What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Anti-Felix Jones Group (1 Viewer)

JFS171

Footballguy
Relatively new to the forum, so if this belongs elsewhere or combined with something, by all means...

For those of us in deeper leagues, dynasty leagues, etc who may not exactly trust Felix Jones, who's the best handcuff for next-in-line?

I ask for a couple reasons.

1) Jones has never carried the load... seems to always break when he does.

2) The Audible podcast had an interesting take on Murray's injury, saying it's really difficult to know with ligament sprains in the foot. We don't know what area exactly; we don't know what ligaments; we don't know exactly how sprained. I don't think the Cowboys or Murray are lying, but I'm not 100% buying that McFadden and the Raiders were purposefully lying last year either. My point is while everyone may think Murray is a 1-2 week or quicker recovery, it COULD be longer - we don't know.

3) Definitely don't know the chance of reinjuring the foot once he returns, given he's going to be tackled by very large human beings and running into pile-ups quite often.

4) What do we really know about Phillip Tanner?

5) What do we really know about Lance Dunbar?

This article here pointed to Dunbar as an interesting stash.

Dunbar's pro-day:

Height: 5'8 3/8"

Weight: 197 lbs

40 Time: 4.47

Vertical: 35"

3 Cone: 6.8

Short Shuttle: 4.07

Tanner's pro-day:

Height: 5'10"

Weight: 208

40 Time: 4.55

Vertical: 36"

3 Cone: 7.2

Short Shuttle: 4.4

Tanner is now listed at 217, which I doubt makes him any faster. His career YPC is 3.5 (a debated stat I know). HE seems more like an effort guy running, and I've seen compared to Morris (which prior to this year, in a perfect system, wouldn't have necessarily been a positive).

Dunbar's got production (more than Tanner in the same conference), has some wiggle, can catch, and is obviously shifty. At 5'8", 200lbs essentially, he's gotta be hard to get a clean hit on.

Makes for an interesting debate... who you got?

 
I think Tanner fits the running scheme of the team better than Dunbar. Coming from a Cowobys homer, I would much rather have Tanner take the lead for a few games and see what happens. Romo and the passing game needs a bruiser, someone the defense knows isn't afraid of them.

 
Nice thread starter. Well written.

I would have to go with Tanner here. More familiarity and if they don't have any glaring quality that clearly separates them to make them a different type of back,I think you go with the incumbent.

 
Obviously the opportunity favors Tanner. I don't really watch Cowboys games (though I may now be forced to after relocating to Austin, TX), but is Tanner a complete back? Supposing Murray is out longer than anticipated, and Jones gets hurt, is it conceivable that Tanner becomes a 3-down guy? Or, does Dunbar become more the third-down, 2-minute guy while Tanner is the early-down thumper?

Haven't seen either of them play... just not excited about Felix, and there are no guarantees with Demarco and foot sprains in general.

 
Dont forget Jerry has man love for Felix. He will be wanting to see his boy given as many carries as possible whilst he is still capable offorward movement. For 1 or 2 weeks I think it is Felix, if it takes longer than that for Murray to see the field again then we might see some Tanner action.

 
Dont forget Jerry has man love for Felix. He will be wanting to see his boy given as many carries as possible whilst he is still capable offorward movement. For 1 or 2 weeks I think it is Felix, if it takes longer than that for Murray to see the field again then we might see some Tanner action.
The key is when.Tanner actually started to make his appearance in 2nd half of last game.Still I'm guessing Jones gets the work this week, wait past that game, see if Murray is doing the dreaded dance of not practicing but saying he will play and then get Tanner preemptively.I always thought Tanner looked good, maybe not Murray-good but good. And maybe he has value at the goal line.
 
I needed help badly at RB so while I am not confident with felix I am faced with no other choice. I saw Dunbar looking very good last week.

 
I have won games in the past because of Felix's injury issues.

My money is on Tanner if Murray's injury proves to be of the lingering type.

This week however, I think Felix makes for a strong RB2 play with Tanner being a desperation flex play that could pay dividends.

 
Perhaps it should have been named "Fragile Felix Reality" instead of Anti Felix Jones. The point remains... dude gets hurt.

My Panthers are terrible on D, no doubt, and the Cowboys should completely blow them out. Full disclosure, I don't own any Cowboys RBs anywhere, but the deep leagues I play in have Dunbar on waivers. I found that article intriguing, and he appears to be built fairly well for RB success.

Tanner's likely to get the first opportunity behind Felix, and may be in combination with Felix. Still think Dunbar could be interesting before it's all said and done... and given the option (looking past this week), give me those guys instead of Felix.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top