Really you think that avg net matters? You must think a guy like Reggie Roby needs to be in the hall over Ray Guy. What makes more impact? A guy that booms all his kicks into the end zone and gets the net up, or the guy that can kick from the opponents 40, and pin them down inside thier own 5, for a net of 35? I think that you ask anyone with knowledge of football and they will take the field position over the average net seven days a week and twice on Sunday.
Uh, that's exactly what I'm saying. If you boom the kick into the end zone from the opponent's 40, you get a net of 20. Pinning them at the 5 gives you a net of 35. If Guy actually was much better at pinning teams at the 5, he would have a much better net average. But he doesn't.And no, I don't think Reggie Roby belongs in the Hall, either, but
he was definitely a better punter than Ray Guy. (Guy: 42.4 average, 33.8 net; Roby: 43.3 average, 34.0 net).
And his being a tough guy. You seemed to allude to the idea that Ray Guy wasn't part of the tough guy image of the Raiders and that era. But he was one badass SOB, just like the rest of 'em. John Madden suffered no fools and no wussies. It was a different era, and stats could never tell the story about the character of Ray Guy or the pre-LA, Oakland Raiders.
RAYDUUUUUHS, yes, I get it. Guy clearly belongs in the Oakland Raiders hall of fame. Just not the Hall for football players.