What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Anyone considering ADP over LT for #1? (1 Viewer)

footballnerd

Footballguy
Just wondering what you're thoughts on about ADP over LT this year? LT is 29 and coming off a slight injury, could this be the beginning of a decline? ADP did pretty dang well in a RBBC, and he's not a rookie anymore. I'm definitely considering taking LT at #1, but just wanted to hear others POVs.

 
I considered it for about 10 seconds. I LOVE ADP but:

ADP Cons

-at this point ADP's ceiling/upside is a lot closer to LT's floor/average.

-ADP is in a RBBC, with out a solid QB and WR core

-ADP has more of an injury history.

-Outside of two huge games he was mortal.

-does not catch a lot of balls

ADP Pro's

-He is young/talented/sexy pick

-Great O-line

LT Con's

-He is 29

LT Pro's

-LT has a solid QB, WR core

-cake schedule.

-History of performance

-Little to no injury history

-Catches the ball a lot

-The lowest risk RB in the fantasy draft.

LT by a landslide. Take him and don't look back. I do have the #1 pick in my draft and have thought this over A LOT.

 
I considered it for about 10 seconds. I LOVE ADP but:

ADP Cons

-at this point ADP's ceiling/upside is a lot closer to LT's floor/average.

-ADP is in a RBBC, with out a solid QB and WR core

-ADP has more of an injury history.

-Outside of two huge games he was mortal.

-does not catch a lot of balls

ADP Pro's

-He is young/talented/sexy pick

-Great O-line

LT Con's

-He is 29

LT Pro's

-LT has a solid QB, WR core

-cake schedule.

-History of performance

-Little to no injury history

-Catches the ball a lot

-The lowest risk RB in the fantasy draft.

LT by a landslide. Take him and don't look back. I do have the #1 pick in my draft and have thought this over A LOT.
ADP Con:- Let's also not forget that McKinnie could be gone for the first 4 games of the year...

LT Pro:

- Damn fine OLine too

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think I would go with LT only becuase ADP is a RBBC.

I have thought about taking Westy over both LT and ADP if I did get the number one pick overall. Only in PPR leagues though.

 
Don't agree with this at all.
Very insightful. What don't you agree with.
I don't agree with it either, but it doesn't make it less insightful than "at this point ADP's ceiling/upside is a lot closer to LT's floor/average.". Your other points are pretty solid, but this one, not so much.
Based off FBG's projections for example (5 experts)Fantasy Points (I know this is based off projections only)

ADP

High is 313

Avg. is 269

low is 239

LT

High is 325

Avg. is 301

Low is 280

I think the experts would say the same. Look at how close LT's Avg projection is to ADP's High.

 
I joined a first year keeper league this year, and I will be taking him over LT. That is really the only scenario where I would do it.

 
Don't agree with this at all.
Very insightful. What don't you agree with.
I don't agree with it either, but it doesn't make it less insightful than "at this point ADP's ceiling/upside is a lot closer to LT's floor/average.". Your other points are pretty solid, but this one, not so much.
Based off FBG's projections for example (5 experts)Fantasy Points (I know this is based off projections only)

ADP

High is 313

Avg. is 269

low is 239

LT

High is 325

Avg. is 301

Low is 280

I think the experts would say the same. Look at how close LT's Avg projection is to ADP's High.
If those are the numbers you're using, I'd say they aren't saying the same. As a matter of fact, AD's ceiling is exactly half way between LT2's ceiling and average.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
In a non PPR league I can certainly see why someone would at least consider Peterson but LT has 3 major things going for him that Peterson does not:

1. History of production. Believe it or not but most rookie RB's who run for over 1,000 yards regress the next season. A few weeks ago I read somewhere that only 1 in 8 rookies who run for over 1,000 yards improve their output the next season. I checked myself and the last 15 years only 2 RB's who ran for over 1,000 yards their rookie season saw noticeable improvements in their rushing totals the second year and those two backs were LT and Terrell Davis. Now I will say a lot of backs maintaned their totals but for those who assume Peterson will improve his second year it is not the norm.

2. History of good health. I know LT is coming off an injury but he still grades out as a far less major injury risk than Peterson.

3. Goal line touches. Things might change this year but Peterson rarely saw the ball near the GL last year. I think he only had around 5 carries inside the 5.

In PPR leagues no one should even remotely consider taking Peterson over Tomlinson. Even if Peterson is as good as Eric Dickerson is his prime it still does not equal an average LT year in PPR leagues. Last year LT had a down year by his standards and came within one fantasy point per game of Dickerson best fantasy season in PPR leagues-which happened to be his rookie season.

 
Ya I guess I'm thinking at what point do you say LT is declining and ADP should take over. It was agony having LT in the first half of last season, but that was more based on SOS as he finished the season strong. One of these years LT will hand over the reigns to ADP or ever McFadden, but prob wont be this year. Thanks guys.

 
I joined a first year keeper league this year, and I will be taking him over LT. That is really the only scenario where I would do it.
This is where I am at. I have the 1.1 in a dynasty league. Do I take LT for maybe 3 more years of production or do I go with the kid? I am seriously torn here. It's a non PPR which makes it even harder. One stat I heard last night on that shiddy ESPN draft was that he only had 5 carries inside the 5 last year? Is this possible? That if he gets any goal line carries this year we can be looking at 20TD's with his homerun ability on just about every play...
 
In a non PPR league I can certainly see why someone would at least consider Peterson but LT has 3 major things going for him that Peterson does not:

1. History of production. Believe it or not but most rookie RB's who run for over 1,000 yards regress the next season. A few weeks ago I read somewhere that only 1 in 8 rookies who run for over 1,000 yards improve their output the next season. I checked myself and the last 15 years only 2 RB's who ran for over 1,000 yards their rookie season saw noticeable improvements in their rushing totals the second year and those two backs were LT and Terrell Davis. Now I will say a lot of backs maintaned their totals but for those who assume Peterson will improve his second year it is not the norm.
What percentage on non-rookies who run for over 1,000 yards regress the next season?
 
FWIW

ADP

2007 Pro Bowl - 16 carries 129 yards & 2 TD's

LT

2006 Pro Bowl - LT 10 carries, 51 yards & 1 TD

2005 Pro Bowl - LT 5 carries, 13 yards & no TD's

2004 Pro Bowl- LT 7 carries, 28 yards & 1 TD

Three year total - 22 carries, 92 yards & 2 TD's

ADP outscored LT's last three Pro Bowl appearences combined. :popcorn:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
In a non PPR league I can certainly see why someone would at least consider Peterson but LT has 3 major things going for him that Peterson does not:

1. History of production. Believe it or not but most rookie RB's who run for over 1,000 yards regress the next season. A few weeks ago I read somewhere that only 1 in 8 rookies who run for over 1,000 yards improve their output the next season. I checked myself and the last 15 years only 2 RB's who ran for over 1,000 yards their rookie season saw noticeable improvements in their rushing totals the second year and those two backs were LT and Terrell Davis. Now I will say a lot of backs maintaned their totals but for those who assume Peterson will improve his second year it is not the norm.
What percentage on non-rookies who run for over 1,000 yards regress the next season?
In 2006 there were 22 running backs who ran for 1,000 yards. One was Tiki Barber, who retired and didn't play in 2007. One was Joseph Addai, who was the only rookie in the group, and he scored 45 more points in 2007 than in 2006.Of the other 20 running backs, only three scored more fantasy points in 2007 than in 2006. On average they scored 77.9 fewer points the year after rushing for 1,000 yards.

I don't think the stat you quote, if it's even accurate, is any reason to downgrade Peterson.

 
FWIW

ADP

2007 Pro Bowl - 16 carries 129 yards & 2 TD's

LT

2006 Pro Bowl - LT 10 carries, 51 yards & 1 TD

2005 Pro Bowl - LT 5 carries, 13 yards & no TD's

2004 Pro Bowl- LT 7 carries, 28 yards & 1 TD

Three year total - 22 carries, 92 yards & 2 TD's

ADP outscored LT's last three Pro Bowl appearences combined. :shrug:
.......
 
In a non PPR league I can certainly see why someone would at least consider Peterson but LT has 3 major things going for him that Peterson does not:

1. History of production. Believe it or not but most rookie RB's who run for over 1,000 yards regress the next season. A few weeks ago I read somewhere that only 1 in 8 rookies who run for over 1,000 yards improve their output the next season. I checked myself and the last 15 years only 2 RB's who ran for over 1,000 yards their rookie season saw noticeable improvements in their rushing totals the second year and those two backs were LT and Terrell Davis. Now I will say a lot of backs maintaned their totals but for those who assume Peterson will improve his second year it is not the norm.
What percentage on non-rookies who run for over 1,000 yards regress the next season?
I have no idea.The stat I read about only 1 in 8 rooks improving on their 1,000 yard seasons was in someones write up about Marshawn Lynch and as they were trying to point out that you should not assume second year improvement for him.

 
In a non PPR league I can certainly see why someone would at least consider Peterson but LT has 3 major things going for him that Peterson does not:

1. History of production. Believe it or not but most rookie RB's who run for over 1,000 yards regress the next season. A few weeks ago I read somewhere that only 1 in 8 rookies who run for over 1,000 yards improve their output the next season. I checked myself and the last 15 years only 2 RB's who ran for over 1,000 yards their rookie season saw noticeable improvements in their rushing totals the second year and those two backs were LT and Terrell Davis. Now I will say a lot of backs maintaned their totals but for those who assume Peterson will improve his second year it is not the norm.
What percentage on non-rookies who run for over 1,000 yards regress the next season?
In 2006 there were 22 running backs who ran for 1,000 yards. One was Tiki Barber, who retired and didn't play in 2007. One was Joseph Addai, who was the only rookie in the group, and he scored 45 more points in 2007 than in 2006.Of the other 20 running backs, only three scored more fantasy points in 2007 than in 2006. On average they scored 77.9 fewer points the year after rushing for 1,000 yards.

I don't think the stat you quote, if it's even accurate, is any reason to downgrade Peterson.
Sure what I said is a reason to downgrade Peterson and frankly you only added to a reason to downgrade Peterson in relation to LT. Consistency. LT is consistent and Peterson has yet to prove it beyond one year where he failed to play all 16 games.Going back to why I bothered to point out rookie production in the first place. I think those people who select Peterson do so on the belief he's going to improve from his rookie year to his second. Not to many people expect backs to improve from say their 5th to 6th years like people tend to assume backs will improve in their second season. All of this is relevant it you think Peterson is a better pick because of LT because you view him as an ascending player.

 
Don't agree with this at all.
Very insightful. What don't you agree with.
I don't agree with it either, but it doesn't make it less insightful than "at this point ADP's ceiling/upside is a lot closer to LT's floor/average.". Your other points are pretty solid, but this one, not so much.
Based off FBG's projections for example (5 experts)Fantasy Points (I know this is based off projections only)

ADP

High is 313

Avg. is 269

low is 239

LT

High is 325

Avg. is 301

Low is 280

I think the experts would say the same. Look at how close LT's Avg projection is to ADP's High.
LOLOLOLOL WHAT IS A FANTASY FOOTBALL EXPERT. OKAY I GUESS THEY WEN'T TO THE SCHOOL OF FANTASY FOOTBALL. ANYONE WHO CALLS THEMSELVES A FANTASY FOOTBALL EXPERT IS A JOKE. YOU LOOK AT LAST YEARS STATS AND TAKE A GUESS.....THATS ALL IT IS

 
Don't agree with this at all.
Very insightful. What don't you agree with.
I don't agree with it either, but it doesn't make it less insightful than "at this point ADP's ceiling/upside is a lot closer to LT's floor/average.". Your other points are pretty solid, but this one, not so much.
Based off FBG's projections for example (5 experts)Fantasy Points (I know this is based off projections only)

ADP

High is 313

Avg. is 269

low is 239

LT

High is 325

Avg. is 301

Low is 280

I think the experts would say the same. Look at how close LT's Avg projection is to ADP's High.
LOLOLOLOL WHAT IS A FANTASY FOOTBALL EXPERT. OKAY I GUESS THEY WEN'T TO THE SCHOOL OF FANTASY FOOTBALL. ANYONE WHO CALLS THEMSELVES A FANTASY FOOTBALL EXPERT IS A JOKE. YOU LOOK AT LAST YEARS STATS AND TAKE A GUESS.....THATS ALL IT IS
Tough day in the office?
 
In a non PPR league I can certainly see why someone would at least consider Peterson but LT has 3 major things going for him that Peterson does not:

1. History of production. Believe it or not but most rookie RB's who run for over 1,000 yards regress the next season. A few weeks ago I read somewhere that only 1 in 8 rookies who run for over 1,000 yards improve their output the next season. I checked myself and the last 15 years only 2 RB's who ran for over 1,000 yards their rookie season saw noticeable improvements in their rushing totals the second year and those two backs were LT and Terrell Davis. Now I will say a lot of backs maintaned their totals but for those who assume Peterson will improve his second year it is not the norm.
What percentage on non-rookies who run for over 1,000 yards regress the next season?
In 2006 there were 22 running backs who ran for 1,000 yards. One was Tiki Barber, who retired and didn't play in 2007. One was Joseph Addai, who was the only rookie in the group, and he scored 45 more points in 2007 than in 2006.Of the other 20 running backs, only three scored more fantasy points in 2007 than in 2006. On average they scored 77.9 fewer points the year after rushing for 1,000 yards.

I don't think the stat you quote, if it's even accurate, is any reason to downgrade Peterson.
Sure what I said is a reason to downgrade Peterson and frankly you only added to a reason to downgrade Peterson in relation to LT. Consistency. LT is consistent and Peterson has yet to prove it beyond one year where he failed to play all 16 games.Going back to why I bothered to point out rookie production in the first place. I think those people who select Peterson do so on the belief he's going to improve from his rookie year to his second. Not to many people expect backs to improve from say their 5th to 6th years like people tend to assume backs will improve in their second season. All of this is relevant it you think Peterson is a better pick because of LT because you view him as an ascending player.
I think it's safe to say that ADP has a better chance of being that 1, then the other rookie RB's combined. He is simply that good.
 
Don't agree with this at all.
Very insightful. What don't you agree with.
I don't agree with it either, but it doesn't make it less insightful than "at this point ADP's ceiling/upside is a lot closer to LT's floor/average.". Your other points are pretty solid, but this one, not so much.
Based off FBG's projections for example (5 experts)Fantasy Points (I know this is based off projections only)

ADP

High is 313

Avg. is 269

low is 239

LT

High is 325

Avg. is 301

Low is 280

I think the experts would say the same. Look at how close LT's Avg projection is to ADP's High.
LOLOLOLOL WHAT IS A FANTASY FOOTBALL EXPERT. OKAY I GUESS THEY WEN'T TO THE SCHOOL OF FANTASY FOOTBALL. ANYONE WHO CALLS THEMSELVES A FANTASY FOOTBALL EXPERT IS A JOKE. YOU LOOK AT LAST YEARS STATS AND TAKE A GUESS.....THATS ALL IT IS
Time to switch to decaf.
 
Don't agree with this at all.
Very insightful. What don't you agree with.
I don't agree with it either, but it doesn't make it less insightful than "at this point ADP's ceiling/upside is a lot closer to LT's floor/average.". Your other points are pretty solid, but this one, not so much.
Based off FBG's projections for example (5 experts)Fantasy Points (I know this is based off projections only)

ADP

High is 313

Avg. is 269

low is 239

LT

High is 325

Avg. is 301

Low is 280

I think the experts would say the same. Look at how close LT's Avg projection is to ADP's High.
What is the specific margin of error for the "experts" predictions for the top 5 RB's last year? Not to disparage the fine people who run this great site, but the fact that they are "experts" does not mean they are always right. Heck in FF even us average guys can be as accurate as they are on a handful of players who we follow closely. What sets the "experts" apart is the scope of their predictions, not the level of accuracy in every specific case. When comparing the limited scope of two specific players deffering to the experts isn't very helpful.As a matter of fact in this day and age everyone knows what the experts think, the way to win is to figure out where they are wrong and capitalize on it.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
ADP Con:- Let's also not forget that McKinnie could be gone for the first 4 games of the year...LT Pro:- Damn fine OLine too
Nick Hardwick, SD's 2006 all pro center is struggling to make it back from injury - he's still not practicing and is wearing a brace on his leg. He'll be lucky not to land on the PUP to start the season. They picked up Newberry from the Raiders as a FA to fill in (he too was a pro bowler in 2002 and 2003 with SF), but it's still a drop off. Their right tackle Clary is entering his first season as the starter out of training camp, though he did start most of last season.The line didn't look so good against the starting Dallas D last Sat, but left tackle McNeil was out with a neck stinger.I'm hoping for improvement from the line over last year (especially the beginning) but I'm not 100% convinced that's going to happen yet. I'd still give Minny the edge in this area even if McKinnie does miss the 1st 4 games.That being said, in redraft this year you have to go with LaDainian. He knows time is getting short for him in terms of winning a championship, and the way he went out last year is burning him up and will do so all season long. This year should see the most determined LaDainian we've ever seen. Add to that that the team has now fully internalized Norv's much more complex offensive scheme and playbook and an influx of more talent on offense compared to the start of last season (I think Gates will be there for the opening game), which will lead to more pliable defenses for LaDainian to capitalize on. Plan accordingly.
 
Don't agree with this at all.
Very insightful. What don't you agree with.
I don't agree with it either, but it doesn't make it less insightful than "at this point ADP's ceiling/upside is a lot closer to LT's floor/average.". Your other points are pretty solid, but this one, not so much.
Based off FBG's projections for example (5 experts)Fantasy Points (I know this is based off projections only)

ADP

High is 313

Avg. is 269

low is 239

LT

High is 325

Avg. is 301

Low is 280

I think the experts would say the same. Look at how close LT's Avg projection is to ADP's High.
LOLOLOLOL WHAT IS A FANTASY FOOTBALL EXPERT. OKAY I GUESS THEY WEN'T TO THE SCHOOL OF FANTASY FOOTBALL. ANYONE WHO CALLS THEMSELVES A FANTASY FOOTBALL EXPERT IS A JOKE. YOU LOOK AT LAST YEARS STATS AND TAKE A GUESS.....THATS ALL IT IS
Time to switch to decaf.
Yeah I was kinda rude there.... My bad..
 
I have the first pick in my non-PPR redraft league and I am taking Peterson because I think he is the best RB in the league.

Over the first half of last year, Peterson was on pace for 2,000 yards rushing and somewhere in the neighborhood of 16-18 rushing TDs. Combine his injury with a little bit of him hitting the rookie wall and I think you have a pretty reasonable excuse for his diminished production over the second half of the season. I think it is reasonable to assume that he can improve upon his first season and maintain a high level of performance the whole year.

To my eyes, LT just doesnt look as explosive as he did a few years ago. Granted, I didnt watch every snap that LT or ADP took last year like some of the folks in here, but I saw enough to convince me. I also would not be surprised to see him start to slow down a bit this year. He has an incredible amount of mileage on him.

Dont let anyone tell you that there is a wrong choice between the two, as long as you have your reasons - take the one you want. These two are the cream of the crop and have a solid chance to finish 1-2 when it is all said and done.

There have been times in the past where I have caved to the popular opinion and passed up on the player that I really wanted because:

1. I didnt want to look stupid...and/or

2. I let someone convince me it was too big of a risk.

Regardless how it worked out, I always regretted not sticking my neck out and taking the guy that I thought was better.

If you think ADP is better, then take him first. If you think LT is better, then take him first. If you have no real opinion, then you are probably best served going with popular opinion and taking LT first (afterall, it is probably a popular opinion for a reason). If it turns out that you were wrong, then such is life.

 
I have the first pick in my non-PPR redraft league and I am taking Peterson because I think he is the best RB in the league.Over the first half of last year, Peterson was on pace for 2,000 yards rushing and somewhere in the neighborhood of 16-18 rushing TDs. Combine his injury with a little bit of him hitting the rookie wall and I think you have a pretty reasonable excuse for his diminished production over the second half of the season. I think it is reasonable to assume that he can improve upon his first season and maintain a high level of performance the whole year.To my eyes, LT just doesnt look as explosive as he did a few years ago. Granted, I didnt watch every snap that LT or ADP took last year like some of the folks in here, but I saw enough to convince me. I also would not be surprised to see him start to slow down a bit this year. He has an incredible amount of mileage on him. Dont let anyone tell you that there is a wrong choice between the two, as long as you have your reasons - take the one you want. These two are the cream of the crop and have a solid chance to finish 1-2 when it is all said and done. There have been times in the past where I have caved to the popular opinion and passed up on the player that I really wanted because:1. I didnt want to look stupid...and/or2. I let someone convince me it was too big of a risk.Regardless how it worked out, I always regretted not sticking my neck out and taking the guy that I thought was better. If you think ADP is better, then take him first. If you think LT is better, then take him first. If you have no real opinion, then you are probably best served going with popular opinion and taking LT first (afterall, it is probably a popular opinion for a reason). If it turns out that you were wrong, then such is life.
Very, very :thumbup:
 
I have the first pick in my non-PPR redraft league and I am taking Peterson because I think he is the best RB in the league.Over the first half of last year, Peterson was on pace for 2,000 yards rushing and somewhere in the neighborhood of 16-18 rushing TDs. Combine his injury with a little bit of him hitting the rookie wall and I think you have a pretty reasonable excuse for his diminished production over the second half of the season. I think it is reasonable to assume that he can improve upon his first season and maintain a high level of performance the whole year.To my eyes, LT just doesnt look as explosive as he did a few years ago. Granted, I didnt watch every snap that LT or ADP took last year like some of the folks in here, but I saw enough to convince me. I also would not be surprised to see him start to slow down a bit this year. He has an incredible amount of mileage on him. Dont let anyone tell you that there is a wrong choice between the two, as long as you have your reasons - take the one you want. These two are the cream of the crop and have a solid chance to finish 1-2 when it is all said and done. There have been times in the past where I have caved to the popular opinion and passed up on the player that I really wanted because:1. I didnt want to look stupid...and/or2. I let someone convince me it was too big of a risk.Regardless how it worked out, I always regretted not sticking my neck out and taking the guy that I thought was better. If you think ADP is better, then take him first. If you think LT is better, then take him first. If you have no real opinion, then you are probably best served going with popular opinion and taking LT first (afterall, it is probably a popular opinion for a reason). If it turns out that you were wrong, then such is life.
What do I do if I think ADP is better, but Dodds and VBD are telling me LT?
 
What do I do if I think ADP is better, but Dodds and VBD are telling me LT?
Who's team is it? Or you could just do what too many people around here do. Go with "the list" and crow if it is right and have someone other than your self to blame if you are wrong. If this happens I think it is a FBG rule that you must come to the forum beginning about week six making posts blaming FBG staff for ruining your season and costing you thousands :rolleyes: of dollars.
 
NO....but I would consider Westy at #1 in a PPR league.

Westy outscored LT in a PPR league last year yet nobody mentioned him.

Westy >>> AP :rolleyes:

 
Itchy Amos said:
I have the first pick in my non-PPR redraft league and I am taking Peterson because I think he is the best RB in the league.
Talk to the guy at 1.02 and see if he wants to switch spots with you. 90% chance you'll still get AD, and you'll get the 2.11 instead of the 2.12. Doesn't sound like a big deal, but I can't count how many times the guy before me took the player I wanted in the 2nd round!
 
NO....but I would consider Westy at #1 in a PPR league.Westy outscored LT in a PPR league last year yet nobody mentioned him.Westy >>> AP :boxing:
:shrug: :lmao: :lmao: I won my league with Westy last year and I got the #3 this year and of course, I went with Westy in a PPR league. Could not be more thrilled!!!
 
NO....but I would consider Westy at #1 in a PPR league.Westy outscored LT in a PPR league last year yet nobody mentioned him.Westy >>> AP :boxing:
:cry: :wub: :goodposting: I won my league with Westy last year and I got the #3 this year and of course, I went with Westy in a PPR league. Could not be more thrilled!!!
Westy is a STUD in PPR leagues but that knee and his age are worries to me.He's at #3 in my rankings.
 
I had my heart set on LT #1 overall, but ever since DirecTV started airing those Peterson-Kimmel commercials I'm leaning towards All Day!

And the Vikes get Detroit twice this year, so there's at least 600 yards and 6 TDs right there for Peterson.

 
Itchy Amos said:
I have the first pick in my non-PPR redraft league and I am taking Peterson because I think he is the best RB in the league.Over the first half of last year, Peterson was on pace for 2,000 yards rushing and somewhere in the neighborhood of 16-18 rushing TDs. Combine his injury with a little bit of him hitting the rookie wall and I think you have a pretty reasonable excuse for his diminished production over the second half of the season. I think it is reasonable to assume that he can improve upon his first season and maintain a high level of performance the whole year.To my eyes, LT just doesnt look as explosive as he did a few years ago. Granted, I didnt watch every snap that LT or ADP took last year like some of the folks in here, but I saw enough to convince me. I also would not be surprised to see him start to slow down a bit this year. He has an incredible amount of mileage on him. Dont let anyone tell you that there is a wrong choice between the two, as long as you have your reasons - take the one you want. These two are the cream of the crop and have a solid chance to finish 1-2 when it is all said and done. There have been times in the past where I have caved to the popular opinion and passed up on the player that I really wanted because:1. I didnt want to look stupid...and/or2. I let someone convince me it was too big of a risk.Regardless how it worked out, I always regretted not sticking my neck out and taking the guy that I thought was better. If you think ADP is better, then take him first. If you think LT is better, then take him first. If you have no real opinion, then you are probably best served going with popular opinion and taking LT first (afterall, it is probably a popular opinion for a reason). If it turns out that you were wrong, then such is life.
but i love them both equally. :thumbdown: i had AD last year and LT when he broke the record. i hope i don't get the 1st pick this year so i won't be so torn.
 
I'd draft AD over LT. He's younger and in the beginning of his career whereas LT is in the middle-later part of his. He's reaching the age where the skills could start to diminish possibly dramatically. AD isn't anywhere near that point of his career. Drafting Peterson prevents you from getting a guy who could fall off in a big way this season. In a way I think that Peterson is the safer pick over Tomlinson.

However LT is still only 29 which is less than 30. It's a tough decision but one that I could see both sides making sense. It's not clear one way or another.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I joined a first year keeper league this year, and I will be taking him over LT. That is really the only scenario where I would do it.
This is where I am at. I have the 1.1 in a dynasty league. Do I take LT for maybe 3 more years of production or do I go with the kid? I am seriously torn here. It's a non PPR which makes it even harder. One stat I heard last night on that shiddy ESPN draft was that he only had 5 carries inside the 5 last year? Is this possible? That if he gets any goal line carries this year we can be looking at 20TD's with his homerun ability on just about every play...
In dynasty, ADP is a consensus #1 here and elsewhere.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top