fixedThat would mean Walter's in store for a pretty good overall career as a loser
fixedThat would mean Walter's in store for a pretty good overall career as a loser
4 Pro Bowls (including one of the best sophomore years any QB has ever had), well over 44,000 yards passing (including eight years over 3,000 and a top ten career mark), about 50 more TDs than INTs, top 5 all-time in completions, and a winning record in the playoffs.Way to know your stuff, buddy.fixedThat would mean Walter's in store for a pretty good overall career as a loser
7th all-time in passing yards5th all-time in pass attemptsfixedThat would mean Walter's in store for a pretty good overall career as a loser
Yes, this is horrible, this thread.Despyzer said:4 Pro Bowls (including one of the best sophomore years any QB has ever had), well over 44,000 yards passing (including eight years over 3,000 and a top ten career mark), about 50 more TDs than INTs, top 5 all-time in completions, and a winning record in the playoffs.Way to know your stuff, buddy.Young 8 said:fixedgman8343 said:That would mean Walter's in store for a pretty good overall career as a loser
ask to Patriots & Cowboys fansDespyzer said:4 Pro Bowls (including one of the best sophomore years any QB has ever had), well over 44,000 yards passing (including eight years over 3,000 and a top ten career mark), about 50 more TDs than INTs, top 5 all-time in completions, and a winning record in the playoffs.Way to know your stuff, buddy.Young 8 said:fixedgman8343 said:That would mean Walter's in store for a pretty good overall career as a loser
rings ??performances under pressure ??Avery said:7th all-time in passing yards5th all-time in pass attemptsYoung 8 said:fixedgman8343 said:That would mean Walter's in store for a pretty good overall career as a loser
5th all-time in pass completions
Yup.
Big time loser.![]()
Did pretty good in the 2001 playoffs when Brady was dinged up, no? Without Bledsoe, the Pats don't win the SB.rings ??performances under pressure ??Avery said:7th all-time in passing yards5th all-time in pass attemptsYoung 8 said:fixedgman8343 said:That would mean Walter's in store for a pretty good overall career as a loser
5th all-time in pass completions
Yup.
Big time loser.![]()
How old are you? Too young to remember Bledsoe leading the Patriots to the '97 Super Bowl? Did you fail to read where I mentioned that he has a winning record in the playoffs?Let this one go. You are only making yourself look worse.performances under pressure ??
It's hard to evaluate him in such a putrid offense. I'll give him a mulligan on this year.
As a Pats fan, he pretty much saved the franchise. I'd like to thank him for that. So what was the question again?ask to Patriots & Cowboys fans
I would tend to agree. He doesn't strike me as a QB that has the ever-unquantifiable "it", but to be fair, no QB would probably succeed on this team.It's hard to evaluate him in such a putrid offense. I'll give him a mulligan on this year.
I'm a Patriots fan. I have nothing but the utmost respect and gratitude for what an incredible player Bledsoe was while here, and furthermore, what a class act he was when he was benched by Brady. He is not a "loser", and Adrew Walter should not be mentioned in the same sentence as Drew Bledsoe.ask to Patriots & Cowboys fansDespyzer said:4 Pro Bowls (including one of the best sophomore years any QB has ever had), well over 44,000 yards passing (including eight years over 3,000 and a top ten career mark), about 50 more TDs than INTs, top 5 all-time in completions, and a winning record in the playoffs.Way to know your stuff, buddy.Young 8 said:fixedgman8343 said:That would mean Walter's in store for a pretty good overall career as a loser![]()
I respect Bledsoe for having a long productive career, but let's not get too carried away with how great he is. Chris Chandler led a team to a Super Bowl too, as did Jeff Hostetler, Jake Delhomme, Trent Dilfer, and Kerry Collins. While certainly commendable, I hardly think that that automatically introduces you into the rarified air of "greatness". Here are Bledsoe's postseason numbers. Yes, he may have a winning record (4-3), but you wouldn't know it from his own personal performances. In fact, he's only thrown more TD's than INT's in two out of five post-season games. This really is to say that it's hard to award any one player credit for a "win" in what is very much a team sport.How old are you? Too young to remember Bledsoe leading the Patriots to the '97 Super Bowl? Did you fail to read where I mentioned that he has a winning record in the playoffs?Let this one go. You are only making yourself look worse.performances under pressure ??
Postseason dataPlease read this fine print before using this data or sending questions or corrections. Year Opp Result | CMP ATT PYD PTD INT | RSH YD TD---------------------+--------------------------+----------------- 1994 cle L,13-20 | 21 50 235 1 3 | 2 2 0 1996 pit W,28-3 | 14 24 164 1 2 | 1 -1 0 1996 jax W,20-6 | 20 33 178 0 1 | 1 4 0*1996 gnb L,21-35 | 25 48 253 2 4 | 1 1 0 1997 mia W,17-3 | 16 32 139 1 0 | 2 4 0 1997 pit L,6-7 | 23 44 264 0 2 | 2 -4 0 2001 pit W,24-17 | 10 21 102 1 0 | 4 1 0---------------------+--------------------------+-----------------TOTAL | 129 252 1335 6 12 | 13 7 0
Link to where I said anything about greatness? I was simply combatting the ridiculous notion that he was a loser. He has put up some of the best numbers in the game, has won a lot of games in both the regular and post seasons. How does that qualify him as a loser?While certainly commendable, I hardly think that that automatically introduces you into the rarified air of "greatness".
Link to where I called him a "loser"?Link to where I said anything about greatness? I was simply combatting the ridiculous notion that he was a loser. He has put up some of the best numbers in the game, has won a lot of games in both the regular and post seasons. How does that qualify him as a loser?While certainly commendable, I hardly think that that automatically introduces you into the rarified air of "greatness".
You got into this conversation late, hoss. My comments were in reference to this:Link to where I called him a "loser"?![]()
Good, then we're in agreement.
You were the one who started putting words in people's mouths while quoting my post.Young 8 said:fixedgman8343 said:That would mean Walter's in store for a pretty good overall career as a loser
And you did the same with my post. Have another cup of coffee, Nancy.You got into this conversation late, hoss. My comments were in reference to this:Link to where I called him a "loser"?![]()
Good, then we're in agreement.You were the one who started putting words in people's mouths while quoting my post.Young 8 said:fixedgman8343 said:That would mean Walter's in store for a pretty good overall career as a loser
Huh? I was disputing the argument that he was a loser. You came in and argued that I was marking him for greatness. I replied that you were mistaken.And you did the same with my post. Have another cup of coffee, Nancy.
He's Bledsoe without the arm or the accuracy.