He was on a new team with an entrenched veteran (Mason) who was the go-to outlet for Flacco. Mason is what ... 37 years old now? He's still a good route runner and will be used in the short game, but it's doubtful he'll the long ball target like Mason will be. TJ Housh isn't even in the picture. You should absolutely expect an increase in Boldin's numbers, but how far is uncertain assuming Mason is still around.Stick a fork in him? Up until last off-season there were still people touting this guy as a Top-10WR talent; what's the word on him now? I didn't watch many Ravens games last year.
64 / 837 / 7TD
I can't believe a gimmick account has 41,000+ posts now, wow, bravo.It's not rocket science guppies...Boldin was 25th in targets.(108) His reception percentage and yards per reception were both excellent.Cameron used him as a decoy, a lot. He was the only thing remotely close to a deep threat on the team and Cameron needed him to stretch the field...old man Mason certainly wasn't going to do it.It doesn't help that Flacco isn't necessarily the best deep ball passer in the league and he certainly is no Kurt Warner.It's unfortunate because Quan is easily a top 15 WR in the league...comparing him to Greg Jennings, well, there really is no comparison.Expect a slight uptick in receptions, yardage and TDs but unless Cameron changes his gameplans and unless Flacco develops some deep ball skills we're not going to see Anquan's numbers come remotely close to those he had in AZ.
Not only Smith but also Tandon Doss. I expect one of these 2 to be able to open things up somewhat.A part of the problem is the Ravens didnt have anyone to stretch the field. If Torrey Smith can make an immediate impact it could help open up some things underneath for Boldin, otherwise i would expect similar numbers to last season. Maybe a small uptick in receptions with Housh gone and Mason another year older.
I haven't considered Mason a long ball target for years! Am I misinformed about something? I thought that's why they grabbed T.Smith...because they don't have an effective long ball target on the roster.He was on a new team with an entrenched veteran (Mason) who was the go-to outlet for Flacco. Mason is what ... 37 years old now? He's still a good route runner and will be used in the short game, but it's doubtful he'll the long ball target like Mason will be. TJ Housh isn't even in the picture. You should absolutely expect an increase in Boldin's numbers, but how far is uncertain assuming Mason is still around.Stick a fork in him? Up until last off-season there were still people touting this guy as a Top-10WR talent; what's the word on him now? I didn't watch many Ravens games last year.
64 / 837 / 7TD
Im surprised posts like this are allowed in the shark pool, LHUCKS brings alot of good information to the pool unlike yourself, Ive reported this post to the moderators as I dont believe personal attacks are allowed on this forum.I can't believe a gimmick account has 41,000+ posts now, wow, bravo.It's not rocket science guppies...Boldin was 25th in targets.(108) His reception percentage and yards per reception were both excellent.Cameron used him as a decoy, a lot. He was the only thing remotely close to a deep threat on the team and Cameron needed him to stretch the field...old man Mason certainly wasn't going to do it.It doesn't help that Flacco isn't necessarily the best deep ball passer in the league and he certainly is no Kurt Warner.It's unfortunate because Quan is easily a top 15 WR in the league...comparing him to Greg Jennings, well, there really is no comparison.Expect a slight uptick in receptions, yardage and TDs but unless Cameron changes his gameplans and unless Flacco develops some deep ball skills we're not going to see Anquan's numbers come remotely close to those he had in AZ.
I think maybe it's the "It's not rocket science guppies" line that did it. That's just obnoxious. LHUCKS does bring good information, but he places himself on a pedestal taller than Mt. Everest.'NorrisB said:Im surprised posts like this are allowed in the shark pool, LHUCKS brings alot of good information to the pool unlike yourself, Ive reported this post to the moderators as I dont believe personal attacks are allowed on this forum.'IHEARTFF said:I can't believe a gimmick account has 41,000+ posts now, wow, bravo.'LHUCKS said:It's not rocket science guppies...Boldin was 25th in targets.(108) His reception percentage and yards per reception were both excellent.Cameron used him as a decoy, a lot. He was the only thing remotely close to a deep threat on the team and Cameron needed him to stretch the field...old man Mason certainly wasn't going to do it.It doesn't help that Flacco isn't necessarily the best deep ball passer in the league and he certainly is no Kurt Warner.It's unfortunate because Quan is easily a top 15 WR in the league...comparing him to Greg Jennings, well, there really is no comparison.Expect a slight uptick in receptions, yardage and TDs but unless Cameron changes his gameplans and unless Flacco develops some deep ball skills we're not going to see Anquan's numbers come remotely close to those he had in AZ.
'NorrisB said:Im surprised posts like this are allowed in the shark pool, LHUCKS brings alot of good information to the pool unlike yourself, Ive reported this post to the moderators as I dont believe personal attacks are allowed on this forum.'IHEARTFF said:I can't believe a gimmick account has 41,000+ posts now, wow, bravo.'LHUCKS said:It's not rocket science guppies...Boldin was 25th in targets.(108) His reception percentage and yards per reception were both excellent.
Cameron used him as a decoy, a lot. He was the only thing remotely close to a deep threat on the team and Cameron needed him to stretch the field...old man Mason certainly wasn't going to do it.
It doesn't help that Flacco isn't necessarily the best deep ball passer in the league and he certainly is no Kurt Warner.
It's unfortunate because Quan is easily a top 15 WR in the league...comparing him to Greg Jennings, well, there really is no comparison.
Expect a slight uptick in receptions, yardage and TDs but unless Cameron changes his gameplans and unless Flacco develops some deep ball skills we're not going to see Anquan's numbers come remotely close to those he had in AZ.
He really isn't...Cameron used him that way to run coverage off. Since he was the best WR on the field it often worked.'JamesTheScot said:I haven't considered Mason a long ball target for years! Am I misinformed about something? I thought that's why they grabbed T.Smith...because they don't have an effective long ball target on the roster.'Anonymous Internet User said:He was on a new team with an entrenched veteran (Mason) who was the go-to outlet for Flacco. Mason is what ... 37 years old now? He's still a good route runner and will be used in the short game, but it's doubtful he'll the long ball target like Mason will be. TJ Housh isn't even in the picture. You should absolutely expect an increase in Boldin's numbers, but how far is uncertain assuming Mason is still around.Stick a fork in him? Up until last off-season there were still people touting this guy as a Top-10WR talent; what's the word on him now? I didn't watch many Ravens games last year.
64 / 837 / 7TD
41,000 posts, plus he has time for an alias.P.S. LHucks...i mean Norris, were was the personal attack in his statement?'NorrisB said:Im surprised posts like this are allowed in the shark pool, LHUCKS brings alot of good information to the pool unlike yourself, Ive reported this post to the moderators as I dont believe personal attacks are allowed on this forum.'IHEARTFF said:I can't believe a gimmick account has 41,000+ posts now, wow, bravo.'LHUCKS said:It's not rocket science guppies...Boldin was 25th in targets.(108) His reception percentage and yards per reception were both excellent.Cameron used him as a decoy, a lot. He was the only thing remotely close to a deep threat on the team and Cameron needed him to stretch the field...old man Mason certainly wasn't going to do it.It doesn't help that Flacco isn't necessarily the best deep ball passer in the league and he certainly is no Kurt Warner.It's unfortunate because Quan is easily a top 15 WR in the league...comparing him to Greg Jennings, well, there really is no comparison.Expect a slight uptick in receptions, yardage and TDs but unless Cameron changes his gameplans and unless Flacco develops some deep ball skills we're not going to see Anquan's numbers come remotely close to those he had in AZ.
Do you seriously not consider someone calling another person a gimmick as a person attack? Y'all need to accept the information and dismiss the uppity, he brings a lot to the table in these forums. We need to keep valuable contributors around in my opinion and not run them off.41,000 posts, plus he has time for an alias.P.S. LHucks...i mean Norris, were was the personal attack in his statement?'NorrisB said:Im surprised posts like this are allowed in the shark pool, LHUCKS brings alot of good information to the pool unlike yourself, Ive reported this post to the moderators as I dont believe personal attacks are allowed on this forum.'IHEARTFF said:I can't believe a gimmick account has 41,000+ posts now, wow, bravo.
No, and he didnt call him a gimmick. He said he was surprised a gimmick account had so many posts. Plus, i think it is a pretty accurate description. Wether he brings good info or not(i have failed to see it) there is little doubt he does so in a "gimmicky" way.Do you seriously not consider someone calling another person a gimmick as a person attack? Y'all need to accept the information and dismiss the uppity, he brings a lot to the table in these forums. We need to keep valuable contributors around in my opinion and not run them off.41,000 posts, plus he has time for an alias.P.S. LHucks...i mean Norris, were was the personal attack in his statement?'NorrisB said:Im surprised posts like this are allowed in the shark pool, LHUCKS brings alot of good information to the pool unlike yourself, Ive reported this post to the moderators as I dont believe personal attacks are allowed on this forum.'IHEARTFF said:I can't believe a gimmick account has 41,000+ posts now, wow, bravo.
I consider the following much more of a personal attack (on others):Do you seriously not consider someone calling another person a gimmick as a person attack? Y'all need to accept the information and dismiss the uppity, he brings a lot to the table in these forums. We need to keep valuable contributors around in my opinion and not run them off.41,000 posts, plus he has time for an alias.P.S. LHucks...i mean Norris, were was the personal attack in his statement?'NorrisB said:Im surprised posts like this are allowed in the shark pool, LHUCKS brings alot of good information to the pool unlike yourself, Ive reported this post to the moderators as I dont believe personal attacks are allowed on this forum.'IHEARTFF said:I can't believe a gimmick account has 41,000+ posts now, wow, bravo.
'LHUCKS said:It's not rocket science guppies...
Agreed, and i have seen him make similar comments multiple times.I consider the following much more of a personal attack (on others):Do you seriously not consider someone calling another person a gimmick as a person attack? Y'all need to accept the information and dismiss the uppity, he brings a lot to the table in these forums. We need to keep valuable contributors around in my opinion and not run them off.41,000 posts, plus he has time for an alias.P.S. LHucks...i mean Norris, were was the personal attack in his statement?'NorrisB said:Im surprised posts like this are allowed in the shark pool, LHUCKS brings alot of good information to the pool unlike yourself, Ive reported this post to the moderators as I dont believe personal attacks are allowed on this forum.'IHEARTFF said:I can't believe a gimmick account has 41,000+ posts now, wow, bravo.'LHUCKS said:It's not rocket science guppies...
This logic, but with more modest projections. 10 TDs is too high. 7-8 TDs is more realistic.85 for 1200 = 14+ ypc = too high for a possession receiver. 75 for 950 is more realistic.Boldin has a huge bounce back year as the clear number 1 in Baltimore this season.The guy is still a great player coming off a transition year and the team is also going to really let Flacco loose this season.85 receptions 1200 yards 10 TDs
I agree and suggest that may have been a good sell high moment. (in hindsight.)Note: He put up exceptional numbers against the Browns last year & little else.
I'm sorry if it comes across as a personal attack, but the guy makes outlandish comments in almost every post. I consider that a "gimmick". And just because he has a much higher volume of posts than I or many others do, doesn't make his information good. There's like 3 misguided comments just in the op.Im surprised posts like this are allowed in the shark pool, LHUCKS brings alot of good information to the pool unlike yourself, Ive reported this post to the moderators as I dont believe personal attacks are allowed on this forum.I can't believe a gimmick account has 41,000+ posts now, wow, bravo.It's not rocket science guppies...Boldin was 25th in targets.(108) His reception percentage and yards per reception were both excellent.Cameron used him as a decoy, a lot. He was the only thing remotely close to a deep threat on the team and Cameron needed him to stretch the field...old man Mason certainly wasn't going to do it.It doesn't help that Flacco isn't necessarily the best deep ball passer in the league and he certainly is no Kurt Warner.It's unfortunate because Quan is easily a top 15 WR in the league...comparing him to Greg Jennings, well, there really is no comparison.Expect a slight uptick in receptions, yardage and TDs but unless Cameron changes his gameplans and unless Flacco develops some deep ball skills we're not going to see Anquan's numbers come remotely close to those he had in AZ.
Don't post in my threads if you're going to be a condescending #####.It's not rocket science guppies...Boldin was 25th in targets.(108) His reception percentage and yards per reception were both excellent.Cameron used him as a decoy, a lot. He was the only thing remotely close to a deep threat on the team and Cameron needed him to stretch the field...old man Mason certainly wasn't going to do it.It doesn't help that Flacco isn't necessarily the best deep ball passer in the league and he certainly is no Kurt Warner.It's unfortunate because Quan is easily a top 15 WR in the league...comparing him to Greg Jennings, well, there really is no comparison.Expect a slight uptick in receptions, yardage and TDs but unless Cameron changes his gameplans and unless Flacco develops some deep ball skills we're not going to see Anquan's numbers come remotely close to those he had in AZ.
Maybe but he is great at taking short passes and going upfield. Boldin is known for that.But we are on the same page. Too much talent for him not to be much better this season.Buy low.This logic, but with more modest projections. 10 TDs is too high. 7-8 TDs is more realistic.85 for 1200 = 14+ ypc = too high for a possession receiver. 75 for 950 is more realistic.Boldin has a huge bounce back year as the clear number 1 in Baltimore this season.The guy is still a great player coming off a transition year and the team is also going to really let Flacco loose this season.85 receptions 1200 yards 10 TDs
wow...a bit sensitive here aren't we...have a little bit of fun fellas. Sheesh.'Eminence said:Don't post in my threads if you're going to be a condescending #####.It's not rocket science guppies...Boldin was 25th in targets.(108) His reception percentage and yards per reception were both excellent.Cameron used him as a decoy, a lot. He was the only thing remotely close to a deep threat on the team and Cameron needed him to stretch the field...old man Mason certainly wasn't going to do it.It doesn't help that Flacco isn't necessarily the best deep ball passer in the league and he certainly is no Kurt Warner.It's unfortunate because Quan is easily a top 15 WR in the league...comparing him to Greg Jennings, well, there really is no comparison.Expect a slight uptick in receptions, yardage and TDs but unless Cameron changes his gameplans and unless Flacco develops some deep ball skills we're not going to see Anquan's numbers come remotely close to those he had in AZ.
That was a fast month.wow...a bit sensitive here aren't we...have a little bit of fun fellas. Sheesh.'Eminence said:Don't post in my threads if you're going to be a condescending #####.It's not rocket science guppies...Boldin was 25th in targets.(108) His reception percentage and yards per reception were both excellent.Cameron used him as a decoy, a lot. He was the only thing remotely close to a deep threat on the team and Cameron needed him to stretch the field...old man Mason certainly wasn't going to do it.It doesn't help that Flacco isn't necessarily the best deep ball passer in the league and he certainly is no Kurt Warner.It's unfortunate because Quan is easily a top 15 WR in the league...comparing him to Greg Jennings, well, there really is no comparison.Expect a slight uptick in receptions, yardage and TDs but unless Cameron changes his gameplans and unless Flacco develops some deep ball skills we're not going to see Anquan's numbers come remotely close to those he had in AZ.
That was a fast month.![]()
Greg Jennings thread, thought you got put in timeout.That was a fast month.![]()
![]()