Andre Carter/Reggie Hayward (1 Viewer)

[cr8f]

Who has more keeper value for my #6 DE?

 

[Beaumont]

Who has more keeper value for my #6 DE?

Heyward IMHO ...

 

[jgb95]

I like Hayward as well.

 

[Weiner Dog]

They'll probably score fairly the same (low tackles / decent sacks). However, Hayward does not have AC's injury history.

Close...but gotta go with Hayward.

 

[cr8f]

They'll probably score fairly the same (low tackles / decent sacks). However, Hayward does not have AC's injury history.

Close...but gotta go with Hayward.

Thanks. May not see the field much but you never know.

 

[Weiner Dog]

They'll probably score fairly the same (low tackles / decent sacks). However, Hayward does not have AC's injury history.

Close...but gotta go with Hayward.

Thanks. May not see the field much but you never know.

Who may not see the field??Hayward and Carter are both starters for their teams.

 

[Beaumont]

They'll probably score fairly the same (low tackles / decent sacks). However, Hayward does not have AC's injury history.

Close...but gotta go with Hayward.

Thanks. May not see the field much but you never know.

Who may not see the field??Hayward and Carter are both starters for their teams.

On his team ...

 

[Bob_Magaw]

if your DE6 is playing, he either really broke or your top 5 DEs are either not very good or injured.

 

[cr8f]

They'll probably score fairly the same (low tackles / decent sacks).  However, Hayward does not have AC's injury history.

Close...but gotta go with Hayward.

Thanks. May not see the field much but you never know.

Who may not see the field??Hayward and Carter are both starters for their teams.

I meant fantasy-wise.My other DL re

C Grant

Ogunleye,

K Williams,

Little

and C Griffin

 

[houndirish]

I'd take Carter or Hayward over C-Griff.

 

[cr8f]

Who may not see the field??

Hayward and Carter are both starters for their teams.

On his team ...

Yeah, I was pretending I had a real team.

 

[Tick]

I'd take Carter or Hayward over C-Griff.

Agreed. Hayward - Carter - Griffin.

 

[cr8f]

I'd take Carter or Hayward over C-Griff.

Agreed. Hayward - Carter - Griffin.

Hayward's never had more than 31 tackles. Frankly I think Carter will open up opportuntities for Griffin if healthy. We'll see.

 

[Weiner Dog]

I'd take Carter or Hayward over C-Griff.

Agreed. Hayward - Carter - Griffin.

Hayward's never had more than 31 tackles. Frankly I think Carter will open up opportuntities for Griffin if healthy. We'll see.

...and Griffin has never had more than 6 sacks in a season (Hayward has had 8.5 sacks or more each of the past three).It all depends on your scoring system.

Heavy-scoring for sacks ---> Hayward and Carter

Heavy-scoring for tackles ---> Griffin

 

[cracKer]

Hayward had a six game stretch last year where he recorded 6 solo tackles with no sacks. Unacceptable. I have he and Carter ranked close but would take a healthy Griffin over both of'em.

 

[cr8f]

Hayward had a six game stretch last year where he recorded 6 solo tackles with no sacks. Unacceptable. I have he and Carter ranked close but would take a healthy Griffin over both of'em.

John Norton had him rated even higher than you projections-wise. If he is healthy I will take Carter and Griffin even though on the same team.Will come nack in a few months and see how it shakes out. Thanks everyone.