Crimes and Misdemeanors Felonies
I think many people thought, even at the time, that the allegations concerning Dylan were made up by Mia in her anger over the Soon Yi thing.are people shocked? are they not aware of how he met his current wife?
I think a lot of people were willing to accept Woody's story that he didn't get involved with Soon-Yi until after she had turned 18 years old.are people shocked? are they not aware of how he met his current wife?
I don't doubt the possibility that these allegations are false. Maybe I misread Binky's post, but it seemed like he was saying, "wait a minute! it seems like Woody Allen might be a little creepy."I think many people thought, even at the time, that the allegations concerning Dylan were made up by Mia in her anger over the Soon Yi thing.are people shocked? are they not aware of how he met his current wife?
I know nothing about the Woody Allen back story. What does she mean by this statement? Who is her sister?"I didnt know that my father would use his sexual relationship with my sister to cover up the abuse he inflicted on me."
This sentence actually says a lot. Not presuming guilt or innocence, but it's there. Crazy and sad.
his wife.I know nothing about the Woody Allen back story. What does she mean by this statement? Who is her sister?"I didnt know that my father would use his sexual relationship with my sister to cover up the abuse he inflicted on me."
This sentence actually says a lot. Not presuming guilt or innocence, but it's there. Crazy and sad.
Her adopted sister, who Woody Allen then married. Soon Yi. It's just...a crazy story. Mia Farrow adopts a daughter, Woody then marries her later. For more clarity, click the link below.I know nothing about the Woody Allen back story. What does she mean by this statement? Who is her sister?"I didnt know that my father would use his sexual relationship with my sister to cover up the abuse he inflicted on me."
This sentence actually says a lot. Not presuming guilt or innocence, but it's there. Crazy and sad.
Mia Farrow adopted Soon-Yi Previn around 1979. Shortly afterwards, Mia began dating Woody Allen (although they never married).I know nothing about the Woody Allen back story. What does she mean by this statement? Who is her sister?"I didnt know that my father would use his sexual relationship with my sister to cover up the abuse he inflicted on me."
This sentence actually says a lot. Not presuming guilt or innocence, but it's there. Crazy and sad.
Yep, I'm sold.No way Sinatra isn't this kid's father.
http://images.kpopstarz.com/data/images/full/107589/mia-farrow-woody-allen-dylan-controversy-photo-credit-twitter.jpg
That's what I figured. Still not sure this isn't true, although I don't want to call this girl a liar.I think many people thought, even at the time, that the allegations concerning Dylan were made up by Mia in her anger over the Soon Yi thing.are people shocked? are they not aware of how he met his current wife?
It is hard to believe that she would lie. I agree with you.So, the theory is that both Mia and Dylan are in on this lie as retribution for Soon Yi, who by all accounts, has been a willing participant and, in fact, is not his wife of 20 years? That he raped a seven year old? I love Woody's films, but that is very hard to believe. I'm inclined to believe her.
Oh, well. That answers that question.It is hard to believe that she would lie. I agree with you.So, the theory is that both Mia and Dylan are in on this lie as retribution for Soon Yi, who by all accounts, has been a willing participant and, in fact, is not his wife of 20 years? That he raped a seven year old? I love Woody's films, but that is very hard to believe. I'm inclined to believe her.
On the other hand, while Woody has always displayed a predilection for "Lolita" type of young- teenage girl infatuations (from Manhattan's lead character to Soon Yi in real life), there's never been any indication whatsoever that he was into pre-pubescent stuff.
Were you expecting me to decide whether he's guilty or not?Oh, well. That answers that question.It is hard to believe that she would lie. I agree with you.So, the theory is that both Mia and Dylan are in on this lie as retribution for Soon Yi, who by all accounts, has been a willing participant and, in fact, is not his wife of 20 years? That he raped a seven year old? I love Woody's films, but that is very hard to believe. I'm inclined to believe her.
On the other hand, while Woody has always displayed a predilection for "Lolita" type of young- teenage girl infatuations (from Manhattan's lead character to Soon Yi in real life), there's never been any indication whatsoever that he was into pre-pubescent stuff.
It's a pretty significant leap from being inclined to believe her to that POS ought to be in jail.It's very probably true, I also am inclined to believe her. That POS ought to be in jail, and it doesn't make a bit of difference that he was a great filmmaker.
Well, jumping to conclusions based upon partial evidence is your MO.Were you expecting me to decide whether he's guilty or not?Oh, well. That answers that question.It is hard to believe that she would lie. I agree with you.So, the theory is that both Mia and Dylan are in on this lie as retribution for Soon Yi, who by all accounts, has been a willing participant and, in fact, is not his wife of 20 years? That he raped a seven year old? I love Woody's films, but that is very hard to believe. I'm inclined to believe her.
On the other hand, while Woody has always displayed a predilection for "Lolita" type of young- teenage girl infatuations (from Manhattan's lead character to Soon Yi in real life), there's never been any indication whatsoever that he was into pre-pubescent stuff.
Well, she is either telling the truth or she is not. If she is, then he ought to be in jail. If she isn't then he ought to be left alone. Is that good enough for you?It's a pretty significant leap from being inclined to believe her to that POS ought to be in jail.It's very probably true, I also am inclined to believe her. That POS ought to be in jail, and it doesn't make a bit of difference that he was a great filmmaker.
Considering we'll never know what happened, saying that POS ought to be in jail reads like you think "that POS ought to be in jail."Well, she is either telling the truth or she is not. If she is, then he ought to be in jail. If she isn't then he ought to be left alone. Is that good enough for you?It's a pretty significant leap from being inclined to believe her to that POS ought to be in jail.It's very probably true, I also am inclined to believe her. That POS ought to be in jail, and it doesn't make a bit of difference that he was a great filmmaker.
Your acuity is astonishing.Considering we'll never know what happened, saying that POS ought to be in jail reads like you think "that POS ought to be in jail."Well, she is either telling the truth or she is not. If she is, then he ought to be in jail. If she isn't then he ought to be left alone. Is that good enough for you?It's a pretty significant leap from being inclined to believe her to that POS ought to be in jail.It's very probably true, I also am inclined to believe her. That POS ought to be in jail, and it doesn't make a bit of difference that he was a great filmmaker.
I've only boycotted one movie artist- Mel Gibson- but that's because I heard what he had to say with my own ears. I have trouble believing she would lie as well, but that is not proof.What does Dylan Farrow have to gain at this point by lying? The guy did it. He's a POS and at the absolute minimum decent people should boycott every thing associated with the scumbag.
Not really. When it follows this paragraph:Sounds believable until I read this part....
What if it had been your child, Cate Blanchett? Louis CK? Alec Baldwin? What if it had been you, Emma Stone? Or you, Scarlett Johansson? You knew me when I was a little girl, Diane Keaton. Have you forgotten me?
Seems off to me to include this paragraph in an accusation.![]()
Do you happen to be a good friend of Woody's, or are you making that judgement on the presumption that the movies he makes tells one all you need to know about his character?It is hard to believe that she would lie. I agree with you.So, the theory is that both Mia and Dylan are in on this lie as retribution for Soon Yi, who by all accounts, has been a willing participant and, in fact, is not his wife of 20 years? That he raped a seven year old? I love Woody's films, but that is very hard to believe. I'm inclined to believe her.
On the other hand, while Woody has always displayed a predilection for "Lolita" type of young- teenage girl infatuations (from Manhattan's lead character to Soon Yi in real life), there's never been any indication whatsoever that he was into pre-pubescent stuff.
I'm just saying that there's never been a hint of it, but there HAS been plenty of hints that he's into young girls (though physically fully developed). Make of that what you will. No I have no more idea about the guy's private life than anyone else here does.Do you happen to be a good friend of Woody's, or are you making that judgement on the presumption that the movies he makes tells one all you need to know about his character?It is hard to believe that she would lie. I agree with you.So, the theory is that both Mia and Dylan are in on this lie as retribution for Soon Yi, who by all accounts, has been a willing participant and, in fact, is not his wife of 20 years? That he raped a seven year old? I love Woody's films, but that is very hard to believe. I'm inclined to believe her.
On the other hand, while Woody has always displayed a predilection for "Lolita" type of young- teenage girl infatuations (from Manhattan's lead character to Soon Yi in real life), there's never been any indication whatsoever that he was into pre-pubescent stuff.