking about this...

This is a national sports discussion, validating the discussion we are having here..

You degrading every poster who seems to take up the opposing argument is rather immature, and getting kinda old..

Reality is, there is merit to the discussion, whether it's enough to knock Rodgers out of MVP isn't the only discussion point.

1) Is it a valid discussion? Yes..

2) Should Flynn's production weigh into the Rodgers MVP discussion? Yes

3) Does Flynn's production weigh in enough to knock Rodgers out of the MVP spot? Probably not..

You've been consistently wrong about questions 1 and 2.. Shows extreme bias on your behalf, which is ok.. You're a Packers fan.. But to make ignorant, degrading or thick headed remarks about it isn't making you sound very intelligent..

I think Rodger's wins the MVP. I don't think that proves he is, was, has been, will be the better QB. That is still up for discussion. He's a media darling. He has played some very solid/great football, MVP caliber.. But he isn't the only one.

Again, all wrong. Flynn's performance only matters to those who are haters. Hate on, my friend. Hate on.

Guess you missed the link..

Here I'll make it more obvious for you

https://www.google.com/search?q=matt+flynn+nfl+mvp&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-USfficial&client=firefox-a

^LINK^

Always funny to argue with Packer fans that can't look beyond their own team colors

As posted in the other thread...you two should really look at the links before considering them proof.Most of them make the case for Rodgers.

One of them even stated what many of us have been saying.

"But please, I hope no one with a brain — voters or anyone else — questions Rodgers' season based on Flynn's performance. Rodgers set an NFL record by finishing with a 122.5 passer rating and is the only quarterback ever to throw for at least 4,000 yards and throw six or less interceptions in a season. MVP or not, let's not manufacture reasons to diminish what will still go down as one of the best seasons for a quarterback in NFL history."

And its always funny when benson calls anyone else a homer.

Proof that it's being discussed outside of this forum, and at a nation wide level.. Yea, how does what you've just posted here prove otherwise?.. I think you're confused.. I didn't post the link to prove Rodgers wouldn't get the MVP.. As a matter of fact, I think I've said on a number of occasions that Rodgers will likely be the MVP.. That link was proof that it wasn't "just a handfull of bearsfans, Rodgers haters, and fisherman" that were discussing the topic..A couple Packer Fans here have insinuated that anyone willing to consider this topic was stupid and that we were a limited minority, specific to a couple FBG threads.. That link proves otherwise..

You didn't mention several of the other articles, for obvious reasons.. Right?.. lol

Congratulations finding at least 1 that agrees with you.. What does that prove?

How long are you going to get Sho nuff?

 

[sho nuff]

Okay, so your thoughts are valid because some poster started a thread about Matt Flynn.

Let's see some actual experts break it down that actually have a say in the vote. You'll see that not a single one of them mentions Matt Flynn's performance or anything about a "system" at all (much less as a negative factor) when they pick Rodgers. I doubt that argument even enters into the decision process for most of the voters.

HmmmYou act as if it's only a handfull of FBG's posters are talking about this...

This is a national sports discussion, validating the discussion we are having here..

You degrading every poster who seems to take up the opposing argument is rather immature, and getting kinda old..

Reality is, there is merit to the discussion, whether it's enough to knock Rodgers out of MVP isn't the only discussion point.

1) Is it a valid discussion? Yes..

2) Should Flynn's production weigh into the Rodgers MVP discussion? Yes

3) Does Flynn's production weigh in enough to knock Rodgers out of the MVP spot? Probably not..

You've been consistently wrong about questions 1 and 2.. Shows extreme bias on your behalf, which is ok.. You're a Packers fan.. But to make ignorant, degrading or thick headed remarks about it isn't making you sound very intelligent..

I think Rodger's wins the MVP. I don't think that proves he is, was, has been, will be the better QB. That is still up for discussion. He's a media darling. He has played some very solid/great football, MVP caliber.. But he isn't the only one.

Again, all wrong. Flynn's performance only matters to those who are haters. Hate on, my friend. Hate on.

Guess you missed the link..

Here I'll make it more obvious for you

https://www.google.com/search?q=matt+flynn+nfl+mvp&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-USfficial&client=firefox-a

^LINK^

Always funny to argue with Packer fans that can't look beyond their own team colors

As posted in the other thread...you two should really look at the links before considering them proof.Most of them make the case for Rodgers.

One of them even stated what many of us have been saying.

"But please, I hope no one with a brain — voters or anyone else — questions Rodgers' season based on Flynn's performance. Rodgers set an NFL record by finishing with a 122.5 passer rating and is the only quarterback ever to throw for at least 4,000 yards and throw six or less interceptions in a season. MVP or not, let's not manufacture reasons to diminish what will still go down as one of the best seasons for a quarterback in NFL history."

And its always funny when benson calls anyone else a homer.

Proof that it's being discussed outside of this forum, and at a nation wide level.. Yea, how does what you've just posted here prove otherwise?.. I think you're confused.. I didn't post the link to prove Rodgers wouldn't get the MVP.. As a matter of fact, I think I've said on a number of occasions that Rodgers will likely be the MVP.. That link was proof that it wasn't "just a handfull of bearsfans, Rodgers haters, and fisherman" that were discussing the topic..A couple Packer Fans here have insinuated that anyone willing to consider this topic was stupid and that we were a limited minority, specific to a couple FBG threads.. That link proves otherwise..

You didn't mention several of the other articles, for obvious reasons.. Right?.. lol

Congratulations finding at least 1 that agrees with you.. What does that prove?

How long are you going to get Sho nuff?

Do I need to post that little quote from a moderator here that you only like to bring up when its convenient to you?BTW...no anyway...but if you think so...go right ahead.

There are how many threads on this in here? And in most of them you have you and Hustler doing your best to try and think you have shown anything more than people are talking about it...great...they are talking about it.

Does that make the logic of the discussion valid or prove that? No. Especially given its likely neither of you read half the crap in those links...if you had you would know that several of them made my points for me supporting Rodgers.

Hilarious.

 

[MaxThreshold]

Okay, so your thoughts are valid because some poster started a thread about Matt Flynn.

Let's see some actual experts break it down that actually have a say in the vote. You'll see that not a single one of them mentions Matt Flynn's performance or anything about a "system" at all (much less as a negative factor) when they pick Rodgers. I doubt that argument even enters into the decision process for most of the voters.

HmmmYou act as if it's only a handfull of FBG's posters are talking about this...

This is a national sports discussion, validating the discussion we are having here..

You degrading every poster who seems to take up the opposing argument is rather immature, and getting kinda old..

Reality is, there is merit to the discussion, whether it's enough to knock Rodgers out of MVP isn't the only discussion point.

1) Is it a valid discussion? Yes..

2) Should Flynn's production weigh into the Rodgers MVP discussion? Yes

3) Does Flynn's production weigh in enough to knock Rodgers out of the MVP spot? Probably not..

You've been consistently wrong about questions 1 and 2.. Shows extreme bias on your behalf, which is ok.. You're a Packers fan.. But to make ignorant, degrading or thick headed remarks about it isn't making you sound very intelligent..

I think Rodger's wins the MVP. I don't think that proves he is, was, has been, will be the better QB. That is still up for discussion. He's a media darling. He has played some very solid/great football, MVP caliber.. But he isn't the only one.

Again, all wrong. Flynn's performance only matters to those who are haters. Hate on, my friend. Hate on.

Guess you missed the link..

Here I'll make it more obvious for you

https://www.google.c...lient=firefox-a

^LINK^

Always funny to argue with Packer fans that can't look beyond their own team colors

As posted in the other thread...you two should really look at the links before considering them proof.Most of them make the case for Rodgers.

One of them even stated what many of us have been saying.

"But please, I hope no one with a brain — voters or anyone else — questions Rodgers' season based on Flynn's performance. Rodgers set an NFL record by finishing with a 122.5 passer rating and is the only quarterback ever to throw for at least 4,000 yards and throw six or less interceptions in a season. MVP or not, let's not manufacture reasons to diminish what will still go down as one of the best seasons for a quarterback in NFL history."

And its always funny when benson calls anyone else a homer.

Proof that it's being discussed outside of this forum, and at a nation wide level.. Yea, how does what you've just posted here prove otherwise?.. I think you're confused.. I didn't post the link to prove Rodgers wouldn't get the MVP.. As a matter of fact, I think I've said on a number of occasions that Rodgers will likely be the MVP.. That link was proof that it wasn't "just a handfull of bearsfans, Rodgers haters, and fisherman" that were discussing the topic..A couple Packer Fans here have insinuated that anyone willing to consider this topic was stupid and that we were a limited minority, specific to a couple FBG threads.. That link proves otherwise..

You didn't mention several of the other articles, for obvious reasons.. Right?.. lol

Congratulations finding at least 1 that agrees with you.. What does that prove?

How long are you going to get Sho nuff?

Do I need to post that little quote from a moderator here that you only like to bring up when its convenient to you?BTW...no anyway...but if you think so...go right ahead.

There are how many threads on this in here? And in most of them you have you and Hustler doing your best to try and think you have shown anything more than people are talking about it...great...they are talking about it.

Does that make the logic of the discussion valid or prove that? No. Especially given its likely neither of you read half the crap in those links...if you had you would know that several of them made my points for me supporting Rodgers.

Hilarious.

Edit: can anyone tell me why the emoticon above is showing up as a link instead of the image? When I add it it the editor it shows up as the emoticon but when I save the post it shows as the link. What's the dilly?

 

[Carolina Hustler]

Especially given its likely neither of you read half the crap in those links...if you had you would know that several of them made my points for me supporting Rodgers.Hilarious.

Sho, if you read them, like you are insinuating, you'd know several of them disagree with you as well...But, that wasn't the point of the link, the link, and I'll say it again since it doesn't seem to have penetrated yet, was only posted because a couple of you were saying this topic was limited to a few 'FBG, Rodgers haters'.. that's obviously not the case..

 

[sho nuff]

Especially given its likely neither of you read half the crap in those links...if you had you would know that several of them made my points for me supporting Rodgers.Hilarious.

Sho, if you read them, like you are insinuating, you'd know several of them disagree with you as well...But, that wasn't the point of the link, the link, and I'll say it again since it doesn't seem to have penetrated yet, was only posted because a couple of you were saying this topic was limited to a few 'FBG, Rodgers haters'.. that's obviously not the case..

I saw very little that claimed that Flynn's performance would influence their vote or the race. Mainly the one emailer to King...which is quickly dismissed.But again..."this topic" had nothing to do with that...til you brought it back up.I don't think anyone claimed it was ever limited to just FBGs. We are talking the validity of the points being made...not in having the discussion at all.But you can't seem to get past that.

 

[Carolina Hustler]

Edit: can anyone tell me why the emoticon above is showing up as a link instead of the image? When I add it it the editor it shows up as the emoticon but when I save the post it shows as the link. What's the dilly?

O,gosh, you must have missed the memo.. Seems, that until you start making valid, cogent points in the forum, your emoticon rights have been restrictedUntil your probation is over, you're restricted to the following emoticons:

:whoosh: - they couldn't deprive you of this, you will likely need to use often

- because they knew you'd need it when the Packers get bounced next week

- for use when Brees wins Superbowl MVP

 

[Carolina Hustler]

Especially given its likely neither of you read half the crap in those links...if you had you would know that several of them made my points for me supporting Rodgers.Hilarious.

Sho, if you read them, like you are insinuating, you'd know several of them disagree with you as well...But, that wasn't the point of the link, the link, and I'll say it again since it doesn't seem to have penetrated yet, was only posted because a couple of you were saying this topic was limited to a few 'FBG, Rodgers haters'.. that's obviously not the case..

I saw very little that claimed that Flynn's performance would influence their vote or the race. Mainly the one emailer to King...which is quickly dismissed.But again..."this topic" had nothing to do with that...til you brought it back up.I don't think anyone claimed it was ever limited to just FBGs. We are talking the validity of the points being made...not in having the discussion at all.But you can't seem to get past that.

Maybe I'm crossing up the 2 or 3 threads.. But it was certainly said, more than once, and by more than just Max..

 

[MaxThreshold]

Edit: can anyone tell me why the emoticon above is showing up as a link instead of the image? When I add it it the editor it shows up as the emoticon but when I save the post it shows as the link. What's the dilly?

O,gosh, you must have missed the memo.. Seems, that until you start making valid, cogent points in the forum, your emoticon rights have been restrictedUntil your probation is over, you're restricted to the following emoticons:

:whoosh: - they couldn't deprive you of this, you will likely need to use often

- because they knew you'd need it when the Packers get bounced next week

- for use when Brees wins Superbowl MVP

Again, who's the one making insults?

 

[Carolina Hustler]

Edit: can anyone tell me why the emoticon above is showing up as a link instead of the image? When I add it it the editor it shows up as the emoticon but when I save the post it shows as the link. What's the dilly?

O,gosh, you must have missed the memo.. Seems, that until you start making valid, cogent points in the forum, your emoticon rights have been restrictedUntil your probation is over, you're restricted to the following emoticons:

:whoosh: - they couldn't deprive you of this, you will likely need to use often

- because they knew you'd need it when the Packers get bounced next week

- for use when Brees wins Superbowl MVP

Again, who's the one making insults?

You didn't find any of that funny?.. fine.. I give..

 

[smackdaddies]

Sporting News - Offensive Player of the Year

 

[smackdaddies]

MVP

 

[MaxThreshold]

MVP

He absolutely crushed Brees in the voting, 48-2. This should put to rest the "System QB" nonsense.

 

[Carolina Hustler]

MVP

He absolutely crushed Brees in the voting, 48-2. This should put to rest the "System QB" nonsense.

A popularity vote doesn't prove anything but popular opinion.. Nice try though..

 

[MaxThreshold]

MVP

He absolutely crushed Brees in the voting, 48-2. This should put to rest the "System QB" nonsense.

A popularity vote doesn't prove anything but popular opinion.. Nice try though..

yeah, whatever you have to say to make yourself feel better. Maybe the pro-bowl is a popularity contest, but not the MVP award. Now you're just delusional.

You're "System QB" argument was completely and resoundingly blown out of the water. Ouch, that's gotta' hurt.

 

[Multiple Scores]

MVP

He absolutely crushed Brees in the voting, 48-2. This should put to rest the "System QB" nonsense.

A popularity vote doesn't prove anything but popular opinion.. Nice try though..

yeah, whatever you have to say to make yourself feel better. Maybe the pro-bowl is a popularity contest, but not the MVP award. Now you're just delusional.

You're "System QB" argument was completely and resoundingly blown out of the water. Ouch, that's gotta' hurt.

Tone down the tool factor.

 

[benson_will_lead_the_way]

MVP

He absolutely crushed Brees in the voting, 48-2. This should put to rest the "System QB" nonsense.

A popularity vote doesn't prove anything but popular opinion.. Nice try though..

yeah, whatever you have to say to make yourself feel better. Maybe the pro-bowl is a popularity contest, but not the MVP award. Now you're just delusional.

You're "System QB" argument was completely and resoundingly blown out of the water. Ouch, that's gotta' hurt.

That poll showed that FBG's thought he would get the MVP, but also that he had an advantage with system/personnel. In the NFCC, Rodgers missed a few WR's but most of the complaints were about drops. To have it both ways, shouldn't they be complimenting the WRs on the good catches?

 

[Serenity Now]

Hopefully Rodgers enjoys his 'major awards' from the sidelines during the game for the only prize that means anything, really.

 

[sho nuff]

MVP

He absolutely crushed Brees in the voting, 48-2. This should put to rest the "System QB" nonsense.

A popularity vote doesn't prove anything but popular opinion.. Nice try though..

yeah, whatever you have to say to make yourself feel better. Maybe the pro-bowl is a popularity contest, but not the MVP award. Now you're just delusional.

You're "System QB" argument was completely and resoundingly blown out of the water. Ouch, that's gotta' hurt.

Tone down the tool factor.

Coming from you...funniest thing I have read in a while.

 

[AmosMoses]

Rogers PWNED by Matt Birk!!!

 

[Carolina Hustler]

MVP

He absolutely crushed Brees in the voting, 48-2. This should put to rest the "System QB" nonsense.

A popularity vote doesn't prove anything but popular opinion.. Nice try though..

yeah, whatever you have to say to make yourself feel better. Maybe the pro-bowl is a popularity contest, but not the MVP award. Now you're just delusional.

You're "System QB" argument was completely and resoundingly blown out of the water. Ouch, that's gotta' hurt.

Make myself feel better? You are a tool and a clown, even your own packer fans would (and have) let you know..

I could care less one way or the other as I don't care for either team. But I and many before did say Rodgers would likely win.. Your return here to thump your chest is rather silly.. You're looking to stamp an I told you so on a thread where If I were you, I'd be hoping to bury as quick as possible as ridiculous as you showed your self to be in this thread.. (including in the last post here^)

Everyone already conceded that Rodgers would likely win.. Fishing trip should be over, but not with you around huh?

 

[nxmehta]

MVP

He absolutely crushed Brees in the voting, 48-2. This should put to rest the "System QB" nonsense.

A popularity vote doesn't prove anything but popular opinion.. Nice try though..