I wasn't disagreeing with your ranking at all. Just pointing out a few things that could be more in his favor this year than last September.Tier 1 is extremely tightly packed. I can make a case for any of them #1.I agree with this. There's almost no way he can keep those efficiency numbers up,3. Lamar Jackson, he 100% should have been the NFL MVP last season, he had peak Rodgers efficacy, but with 900 rushing yards too. But fantasy wise, its likely he declines a bit. The 2 best fantasy QB seasons in the last 6 years belong to Jackson, there's really nowhere to go but down. A 41-4 TD/INT ratio is unsustainable, as is a TD pass on 8.6% of your passes. The Ravens also had a pretty awful defense for much of last season, but they figured it out late, and that should carry over to this season.
Couple of caveats, though.
1. I think the defense being good will help him with scoring opportunities. Maybe the RBs get the bulk of that advantage, but Jackson will get some of it either passing or running.
2. He's got the best receiving group he's ever had.
I didn't think you were disagreeing, I just wanted to double down on how close tier 1 of QBs is.I wasn't disagreeing with your ranking at all. Just pointing out a few things that could be more in his favor this year than last September.Tier 1 is extremely tightly packed. I can make a case for any of them #1.I agree with this. There's almost no way he can keep those efficiency numbers up,3. Lamar Jackson, he 100% should have been the NFL MVP last season, he had peak Rodgers efficacy, but with 900 rushing yards too. But fantasy wise, its likely he declines a bit. The 2 best fantasy QB seasons in the last 6 years belong to Jackson, there's really nowhere to go but down. A 41-4 TD/INT ratio is unsustainable, as is a TD pass on 8.6% of your passes. The Ravens also had a pretty awful defense for much of last season, but they figured it out late, and that should carry over to this season.
Couple of caveats, though.
1. I think the defense being good will help him with scoring opportunities. Maybe the RBs get the bulk of that advantage, but Jackson will get some of it either passing or running.
2. He's got the best receiving group he's ever had.
Was just outside the top-40, in a group with Diggs, Mooney, and Golden.Great stuff, thank you!
Where does Rome Odunze rank?
Thank you. I've been arguing this in dynasty circles, everyone is way too low on the guy. His floor was last season and that was still QB1 level.9. Brock Purdy, move over Rodney Dangerfield, there is a new Mr. gets no respect. I almost feel like Purdy is still getting being Mr. Irrelevant held against him. He's been a top-10 QB since he took over in 2022, and even last year was QB9 despite getting half a season from Aiyuk/Trent Williams, and like 3 games from CMC, and having a clearly not right Deebo. Despite all that, Purdy still had an elite YPA and added some major rushing value that may or not be sticky. Now CMC is back, Aiyuk should be at some point, and its possible Pearsall takes a step forward after being shot in the chest last summer.
Just outside the top-40. He may break out, but he also may be the #4 target on the Bears. We don't really have a template for how Ben Johnson would use an Odunze type. As a Bears fan, I will say, it worries me slightly that they felt the need to go TE/WR with their first 2 picks. Maybe that means nothing and its BPA (I like both Loveland and Burden a lot) but it also could mean they were underwhelmed with Odunze.@travdogg Where would you rank Odunze? Any chance he breaks out?
You pretty much nailed it. Stafford contributes nothing as a runner, and Lawrence is an above average runner.One question for @travdogg ...
If the justification for Trevor Lawrence at #12 is that Brian Thomas Jr. (ranked 6) and Travis Hunter (ranked 23) carry him to QB1 finish, where does Matthew Stafford shake out with Puka Nacua (ranked 5) and Davante Adams (ranked 18)? Or am I discounting Lawrence's rushing upside and passing game to the backs too much?