What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

As a Pats fan... (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter Thread starter General Tso
  • Start date Start date
switz said:
I don't even like the Patriots, but you are ridiculous. You are saying that NE's TD drive wasn't crunch time because there was too much time left, but if Brady had thrown an INT on that 3rd down play instead of the TD, and then the Giants ran the clock out, you would be ripping Brady for failing in crunch time, saying, "It was their last drive, and he failed!" You are so predictable.
No, I wouldn't. I would say that the Giants shut down the Pats all day long, which they did anyway. IMO, all the tremendous game winning, crunch time drives, happen within the last five minutes, and most within the least 3 minutes or so. Just go through the history of the great games in your mind... all the "crunch time" drives are LATE in the 4th quarter...And either way, Brady didn't lead them to a game winning TD... there's no refuting that.And whether Brady threw an INT instead of scoring on their 4th quarter drive wouldn't have made a difference in the world. Either way he failed to lead the #1 offense in the NFL to a win, even though his opponent scored only 17 points.All you Pats fans (and supposed non-Pats fans) can disregard me all you want. It doesn't change that you have to live with your team giving probably the WORST choke job in the history of the Super Bowl.
I get your point about the TD drive not being game winning, but Tom Brady doesn't play defense. He drove his team to the go ahead score and should not be faulted for what the Giants did in response. And don't start with any hooey about leaving too much time on the clock.Brady should be faulted for his decision making on first down with 29 seconds and 3 time outs.
 
switz said:
I don't even like the Patriots, but you are ridiculous. You are saying that NE's TD drive wasn't crunch time because there was too much time left, but if Brady had thrown an INT on that 3rd down play instead of the TD, and then the Giants ran the clock out, you would be ripping Brady for failing in crunch time, saying, "It was their last drive, and he failed!" You are so predictable.
No, I wouldn't. I would say that the Giants shut down the Pats all day long, which they did anyway. IMO, all the tremendous game winning, crunch time drives, happen within the last five minutes, and most within the least 3 minutes or so. Just go through the history of the great games in your mind... all the "crunch time" drives are LATE in the 4th quarter...And either way, Brady didn't lead them to a game winning TD... there's no refuting that.And whether Brady threw an INT instead of scoring on their 4th quarter drive wouldn't have made a difference in the world. Either way he failed to lead the #1 offense in the NFL to a win, even though his opponent scored only 17 points.All you Pats fans (and supposed non-Pats fans) can disregard me all you want. It doesn't change that you have to live with your team giving probably the WORST choke job in the history of the Super Bowl.
Switz, you've been getting unfairly blasted here by several Pats fans, but in order for a game to be called "probably the WORST choke job in the history of the Super Bowl" the team that wins needs to be considered a bunch of nobodys / overachievers. The Giants don't fall into that category. I suppose if the Giants are not contenders next year, I'll have to concede your point, but until then I prefer to view the Giants as a special team.
 
switz said:
I don't even like the Patriots, but you are ridiculous. You are saying that NE's TD drive wasn't crunch time because there was too much time left, but if Brady had thrown an INT on that 3rd down play instead of the TD, and then the Giants ran the clock out, you would be ripping Brady for failing in crunch time, saying, "It was their last drive, and he failed!" You are so predictable.
No, I wouldn't. I would say that the Giants shut down the Pats all day long, which they did anyway. IMO, all the tremendous game winning, crunch time drives, happen within the last five minutes, and most within the least 3 minutes or so. Just go through the history of the great games in your mind... all the "crunch time" drives are LATE in the 4th quarter...And either way, Brady didn't lead them to a game winning TD... there's no refuting that.And whether Brady threw an INT instead of scoring on their 4th quarter drive wouldn't have made a difference in the world. Either way he failed to lead the #1 offense in the NFL to a win, even though his opponent scored only 17 points.All you Pats fans (and supposed non-Pats fans) can disregard me all you want. It doesn't change that you have to live with your team giving probably the WORST choke job in the history of the Super Bowl.
Do you happen to have stats on how many qbs have driven 40 yds in the final 35 seconds to put his team in position to send a game to OT (only include playoff games)? I'm thinking what it comes down to is you faulting Brady for not getting it done on the final drive (i.e. "crunch time"). You don't consider the drive that they actually scored a td "crunch time" even though there was just over 2 mins left in the game when they scored. In the superbowl when you're losing midway or late in the 4th qtr, I'm pretty sure it's crunch time.
 
5. Tom Brady is over-rated. Yes - I said it. And I'm a Pats fan. He's a great QB, don't get me wrong. But he's not one of the top 5 all-time in my opinion. I thought he played lousy yesterday and lousy 2 weeks ago. Just my opinion.
:penalty: I did not lose any respect for Tom Brady. I was impressed by his toughness and how he kept his cool from beginning to end.

That's why Brady is still my favorite QB. :wub:
You mean like when he screamed at Welker on a pass play to the sideline? You know the same play where it looked like Andre the Giant standing on the bench would have had trouble catching the pass. :confused:
 
5. Tom Brady is over-rated. Yes - I said it. And I'm a Pats fan. He's a great QB, don't get me wrong. But he's not one of the top 5 all-time in my opinion. I thought he played lousy yesterday and lousy 2 weeks ago. Just my opinion.
:confused: I did not lose any respect for Tom Brady. I was impressed by his toughness and how he kept his cool from beginning to end.

That's why Brady is still my favorite QB. :penalty:
Brady didn't have his best game by far but he really impressed me with his toughness and his coolness.
Toughness, I'll give you. He stayed physically in the game, while taking a decent beating.Coolness? No way, he was totally unnerved. His throws were way off, he looked rattled every snap in the second half.

Do I think he sucks because of the game? No. Do I agree that he's been overrated? Yes. Other QBs face pressure week in and out, and put up stats and win games. Brady has usually had tons of time to throw, and when he doesn't he can't pull it off.
I think i read that the number is THREE. Mr. Brady is a .500 QB when he is sacked 3 times or more.
 
5. Tom Brady is over-rated. Yes - I said it. And I'm a Pats fan. He's a great QB, don't get me wrong. But he's not one of the top 5 all-time in my opinion. I thought he played lousy yesterday and lousy 2 weeks ago. Just my opinion.
He's overrated, but it's not as drastic as you're saying. I'll repeat my observation I've been making about him since December - he is no better than average among NFL pocket passers at successfully passing in the face of pressure. Frankly, it looks like he's more aware of pressure than many otherwise inferior NFL QB's, and that's a major Achilles heel.
The numbers pretty much bear that out too (see my above post).
 
5. Tom Brady is over-rated. Yes - I said it. And I'm a Pats fan. He's a great QB, don't get me wrong. But he's not one of the top 5 all-time in my opinion. I thought he played lousy yesterday and lousy 2 weeks ago. Just my opinion.
He's overrated, but it's not as drastic as you're saying. I'll repeat my observation I've been making about him since December - he is no better than average among NFL pocket passers at successfully passing in the face of pressure. Frankly, it looks like he's more aware of pressure than many otherwise inferior NFL QB's, and that's a major Achilles heel.
The numbers pretty much bear that out too (see my above post).
You are nuts. Brady stands in and takes the hit to complete a pass much better than any QB in the league. Eli Manning is famous for falling away and throwing off his back foot while facing pressure.There are two types of QB's in the NFL, those that step up into the pocket when facing pressure and those that fade away further from the line of scrimmage when facing pressure. Brady and Peyton Manning are the best at stepping up (Marino was great as well) and Aaron Brooks is the poster boy for fading away.

 
5. Tom Brady is over-rated. Yes - I said it. And I'm a Pats fan. He's a great QB, don't get me wrong. But he's not one of the top 5 all-time in my opinion. I thought he played lousy yesterday and lousy 2 weeks ago. Just my opinion.
He's overrated, but it's not as drastic as you're saying. I'll repeat my observation I've been making about him since December - he is no better than average among NFL pocket passers at successfully passing in the face of pressure. Frankly, it looks like he's more aware of pressure than many otherwise inferior NFL QB's, and that's a major Achilles heel.
The numbers pretty much bear that out too (see my above post).
You are nuts. Brady stands in and takes the hit to complete a pass much better than any QB in the league. Eli Manning is famous for falling away and throwing off his back foot while facing pressure.There are two types of QB's in the NFL, those that step up into the pocket when facing pressure and those that fade away further from the line of scrimmage when facing pressure. Brady and Peyton Manning are the best at stepping up (Marino was great as well) and Aaron Brooks is the poster boy for fading away.
Im not knocking Brady, but no way does he take a hit and deliver a pass better then Big Ben. No freakin' way.
 
5. Tom Brady is over-rated. Yes - I said it. And I'm a Pats fan. He's a great QB, don't get me wrong. But he's not one of the top 5 all-time in my opinion. I thought he played lousy yesterday and lousy 2 weeks ago. Just my opinion.
:shrug: I did not lose any respect for Tom Brady. I was impressed by his toughness and how he kept his cool from beginning to end.

That's why Brady is still my favorite QB. :(
Brady didn't have his best game by far but he really impressed me with his toughness and his coolness.
Toughness, I'll give you. He stayed physically in the game, while taking a decent beating.Coolness? No way, he was totally unnerved. His throws were way off, he looked rattled every snap in the second half.

Do I think he sucks because of the game? No. Do I agree that he's been overrated? Yes. Other QBs face pressure week in and out, and put up stats and win games. Brady has usually had tons of time to throw, and when he doesn't he can't pull it off.
I think i read that the number is THREE. Mr. Brady is a .500 QB when he is sacked 3 times or more.
Ummm . . . not even close.Here is Brady's record getting sacked three or more times in a game:

2001: 9-1

2002: 1-4

2003: 4-0

2004: 1-1

2005: 6-1

2006: 3-2

2007: 4-1

TOTAL: 28-10 (.737)

 
5. Tom Brady is over-rated. Yes - I said it. And I'm a Pats fan. He's a great QB, don't get me wrong. But he's not one of the top 5 all-time in my opinion. I thought he played lousy yesterday and lousy 2 weeks ago. Just my opinion.
:thumbup: I did not lose any respect for Tom Brady. I was impressed by his toughness and how he kept his cool from beginning to end.

That's why Brady is still my favorite QB. :porked:
Brady didn't have his best game by far but he really impressed me with his toughness and his coolness.
Toughness, I'll give you. He stayed physically in the game, while taking a decent beating.Coolness? No way, he was totally unnerved. His throws were way off, he looked rattled every snap in the second half.

Do I think he sucks because of the game? No. Do I agree that he's been overrated? Yes. Other QBs face pressure week in and out, and put up stats and win games. Brady has usually had tons of time to throw, and when he doesn't he can't pull it off.
I think i read that the number is THREE. Mr. Brady is a .500 QB when he is sacked 3 times or more.
Ummm . . . not even close.Here is Brady's record getting sacked three or more times in a game:

2001: 9-1

2002: 1-4

2003: 4-0

2004: 1-1

2005: 6-1

2006: 3-2

2007: 4-1

TOTAL: 28-10 (.737)
I really hesitate to break this one out since it's too often used inappropriately, but: :pickle:

 
5. Tom Brady is over-rated. Yes - I said it. And I'm a Pats fan. He's a great QB, don't get me wrong. But he's not one of the top 5 all-time in my opinion. I thought he played lousy yesterday and lousy 2 weeks ago. Just my opinion.
:goodposting: I did not lose any respect for Tom Brady. I was impressed by his toughness and how he kept his cool from beginning to end.

That's why Brady is still my favorite QB. :tfp:
Brady didn't have his best game by far but he really impressed me with his toughness and his coolness.
Toughness, I'll give you. He stayed physically in the game, while taking a decent beating.Coolness? No way, he was totally unnerved. His throws were way off, he looked rattled every snap in the second half.

Do I think he sucks because of the game? No. Do I agree that he's been overrated? Yes. Other QBs face pressure week in and out, and put up stats and win games. Brady has usually had tons of time to throw, and when he doesn't he can't pull it off.
I think i read that the number is THREE. Mr. Brady is a .500 QB when he is sacked 3 times or more.
Ummm . . . not even close.Here is Brady's record getting sacked three or more times in a game:

2001: 9-1

2002: 1-4

2003: 4-0

2004: 1-1

2005: 6-1

2006: 3-2

2007: 4-1

TOTAL: 28-10 (.737)
I really hesitate to break this one out since it's too often used inappropriately, but: :yes:
First off, I did not make an absolute statment. Here is what I said:
I think i read that the number is THREE. Mr. Brady is a .500 QB when he is sacked 3 times or more.
Maybe it was 4 times but I really thought it was 3. Also the more I think about it the more I think I actually saw it on one of the shows after the Super Bowl (ESPN most likely).I did a google search to try and see if I could find that stat. I found it posted by someone else at a Bucs board too (I know I wasn't crazy that I heard/saw that stat).

http://bbs.buccaneers.com/showpost.php?p=3...mp;postcount=30

At another site (a bit over half way down): http://64.233.169.104/search?q=cache:zGCtF...lient=firefox-a

I will continue to try and find the originating source of that info.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top