What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Alec Baldwin killed a woman on set with prop gun (1 Viewer)

Seems to me like people here want to hold somebody responsible, and it is somehow important to be someone they have heard of. It's a funny world now I guess.
It is a funny world.
Who fired the gun that killed a woman on the set? Alec Baldwin.
Who didn't pay attention during the mandatory gun safety briefing? Alec Baldwin.
Who was in charge of the set where two previous gun misfires had already occurred that caused seasoned professionals to quit due to safety concerns? Alec Baldwin.

The idea that he should be assigned some of the blame doesn't seem like "people just want someone they've heard of to hold responsible" to me.
 
Seems to me like people here want to hold somebody responsible, and it is somehow important to be someone they have heard of. It's a funny world now I guess.
It is a funny world.
Who fired the gun that killed a woman on the set? Alec Baldwin.
Who didn't pay attention during the mandatory gun safety briefing? Alec Baldwin.
Who was in charge of the set where two previous gun misfires had already occurred that caused seasoned professionals to quit due to safety concerns? Alec Baldwin.

The idea that he should be assigned some of the blame doesn't seem like "people just want someone they've heard of to hold responsible" to me.
For the most part, I don't really want to dive into some of the fray going on here, but there have been other fatalities in previous movie productions (shootings, accidents, drownings, crashes, stunts gone wrong) where I am sure there were issues in lack of firearms training, inexperienced people not fully qualified for the roles they had on set, poor safety practices, improper maintenance of equipment, crew members walking off productions, etc. But I don't seem to remember times where individuals were criminally charged in those incidents. I am sure there most likely were sizable civil suits, insurance claims, and big dollar settlements. Obviously one fatality is one too many, but I'm curious why those incidents didn't merit the scrutiny and infuriation that the Baldwin case has. Why weren't criminal charges filed in those other tragedies?
 
Seems to me like people here want to hold somebody responsible, and it is somehow important to be someone they have heard of. It's a funny world now I guess.
It is a funny world.
Who fired the gun that killed a woman on the set? Alec Baldwin.
Who didn't pay attention during the mandatory gun safety briefing? Alec Baldwin.
Who was in charge of the set where two previous gun misfires had already occurred that caused seasoned professionals to quit due to safety concerns? Alec Baldwin.

The idea that he should be assigned some of the blame doesn't seem like "people just want someone they've heard of to hold responsible" to me.
That’s not the way movie sets work.

Lebron James is an executive producer on various projects. He has nothing to do with the day to day operations. AB as an actor is only focused on acting. All of the producer duties were most likely handled by his subordinates.
 
Seems to me like people here want to hold somebody responsible, and it is somehow important to be someone they have heard of. It's a funny world now I guess.
It is a funny world.
Who fired the gun that killed a woman on the set? Alec Baldwin.
Who didn't pay attention during the mandatory gun safety briefing? Alec Baldwin.
Who was in charge of the set where two previous gun misfires had already occurred that caused seasoned professionals to quit due to safety concerns? Alec Baldwin.

The idea that he should be assigned some of the blame doesn't seem like "people just want someone they've heard of to hold responsible" to me.
For the most part, I don't really want to dive into some of the fray going on here, but there have been other fatalities in previous movie productions (shootings, accidents, drownings, crashes, stunts gone wrong) where I am sure there were issues in lack of firearms training, inexperienced people not fully qualified for the roles they had on set, poor safety practices, improper maintenance of equipment, crew members walking off productions, etc. But I don't seem to remember times where individuals were criminally charged in those incidents. I am sure there most likely were sizable civil suits, insurance claims, and big dollar settlements. Obviously one fatality is one too many, but I'm curious why those incidents didn't merit the scrutiny and infuriation that the Baldwin case has. Why weren't criminal charges filed in those other tragedies?
I assume the circumstances weren't the same. I don't recall another movie set death where multiple safety violations had occurred in the few days before. I don't recall another movie set death where the actor was pointing the gun at a person and pulling the trigger without direct instructions to do so. Again, just reading what occurred IN THIS CASE ALONE, it seems he bears a portion of the guilt. I can't speak to other cases that haven't been as scrutinized.

However, saying he shouldn't be charged because no one else ever has been in an accidental movie death is not a valid reason to me.
 
Seems to me like people here want to hold somebody responsible, and it is somehow important to be someone they have heard of. It's a funny world now I guess.
It is a funny world.
Who fired the gun that killed a woman on the set? Alec Baldwin.
Who didn't pay attention during the mandatory gun safety briefing? Alec Baldwin.
Who was in charge of the set where two previous gun misfires had already occurred that caused seasoned professionals to quit due to safety concerns? Alec Baldwin.

The idea that he should be assigned some of the blame doesn't seem like "people just want someone they've heard of to hold responsible" to me.
For the most part, I don't really want to dive into some of the fray going on here, but there have been other fatalities in previous movie productions (shootings, accidents, drownings, crashes, stunts gone wrong) where I am sure there were issues in lack of firearms training, inexperienced people not fully qualified for the roles they had on set, poor safety practices, improper maintenance of equipment, crew members walking off productions, etc. But I don't seem to remember times where individuals were criminally charged in those incidents. I am sure there most likely were sizable civil suits, insurance claims, and big dollar settlements. Obviously one fatality is one too many, but I'm curious why those incidents didn't merit the scrutiny and infuriation that the Baldwin case has. Why weren't criminal charges filed in those other tragedies?

The first/most recent incident that comes to mind for me is the Gregg Allman movie "Midnight Rider", where a production assistant named Sarah Jones was struck by a train and killed while filming on a set near train tracks, in Georgia in 2014. The director/producer Randall Miller, writer/producer Jody Savin, executive producer Jay Sedrish, and assistant director Hillary Schwartz were all charged with involuntary manslaughter. The director pled guilty and got a 10-year sentence, of which he served one year in prison and was granted probation for the remainder. Sedrish pled guilty and got 10 years probation. The charges against Savin were dismissed as part of the plea deals for the director (her husband). The assistant director pled guilty and also received 10 years probation.

Afterwards the "Safety for Sarah" campaign started, to raise awareness of safety issues on set. Most union crews are given frequent reminders of protocols and I still see "Saftey for Sarah" bumper stickers on equipment, vehicles, and office doors. Many in the industry are aware of the event and that the producers and assistant director faced criminal charges.
 
Last edited:
Seems to me like people here want to hold somebody responsible, and it is somehow important to be someone they have heard of. It's a funny world now I guess.
It is a funny world.
Who fired the gun that killed a woman on the set? Alec Baldwin.
Who didn't pay attention during the mandatory gun safety briefing? Alec Baldwin.
Who was in charge of the set where two previous gun misfires had already occurred that caused seasoned professionals to quit due to safety concerns? Alec Baldwin.

The idea that he should be assigned some of the blame doesn't seem like "people just want someone they've heard of to hold responsible" to me.
That’s not the way movie sets work.

Lebron James is an executive producer on various projects. He has nothing to do with the day to day operations. AB as an actor is only focused on acting. All of the producer duties were most likely handled by his subordinates.
If LeBron James were the executive producer of a project that had multiple safety issues and didn't change anything about it despite knowing about those failures, he'd likely be under similar scrutiny.
 
However, saying he shouldn't be charged because no one else ever has been in an accidental movie death is not a valid reason to me.
That's not really what I was saying. I was wondering what determines if charges are or aren't filed, and from the incidents that I vaguely remember, most of the other times charges weren't filed (or if they were, they were either dropped or plead out). Many times, financial settlements were reached or civil actions were filed.

I will use a different example which also didn't make sense to me. I know someone who had a brother that was killed in a car accident. The crash was minor, but the gas tank exploded and that eliminated any chance of surviving. The family took the manufacturer to court and in the discovery process found all sorts of reports and internal communication that identified the issue and reported it all the way up to the CEO. That led to number crunching and risk assessment to try to figure out just how many vehicles were impacted and what to do about it.

That spelled out that there was a known design flaw where minor accidents could result in fatalities. Production was briefly stopped and the problem was addressed and corrected, but they decided not to do anything about the cars that were already on the market. By their math, not enough vehicles were impacted so they did not initiate a recall or a transportation safety bulletin. The family got an eight figure settlement, but even with the paper trail that named names and what they all knew, law enforcement would not investigate further.
 
Seems to me like people here want to hold somebody responsible, and it is somehow important to be someone they have heard of. It's a funny world now I guess.
It is a funny world.
Who fired the gun that killed a woman on the set? Alec Baldwin.
Who didn't pay attention during the mandatory gun safety briefing? Alec Baldwin.
Who was in charge of the set where two previous gun misfires had already occurred that caused seasoned professionals to quit due to safety concerns? Alec Baldwin.

The idea that he should be assigned some of the blame doesn't seem like "people just want someone they've heard of to hold responsible" to me.
That’s not the way movie sets work.

Lebron James is an executive producer on various projects. He has nothing to do with the day to day operations. AB as an actor is only focused on acting. All of the producer duties were most likely handled by his subordinates.
If LeBron James were the executive producer of a project that had multiple safety issues and didn't change anything about it despite knowing about those failures, he'd likely be under similar scrutiny.
Nope. That’s just not the way the business works. Simply because AB was on site as an actor/director/grip/electrcian/craft services/whatever does not mean that he’s acting as the producer on site. ESPECIALLY if he’s the executive producer.
 
haven't followed this case but I've heard about it and wanted to see what the consensus was but I saw

I'm not for imprisoning people for accidents when they weren't doing anything illegal, such as a car accident while drunk.
if you are drunk and you get behind the wheel of a 1 ton bullet then you are commiting a crime and if that crime results in a death it's involuntary manslaughter. One could make the argument (and I'm sure someone has) that a drunk doesn't understand what they are doing but they are being reckless and irresponsible with their actions. Harsh penalties, including jail time, should very much be on the table.
They made the choice to drink and drive a weapon of over a ton in weight. What AH thinks that's okay?

I could be misreading but I think @ghostguy123 was using the drunk driver as an example of someone that was doing something illegal and SHOULD be imprisoned. He was saying this Rust case is not like that.
He's saying, or at least the way that I keep reading it, is that he was an accident so Baldwin shouldn't face jail time. and then said that a car wreck caused by drunk driving isn't illegal but it is illegal and immoral (IMO) to drive while drunk. He IS right that someone that gets in an auto accident that doesn't result in death probably won't face jail time but if you read Dezbelief post then it does make it sound like Baldwin was being willfully negligent.

Of course driving drunk is illegal, hence the phrase "... doing anything illegal, such as a car accident while drunk." Perhaps poorly phrased, but it makes no sense to assume the poster is equating a purely accidental act with the intentional act of drunk driving. He's drawing a contrast, not equating the two situations in terms of intent and "accidental conduct."

Well the actual quote was

I'm all for imprisoning criminals. I'm not for imprisoning people for accidents when they weren't doing anything illegal, such as a car accident while drunk.

If you have to edit a quote then maybe the quote doesn't mean what you want it to. You say it makes no sense but unless ghostguy123 is an account of yours or he's a friend that you talk to outside of this site then you have no idea what he meant or what he believes. Earlier, he gave the example of a nurse that kills thier patient (commits involuntary manslaughter) would not see prision time. Does every charge of involuntary manslaughter result in prision time? probably not or maybe it does, dunno not a lawyer. What I think he thinks or believes is that drunk driving and an accidental medical related death do not make one a criminal amd shouldn't result in jail time. And honestly, I can sorta get on board. Accidents happen and throwing someone in jail does ???? In the eyes of the law, both a car accident while DUI and a medical accident are involuntary manslaughter. Now drunk driving, as you point out, is seen as an intentional act but I would not be surprised if he (and many others) don't see it as anything more than an accident. He's welcome to come in here and explain himself further. Although it would be interesting to see what he thinks about the armorer going to jail.

I ABHOR drunk driving so I think it explains my initial hostile reaction and I just thought he was either unaware that drunk driving was a crime or that he doesn't consider it a "criminal act".

I guess my stance is that a women lost her life, its sad and nothing is going to remedy that.
 
I bet the armorer gets released soon. If the issue was prejudicial to Baldwin it will be to her as well. Prosecutor really messed up here no matter your view of Baldwin’s actions.
 
An Executive Producer is in most cases a title job that indicates a profit sharing piece. They typical don’t manage the project and the title and comp go with having that big name attached to a film or they are helping to bank roll the film.

Since the trial was halted, we simply don't know how much of a role Baldwin had. Some producers are "in name only", some are deep into the day-to-day. There could be a dozen with the title on a movie. The liability of each would have been a matter of fact for the jury to determine.
 
An Executive Producer is in most cases a title job that indicates a profit sharing piece. They typical don’t manage the project and the title and comp go with having that big name attached to a film or they are helping to bank roll the film.

Since the trial was halted, we simply don't know how much of a role Baldwin had. Some producers are "in name only", some are deep into the day-to-day. There could be a dozen with the title on a movie. The liability of each would have been a matter of fact for the jury to determine.
The criminal trial is over - the civil trial will be next …
 
I think it's the prop master, which was also the armorer.

If this was a snarky comment about Baldwin being inno b/c he wasn't the prop master in charge of supplies....I was just replying to bigbottom whom I thought wanted to know if Baldwin was a producer or an ep.
 
An Executive Producer is in most cases a title job that indicates a profit sharing piece. They typical don’t manage the project and the title and comp go with having that big name attached to a film or they are helping to bank roll the film.

Since the trial was halted, we simply don't know how much of a role Baldwin had. Some producers are "in name only", some are deep into the day-to-day. There could be a dozen with the title on a movie. The liability of each would have been a matter of fact for the jury to determine.
The criminal trial is over - the civil trial will be next …
The civil trial has already been settled. The movie has already been finished in another state. The judge in Alec Baldwin’s trial ruled that mentioning his producer role be excluded during the trial. The purposely withheld evidence explains how the bullets got in the gun. Alec Baldwin’s criminal case was dismissed in such way as that he won't be tried again with the same charges. The armorer has a chance of getting her conviction reversed by the withheld evidence. It's all out there in the interwebs. I will not provide links. Do your own homework if you care. Please don't quote me I am done engaging in this thread.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zow
An Executive Producer is in most cases a title job that indicates a profit sharing piece. They typical don’t manage the project and the title and comp go with having that big name attached to a film or they are helping to bank roll the film.

Since the trial was halted, we simply don't know how much of a role Baldwin had. Some producers are "in name only", some are deep into the day-to-day. There could be a dozen with the title on a movie. The liability of each would have been a matter of fact for the jury to determine.
The criminal trial is over - the civil trial will be next …
The civil trial has already been settled. The movie has already been finished in another state. The judge in Alec Baldwin’s trial ruled that mentioning his producer role be excluded during the trial. The purposely withheld evidence explains how the bullets got in the gun. Alec Baldwin’s criminal case was dismissed in such way as that he won't be tried again with the same charges. The armorer has a chance of getting her conviction reversed by the withheld evidence. It's all out there in the interwebs. I will not provide links. Do your own homework if you care. Please don't quote me I am done engaging in this thread.
When you are done chastising everyone on the internet for not doing their research - maybe take some time to read:

 
More research for you - if you have the time:

An attorney for the family of Rust cinematographer Halyna Hutchins said that Alec Baldwin's involuntary manslaughter case being dismissed "only strengthens our resolve to pursue justice in the civil case."

On Saturday, July 13, attorney Gloria Allred spoke to reporters outside of a courthouse in Santa Fe, New Mexico — one day after Baldwin's case was dismissed with prejudice by Judge Mary Marlowe Sommer. Allred said that she "respectfully disagrees" with the dismissal, per CBS News.

"The dismissal only strengthens our resolve to pursue justice in the civil case that we have filed against him in Santa Fe, New Mexico," said Allred, who represents the late cinematographer's parents and sister.

The attorney added that the news was "devastating to the family in Ukraine who mourn [Halyna's] loss every day" and that they intend to "fight to the end," per the outlet. Allred does not represent Halyna's widower, Matthew Hutchins, who previously settled a wrongful death lawsuit that he filed in 2022. Matthew previously said he believed his wife's death was a "terrible accident" and that he had "no interest in engaging in recriminations or attribution of blame (to the producers or Mr. Baldwin)."

In footage from her announcement, shared by KCAL-TV, Allred also said she was "dedicated" to holding Baldwin, 66, and the "entire Rust production accountable" in the civil lawsuit, which she noted was "not affected by the decision of the court yesterday in the criminal case."

"Our case is important, because we believe that everyone — yes, even celebrities like Alec Baldwin and producers — should follow accepted safety protocols so that all crew members have a safe workplace," Allred said.
 
A snipet from an article recently put out about the Brandon Lee death on the set of the crow drawing parrells to this


“And a practice in which the first assistant director, oftentimes the key grip, the prop master are all involved with the actor, making certain a weapon is cold when it’s cold, is hot when it’s hot, and there is nothing in the barrel or chamber that could be ejected.

“To see that in the almost 30 years between the movies we hadn’t improved upon that was certainly devastating. I will say that I find it tragic and beyond belief that Alec Baldwin has been held any bit responsible for this. As a producer with more than 30 years’ experience and numerous action films under his belt, I can assure you that there is no place in the world in which an actor is responsible for the weapon they’re handling.
 
i guess the special prosecutor who went on the stand and deep sixed her own case and didnt turn over evidence is now seeking to have a judge reinstate the charges take that to the bank brochachos
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top