Crazy Tony
Footballguy
Can there be a weekly are that summarizes the various Projections/sleepers/rankings/data from the previous week compared with that actual production and results?
I feel like each week there's TONS of Data and UPDATES....and each week it's a crap shoot because of how the week never turns out exactly how you think.
It could be just a side by side comparison of the data for rankings/projections.
For sleepers, tough match-ups...great matchups... when a specific player is named you could do...Right, Wrong, Neutral.
If you pick 5-7 sleepers... and 3 pan out...that's actually not bad...
I think tracking this data/these type of results will allow subscribers to better determine how to process and utilize the vast amounts of information.
...Our Panning for gold article is 60% accurate week to week (60% of the players mentioned achieve expectation for that week) AND it's 75% accurate over a 4 week window (This player produces at expected or starter caliber level 1x within 4 weeks).
This way, if I needed a player I could look to the summary and find out what's been working, what might give me the best odds at picking a line-up, player that I need.... if for some reason there are predictions etc that just don't seem to be panning out...maybe you lean more heavily on another guru's data.
Just my thoughts. I know you guys are busy as it is. You might already have this information in your own personal stash but don't necessarily track it for public.
I feel like each week there's TONS of Data and UPDATES....and each week it's a crap shoot because of how the week never turns out exactly how you think.
It could be just a side by side comparison of the data for rankings/projections.
For sleepers, tough match-ups...great matchups... when a specific player is named you could do...Right, Wrong, Neutral.
If you pick 5-7 sleepers... and 3 pan out...that's actually not bad...
I think tracking this data/these type of results will allow subscribers to better determine how to process and utilize the vast amounts of information.
...Our Panning for gold article is 60% accurate week to week (60% of the players mentioned achieve expectation for that week) AND it's 75% accurate over a 4 week window (This player produces at expected or starter caliber level 1x within 4 weeks).
This way, if I needed a player I could look to the summary and find out what's been working, what might give me the best odds at picking a line-up, player that I need.... if for some reason there are predictions etc that just don't seem to be panning out...maybe you lean more heavily on another guru's data.
Just my thoughts. I know you guys are busy as it is. You might already have this information in your own personal stash but don't necessarily track it for public.
