Arizona WR's (1 Viewer)

[lsutigers]

Kurt Warner has played in all 16 games just 2 times in 7 seasons, the most recent coming in 2001.

While past injury issues are not always the best indicator of future issues, are both Arizona WR's still top 5 WR candidates if Navarre or Leinhart are tossing them the rock? You have to think that Denny Green would lean on Edge and the short game?

Does that necessarily favor Boldin, the inside slant reception WR or Fitzgerald, the more typical big play WR?

 

[Double_J]

I don't think so and that's why I steered clear of all Cardinals except Rackers.

 

[Native]

Is Leinart #2 on the depth chart? I wouldnt trust him throwing the ball during his rookie year. Whos #2 in Arizona?

 

[J R]

Why would losing Warner hurt their value? He's not any good. If he goes down first day, and we have to watch Navarre play because Leinart's not ready yet, then maybe. Otherwise, at least if I was a Boldin owner I'd be more worried that the team gets better and there's not so many garbage time passing yards to rack up.

 

[nygiants56]

depends on how you feel about Leinart or Navarre, should they be called upon to start..

the Cards figure to play one of, if not the easiest , schedules vs. the pass..in four games as a starter last year, Mccown threw for 1374 yards ( 343.5 avg per game), 7 tds..

he started other games, too..but in these 4, Fitgerald recorded the following stats:

wk 4: 7-102, 1td

wk 5: 9-136, 1td

wk 16: 5-93, 1td

wk 17: 6-80, 1td

boldin,during the same weeks, recorded the following:

wk 4: 8-116, 1td

wk 5: 10-162, 1td

wk 16:9-81, 1td

wk 17: 8-81

that's about ALL I need to see to draft Fitz OR Boldin..with or without Warner, this offense will move the ball on anyone, and because they now have Edge , they should be able to do it more easily, too...

I'm not afraid of that offense losing any steam without Warner..