Brown = BradshawWilson = his own set of special plays outside of the Giants' base Run n' Shoot offense.I was surprised that brown had all the work after Bradshaw went. What will the role of these two guys be going forward if Bradshaw misses time?
Andre Brown does a lot of things well -- he combines power with adequate speed, shows decent vision and has good hands out of the backfield -- but he does none of it exceptionally. He is a stopgap, IMO. If you are looking for a potential short-term flex play, Brown could fill the role. There is no word on the MRI on Bradshaw's neck yet, but with the short week, I expect Brown to start Week 3. Beyond Week 3, I am doubtful Brown will hold much value, however, but stay tuned to news out of New York on the extent of Bradshaw's injury.
I am interested to see how much the Giants will try to phase in David Wilson, who has had only a very minor role thus far. That role could expand quickly.
If you are a Bradshaw owner, you are probably rooting for Brown to perform well in Bradshaw's absence, keeping WIlson off the field as much as possible. Once Wilson hits his stride, Bradshaw's value will plummet.
First off, trust me on all things Giants. I am very much in the know about the GMEN and most likely the biggest fan on this forum.If Bradshaw is out for any amount of time, you have to factor in da'rell Scott as well (hes been hurt but will prob play this week). Agree with the poster who theorized that WIlson has his own plays and at this point Ahmad's injury doesn't change that. Dude has talent but looks very tentative out there right now. I have spoken.
I dunno. There a lot of fat giants fans here.First off, trust me on all things Giants. I am very much in the know about the GMEN and most likely the biggest fan on this forum.If Bradshaw is out for any amount of time, you have to factor in da'rell Scott as well (hes been hurt but will prob play this week). Agree with the poster who theorized that WIlson has his own plays and at this point Ahmad's injury doesn't change that. Dude has talent but looks very tentative out there right now. I have spoken.
Trust him.I dunno. There a lot of fat giants fans here.First off, trust me on all things Giants. I am very much in the know about the GMEN and most likely the biggest fan on this forum.If Bradshaw is out for any amount of time, you have to factor in da'rell Scott as well (hes been hurt but will prob play this week). Agree with the poster who theorized that WIlson has his own plays and at this point Ahmad's injury doesn't change that. Dude has talent but looks very tentative out there right now. I have spoken.
It isn't just being a fan that would give any particular insight. I think you need to go deeper in your analysis. Perhaps review what the poster wrote in its entirety.I appreciate the insight but, but considering the internet and the 24 hour sports news cycle, I am not sure how being a fan of any team gives anyone particular insight above anyone else.
Either this is a joke, or who knows who this guy is and it is a bit of an inside source.I'm going with option A, personally.Trust him.I dunno. There a lot of fat giants fans here.First off, trust me on all things Giants. I am very much in the know about the GMEN and most likely the biggest fan on this forum.If Bradshaw is out for any amount of time, you have to factor in da'rell Scott as well (hes been hurt but will prob play this week). Agree with the poster who theorized that WIlson has his own plays and at this point Ahmad's injury doesn't change that. Dude has talent but looks very tentative out there right now. I have spoken.
I assumed option A as well.Either this is a joke, or who knows who this guy is and it is a bit of an inside source.I'm going with option A, personally.Trust him.I dunno. There a lot of fat giants fans here.First off, trust me on all things Giants. I am very much in the know about the GMEN and most likely the biggest fan on this forum.If Bradshaw is out for any amount of time, you have to factor in da'rell Scott as well (hes been hurt but will prob play this week). Agree with the poster who theorized that WIlson has his own plays and at this point Ahmad's injury doesn't change that. Dude has talent but looks very tentative out there right now. I have spoken.
Good to see him able to contribute after that torn achillies.Da 'Rell Scot may play but he's a total question mark as to what role and how much work he'd be given.Brown's play in camp and preseason is why Ware was let go on cut day.http://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=538556&st=0&p=12040956&hl=andre%20brown&fromsearch=1entry12040956http://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=468736&st=0&p=10340373&hl=andre%20brown&fromsearch=1entry10340373Here are 2 good old threads on Andre Brown. I always thought he could contribute if he got his injuries taken care of. He is a big, fast, physical back that catches passes.
Andre Brown does a lot of things well -- he combines power with adequate speed, shows decent vision and has good hands out of the backfield -- but he does none of it exceptionally. He is a stopgap, IMO. If you are looking for a potential short-term flex play, Brown could fill the role. There is no word on the MRI on Bradshaw's neck yet, but with the short week, I expect Brown to start Week 3. Beyond Week 3, I am doubtful Brown will hold much value, however, but stay tuned to news out of New York on the extent of Bradshaw's injury.
I am interested to see how much the Giants will try to phase in David Wilson, who has had only a very minor role thus far. That role could expand quickly.
If you are a Bradshaw owner, you are probably rooting for Brown to perform well in Bradshaw's absence, keeping WIlson off the field as much as possible. Once Wilson hits his stride, Bradshaw's value will plummet.Here we go again
Coach Tom Coughlin hinted that RB Andre Brown would indeed take over as the featured back if Ahmad Bradshaw (neck) sits out Thursday night."I thought Andre did a nice job," Coughlin said. "He certainly was the focal point once Ahmad came out of the game. David (Wilson) has his plays and certainly will get some more time as well." Brown will be a top-30 fantasy option versus the Panthers if Bradshaw is inactive this week.
SSSSHHHHHHHHHHHHHHhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1Coach Tom Coughlin hinted that RB Andre Brown would indeed take over as the featured back if Ahmad Bradshaw (neck) sits out Thursday night."I thought Andre did a nice job," Coughlin said. "He certainly was the focal point once Ahmad came out of the game. David (Wilson) has his plays and certainly will get some more time as well." Brown will be a top-30 fantasy option versus the Panthers if Bradshaw is inactive this week.
I think too many people are trying to be "sneaky" - there is a reason Brown isn't sneaky - it's because he is the obvious choice for many more carries, goal line work and early down work than a rookie who has confidence issues and fumbilitis playing for Coughlin on a "short" week.Not sure why, but i am seeing Wilson having a better day than Brown. With a few days to get a game plan, and not be in pass mode, Wilson could be a sneaky play.
I think too many people are trying to be "sneaky" - there is a reason Brown isn't sneaky - it's because he is the obvious choice for many more carries, goal line work and early down work than a rookie who has confidence issues and fumbilitis playing for Coughlin on a "short" week.Not sure why, but i am seeing Wilson having a better day than Brown. With a few days to get a game plan, and not be in pass mode, Wilson could be a sneaky play.
You must have Wilson.Not sure why, but i am seeing Wilson having a better day than Brown. With a few days to get a game plan, and not be in pass mode, Wilson could be a sneaky play.
I agree but what strikes me about Wilson (and I don't own him for what it's worth) is he's getting action early in games. His fumble in Week 1 came on the Giants' first series. He had a pass target in the first series against the Bucs and a couple of runs in the second series. I think Brown's clearly the safer play tomorrow night but if Wilson gets his "plays" (as Coughlin says) early again and he does something with them it'll be interesting to see if his role grows as the game goes on.It would take some serious stones to start Wilson as a flex this week but it's not inconceivable that it could pay off.Wilson may get some more touches this week, but no way does Coughlin rely on him just yet.
That may be part of it, but the bigger issue appears to be , as mentioned, that Coughlin doesn't trust the rookie yet in a significant ball carrier role.And with a short week, I don't think they will have the time to prepare him for that role. Maybe next week after a long layoff if Wilson does well, Brown flops and Bradshaw is still out.Brown is a better pass blocker than Wilson, that's why he was in last week Giants' 500+ passing yard game.
You must have started him in week 1. That's your own faultI wouldn't dare start Wilson again this year. Until every other back on the team is in a coma or ruled out. God I hate Coughlin.![]()
This shtick is annoying. Seriously.I have spoken and all of my prophecies have come to fruition. My knowledge of all things NY Giants will never again be questioned! Get Brown in your lineup. Hes a great flex or RB2. Carolina Kittens cant stop the run, Brown will be fed the ball early and often tomorrow night. I have spoken!
I don't see a long term future for Brown, Plug n Play for week 3 if you need a RB badly. You can always gain trust but you can't gain Talent. There is a reason why Brown was cut by 5 teams in 4 seasons, we are going to see why in week 3... some would even call this a prophecy.That may be part of it, but the bigger issue appears to be , as mentioned, that Coughlin doesn't trust the rookie yet in a significant ball carrier role.And with a short week, I don't think they will have the time to prepare him for that role. Maybe next week after a long layoff if Wilson does well, Brown flops and Bradshaw is still out.Brown is a better pass blocker than Wilson, that's why he was in last week Giants' 500+ passing yard game.
IIRC the Giants were always high in Brown. It was his Achilles injury that had him bouncing around the league. Teams prob went with the healthier guy when making roster cuts. He obviously looked health this year enough to cut DJ Ware, who they liked also.I don't see a long term future for Brown, Plug n Play for week 3 if you need a RB badly. You can always gain trust but you can't gain Talent. There is a reason why Brown was cut by 5 teams in 4 seasons, we are going to see why in week 3... some would even call this a prophecy.That may be part of it, but the bigger issue appears to be , as mentioned, that Coughlin doesn't trust the rookie yet in a significant ball carrier role.And with a short week, I don't think they will have the time to prepare him for that role. Maybe next week after a long layoff if Wilson does well, Brown flops and Bradshaw is still out.Brown is a better pass blocker than Wilson, that's why he was in last week Giants' 500+ passing yard game.
You can't use that excuse for all 5 times in 4 seasons, "com'on man!"IIRC the Giants were always high in Brown. It was his Achilles injury that had him bouncing around the league. Teams prob went with the healthier guy when making roster cuts. He obviously looked health this year enough to cut DJ Ware, who they liked also.I don't see a long term future for Brown, Plug n Play for week 3 if you need a RB badly. You can always gain trust but you can't gain Talent. There is a reason why Brown was cut by 5 teams in 4 seasons, we are going to see why in week 3... some would even call this a prophecy.That may be part of it, but the bigger issue appears to be , as mentioned, that Coughlin doesn't trust the rookie yet in a significant ball carrier role.And with a short week, I don't think they will have the time to prepare him for that role. Maybe next week after a long layoff if Wilson does well, Brown flops and Bradshaw is still out.Brown is a better pass blocker than Wilson, that's why he was in last week Giants' 500+ passing yard game.
Let's try this a different way...which RB would you rather have take the majority of the carries:RB1: 13 carries at 5.5 YPC, 1 TD, 2 recpetions for 19 yards and 0 turnoversYou can't use that excuse for all 5 times in 4 seasons, "com'on man!"IIRC the Giants were always high in Brown. It was his Achilles injury that had him bouncing around the league. Teams prob went with the healthier guy when making roster cuts. He obviously looked health this year enough to cut DJ Ware, who they liked also.I don't see a long term future for Brown, Plug n Play for week 3 if you need a RB badly. You can always gain trust but you can't gain Talent. There is a reason why Brown was cut by 5 teams in 4 seasons, we are going to see why in week 3... some would even call this a prophecy.That may be part of it, but the bigger issue appears to be , as mentioned, that Coughlin doesn't trust the rookie yet in a significant ball carrier role.And with a short week, I don't think they will have the time to prepare him for that role. Maybe next week after a long layoff if Wilson does well, Brown flops and Bradshaw is still out.Brown is a better pass blocker than Wilson, that's why he was in last week Giants' 500+ passing yard game.
Shouldnt have stated it as fact, your right. I dont know what he was going against on his other teams. Just speculating. Point was the Giants always liked him. Netnalp-correct me if Im wrong plaese.You can't use that excuse for all 5 times in 4 seasons, "com'on man!"IIRC the Giants were always high in Brown. It was his Achilles injury that had him bouncing around the league. Teams prob went with the healthier guy when making roster cuts. He obviously looked health this year enough to cut DJ Ware, who they liked also.I don't see a long term future for Brown, Plug n Play for week 3 if you need a RB badly. You can always gain trust but you can't gain Talent. There is a reason why Brown was cut by 5 teams in 4 seasons, we are going to see why in week 3... some would even call this a prophecy.That may be part of it, but the bigger issue appears to be , as mentioned, that Coughlin doesn't trust the rookie yet in a significant ball carrier role.And with a short week, I don't think they will have the time to prepare him for that role. Maybe next week after a long layoff if Wilson does well, Brown flops and Bradshaw is still out.Brown is a better pass blocker than Wilson, that's why he was in last week Giants' 500+ passing yard game.
Yep.Has Bradshaw been officially ruled out yet? Sorry if I missed it....
Once again "You can always gain trust but you can't gain Talent."Your statistics are skewed. All Brown's carries are against a pass prevent D in one game while All Wilson's runs are against Run D.Let's try this a different way...which RB would you rather have take the majority of the carries:RB1: 13 carries at 5.5 YPC, 1 TD, 2 recpetions for 19 yards and 0 turnoversYou can't use that excuse for all 5 times in 4 seasons, "com'on man!"IIRC the Giants were always high in Brown. It was his Achilles injury that had him bouncing around the league. Teams prob went with the healthier guy when making roster cuts. He obviously looked health this year enough to cut DJ Ware, who they liked also.I don't see a long term future for Brown, Plug n Play for week 3 if you need a RB badly. You can always gain trust but you can't gain Talent. There is a reason why Brown was cut by 5 teams in 4 seasons, we are going to see why in week 3... some would even call this a prophecy.That may be part of it, but the bigger issue appears to be , as mentioned, that Coughlin doesn't trust the rookie yet in a significant ball carrier role.And with a short week, I don't think they will have the time to prepare him for that role. Maybe next week after a long layoff if Wilson does well, Brown flops and Bradshaw is still out.Brown is a better pass blocker than Wilson, that's why he was in last week Giants' 500+ passing yard game.
RB2: 5 carries at 2.0 YPC, 0 TD, 0 Receptions and 1 fumble lost.
Now pretend your Tom Coughlin, and you don't trust rookies and you don't like turnovers...and RB2 is a rookie.
Which one?
"All" Brown's carries are against a pass prevent D? Untrue.Once again "You can always gain trust but you can't gain Talent."Your statistics are skewed. All Brown's carries are against a pass prevent D in one game while All Wilson's runs are against Run D.Let's try this a different way...which RB would you rather have take the majority of the carries:RB1: 13 carries at 5.5 YPC, 1 TD, 2 recpetions for 19 yards and 0 turnoversYou can't use that excuse for all 5 times in 4 seasons, "com'on man!"IIRC the Giants were always high in Brown. It was his Achilles injury that had him bouncing around the league. Teams prob went with the healthier guy when making roster cuts. He obviously looked health this year enough to cut DJ Ware, who they liked also.I don't see a long term future for Brown, Plug n Play for week 3 if you need a RB badly. You can always gain trust but you can't gain Talent. There is a reason why Brown was cut by 5 teams in 4 seasons, we are going to see why in week 3... some would even call this a prophecy.That may be part of it, but the bigger issue appears to be , as mentioned, that Coughlin doesn't trust the rookie yet in a significant ball carrier role.And with a short week, I don't think they will have the time to prepare him for that role. Maybe next week after a long layoff if Wilson does well, Brown flops and Bradshaw is still out.Brown is a better pass blocker than Wilson, that's why he was in last week Giants' 500+ passing yard game.
RB2: 5 carries at 2.0 YPC, 0 TD, 0 Receptions and 1 fumble lost.
Now pretend your Tom Coughlin, and you don't trust rookies and you don't like turnovers...and RB2 is a rookie.
Which one?
you can't make a conclusion off 5 carries. Your data samples are insufficient even for an educated guess, let alone a conclusion.
By your Logic,
Oakland Raiders Game 2:
RB1 11 Plays 2.0 YPP 0 TD
RB2 3 Plays 27.7 YPP 1 TD
Now pretend you'RE Dennis Allen, and you don't like losing, it's so simple... right?![]()